Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2019-09-13
09:47:12 aspiers kashyap: hw_machine_type is not the only thing needing a reminder, what else?
09:49:57 aspiers hw_*_bus is one
09:55:36 kashyap aspiers: Yeah, hw_*_bus and machine type are the only things that come to mind
10:01:01 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Add reminder to update corresponding glance docs https://review.opendev.org/682012
10:01:02 aspiers kashyap: ^^^
10:04:38 kashyap aspiers: Already has it open
10:10:00 kashyap aspiers: Reviewed; only thing is - do you want to spell out the name of the document?
10:10:22 aspiers kashyap: I removed that from the first version, because it could change, and anyway there are multiple files
10:10:38 aspiers there's the metadefs JSON too
10:10:39 kashyap aspiers: Okay, thought so.
10:11:44 kashyap aspiers: And on casing, is my guess correct?
10:22:33 aspiers kashyap: replied
10:31:29 kashyap aspiers: So I have to "unlearn" the capitalization everywhere except at the start of sentence.
10:31:35 aspiers kashyap: IIUC
10:32:06 kashyap Okido; regardless, the change is ready for merge :-)
10:40:39 openstackgerrit Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Add an option to pass extra parameters for libvirt migration uri https://review.opendev.org/682019
10:40:52 stephenfin gibi: I'd say hold on rechecking the mox patches
10:41:59 stephenfin We discussed it in the meeting last night and decided to wait until U to merge those now since the gate is busted
10:43:24 openstackgerrit Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Add an option to pass extra parameters for libvirt migration uri https://review.opendev.org/682019
10:49:07 openstackgerrit Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Add an option to pass extra parameters for libvirt migration uri https://review.opendev.org/682019
10:55:06 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Func test for migrate re-schedule with bandwidth https://review.opendev.org/676972
10:58:45 tkajinam ping stephenfin
11:11:55 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Fix a misuse of assertGreaterEqual https://review.opendev.org/682025
11:14:31 takashin Hi, core reviewers. Would you review this patch https://review.opendev.org/#/c/682025/ related to a gate failure?
11:17:19 cdent good find takashin
12:06:31 sean-k-mooney donnyd: i have had no issue with any of the FN jobs that have been run in the last 24 hours. they all completed fine. the reson we are rechcking them is to pick up different versions fo the code. i am using a feature of how zuul works to mean i dont need to keep rebasing the zuul job to test diffent parts of the code via an in repo depends on
12:14:44 donnyd sean-k-mooney: that is great news
12:14:56 donnyd Let me know if there is anything else I can do
12:16:21 sean-k-mooney donnyd: at this point we are just waiting on zuul. also my brain is mostly fried after the last few days so im not going to be doing much more until next week
12:17:24 gibi stephenfin: ack
12:19:36 sean-k-mooney donnyd: my next ci task is to create the nodepool lable for nested-virt-bionic and update my ovs-dpdk job https://review.opendev.org/#/c/656580/ then work with limestone and/or vexxhost to expand the multi-numa lable to them and try and enable the whitebox tempest pluging in the nfv job we have been Running against FN
12:21:09 sean-k-mooney donnyd: the white box tempest pluging, combined with writing some new standard test will allow me to compress the many fo the temport jobs down into 1 job
12:21:42 sean-k-mooney donnyd: which im hoping to run as a perodic job intially and eventuly move to check after its stableised.
12:22:09 sean-k-mooney donnyd: so for now relax, you have done more then enough to help with this effort
12:23:04 donnyd I'm very glad I could be helpful.
12:26:34 sean-k-mooney donnyd: for what its worth this is the set of ci topic we talked about last PTG https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-ptg-train-ci
12:28:28 sean-k-mooney donnyd: line 36 multi numa guests and basically everytin form line 31 to 45 is what you have allowed us to start testing
12:30:43 donnyd Well if fn can do anything else, never be afraid to ask
12:32:22 sean-k-mooney efried: speaking of that etherpad line 29 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-ptg-train-ci can i anounce/propose the deprectation fo libvirt with virt-type uml
12:33:35 sean-k-mooney efried: there are other virt types that also shoudl be marked experimenal or deprecated but too slince they have no testing. lxc is almost workign again but there are defiently gaps
12:34:01 sean-k-mooney so i kind of want to hold off on that until Ussuri
12:35:28 sean-k-mooney efried: mriedem has an experimal lxc job and we have patches to fixed some of the short comings with cloud init https://review.opendev.org/#/c/667976/
12:42:52 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Follow up for I220fa02ee916728e241503084b14984bab4b0c3b https://review.opendev.org/680810
12:59:49 donnyd sean-k-mooney: I'm pretty interested in lxc functionality due to my resources not being as much as some others out there
13:00:34 sean-k-mooney ya it would be nice to get it working fully again
13:00:58 sean-k-mooney i was able to boot a contianer and inject keys with that cloud init patch
13:01:08 donnyd And knocking down targets from the ptg is a good thing too
13:02:14 sean-k-mooney the next gap for lxc that i hit while testing it is we are not correctly resizing the filesystme in the image to match the route disk on the flaovr
13:02:23 sean-k-mooney and you cant do it inside the contianer
13:02:43 sean-k-mooney so we would have to fix that before i would be comfortable useing it in production
13:09:57 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: Use os-brick locking for volume attach and detach https://review.opendev.org/614190
13:10:31 lyarwood ^ any cores around, is it too late in the cycle to land bugfixes that bump requirements.txt?
13:10:46 lyarwood or is that not even a thing until rc?
13:17:32 stephenfin gibi: You should probably hit https://review.opendev.org/#/c/682025/
13:18:00 stephenfin lyarwood: I've no idea. Might be a good thing to ask on #openstack-requirements ?
13:18:50 stephenfin or wait for mriedem, I guess
13:20:39 stephenfin speak of the devil
13:21:48 mriedem muwahahahaha?
13:22:46 stephenfin Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: Use os-brick locking for volume attach and detach https://review.opendev.org/614190
13:22:46 stephenfin <lyarwood> ^ any cores around, is it too late in the cycle to land bugfixes that bump requirements.txt?
13:22:49 stephenfin mriedem: ^
13:23:14 mriedem seems a bit risky to land that right now,
13:23:20 mriedem that's something i'd rather land early in U and let it bake
13:23:34 mriedem b/c fallout from that would probably be weird and hard to determine
13:25:35 lyarwood yup that's fair and on me for not pushing this earlier in the cycle
13:26:06 mriedem i think it's also a low severity issue,
13:26:10 mriedem i left some comments in the patch
13:26:23 lyarwood ack thanks
13:31:36 efried sean-k-mooney: "deprectation fo libvirt with virt-type uml" I don't know what that means.
13:31:54 efried So, sure, you can propose it, but someone who knows more than me might reject your proposal :)
13:32:27 sean-k-mooney the libvirt virt dirver support multiple virt-types that match to different dirver in libvirt
13:32:32 sean-k-mooney UML is user mode linux
13:33:06 sean-k-mooney i dont think we have ever had ci for that and dont know of anyone that support it in a product
13:34:02 sean-k-mooney we talked about deprecating libvirt virt types that do not have ci at the ptg in the test/ci session
13:34:26 sean-k-mooney since we are going to do that for xenserver i was wondering if we should do it for uml
13:35:51 sean-k-mooney again its more of a shot across the bow.
13:35:57 dansmith sean-k-mooney: I'd be fine with deprecation or straight removal, but I'm not sure it's worth it
13:36:21 dansmith the xen deprecation brings benefit, I'm not sure deprecating or removing uml is anything other than more work
13:36:36 sean-k-mooney we have a few conditional in the libvirt dirver to handel it
13:36:39 dansmith I know
13:36:40 sean-k-mooney so we could remove those
13:36:50 sean-k-mooney but it not a huge benifit
13:36:52 dansmith which is work for minimal benefit :)
13:37:12 sean-k-mooney ya
13:37:15 dansmith but if you want to do it I don't think there's any reason to keep it
13:37:51 sean-k-mooney well its not like anyone has filed a bug for it in years
13:38:07 sean-k-mooney whicih is proably the primary inicator no one is useing it
13:38:46 sean-k-mooney well there is one https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1597754
13:38:47 openstack Launchpad bug 1597754 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Unable to boot instance using UML" [Low,Triaged]
13:39:39 sean-k-mooney that seams like an imporant action for a virt type to support :)
13:41:17 efried Hell, even powervm could do THAT.
13:41:42 sean-k-mooney :)
13:42:05 dansmith I'd guess that was someone bored on a thursday evening, just trying to see if it still works
13:42:38 dansmith I'd bet it's less flexible than ironic even, probably fails the support matrix test
13:43:14 sean-k-mooney it was reported by mdbooth so i suspect it was filed when he was working on https://review.opendev.org/#/q/status:abandoned+topic:libvirt-imagebackend
13:43:37 dansmith heh
13:44:50 sean-k-mooney he fixed it in his image backend erfactor which we never merged.
13:45:35 efried So I'm having kind of a hard time believing that nova's gate throughput is on par with everyone else's, even in absolute numbers. Are small projects literally getting like two results every three hours?
13:46:10 efried i.e. the algorithm is broken
13:46:46 sean-k-mooney efried: we are effectivly down 2 ci providres at the momemnt i think

Earlier   Later