Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2019-09-05
13:15:09 mriedem test_attach_volume_pre_v278
13:15:36 gmann mriedem: that is for POST API only i asked to test the same for GET (list and show)
13:16:12 mriedem ok
13:16:46 brinzhang mriedem: gmann: thanks
13:17:57 luyao dansmith: Hi, Dan, comments addressed, https://review.opendev.org/#/c/678447/ and https://review.opendev.org/#/c/678448/. Could you help confirm if it is right?
13:19:36 mriedem brinzhang: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/674243/20 is in merge conflict
13:21:00 brinzhang mriedem: yeah, beacause of https://review.opendev.org/#/c/621476/ hit the microversion 2.78
13:22:10 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: update allocation in binding profile during migrate https://review.opendev.org/656422
13:23:03 brinzhang mriedem: I will update it by tomorrow, and need your suggestion in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/674243/20/nova/tests/functional/api_sample_tests/test_migrations.py
13:24:26 yonglihe mriedem: the client code is under reviewing now.
13:24:58 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add min service level check for migrate with bandwidth https://review.opendev.org/680394
13:24:58 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add bandwidth min service level check of source compute https://review.opendev.org/680395
13:26:43 mriedem brinzhang: i'm likely not going to get to the migrations API change today
13:26:47 mriedem lots of other stuff to review
13:26:57 mriedem yonglihe: novaclient is, but what about openstackclient?
13:27:09 mriedem yonglihe: see: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/compute-api-microversion-gap-in-osc - we don't want to add more gaps to osc
13:27:12 bauzas gibi: can I start looking at your updated change ? ^
13:27:16 yonglihe o, i like to do that also.
13:27:55 gibi bauzas: the first 3 patches are ready
13:28:00 bauzas gibi: cool
13:28:06 mriedem yonglihe: the osc change likely won't land until ussuri but you can start on it,
13:28:12 mriedem maybe after we get closer on the novaclient change
13:28:26 brinzhang mriedem: Ok, tomorrow I will update it, and then wait for your time :)
13:28:34 yonglihe mriedem: Sure, i definitely need few days to do that.
13:29:54 gibi mriedem: I replied in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/656422/18/nova/compute/manager.py@2122 I diverged from your original suggestion a bit
13:30:37 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add bandwidth min service level check of source compute https://review.opendev.org/680396
13:31:34 sean-k-mooney donnyd: i seam to be getting node failures when i use multi-numa-ubuntu-bionic-expanded and multi-numa-ubuntu-bionic
13:31:35 yonglihe mriedem: I take it as my task, for sure. thanks your remind.
13:31:50 sean-k-mooney donnyd: based on https://github.com/openstack/project-config/blob/master/nodepool/nl02.openstack.org.yaml#L348-L357 they shoudl be the correct lables
13:33:27 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: prepare func test env for moving servers with bandwidth https://review.opendev.org/655109
13:36:15 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Func test for migrate server with ports having resource request https://review.opendev.org/655113
13:37:27 stephenfin mriedem: Mind taking a look at that patch to validate CPU config options again today? https://review.opendev.org/#/c/680107/
13:39:29 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Make _rever_allocation nested allocation aware https://review.opendev.org/676138
13:39:30 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support reverting migration / resize with bandwidth https://review.opendev.org/676140
13:39:30 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Func test for migrate re-schedule with bandwidth https://review.opendev.org/676972
13:40:56 stephenfin bauzas: I split that "Differentiate between shared and dedicated CPUs" patch into two patches, btw :) https://review.opendev.org/#/c/680108/ and https://review.opendev.org/#/c/671800/
13:41:37 stephenfin what kind of monster sharpens a _pen_?
13:41:56 stephenfin must be where you got the tattoos
13:42:13 mriedem gibi: sure that works
13:42:32 gibi mriedem: phee, I was a it worried
13:42:44 sean-k-mooney donnyd: actully it seams to be running now
13:43:12 gibi bauzas, mriedem: I think comments are fixed up until the first functional test. I'm working on that now
13:43:21 bauzas stephenfin: the OpenStack CLA doesn't require you to provide your filings
13:43:35 bauzas so I let you imagine whatever you want
13:43:47 efried sean-k-mooney: Can I please ask you to vet the libvirt xml stuff for vpmem here? https://review.opendev.org/#/c/678455/
13:43:53 bauzas gibi: cool, later today if time allows me
13:44:42 gibi bauzas: thanks
13:46:26 bauzas mriedem: gibi: just one thing, hardly working on the placement audit command, are we hit by feature freeze or not ?
13:46:36 bauzas efried: ^
13:46:49 gibi bauzas: ff is next week
13:46:54 bauzas I know
13:47:08 bauzas talking of https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1793569
13:47:09 openstack Launchpad bug 1793569 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Add placement audit commands" [Wishlist,In progress] - Assigned to sean mooney (sean-k-mooney)
13:47:12 bauzas it's wishlist
13:47:45 mriedem gibi: a bit confusing that the commit message title is the same for these https://review.opendev.org/#/c/680395/2 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/680396/2
13:48:01 gibi mriedem: noted, I will add some creativity to those
13:48:11 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: single pass instance info fetch in host manager https://review.opendev.org/623558
13:48:16 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support migrating SRIOV port with bandwidth https://review.opendev.org/676980
13:48:54 gibi bauzas: do you mean ff affects the work on that bug?
13:48:57 efried bauzas: If work isn't already well underway for that, it seems unlikely to make Train.
13:49:04 donnyd sean-k-mooney: those labels got put in the pool with the rest of everything else.. so you will likely have to wait a little longer
13:49:21 bauzas efried: I'm targeting to upload a last rev by tomorrow
13:49:31 efried bauzas: who's on the hook to review it?
13:49:38 bauzas efried: good question
13:49:41 efried What do you consider the importance/priority versus other things we're behind on?
13:49:53 bauzas efried: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/670112/
13:50:31 bauzas efried: I don't disagree with your statement
13:50:44 efried I haven't made statements, just questions :)
13:50:54 efried oh, the "unlikely" one perhaps
13:51:16 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Allow migrating server with port resource request https://review.opendev.org/671497
13:51:17 mriedem bauzas: it's not going to make train
13:51:18 bauzas efried: well, nevermind my question then, you know what, we'll see what's left
13:51:54 cdent efried: i put some unit tests on that host manager change of jays, above. it was as painful as I feared it would be, but I think it got it. at least cover says so
13:51:58 dansmith mriedem: so you think you can take a trip through the numa lm set this morning?
13:52:08 mriedem dansmith: it's on the todo list
13:52:16 dansmith mriedem: thanks
13:52:50 efried dansmith: can you run through the vpmem obj patches again please?
13:53:10 mriedem so,
13:53:22 mriedem efried: dansmith: besides numa lm,
13:53:36 dansmith efried: I just dropped a -1.9 on one
13:53:38 mriedem it seems the two other series that dansmith was reviewing was the forbidden aggregates stuff and sort of the vpmem stuff, right?
13:53:54 mriedem wouldn't it be a better use of dan's time to focus on forbidden aggregates if he's going to review one of those?
13:54:05 dansmith um..
13:54:11 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Do not query allocations twice in finish_revert_resize https://review.opendev.org/678827
13:54:13 mriedem not that i'm picking what dan should work on in the next week,
13:54:19 dansmith apparently you are :)
13:54:22 mriedem but forbidden aggregates isn't merged yet right?
13:54:34 mriedem it was all +2ed at some point
13:55:46 dansmith I haven't looked at that set in a while, but I can circle back
13:55:48 efried ugh, forbidden aggregates slid down my list and out of sight at some point.
13:55:51 mriedem my point is if you're going to ask dan to review something he's reviewed before, maybe make it the forbidden aggs one
13:55:52 efried yeah, same
13:56:27 dansmith mriedem: well, I had gone back and forth on the vpmems bottom patches already recently
13:56:28 mriedem the vpmems series seeems way too risky to me at this point
13:56:41 efried mriedem: for me, vpmem is higher priority, and also more reliant on dansmith's expertise. If we needed to finish up forbidden aggs without him, it would be possible. vpmems (clearly) not so much.
13:56:42 mriedem sure, but do we expect to land that whole series in the next week?
13:56:44 mriedem w/o regression?
13:57:04 dansmith efried: the vpmem series has a -1 on the fourth patch and is really large above that, is that really going to land?
13:57:09 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Allow resizing server with port resource request https://review.opendev.org/679019
13:57:13 dansmith efried: because if not, we shouldn't merge the db and object stuff, IMHO

Earlier   Later