| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2019-08-28 | |||
| 05:59:05 | openstackgerrit | zhufl proposed openstack/nova master: [Trivial]Remove unused helper get_allocated_disk_size https://review.opendev.org/678976 | |
| 07:07:59 | dr_gogeta86 | hi | |
| 07:09:06 | dr_gogeta86 | nobody know a common pattern between nova-compute dying and rabbitmq connections falls to zero | |
| 07:09:19 | dr_gogeta86 | after a while from 10 to 30 minutes | |
| 07:09:28 | dr_gogeta86 | nova-compute kills all rabbitmq | |
| 07:09:33 | dr_gogeta86 | and going stuck | |
| 07:17:38 | openstackgerrit | ZhengMa proposed openstack/nova master: Check container_format on instance creation https://review.opendev.org/673407 | |
| 07:32:11 | bauzas | good morning Nova | |
| 08:11:26 | openstackgerrit | Luyao Zhong proposed openstack/nova master: Track orphan instances and error migrations in resource tracker https://review.opendev.org/678451 | |
| 08:33:28 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Func test for migrate re-schedule with bandwidth https://review.opendev.org/676972 | |
| 08:33:29 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support migrating SRIOV port with bandwidth https://review.opendev.org/676980 | |
| 08:35:56 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Allow migrating server with port resource request https://review.opendev.org/671497 | |
| 08:38:57 | kashyap | aspiers: Thanks for the PS-6 changes here, just got back: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/673790/6/ | |
| 08:39:29 | kashyap | aspiers: I _do_ owe a couple of drinks! | |
| 08:40:45 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Do not query allocations twice in finish_revert_resize https://review.opendev.org/678827 | |
| 09:00:22 | aspiers | kashyap: yw :) | |
| 09:01:06 | kashyap | aspiers: Investigating the "weird" thing you noticed: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/673790/6/nova/tests/unit/virt/libvirt/test_config.py@216 | |
| 09:13:18 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Add user_id and project_id colume to Migration https://review.opendev.org/673990 | |
| 09:22:22 | openstackgerrit | ya.wang proposed openstack/nova master: vCPU model selection https://review.opendev.org/670298 | |
| 09:22:23 | openstackgerrit | ya.wang proposed openstack/nova master: Add compatibility checks for CPU mode and CPU models and extra flags https://review.opendev.org/670299 | |
| 09:22:23 | openstackgerrit | ya.wang proposed openstack/nova master: Support report multi CPU model traits https://review.opendev.org/670300 | |
| 09:45:13 | aspiers | kashyap: replied | |
| 09:45:29 | aspiers | stupid question - where's the thing which does linting on our .rst files? | |
| 09:45:37 | aspiers | I can't see it in tox.ini | |
| 09:46:51 | kashyap | aspiers: Thanks; will look | |
| 09:47:56 | kashyap | aspiers: Hmm, I'm unclear why os.loader.features doesn't contain the given keys doesn't make sense. | |
| 09:57:47 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Allow migrating server with port resource request https://review.opendev.org/671497 | |
| 10:00:10 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Do not query allocations twice in finish_revert_resize https://review.opendev.org/678827 | |
| 10:00:16 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: i noticed another helper function for nomalising tratis i can share between the prefilter and the driver code so im going to pull that out and then respin the first patch to adress your nits | |
| 10:00:30 | stephenfin | cool cool | |
| 10:00:47 | stephenfin | got some nits on the following one too if you want to wait 5 mins | |
| 10:01:11 | sean-k-mooney | also the verion in the prefilter has a bug | |
| 10:01:27 | sean-k-mooney | sure im just going to make coffee anyway | |
| 10:01:47 | sean-k-mooney | want me to wait untill you review all tree | |
| 10:01:57 | sean-k-mooney | then ill adress all your comments | |
| 10:02:36 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Allow resizing server with port resource request https://review.opendev.org/679019 | |
| 10:11:30 | stephenfin | sean-k-mooney: done | |
| 10:12:48 | sean-k-mooney | thanks just looking at the scond one now | |
| 10:16:29 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Add reshaper for PCPU https://review.opendev.org/674895 | |
| 10:22:35 | bauzas | stephenfin: wow, chilling ^ | |
| 10:23:33 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: is that like something taht is almost cool | |
| 10:23:54 | bauzas | I should wear a t-shirt saying "I love reshapes" | |
| 10:24:16 | sean-k-mooney | if you did we would make you write all of them | |
| 10:24:33 | bauzas | \o/ | |
| 10:24:37 | bauzas | anyway, lunch now | |
| 10:45:49 | openstackgerrit | Luyao Zhong proposed openstack/nova master: Claim resources in resource tracker https://review.opendev.org/678452 | |
| 10:45:50 | openstackgerrit | Luyao Zhong proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Enable driver configuring PMEM namespaces https://review.opendev.org/678453 | |
| 10:45:50 | openstackgerrit | Luyao Zhong proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: report VPMEM resources by provider tree https://review.opendev.org/678454 | |
| 10:45:51 | openstackgerrit | Luyao Zhong proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Support VM creation with vpmems and vpmems cleanup https://review.opendev.org/678455 | |
| 10:45:51 | openstackgerrit | Luyao Zhong proposed openstack/nova master: Parse vpmem related flavor extra spec https://review.opendev.org/678456 | |
| 10:45:52 | openstackgerrit | Luyao Zhong proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional tests for virtual persistent memory https://review.opendev.org/678470 | |
| 11:03:12 | openstackgerrit | Luyao Zhong proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional tests for virtual persistent memory https://review.opendev.org/678470 | |
| 11:22:53 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: i hope that answers your question. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/665775/14/nova/scheduler/request_filter.py@176 im going to start reworkign the patches now but your comments make sense | |
| 11:28:46 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Add user_id and project_id colume to Migration https://review.opendev.org/673990 | |
| 11:51:40 | aspiers | kashyap: I'm getting a parse error on your last sentence :) | |
| 12:06:41 | aspiers | kashyap: but what I don't understand is why a list of OS bootloader features would be subdivided into two sections called 'type' and 'readonly' | |
| 12:07:06 | aspiers | 'type' makes no sense as a category | |
| 12:20:16 | kashyap | aspiers: Err, sorry for the garbled sentence; I meant, why doesn't os.loader.features with type|readonly make sense. | |
| 12:20:51 | kashyap | aspiers: Okay, you don't think 'type' makes sense as as category... | |
| 12:24:59 | kashyap | aspiers: Anyway, I'll think a bit more on what I can do there. | |
| 12:26:28 | aspiers | kashyap: 'type' makes as much sense as a category as 'category' does | |
| 12:26:56 | aspiers | i.e. none | |
| 12:27:57 | kashyap | aspiers: Hmm. As you'll recall, it's the "type" ("category"? :-)) of loader. I'll see about reworking | |
| 12:41:25 | kashyap | aspiers: Also on your "not understanding" why a list of OS bootloader features would be subdivided into the two sections (enums) -- ask libvirt upstream :D | |
| 12:42:26 | kashyap | It _sounds_ like you temporarily forgot (but it's in the commit message, and you've seen it before :-)) the output spit out by getDomainCapabilities() | |
| 13:05:25 | alex_xu | aspiers: stephenfin in the end, I confused what the descision at here https://review.opendev.org/#/c/664420/42/nova/scheduler/request_filter.py@206 | |
| 13:06:08 | alex_xu | in the end, we said use req filter or not... | |
| 13:24:08 | stephenfin | alex_xu: I thought we were going to copy the approach from https://review.opendev.org/#/c/671801/32/nova/scheduler/utils.py | |
| 13:24:38 | stephenfin | so that's why I dragged https://review.opendev.org/#/c/674894/ to the front of the series | |
| 13:25:25 | stephenfin | mriedem, dansmith: You have been summoned by efried https://review.opendev.org/#/c/675338/ | |
| 13:26:45 | stephenfin | alex_xu: Yeah, that's what efried's comments are saying too. I guess aspiers is waiting to make sure that gets in first | |
| 13:27:09 | mriedem | stephenfin: why? | |
| 13:27:20 | stephenfin | Haven't a notion | |
| 13:27:52 | mriedem | the extra spec in those api samples could just as well be {'fart': 'sniffer'} | |
| 13:28:02 | stephenfin | Maybe because it's microversion related | |
| 13:28:11 | stephenfin | Yup, that's what I thought | |
| 13:28:27 | mriedem | it's not really, | |
| 13:28:36 | mriedem | but i see a good reason to -1 the shit out of your patch | |
| 13:28:47 | mriedem | oh drat https://review.opendev.org/#/c/675338/11/nova/tests/fixtures.py | |
| 13:28:48 | mriedem | you already got it | |
| 13:29:16 | stephenfin | #winning | |
| 13:30:15 | mriedem | +2 | |
| 13:38:42 | mriedem | mdbooth: for https://review.opendev.org/#/c/677736/ i think we're just waiting for your customer to test it and ack it right? | |
| 13:38:44 | aspiers | stephenfin, alex_xu, efried: my understanding was that we were going to keep it in req filter for now and then change it later | |
| 13:39:24 | aspiers | kashyap: I don't have the slightest issue with features being split into two *meaningful* sections. But a section entitled "type" is totally meaningless. | |
| 13:39:42 | mdbooth | mriedem: So... they did test it but they didn't provide the same logs as last time. I've asked them for them, but they haven't been provided yet. | |
| 13:39:44 | mriedem | gibi: can i get a re-+W on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/637605/37 ? | |
| 13:40:00 | mriedem | mdbooth: did they notice the slow down? | |
| 13:40:18 | aspiers | kashyap: Let me take another tack. Please explain to me what this feature section entitled "type" is supposed to contain. | |
| 13:40:49 | aspiers | kashyap: And while you're at it, I'd like to understand what the section entitled "readonly" is supposed to contain. | |
| 13:41:11 | mdbooth | mriedem: Previously they were seeing compute hosts flapping, but that was only logged by n-api. We don't have logs for n-api. | |
| 13:41:12 | mriedem | stephenfin: i've re-ordered some of the less complicated changes in the cross-cell resize series to the bottom, could you take a look at this simple one to plumb passing the power_on flag down through driver.spawn()? https://review.opendev.org/#/c/642590/30 | |
| 13:41:20 | stephenfin | I sure can | |
| 13:41:28 | mriedem | which incidentally is something i think mdbooth has asked for in the past - the ability to create a stopped server | |
| 13:41:30 | mdbooth | mriedem: They *are* experience other environmental issues. | |
| 13:41:31 | mriedem | or maybe i'm dreaming that up | |
| 13:41:40 | mdbooth | mriedem: Yep, I have asked for that. | |
| 13:41:41 | kashyap | aspiers: I agree that a generic section is meaningless. Maybe 'loader_type', which tells _where_ the guest memory should be mapped -- whether it s a 'rom' or 'pflash' ? | |
| 13:42:10 | mdbooth | mriedem: So what I wanted to see be sure is: in the presence of their environmental issues, are the compute nodes continuing to flap? | |
| 13:42:15 | mdbooth | I'm hoping the answer's no. | |