Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2019-07-26
18:39:23 dansmith heh, I feel like I'm 20 years older than my self, but you're like.. eighty
18:39:25 efried I'd rather keep the comments on the constructive side, even if brutal.
18:39:38 efried not much they can do with "smh"
18:39:41 dansmith efried: I wasn't serious of course
18:39:52 efried yeah
18:39:56 efried of course
18:39:58 dansmith but I did see you were like "woah, nuke this whole sumbitch"
18:40:49 efried well, the *probably* can't justify holding a copy of provider_tree, but they *definitely* can't justify holding a copy of os-resource-classes
18:40:58 efried that's just... no.
18:41:04 dansmith heh
18:41:16 dansmith yeah, that's like... well, ... smh
18:41:17 efried but also, yeah, get rid of 90% of the ReportClient
18:41:19 mriedem dansmith: i'd like you to get off my lawn
18:41:29 dansmith mriedem: you first
18:41:36 mriedem hip is broken, can't
18:41:48 dansmith I don't have an all-terrain cane so I'm kinda stuck
18:42:21 efried Oh, is *that* what "ATC" stands for on the summit badge?
18:42:32 dansmith heh
18:43:41 efried btw, zun copied in the *whole* SchedulerReportClient.
18:44:03 efried Chris and I both had a leetle to say about that https://review.opendev.org/#/c/586960/
18:44:08 mriedem this is the point where i joke about how everyone shits on nova but then copies a bunch of the code out of nova
18:44:32 efried and then it doesn't work for them, so they shit on nova
18:44:49 mriedem i'd pay to see someone copy something wholesale that is about cells
18:44:51 mriedem that'd be great
18:47:09 mriedem i left a comment on the zun patch, pointing to watcher's start https://review.opendev.org/#/c/661245/
18:47:15 mriedem which is pretty simple
18:47:39 mriedem they clearly copied some stuff from SchedulerReportClient but not much
18:48:20 mriedem efried: where do you want blueprints that aren't going to be in train moved to, as in series goal? https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/train
18:48:22 mriedem like the rmd ones?
18:48:32 mriedem just...undefined?
18:48:37 efried that's our only option, nah?
18:48:46 efried or do we have the power to create a new one, like 'backlog'?
18:48:48 mriedem yeah, unless you create a u release, but we don't know the name of that yet
18:48:58 mriedem there is a trunk series but we don't really use it
18:49:05 efried maybe we should
18:49:06 mriedem you could create a backlog series....
18:49:14 mriedem but the 300 or so nova blueprints are already in the backlog
18:49:31 mriedem er, make that
18:49:32 mriedem 1 → 75 of 1128 results
18:49:42 efried it would be nicer to start a backlog afresh
18:49:56 mriedem shrug
18:49:58 efried and for a diligent PTL to refresh it every cycle, moving dead stuff to undefined
18:49:59 mriedem is rmd in the backlog?
18:50:09 efried let me go look at it
18:50:21 efried it's probably just dead, obsolete, but let me look real quick
18:51:34 efried mriedem: if we mark Definition as Obsolete, they drop off this report?
18:52:09 mriedem i think obsolete is as close as we get to dead yeah
18:52:12 efried superseded
18:52:13 efried let me play
18:52:20 mriedem superseded is like duping a bug
18:52:26 mriedem not the same thing as obsolete
18:52:49 mriedem for example, at one point we had at least 5 or 6 blueprints for adding volume type to the server create bdm interface,
18:52:58 mriedem eventually i picked one and just marked all the rest as superseded by that one
18:53:56 efried meh, it shows up on the report either way. Superseded seems appropriate to me.
18:57:10 efried mdbooth_, mriedem: Local disk serial numbers appears to have a bunch of merged code but also a bunch of abandoned code. What should we do with that?
18:57:27 efried https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/local-disk-serial-numbers
18:57:36 mriedem when you supersede a blueprint don't you have to mark it superseded by something else?
18:57:44 mriedem otherwise it's not really superseded
18:57:46 efried apparently not :)
18:57:51 efried I just commented in the whiteboard
18:57:52 mriedem :/
18:58:47 mriedem https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/rmd-base-enablement is still marked for the train series goal
18:59:11 mriedem i'm not really the person to ask about local disk serial numberes
18:59:13 mriedem *numbers
18:59:14 efried yes, all three are
18:59:18 mriedem it's been deferred a couple of times
18:59:38 efried It's not wrong imo to keep it under train since that's where it was proposed and superseded.
18:59:42 mriedem efried: so you're going to leave the rmd ones as marked for train? i guess what i'm looking for is eventually https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/train will just show approved blueprint
19:00:04 efried what would be neat is if there was some way to search for release *plus* status
19:00:12 efried so we wouldn't have to misuse fields like that.
19:00:32 efried never been a fan of launchpad
19:00:38 efried or really any project management software
19:00:41 efried or project management
19:00:43 efried or project managers
19:00:47 efried why am I PTL again?
19:00:52 mriedem the perks
19:00:54 mriedem kickbacks
19:00:56 mriedem fame
19:01:00 mriedem nickels
19:01:22 efried I see. So clearly I just have to wait for those to kick in.
19:03:52 efried thanks fungi. Now I have enough to make a phone call in 1985.
19:04:13 fungi if only you could find a phone booth
19:13:58 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova-specs master: DNM: Interactive Train Themes Midcycle Status https://review.opendev.org/673095
19:48:05 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: doc: fix links for server actions in api guide https://review.opendev.org/673101
20:06:36 efried mriedem: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-July/008064.html
20:19:05 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Use a less chipper title for release notes https://review.opendev.org/671752
20:42:58 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Functional test for NUMA live migration https://review.opendev.org/672595
21:24:52 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Inline trace_request_filter https://review.opendev.org/666663
21:43:11 openstackgerrit Erik Olof Gunnar Andersson proposed openstack/nova master: Always cleanup when hitting MaxRetriesExceeded https://review.opendev.org/672855
21:44:26 openstackgerrit Erik Olof Gunnar Andersson proposed openstack/nova master: Always cleanup when hitting MaxRetriesExceeded https://review.opendev.org/672855
21:50:06 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Remove no longer required "inner" methods. https://review.opendev.org/655282
21:50:15 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Privsepify ipv4 forwarding enablement. https://review.opendev.org/635431
23:12:20 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add InstanceAction/Event create() method https://review.opendev.org/614036
23:12:20 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add Instance.hidden field https://review.opendev.org/631123
23:12:21 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add TargetDBSetupTask https://review.opendev.org/627892
23:12:21 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add CrossCellMigrationTask https://review.opendev.org/631581
23:12:22 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Execute TargetDBSetupTask https://review.opendev.org/633853
23:12:22 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add prep_snapshot_based_resize_at_dest compute method https://review.opendev.org/633293
23:12:23 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add PrepResizeAtDestTask https://review.opendev.org/627890
23:12:23 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add prep_snapshot_based_resize_at_source compute method https://review.opendev.org/634832

Earlier   Later