| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2019-06-24 | |||
| 20:50:28 | efried | you're saying if it's called from elsewhere where that's not the case | |
| 20:50:35 | efried | so yeah, trap and ignore ValueError | |
| 20:50:37 | efried | done | |
| 20:50:55 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-novaclient master: Revert "Add irrelevant files in dsvm job" https://review.opendev.org/667151 | |
| 20:51:26 | mriedem | blech | |
| 20:51:35 | efried | you could do that from within the new-and-improved get_provider_traits | |
| 20:51:37 | mriedem | but yeah that's what i meant - called from conductor where the rp isn't in the cache | |
| 20:51:39 | efried | or check the cache first. | |
| 20:52:13 | mriedem | i'm going to avoid all of that for now because then you could have questions like, "should the caller say if they want the cache and should fail if the rp isn't in the cache?" | |
| 20:52:15 | efried | if self._provider_tree.exists(rp_uuid): | |
| 20:52:37 | efried | "avoid all of that for now" is going to be harder and introduce more technical debt. | |
| 20:52:39 | mriedem | sure - but if i'm compute and expect it in the cache and it's not, we'd want that to fail, not be swallowed | |
| 20:53:05 | mriedem | that's why i said a use_cache kwarg on get_provider_traits seems easier | |
| 20:53:07 | mriedem | the caller says what it wants | |
| 20:53:43 | efried | but you need two knobs | |
| 20:53:45 | mriedem | the very first thing i want to do is just split this large-ish change up into several pieces so i can test in isolation and reason about it | |
| 20:53:55 | efried | 1) retrieve from the cache | |
| 20:53:55 | efried | 2) update the cache | |
| 20:54:02 | efried | one does not imply the other | |
| 20:54:18 | mriedem | ... | |
| 20:54:38 | mriedem | meaning refresh if it's not in the cache and return the cached results, | |
| 20:54:53 | mriedem | or don't get from the cache, get from the API, but update the cache... | |
| 20:54:53 | mriedem | ? | |
| 20:55:51 | mriedem | i'm just going to work on splitting this all up and put a TODO in my code that uses get_provider_traits to somehow leverage the cache - it can be debated in review at that point i think when i actually have something working end to end (which the change is now - the func test shows that, but i'm going to be splitting up and possibly breaking things) | |
| 20:56:10 | efried | okay | |
| 20:57:07 | spatel | sean-k-mooney: hey | |
| 20:58:27 | efried | nts: http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/train/approved/pre-filter-disabled-computes.html | |
| 21:08:00 | mriedem | heh well i've got a chicken-and-egg so i likely can't use the cache anyway | |
| 21:08:27 | mriedem | rt init needs the driver https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/914ee91a5caedcaba64472762c9f08d7bb644d11/nova/compute/manager.py#L538 | |
| 21:08:37 | mriedem | and the driver init needs the virtapi https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/914ee91a5caedcaba64472762c9f08d7bb644d11/nova/compute/manager.py#L535 | |
| 21:09:52 | mriedem | unless i do something hacky like self.virtapi.reportclient = self.reportclient.... | |
| 21:14:22 | efried | that's what we've done all over the place, innit? | |
| 21:14:47 | efried | I guess mostly the other way around, self.reportclient = self.otherthingy.reportclient | |
| 21:15:09 | efried | you could pass the reportclient into the virtapi constructor | |
| 21:16:09 | mriedem | yeah i'm constructing the singleton reportclient in ComputeManager and passing that to RT and ComputeVirtAPI | |
| 21:16:36 | efried | ++ | |
| 21:42:47 | tonyb | sean-k-mooney: We needed to do it in requirements in order to *generate* constraints | |
| 21:45:04 | tonyb | sean-k-mooney: You say it's breaking the requirements-check job but I don't see that | |
| 21:45:37 | tonyb | sean-k-mooney: Given our, lack, of TZ overlap might be best to do this via email? | |
| 21:45:53 | sean-k-mooney | im here | |
| 21:46:14 | sean-k-mooney | we do not generate constratis to project anymore | |
| 21:46:23 | sean-k-mooney | at least the lower constratits | |
| 21:47:21 | sean-k-mooney | the reason i say i breaks the requirement check is https://review.opendev.org/#/c/666651/2/doc/requirements.txt | |
| 21:47:56 | sean-k-mooney | simply addint a comment or otherwise modifying the requiremetns file cause the requirements-check job to fail | |
| 21:48:42 | sean-k-mooney | we can see the error here | |
| 21:48:45 | sean-k-mooney | http://logs.openstack.org/51/666651/2/check/requirements-check/c8c82c5/job-output.txt.gz#_2019-06-20_17_39_08_901350 | |
| 21:48:49 | sean-k-mooney | tonyb: ^ | |
| 21:48:52 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Add placement request filter for disabled computes https://review.opendev.org/654596 | |
| 21:49:09 | tonyb | sean-k-mooney: okay so there are a couple of things | |
| 21:49:53 | tonyb | sean-k-mooney: the requirements team needs to generate constraints (upper) daily and without capping sphinx (and others) in g-r we can't do that | |
| 21:50:32 | sean-k-mooney | ah so when you said generate you ment upper-constraitns not requirement files for projects | |
| 21:50:48 | tonyb | sean-k-mooney: and also the 'fix' to that error is to just merge the chnage that caps sphinx, which is the expected process albeit a little ugly now that we don't auto-sync | |
| 21:51:08 | tonyb | sean-k-mooney: correct | |
| 21:51:30 | sean-k-mooney | yes we have a patch for that but my understdaint is project are not ment to cap any package in ther own reqiuremets file | |
| 21:51:57 | sean-k-mooney | the can balcklis tthing the know do not work but if cap we can break compatiobliy for the intergrated services | |
| 21:52:07 | tonyb | sean-k-mooney: In general we try very hard not to cap in g-r or per project but it isn't "forbidden" | |
| 21:52:25 | tonyb | sean-k-mooney: and with this whole no more py2 support thing we don't have a choice | |
| 21:52:53 | sean-k-mooney | well that is due to useing gloabl-requiremtns for two thing | |
| 21:53:13 | sean-k-mooney | generatihing upper-constratints and capping python2 things | |
| 21:53:36 | tonyb | sean-k-mooney: and listing "approved libraries" so that's 3 things | |
| 21:53:42 | sean-k-mooney | well no it because we use it for generating uppercontratitgs | |
| 21:53:48 | sean-k-mooney | ya | |
| 21:54:14 | sean-k-mooney | so the last point is what i thought its priamary pourpous was | |
| 21:54:35 | sean-k-mooney | listing the appoved libs that wee know are compatiable and are manged by the requiremetns project | |
| 21:54:51 | tonyb | sean-k-mooney: I'm interested in your statement "if cap we can break compatiobliy for the intergrated services" can you elaborate? | |
| 21:55:33 | sean-k-mooney | os-vif say mock < X some other poject requires mock > x | |
| 21:55:48 | sean-k-mooney | os-vif and that service can nolonger be installed together | |
| 21:56:10 | tonyb | sean-k-mooney: ahhh okay .... that's handled in the generate-constraints job so it *shouldn't* be possible | |
| 21:56:34 | tonyb | sean-k-mooney: for *upper* constraints for lower all bets are off | |
| 21:56:37 | sean-k-mooney | can you explain breifly how upper-constratis is generated | |
| 21:56:59 | sean-k-mooney | i.e. how is gr used for uc | |
| 21:57:14 | tonyb | sean-k-mooney: basically we pip install -r global-requirements.txt and "freeze" the output | |
| 21:57:18 | sean-k-mooney | i was not aware uc was generated for gr | |
| 21:57:34 | sean-k-mooney | i though uc was manually updated as needed | |
| 21:57:57 | sean-k-mooney | rathar then auto updating as upstream releases? | |
| 21:58:03 | sean-k-mooney | i guess that is not the case? | |
| 21:58:16 | tonyb | for master it's a daily update and then "fixed" if needed, for stable it's all manual | |
| 21:58:39 | sean-k-mooney | ah ok so master allows latest unless we know somthing is broken | |
| 21:58:53 | sean-k-mooney | is gr used to pin things that are broken in that case ? | |
| 21:58:59 | tonyb | https://review.opendev.org/#/c/666981/ was last night's auto generate | |
| 21:59:33 | tonyb | sean-k-mooney: Yes, if lib $foo has a broken version we add a != in g-r to avoid it | |
| 21:59:47 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Libvirt: add vPMU spec for train https://review.opendev.org/651269 | |
| 22:00:22 | sean-k-mooney | and we are now using sphinx < 2.0 as a shorthad to cover all the non py27 versions | |
| 22:01:45 | sean-k-mooney | ok i can approve https://review.opendev.org/#/c/666387/ but its kind of regretable that we will have to modify requirement every time gr is modifed to reflect a new cap. | |
| 22:02:08 | sean-k-mooney | if the cap was only done via upper-constratits then it would just automaticlly work | |
| 22:02:19 | tonyb | sean-k-mooney: Yes, we've always needed to do that but it's just more obvious now | |
| 22:02:35 | tonyb | sean-k-mooney: I agre it's ugly but we can't think of a better way with the tools we have | |
| 22:02:45 | sean-k-mooney | nova os-vif and other project that generate docs form code need to use uc to pin to compatible verions anyway otherwise they can fail | |
| 22:03:13 | tonyb | sean-k-mooney: correct | |
| 22:03:45 | tonyb | sean-k-mooney: gotta disappear I'll be back in a bit | |
| 22:04:27 | sean-k-mooney | hehe im going to drop too. i was playing games on my desktop but its late enough now that i should praobbly call it a day o/ | |
| 22:04:40 | sean-k-mooney | tonyb: thanks for explainin | |
| 22:05:33 | sean-k-mooney | i had taken the view that capping in requiremetn in repo was nolonger allowed but ill adjust to allowing it if it is capped that way in gr going forward | |
| 22:27:09 | tonyb | sean-k-mooney: we (the requirements team) clearly need better reference docs or a FAQ or something | |
| 22:47:14 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: bdm: store empty object as connection_info by default https://review.opendev.org/645352 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2019-06-25 | |||
| 00:04:29 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Add a guide to add a new microversion support https://review.opendev.org/667002 | |
| 00:07:45 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Support for changing deleted_on_termination after boot https://review.opendev.org/580336 | |
| 00:08:08 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Support delete_on_termination in volume attach api https://review.opendev.org/612949 | |
| 01:12:52 | openstackgerrit | Alex Xu proposed openstack/nova master: Correct the comment of RequestSpec's network_metadata https://review.opendev.org/667061 | |
| 03:40:46 | openstackgerrit | huichen proposed openstack/nova master: Support pagination for sever groups by sql https://review.opendev.org/667259 | |