| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2019-06-17 | |||
| 22:53:17 | Nick_A | melwitt we actually tried that already - it allows for updating of the password once the instance exists, but we can't seem to set it upon creation/rebuild | |
| 22:55:36 | melwitt | Nick_A: that seems unexpected. there might be a bug, or maybe I'm just not aware there's something additional needed for it to work for create/rebuild | |
| 22:59:37 | openstackgerrit | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: create initial image metadata prefilter https://review.opendev.org/665775 | |
| 23:14:00 | Nick_A | Even the random password generated when we manually openstack server create doesn't work... | |
| 23:18:28 | openstackgerrit | Sam Morrison proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: Fix double word hacking test https://review.opendev.org/665788 | |
| 23:19:07 | openstackgerrit | Sam Morrison proposed openstack/nova stable/queens: Fix double word hacking test https://review.opendev.org/665790 | |
| 23:45:45 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Don't rely on SQLAlchemy collections magically initializing __dict__ https://review.opendev.org/661472 | |
| 23:45:52 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: docs: remove the RamFilter from example https://review.opendev.org/665546 | |
| 23:51:29 | openstackgerrit | sean mooney proposed openstack/os-traits master: add libvirt image metadata traits https://review.opendev.org/652996 | |
| 23:51:32 | openstackgerrit | sean mooney proposed openstack/os-traits master: add GOP, NONE and VIRTIO grapics models https://review.opendev.org/665830 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2019-06-18 | |||
| 01:03:44 | openstackgerrit | Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Add extra spec parameter and image property for memory encryption https://review.opendev.org/664420 | |
| 01:03:45 | openstackgerrit | Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Use fake flavor instead of empty dict in test https://review.opendev.org/662555 | |
| 01:03:45 | openstackgerrit | Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Pass extra_specs to flavor in vif tests https://review.opendev.org/662556 | |
| 01:03:46 | openstackgerrit | Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Extract SEV-specific bits on host detection https://review.opendev.org/636334 | |
| 01:03:46 | openstackgerrit | Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Add |
|
| 01:03:47 | openstackgerrit | Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Allow guest devices to include |
|
| 01:03:47 | openstackgerrit | Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Detect that SEV is required and enable iommu for devices https://review.opendev.org/644565 | |
| 01:03:48 | openstackgerrit | Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Use |
|
| 01:03:48 | openstackgerrit | Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Enable memory locking if SEV is requested https://review.opendev.org/662558 | |
| 01:52:16 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/os-vif stable/queens: Prevent "qbr" Linux Bridge from replying to ARP messages https://review.opendev.org/655694 | |
| 02:12:31 | openstackgerrit | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: add StorageTransform class to prefilter https://review.opendev.org/665844 | |
| 06:39:37 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: regarding os-vif and osprofiler. The idea come up in neutron to profile the timing of vif plug. To be able to do that we need to make sure the osprofiler info is transferred to neutron during the vif plug. So far the patch is a PoC which is missing the neutron part. In the long run we might want to have support for osprofiling vif plug in some way | |
| 06:45:56 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: it was also discussed yesterday on the neutron performance meeting http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_performance/2019/neutron_performance.2019-06-17-16.00.log.html#l-20 | |
| 07:45:09 | openstackgerrit | Yongli He proposed openstack/nova-specs master: add spec "show-server-numa-topology" https://review.opendev.org/658716 | |
| 07:49:15 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Fix wrong assert methods https://review.opendev.org/665897 | |
| 07:58:30 | openstackgerrit | Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: Add server sub-resource topology API https://review.opendev.org/621476 | |
| 08:21:20 | openstackgerrit | Hamdy Khader proposed openstack/nova master: OVS DPDK port representors support https://review.opendev.org/658785 | |
| 09:21:10 | bhagyashris__ | stephenfin, sean-k-mooney, alex_xu: Hi, I have checked the replies on mailing list and encounter in issue so replied to mailing thread http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-June/007190.html I would like to hear your opinion. | |
| 09:26:04 | openstackgerrit | Boxiang Zhu proposed openstack/nova master: Validate requested host/node during servers create https://review.opendev.org/661237 | |
| 09:26:04 | openstackgerrit | Boxiang Zhu proposed openstack/nova master: Add host and hypervisor_hostname flag to create server https://review.opendev.org/645520 | |
| 09:30:12 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Microversion 2.74: Support Specifying AZ to unshelve https://review.opendev.org/665136 | |
| 09:33:50 | stephenfin | bhagyashris__: Cool, I'll reply now. What email client are you using, btw? It's not quoting replies properly, whatever it is /o\ | |
| 09:35:37 | bhagyashris__ | stephenfin: actaully I am using outlook in browser so it's not quoting properly, sorry for inconvenience :( | |
| 09:36:24 | stephenfin | bhagyashris__: All good. I was going to point this out (hard learned lesson from my Intel days) but it only applies to the desktop version https://that.guru/blog/sane-outlook/ | |
| 09:42:15 | bhagyashris__ | stephenfin: ohh ok. Thank you ! | |
| 09:57:33 | bhagyashris__ | stephenfin: Got your reply thank you! Just one question if operator set only ``cpu_shared_set`` then in that case what should happen? Will it be reported as VCPU inventory or it should raise error? | |
| 09:58:05 | stephenfin | It should be ignored for VCPU calculation and a warning raised | |
| 09:58:05 | bhagyashris__ | On Train | |
| 09:58:37 | stephenfin | If cpu_dedicated_set is not defined, then cpu_shared_set should only be used for emulator threads | |
| 09:59:46 | stephenfin | However, I think I addressed this in a previous email by saying it was extremely unlikely that cpu_shared_set would be defined without vcpu_pin_set, since it wouldn't offer any advantage (the emulator thread host cores would overlap with the pinned CPU host cores) | |
| 10:01:04 | bhagyashris__ | stephenfin: no I am talking about if operator sets only ``cpu_shared_set`` in Train on fresh compute node then it should report the VCPU inventory as per the specs | |
| 10:01:24 | bhagyashris__ | Right? | |
| 10:01:54 | stephenfin | Then the spec needs a modification. They also need to set cpu_dedicated_set, even if it's to an empty string | |
| 10:02:36 | stephenfin | Because otherwise we can't tell the difference between a freshly deployed node and an upgraded node | |
| 10:03:15 | bhagyashris__ | stephenfin: ok means on train operator can not set the ``cpu_shared_set`` alone . If it's sets then raised the error that ``cpu_dsedoicated_set`` should be set | |
| 10:03:26 | stephenfin | Not an error, a warning | |
| 10:03:32 | bhagyashris__ | Ok ok | |
| 10:04:03 | stephenfin | Stating that we are ignoring that value and are instead relying on 'vcpu_pin_set', if configured, or reporting all host cores if not | |
| 10:04:17 | stephenfin | From the spec | |
| 10:04:19 | stephenfin | "If the [compute] cpu_dedicated_set config option is not set, a warning will be logged stating that reserved_host_cpus is deprecated and that the operator should set both [compute] cpu_shared_set and [compute] cpu_dedicated_set." | |
| 10:04:29 | bhagyashris__ | Then in that case the inventory reported at placement side will be PCPU=0 and VCPU=0 | |
| 10:05:15 | stephenfin | No, it'll be PCPU = (len(vcpu_pin_set) | len($total_host_cores)) | |
| 10:05:33 | stephenfin | and VCPU = (len(vcpu_pin_set) | len($total_host_cores)) * cpu_allocation_ratio | |
| 10:05:59 | stephenfin | i.e. the exact same behavior if cpu_shared_set wasn't defined | |
| 10:06:08 | stephenfin | and cpu_dedicated_set wasn't defined | |
| 10:06:11 | openstackgerrit | zhaixiaojun proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Modify the url of upper_constraints_file https://review.opendev.org/665934 | |
| 10:08:55 | bhagyashris__ | means if only the ``cpu_shared_set`` is define then in that case inventory should be reported as PCPU = (len(vcpu_pin_set) | len($total_host_cores)) and VCPU = (len(vcpu_pin_set) | len($total_host_cores)) * cpu_allocation_ratio | |
| 10:09:07 | bhagyashris__ | ? | |
| 10:10:18 | stephenfin | What's the question? | |
| 10:10:19 | bhagyashris__ | stephenfin: ^ | |
| 10:10:43 | stephenfin | You seem to just be saying exactly what I just said :) | |
| 10:11:47 | bhagyashris__ | stephenfin: my question is if the operator set only ``cpu_shared_set`` in Train on fresh compute node then we will raise the Warning but what inventory will reported at placement side? | |
| 10:12:06 | stephenfin | What I just said | |
| 10:12:09 | stephenfin | PCPU = (len(vcpu_pin_set) | len($total_host_cores)) | |
| 10:12:11 | stephenfin | VCPU = (len(vcpu_pin_set) | len($total_host_cores)) * cpu_allocation_ratio | |
| 10:12:28 | bhagyashris__ | Ok got it | |
| 10:12:58 | sean-k-mooney | actully that is not correct | |
| 10:13:42 | bhagyashris__ | But if operator want to use that not as shared then in that case reporting both PCPU and VCPU the inventory is wrong IMO | |
| 10:13:51 | sean-k-mooney | if vcpu_pin_set is not defiend and cpu_dedicated_set is not defiend but cpu_shared_set is then we should only report a singel inventory of VCPU=len(cpu_share_set) | |
| 10:14:10 | stephenfin | Ohhh, you're right | |
| 10:14:19 | sean-k-mooney | and set the inventory allcoation raito as neeeded | |
| 10:14:33 | stephenfin | Sorry bhagyashris__ | |
| 10:14:51 | bhagyashris__ | stephenfin, sean-k-mooney : yeah thats whats my understanding from the spec | |
| 10:15:02 | stephenfin | Yeah, I guess we'd written off the combination of cpu_shared_set being defined and vcpu_pin_set being undefined as "not gonna happen" | |
| 10:15:30 | sean-k-mooney | yes so we dont actly multiple the capasity by the allocation raition since the inventory has an allcoation ration filed seperatly as well | |
| 10:16:26 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: cpu_share_set and vcpu_pin_set makes sense when doign cpu pinning | |
| 10:17:00 | sean-k-mooney | as the cpu_shared_set is used for emulator trheads as you know but in that case we report vcpu and pcu based on vcpu_pin_set | |
| 10:17:09 | stephenfin | Agreed. I'm saying cpu_shared_set *without* vcpu_pin_set *doesn't* makes sense when doing CPU pinning | |
| 10:17:30 | sean-k-mooney | well i guess it could | |
| 10:17:44 | sean-k-mooney | no it doesnt | |
| 10:18:11 | sean-k-mooney | you never want teh emulator thread to overlap with the cpu that you can pin too | |
| 10:18:35 | sean-k-mooney | so it only makes sense if you have use vcpu_pin_set to restic what cpus you can pin too | |
| 10:18:45 | stephenfin | Correct | |
| 10:18:53 | stephenfin | It's just annoying that we don't have a check to validate that at the moment | |
| 10:19:00 | stephenfin | I wonder if we should add one and backport it? | |
| 10:19:23 | stephenfin | i.e. WARNING: You've set cpu_shared_set without vcpu_pin_set. This is dumb. Stop it. | |
| 10:19:58 | sean-k-mooney | so if cpu_shared_set was defined on its own then it would only make sense in train to model a host that resultss floating vms being confined to a subset of hosts | |
| 10:20:07 | sean-k-mooney | :) | |
| 10:20:27 | sean-k-mooney | i like how bitchy the warning is :) | |
| 10:20:29 | sean-k-mooney | +1 | |
| 10:22:13 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: maybe it makes sense to write up a bunch of different configuration in an eterpad with the config args and the expect placmenet inventories which we can use as a set of functional test to implement | |
| 10:28:04 | bhagyashris__ | stephenfin, sean-k-mooney : thank you for you opinion ! I will try to push the patches ASAP. And incase any of any doubts I will ping. | |
| 10:47:15 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: hacking: Resolve W605 (invalid escape sequence) https://review.opendev.org/652104 | |
| 10:47:16 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Use consistent URL regex substitution https://review.opendev.org/665949 | |
| 11:04:13 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Integrate 'pre-commit' and deprecate 'tox -e fast8' https://review.opendev.org/665518 | |
| 11:22:44 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Remove redundant group host setup https://review.opendev.org/665954 | |
| 11:33:32 | openstackgerrit | Edward Hope-Morley proposed openstack/nova stable/stein: Fix python3 compatibility of rbd get_fsid https://review.opendev.org/664512 | |
| 12:29:21 | openstackgerrit | Hamdy Khader proposed openstack/os-vif master: [Follow Up] OVS DPDK port representors support https://review.opendev.org/665965 | |
| 12:49:40 | openstackgerrit | Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova master: Grab fresh info from the driver during nova start/stop actions https://review.opendev.org/665975 | |
| 13:03:21 | yonglihe | sean-k-mooney: clean up orphan instances, Checking instance nova metadata added: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/627765/ | |