| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2019-05-13 | |||
| 21:33:39 | ganso | mriedem: yea was copy paste | |
| 21:33:45 | mriedem | ok remove that and i'm +2 | |
| 21:33:46 | ganso | mriedem: will remove and push an update | |
| 21:33:50 | ganso | mriedem: great =D | |
| 21:33:56 | ganso | mriedem: doing that now | |
| 21:34:58 | mriedem | sean-k-mooney: so on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/653506/4/nova/network/neutronv2/api.py@3358 - what do you want to do instead? just remove the try/except and let the PortBindingActivationFailed raise up? if so i'm cool with that. | |
| 21:35:46 | sean-k-mooney | mriedem: i was just responding. either that or as i previous said in stead of just doing the update delete the inactive port bidning then leave it fall back to updating the souce binding | |
| 21:36:16 | openstackgerrit | Rodrigo Barbieri proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional confirm_migration_error test https://review.opendev.org/657870 | |
| 21:36:30 | mriedem | sean-k-mooney: just letting that raise up is easier | |
| 21:36:46 | mriedem | this is all workaround for weird edge casing anyway | |
| 21:36:57 | sean-k-mooney | ya that is ture. | |
| 21:37:04 | mriedem | true even | |
| 21:37:10 | sean-k-mooney | :) | |
| 21:37:16 | mriedem | i'll just do that then | |
| 21:37:32 | mriedem | dansmith: ok i'm +2 on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/657870/ | |
| 21:38:04 | sean-k-mooney | cool in which case the last test can just be an assertRaises | |
| 21:38:07 | mriedem | dansmith: tl;dr i had fixed an allocation leak in master and stein but ganso found it it didn't really fix the bug before stein b/c of some code refactor stuff that was missed in the backport | |
| 21:38:33 | dansmith | okay | |
| 21:38:34 | mriedem | the test is used to recreate the bug in rocky and queens https://review.opendev.org/#/q/I9d6478f492351b58aa87b8f56e907ee633d6d1c6 | |
| 21:45:13 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Handle inactive port binding in _update_port_binding_for_instance https://review.opendev.org/653506 | |
| 21:52:58 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova stable/stein: Add functional confirm_migration_error test https://review.opendev.org/658929 | |
| 21:53:01 | mriedem | ganso: there is the stein backport ^ | |
| 21:54:19 | ganso | mriedem_afk: cool, ok! I will improve the text message of the other ones | |
| 22:00:20 | aspiers | is it just me or is https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-ptg-train borked? is that why there was a https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-ptg-train-2 ? but that seems borked too | |
| 22:03:10 | openstackgerrit | Rodrigo Barbieri proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: Add functional confirm_migration_error test https://review.opendev.org/658834 | |
| 22:07:50 | sean-k-mooney | aspiers: -4 was working last week | |
| 22:09:24 | sean-k-mooney | looks like that is broken too. efried has an offline copy. i have one on my personal laptop too | |
| 22:09:30 | aspiers | sean-k-mooney: yikes, etherpad zombies everywhere | |
| 22:09:33 | sean-k-mooney | we proably should jsut email it to the mailing list | |
| 22:09:38 | aspiers | did it just get too big for etherpad to handle? | |
| 22:09:41 | efried | I made -5 last week | |
| 22:09:52 | aspiers | does the infra team know about this? | |
| 22:10:01 | sean-k-mooney | efried: -5 is not loading either | |
| 22:10:01 | efried | aspiers: I've seen way bigger etherpads that have survived, so I doubt it's the size. | |
| 22:10:22 | aspiers | yeah, -5 not loading for me either | |
| 22:10:58 | sean-k-mooney | there is proably some content in it that it does not like | |
| 22:11:01 | efried | urm, looks like I might have killed my open window to -5 | |
| 22:11:16 | aspiers | I've just notified infra | |
| 22:11:21 | efried | was there anything in particular you needed from there? | |
| 22:11:21 | sean-k-mooney | i have a copy i saved offline | |
| 22:11:30 | sean-k-mooney | i can email it to the list | |
| 22:12:38 | sean-k-mooney | if i was to guess at anything i woudl guess it was the non ascii chater that was added to the start of the etherpad | |
| 22:23:59 | sean-k-mooney | aspiers: i sent a mail to the list with subject " [nova][ptg] main etherpad backup" | |
| 22:24:54 | sean-k-mooney | which is apparently held for moderator apporval becasue apprently its over 40KB... | |
| 22:25:05 | sean-k-mooney | this is 2019 right | |
| 22:25:37 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: TC Vision Reflection https://review.opendev.org/658932 | |
| 22:30:16 | sean-k-mooney | efried: am i missing somthing or is the reflect missing form ^ | |
| 22:30:34 | efried | sean-k-mooney: You mean did I forget to git-add | |
| 22:30:35 | efried | yes | |
| 22:30:37 | efried | yes I did. | |
| 22:30:40 | efried | thanks | |
| 22:30:48 | sean-k-mooney | ah ok :) | |
| 22:30:55 | efried | doesn't do me much good to "back up my work" and "save my place" if I don't upload the freakin document. | |
| 22:31:10 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: TC Vision Reflection https://review.opendev.org/658932 | |
| 22:31:36 | efried | sean-k-mooney: ^ | |
| 22:31:37 | sean-k-mooney | did this come up in the ptg by the way. i was in the fourm session but i never got around to bringin this up in the ptg | |
| 22:31:52 | efried | no, it's just something that's been on my to-do list for months and months | |
| 22:32:13 | efried | okay, since March | |
| 22:33:22 | sean-k-mooney | ah ok, we discussed this a bit in the fourm session but since bauzas and i were the only novaish people in the room we did not really have a reason other then no one has done it yet for why nova had not done one when asked | |
| 22:33:46 | efried | yeah, I figured it was my responsibility, just hadn't gotten to it yet | |
| 22:33:50 | efried | (dreading, dreading) | |
| 22:36:12 | sean-k-mooney | out of interest is it still technically possible to deploy nova without keystone. | |
| 22:37:10 | sean-k-mooney | i think our configs imply you coudl deploy the api with no auth but im pretty sure it totally would bork things if you tried | |
| 22:37:58 | efried | no idea. I expect I will commit a number of inaccuracies in my writeup due to my relatively brief history on the project. I expect it to be vetted thoroughly by Nova veterans such as yourself before it is considered mergeable. | |
| 22:38:03 | efried | gtg | |
| 22:38:53 | sean-k-mooney | well you can still fall back to noauth2 but i dont know how functional the deployment would be https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/conf/api.py#L24-L36 | |
| 22:38:55 | sean-k-mooney | o/ | |
| 23:30:05 | mriedem_afk | dansmith: well with commenting out that volume attachment stuff i did get a clean run on a volume-backed cross-cell resize confirm tempest test http://logs.openstack.org/56/656656/10/check/nova-multi-cell/f1def72/testr_results.html.gz so i guess i'll just nix that code from the series | |
| 23:30:19 | dansmith | sweet | |
| 23:30:22 | openstackgerrit | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Integrating with unified limits https://review.opendev.org/615180 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2019-05-14 | |||
| 01:02:43 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Add functional confirm_migration_error test https://review.opendev.org/657870 | |
| 07:33:15 | openstackgerrit | Boxiang Zhu proposed openstack/nova master: Fix failure to boot instances with qcow2 format images https://review.opendev.org/640271 | |
| 08:39:06 | awalende | Where in the db is stored the volumes that are attached to a specific instance? | |
| 08:39:25 | awalende | I have a failing instance which can't boot because it tries to attach a non existing volume. | |
| 08:46:08 | brinzhang | awalende: You can look down the 'block_device_mapping' table. | |
| 08:48:55 | brinzhang | awalende: There may be information about the disk you need with the instance. | |
| 08:51:49 | awalende | Thanks! I found the entry | |
| 08:52:16 | awalende | now to find out which field to manipulate in order to detach it | |
| 08:52:45 | awalende | or is it safe to delete the rows with the non existing volume? | |
| 09:20:32 | openstackgerrit | Boxiang Zhu proposed openstack/nova master: Add host and hypervisor_hostname flag to create server https://review.opendev.org/645520 | |
| 09:37:30 | openstackgerrit | Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: [Docs] Update client docs to add reason and locked options https://review.opendev.org/659000 | |
| 10:50:56 | openstackgerrit | Hamdy Khader proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] OVS DPDK port representors support https://review.opendev.org/658785 | |
| 12:05:26 | openstackgerrit | Hamdy Khader proposed openstack/os-vif master: [WIP] OVS DPDK port representors support https://review.opendev.org/658786 | |
| 12:29:36 | openstackgerrit | Alexandre arents proposed openstack/nova master: Fix live-migration when glance image deleted https://review.opendev.org/659054 | |
| 12:45:27 | kashyap | alex_xu: Hi, I have abandoned this spec (the `cpu_model_list` thing) after further discussions w/ the QEMU & libvirt folks: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/642030/ | |
| 12:57:44 | alex_xu | kashyap: ok, got it | |
| 13:45:27 | mdbooth | bauzas: I also thought we might have other bugs like https://review.opendev.org/#/c/658845/, so I posted to the ML earlier | |
| 13:45:58 | bauzas | mdbooth: yup that's why I left a comment | |
| 13:46:04 | mdbooth | bauzas: ack | |
| 13:46:14 | bauzas | we have this bug, so we can fix it, but maybe we should also look at other methods | |
| 13:46:21 | mdbooth | bauzas: Indeed | |
| 13:47:17 | mdbooth | bauzas: And be generally stricter about not modifying argument data. It causes a bunch of issues, but I think this is the subtlist I've encountered. | |
| 13:48:47 | mdbooth | Incidentally, this specific issue breaks the '1 task at a time' guard in n-api for all operations which use task state, which is nearly all of them. | |
| 13:49:00 | mdbooth | s/all operations/all instance operations/ | |
| 13:51:16 | openstackgerrit | Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova master: [Trivial doc change] Admin can overwrite the locked_reason of an owner https://review.opendev.org/659067 | |
| 13:56:42 | kashyap | aspiers: You okay with the "plan" at the end here: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/655193/ | |
| 13:57:11 | kashyap | alex_xu: If later we decide that we "really need it", we can always restore it. | |
| 14:01:15 | kashyap | efried: When you're about, bike-shedding, for the file name in 'os-traits': how about the x86.py --> x86-common.py? (Or is it "implied"?) | |
| 14:03:26 | efried | kashyap: We can't change x86.py at this point. And yes, I think common is implied. I would just make an x86 subdirectory with intel.py and amd.py | |
| 14:03:39 | kashyap | (Oh, right.) | |