Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2019-02-26
02:55:51 mriedem you currently cannot have a server in more than one group
02:56:04 mriedem i know people have tried to change the api to allow adding/removing servers to/from groups over time
02:56:07 mriedem but that is not implemented today
02:56:27 mriedem is this a list because windriver allows having a server in more than one group?
02:56:30 mriedem *starlingx
02:56:44 yonglihe no, it's not in starlingx,
02:58:22 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Add compute service support for attach/detach root volume https://review.openstack.org/614750
02:58:39 openstackgerrit yenai proposed openstack/nova master: Disconnect volume when encryption is failed https://review.openstack.org/632598
02:58:58 yonglihe should we switch to just one UUID?
03:00:33 mriedem i'm also wondering why not return the server group name along with the uuid
03:00:38 mriedem while we're looking up the server group
03:00:50 mriedem i know you can get the name of the group via the GET /os-server-groups/{id} api
03:01:01 mriedem anyway, i'm mostly -1 because of the list
03:01:07 mriedem adding the name + uuid is just a thought
03:01:41 yonglihe people think that is redundant, uuid is enough.
03:02:52 yonglihe ok so we should patch the bp and rebase patch to return just UUID, along with address comments.
03:03:02 mriedem ugh, i see jaypipes' comment in the spec now https://review.openstack.org/#/c/612255/11/specs/stein/approved/show-server-group.rst@67
03:03:07 mriedem exactly the opposite of mine :)
03:03:31 yonglihe should we align that?
03:04:32 mriedem yonglihe: can you ask about it in the mailing list? i see that my last comment in the spec was https://review.openstack.org/#/c/612255/5/specs/stein/approved/list-server-group.rst@38
03:04:35 mriedem which wasn't the direction taken
03:05:44 mriedem i guess i was thinking something more like this based on what i just said in your patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/612255/4/specs/stein/approved/list-server-group.rst@62
03:06:37 yonglihe ok, i gonna re-open this on mail thead.
03:09:33 mriedem yonglihe: thanks, and sorry - but this is pretty straight-forward otherwise and i don't see a problem with getting it merged once we decide on the format
03:10:30 yonglihe sure, we do it as good as we can, that's good thing to go, i like it -:)
03:31:24 openstackgerrit Boxiang Zhu proposed openstack/nova master: Convert to raw format into rbd volume https://review.openstack.org/638080
03:51:09 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Create specialist set_macaddr_and_vlan helper. https://review.openstack.org/624227
03:51:58 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Move create_tap_dev into privsep. https://review.openstack.org/624228
05:13:09 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Fix changes-before values in an instance action test https://review.openstack.org/638849
05:40:57 openstackgerrit yenai proposed openstack/nova master: Disconnect volume when encryption is failed https://review.openstack.org/632598
06:32:38 masber good afternoon all, is this the right place to ask questions about SRIOV? for some reason nova-compute complains that it can't find the device, however I can't find "the device" in the libvirt device list
06:34:20 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Add compute service support for attach/detach root volume https://review.openstack.org/614750
06:45:43 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add online data migration for populating user_id https://review.openstack.org/633351
06:45:44 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: WIP Add get_counts() to InstanceMappingList https://review.openstack.org/638072
06:45:44 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: WIP Count instances from mappings and cores/ram from placement https://review.openstack.org/638073
06:45:45 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Use instance mappings to count server group members https://review.openstack.org/638324
06:48:07 openstackgerrit Yury Kulazhenkov proposed openstack/nova master: remove deprecated os_brick import from ScaleIO driver https://review.openstack.org/638592
06:49:46 openstackgerrit Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: Add server sub-resource topology API https://review.openstack.org/621476
07:02:19 openstackgerrit Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: Add server sub-resource topology API https://review.openstack.org/621476
07:16:11 openstackgerrit Boxiang Zhu proposed openstack/nova master: Convert to raw format into rbd volume https://review.openstack.org/638080
08:50:25 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Detach/Attach root volume API changes https://review.openstack.org/623981
08:59:34 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Detach/Attach root volume API changes https://review.openstack.org/623981
09:09:04 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Detach/Attach root volume API changes https://review.openstack.org/623981
09:09:04 openstackgerrit Boxiang Zhu proposed openstack/nova master: Convert to raw format into rbd volume https://review.openstack.org/638080
09:43:51 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move set_vf_interface_vlan to be with its only caller. https://review.openstack.org/624229
09:43:52 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move DHCP releasing to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/624230
09:43:52 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Convert additional IP management calls to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/624231
09:43:53 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move route management to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/624232
09:43:53 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move additional IP address management to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/624591
09:43:54 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move slight bonkers IP management to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/624592
09:43:54 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move arping to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/624593
09:43:55 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move cleaning conntrack to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/624594
09:43:55 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Privsepify ipv4 forwarding enablement. https://review.openstack.org/635431
09:43:56 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move killing processes to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/635432
09:43:56 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move FP device creation and deletion to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/635433
09:43:57 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Cleanup the exec_ebtables code a little. https://review.openstack.org/635434
09:43:57 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Privsep the ebtables modification code. https://review.openstack.org/635435
09:43:58 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move adding vlans to interfaces to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/635436
09:43:58 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move iptables rule fetching and setting to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/636508
09:43:59 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move dnsmasq restarts to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/639280
09:44:00 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move router advertisement daemon restarts to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/639281
09:44:00 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move calls to ovs-vsctl to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/639282
10:20:04 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/os-vif master: docs: Use sphinx.ext.autodoc for VIF types https://review.openstack.org/638404
10:20:05 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/os-vif master: docs: Use sphinx.ext.autodoc for profile, datapath offload types https://review.openstack.org/638405
10:29:56 aspiers cfriesen: your suggestion exactly describes what I already pushed to Gerrit :-) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/638680/
10:30:37 aspiers kashyap: I was told to ask your advice on this http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-nova/%23openstack-nova.2019-02-25.log.html#t2019-02-25T23:18:05
10:30:50 kashyap aspiers: Hi
10:31:04 kashyap I'm deeply buried in a different context; will get back to you
10:31:25 aspiers kashyap: ok np, thanks!
10:31:35 kashyap aspiers: I lost all the IRC scrollback from yesterday, that's why I didn't see it.
10:31:49 kashyap aspiers: So it's about machine types and AMD SEV detection
10:31:51 aspiers kashyap: yeah, I noticed you were not in the channel
10:31:56 aspiers correct
10:32:09 kashyap aspiers: Which TZ are you in?
10:32:12 aspiers and this stack of patches: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/638680/
10:32:18 aspiers GMT (London, UK)
10:33:34 kashyap Okido; will come back sometime in the afternoon to this.
10:33:46 kashyap aspiers: I'll leave you with a related URL: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/631154/ ("WIP: Gracefully handle QEMU machine types for guests")
10:36:42 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: looking at the other docs changes you pushed im more or less hapy with the final too in the series. ill take a look at them again when the ci reports back but do you want to include them in the release?
10:36:43 aspiers kashyap: SEV requires q35 but I think that is only loosely related. The main point here is that virConnectGetDomainCapabilities was designed to be invoked just before booting an instance of a specific arch / machine type, not during initialisation of a hypervisor host which can potentially host multiple archs / machine types
10:37:02 aspiers kashyap: but no rush, I will wait patiently ;-) thanks again!
10:37:05 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: If you want, go for it. I'm reviewing ralonsoh's native OVSDB patch atm
10:37:46 kashyap aspiers: Right. One more (couldn't resist), on getDomainCapabilities(), I mentioned it in this WIP spec too (for OVMF): https://review.openstack.org/#/c/506720/6/specs/rocky/approved/ovmf-with-secure-boot-and-smm.rst
10:38:04 aspiers :)
10:38:33 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: ok, cool let me know if you want me to respin the py3-functional patches. we might leave the +w of rodolfos change to jaypies
10:38:55 sean-k-mooney *to jaypipes
10:39:05 stephenfin yup, that's that my plan
10:52:05 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: Oh yeah, and no need to respin, though a follow-up would be nice
11:16:20 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: by the way the reason im making the vscode change is so i can run the functional test under a debugger by addign a break piont and clicking on just the test i want to run :)
11:18:09 sean-k-mooney so vim,emacs,nano is fine too and i use them form most of my work but having a real debugger makes writing new tests and validteing them much simpler
11:18:49 sean-k-mooney i have done this in the past with nova but its on my todo list to set it up again and then document it in the nova docs
11:25:08 openstackgerrit Yury Kulazhenkov proposed openstack/nova master: remove deprecated os_brick import from ScaleIO driver https://review.openstack.org/638592
11:51:43 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: im going to resping the last sriov migration patch. adrianc didnt cherry pick my v14 change so im going to do that and then check if anything else form your comments still needs to be fixed.
12:15:12 frickler sean-k-mooney: regarding your comment on https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1801919, we don't use "Fix Committed" anymore, see also https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/bugs.html , though I don't remember the exact reasoning. but it has been this way for a couple of years now I think
12:15:14 openstack Launchpad bug 1801919 in devstack "brctl is obsolete use ip" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Nate Johnston (nate-johnston)
12:15:52 sean-k-mooney frickler: that is quite missleading for a casual on looker
12:16:32 sean-k-mooney frickler: if we were to drop one of the two i woudl have dropped fix released
12:17:25 frickler sean-k-mooney: I think it doesn't work that way round, because the bug then would still show up as open in lp
12:17:29 sean-k-mooney frickler: i have had people email me in the past about bug that were marked as fix released when they were not
12:18:03 sean-k-mooney frickler: they should still show up as open

Earlier   Later