| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2019-02-20 | |||
| 13:29:53 | jangutter | kashyap, jaypipes: don't get me wrong, I love tripleo. It's also one of the most scarily self-referential things I've ever come across. | |
| 13:30:56 | mdbooth | sean-k-mooney: Through what's almost certainly a bug, but one which goes down a rabbit hole I'm not interested in right now, I've ended up with a port bound on a compute host which neutron doesn't think it's bound on, causing LM failure. What's the best way to kick it so I can get on with my day? | |
| 13:31:28 | jangutter | jaypipes: I presume you're referring to tripleo-quickstart? | |
| 13:32:38 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Check hosts have no instances for AZ rename https://review.openstack.org/509206 | |
| 13:35:44 | sean-k-mooney | mdbooth: define bound. you could try a hard reboot but neutron is the souce of truth in this matter | |
| 13:35:55 | jaypipes | jangutter: no, I'm referring to larsks's phrase "tripleo standalone install" in a recent ML post | |
| 13:36:25 | sean-k-mooney | mdbooth: we recently merged a fix to prevent the network info cache form getting out of sync so that should fix nova db periodicaly | |
| 13:36:35 | mdbooth | sean-k-mooney: I suspect it's an agent issue. Bind fails on the destination. I just deleted the instance, though, so I'm guessing the mess is still there but as long as it doesn't affect me I don't care right now :) | |
| 13:36:44 | jangutter | jaypipes: that sounds like a standalone networked computer in my mind. | |
| 13:36:57 | jaypipes | I'm actually not sure what was meant. | |
| 13:37:33 | mdbooth | It was a failed LM. LM failed because ssh keys weren't configured. Haven't looked , but presumably we created ports on the dest prior to LM, then didn't clean them up properly when it failed. | |
| 13:37:55 | mdbooth | So second attempt to LM fails because port is already bound. | |
| 13:38:17 | jangutter | jaypipes: reading the mail, I think this is "standalone" vs "integrating with an external ... " etc. | |
| 13:38:53 | larsks | jaypipes: standalone tripleo: https://docs.openstack.org/tripleo-docs/latest/install/containers_deployment/standalone.html | |
| 13:39:20 | larsks | Single node tripleo deployment installed using the 'openstack tripleo deploy' command. | |
| 13:39:39 | jangutter | larsks: aaah, "standalone" vs "ha". | |
| 13:39:46 | jaypipes | interesting. | |
| 13:39:56 | larsks | jangutter: not exactly. "standalone" vs "multinode" | |
| 13:40:19 | jaypipes | probably better to call it "all-in-one" or "single-node", but ok | |
| 13:40:29 | larsks | Eh, I didn't name it :). But yes. | |
| 13:40:33 | jaypipes | :) | |
| 13:40:49 | jaypipes | larsks: k, thx for the heads up. looks like this is relatively new functionality. | |
| 13:41:25 | larsks | I think so. I believe it stems from wanting to handle underlcoud deployment the same way as overcloud deployment. | |
| 13:41:54 | jaypipes | it's all a little too inception-y for me. | |
| 13:42:05 | jaypipes | turtles all the way down ;) | |
| 13:42:11 | jangutter | larsks: and that's why I find tripleo so fascinating, going all in with self-referencing! | |
| 13:42:40 | jangutter | larsks: basically it's a scalability problem, where the problem is "how can I scale down to 1 node". | |
| 13:43:47 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Refactor _heal_allocations_for_instance (2) https://review.openstack.org/637954 | |
| 13:43:47 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: nova-manage: heal port allocations https://review.openstack.org/637955 | |
| 13:44:54 | mdbooth | Eurgh. I forgot about that weird F29 iscsi bug when I provisioned this devstack >:( | |
| 13:45:21 | stephenfin | kaisers: sup? | |
| 13:46:21 | kaisers | stephenfin: updates to both CLs | |
| 13:46:49 | kaisers | stephenfin: mostly the open nits but check the is_sysd thing again, pls | |
| 13:46:58 | stephenfin | ack | |
| 13:47:35 | sean-k-mooney | larsks: why does triplo build its docs like that. it makes them really hard to read givent tha that you have 3 or 4 release togehter with 2-3 distros | |
| 13:48:24 | larsks | sean-k-mooney: I have no idea. | |
| 13:49:21 | sean-k-mooney | if it wasnt for the fact i like stephenfin sanity it woul be neice if he had time to fix that... | |
| 13:54:05 | stephenfin | sean-k-mooney: What about my sanity? :D | |
| 13:55:18 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: im suggesting that it may be damaged if you were to undertake reworking all the tripplo docs to be readable | |
| 13:55:32 | stephenfin | Oh, yeah, feck that | |
| 14:00:24 | jangutter | sean-k-mooney: once you get used to it, it's not so bad, but covering all the use cases you want to cover is going to drive you batty. | |
| 14:05:41 | jangutter | sean-k-mooney: would be better if the "LIMIT ENVIRONMENT SPECIFIC CONTENT" bit worked.... | |
| 14:09:42 | mriedem | dansmith: down cells bp was technically dropped from runways yesterday. can we get the docs change merged since we can follow up with the admin guide stuff and because it's causing issues for other changes that need a new microversion (the rest api history doc means everyone has to rebase on this): https://review.openstack.org/#/c/635147/ | |
| 14:11:23 | NewBruce | hey sean-k-mooney! | |
| 14:11:39 | NewBruce | hopefully i can be tied to the desk today! :) | |
| 14:13:30 | mriedem | sean-k-mooney: adrianc: i'm pulling https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/libvirt-neutron-sriov-livemigration from runways | |
| 14:14:21 | adrianc | miredem: ill re-add to queue | |
| 14:14:35 | sean-k-mooney | mriedem: ok. | |
| 14:18:59 | mriedem | jackding: jroll: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/flavor-extra-spec-image-property-validation and https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/ironic-conductor-groups are in runways now | |
| 14:19:50 | jroll | thanks! | |
| 14:22:04 | NewBruce | sean-k-mooney - to avoid cluttering the main chat here have dropped you full details in a DM | |
| 14:23:15 | kaisers | stephenfin: thnx for seeing this through to the current state | |
| 14:23:24 | sean-k-mooney | NewBruce: just finishing a code review but ill pop over in a miniute | |
| 14:23:43 | NewBruce | no worries mate - working late tonight, so ill be here a while | |
| 14:23:53 | NewBruce | have been talking to mnaser about this as well | |
| 14:24:51 | mnaser | i mean it is kindof a nova bug :) | |
| 14:30:32 | mriedem | artom: replied to your questions about the tests in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/631948/ | |
| 14:33:50 | dansmith | mriedem: got it up now | |
| 14:35:40 | gibi | efried, jaypipes: updated https://review.openstack.org/#/c/616239 based on what we agreed on Friday. If you could re-review that patch that would be awesome | |
| 14:36:03 | openstackgerrit | Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova master: API microversion 2.69: Handles Down Cells Documentation https://review.openstack.org/635147 | |
| 14:36:03 | openstackgerrit | Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova master: [Doc Fix]Best practices for effectively tolerating down cells https://review.openstack.org/638173 | |
| 14:36:13 | bauzas | gibi: I need to jump on your b/w series | |
| 14:36:21 | bauzas | gibi: later today | |
| 14:37:38 | gibi | bauzas: thanks in advance | |
| 14:58:52 | jackding | Need another core to approve https://review.openstack.org/#/c/603844/. It's been too long. | |
| 15:00:10 | kashyap | jackding: Hi, I have something unrelated to chat: CPU models | |
| 15:00:38 | efried | gibi: +2 | |
| 15:01:48 | kashyap | jackding: So I recall you filed this one: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/620959/ (Select cpu model from a list of cpu models) | |
| 15:02:10 | kashyap | jackding: I thought you might be interested in this one: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/cpu-selection-with-hypervisor-consideration | |
| 15:04:26 | gibi | efried_pto: thanks | |
| 15:04:39 | kashyap | I'll file a spec too. In short, the core proposal here is to replace the existing two libvirt APIs with the "hypervisor-literate" APIs, which are far more useful. | |
| 15:05:40 | kashyap | jackding: ^ It maps onto the comment I noted here: https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py#L3900,#L3909 | |
| 15:07:19 | ysandeep | #openstack-nova A quick query, If my nova backend of compute nodes is ceph. And I evacuate instance.. Will my root disk of instance (rbd in ceph) will remain intact or the root disk will reimage(Old disk will be deleted and a new disk will be created from image)? | |
| 15:08:28 | mriedem | ysandeep: if you're evacuating to another compute host sharing the same ceph cluster the root disk should remain | |
| 15:10:08 | ysandeep | mriedem, thank you so much .. Do you happen to have idea about - from which branch we have this feature? | |
| 15:11:00 | mriedem | ysandeep: that's been around a long time, that's why the evacuate api has an onSharedStorage parameter https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/?expanded=evacuate-server-evacuate-action-detail#evacuate-server-evacuate-action | |
| 15:11:09 | mriedem | having said that, i'm sure there have been bug fixes over the years | |
| 15:11:15 | mriedem | mdbooth probably knows best about that | |
| 15:11:39 | ysandeep | mriedem, thank you soo much.. really appreciate your help.. | |
| 15:11:56 | mriedem | yw | |
| 15:11:57 | mdbooth | ysandeep: It remains intact. | |
| 15:12:13 | ysandeep | mdbooth, thanks | |
| 15:12:20 | mdbooth | ysandeep: Same for NFS. | |
| 15:13:22 | openstackgerrit | Adrian Chiris proposed openstack/nova master: Add free for claimed, allocated devices https://review.openstack.org/616120 | |
| 15:13:22 | ysandeep | mdbooth, thanks, i will test for nfs also | |
| 15:13:23 | openstackgerrit | Adrian Chiris proposed openstack/nova master: Allow per-port modification of vnic_type and profile https://review.openstack.org/607365 | |
| 15:13:23 | openstackgerrit | Adrian Chiris proposed openstack/nova master: Add get_instance_pci_request_from_vif https://review.openstack.org/619929 | |
| 15:13:24 | openstackgerrit | Adrian Chiris proposed openstack/nova master: SR-IOV Live migration indirect port support https://review.openstack.org/620115 | |
| 15:13:24 | openstackgerrit | Adrian Chiris proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: auto detach/attach sriov ports on migration https://review.openstack.org/629589 | |
| 15:13:48 | jackding | kashyap: noted, thanks | |
| 15:13:59 | mdbooth | ysandeep: Same for boot from volume too, fwiw. | |
| 15:14:08 | kashyap | jackding: Just wanted to give a heads-up, so we don't duplicate efforts :-) | |
| 15:15:01 | jackding | kashyap: sure thing. | |
| 15:15:02 | artom | mriedem, yep, saw that. I'll un-1 soon | |
| 15:15:16 | artom | I also reviewed that series ass-backwards by looking at the top one first | |
| 15:15:38 | ysandeep | mdbooth, yes i was aware for boot from volume(cinder volume) but I was not sure of nova disk(on cluster storage) and ephermal disk behavior | |
| 15:40:29 | mriedem | tssurya: i'll poke on your novaclient change https://review.openstack.org/#/c/579563/ later this morning to try and sort out the test issue | |
| 15:40:39 | tssurya | dansmith: feel free to author the documentation patch if its only those changes in your comments that need to change I can respin, but considering mriedem and you removed the votes I guess there are some obvious incorrect wordings | |
| 15:41:09 | dansmith | tssurya: it's fine, just let me finish the call I'm on and then I'll push up a rev | |
| 15:41:20 | tssurya | mriedem: yea thanks I am not sure why that address gets printed in the wrong order | |