| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2019-02-13 | |||
| 14:01:48 | tssurya | I'll work on ironing out the wrinkles | |
| 14:02:19 | mriedem | cool. otherwise from my manual testing (once i worked around those other bugs with the service version checking) it was working pretty well | |
| 14:02:57 | stephenfin | mriedem: Not sure you already discussed this again with kashyap, but any serious objections to doing the libvirt min version bump now? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/632507/ gibi and I are happy but I recall some objections previously | |
| 14:03:12 | kashyap | stephenfin: Heh, was _just_ about to write a message here. | |
| 14:03:26 | kashyap | stephenfin: Not quite objections, mriedem was not sure, based on some discussion w/ an operator he had | |
| 14:03:53 | kashyap | Ideally, I should have done this at the _start_ of the cycle, but completely lost track of it | |
| 14:04:24 | mriedem | looking, but you should probably ask the PTL | |
| 14:04:27 | adrianc | sean-k-mooney: Hi, regarding sriov live-migration patches, id like to address some of the comments in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/620115/21, however i saw you are planning to upload a new PS for the series, will it be soon ? as id like to avoid merge conflicts etc... | |
| 14:04:58 | kashyap | mriedem: Yeah, will do. I thought melwitt was still catching up after being on PTO (?) | |
| 14:05:28 | mriedem | stephenfin: kashyap: the concern from an operator was they were upgrading from mitaka to i think queens and the minimum bump in between was just for maintenance, not related to any functional changes, and the computes they were upgrading didn't have that minimum libvirt (they were using older centos i think) | |
| 14:06:01 | mriedem | so this operator was asking me if there was a reason for the bump, or if they could just revert the change to keep the older centos compute node but still upgrade nova | |
| 14:06:24 | sean-k-mooney | adrianc: i got pulled into some other stuff so go ahead. | |
| 14:06:28 | kashyap | I see. Yeah, probably we should better advertize _why_ we do bumps and at what intervals? | |
| 14:06:48 | kashyap | mriedem: ^ Like me writing a reminder note to the mailing list about why we do, and give a gentle heads-up. | |
| 14:06:55 | mriedem | i just think in years past we weren't real aggressive about doing it every release | |
| 14:07:09 | sean-k-mooney | adrianc: ill work on adressing the base patches but ill mainly be adressing comment/commit messages so there whould be no conflicts | |
| 14:07:27 | kashyap | mriedem: Yes, I now kept a reminder on my phone to do the start of the cycle | |
| 14:07:33 | adrianc | sean-k-mooney: would you like me to address some of the nits in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/624842/ as well, or ill leave them to you ? | |
| 14:08:59 | mriedem | so looking at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/558171/ the last time we did a bump was pike, is that correct? | |
| 14:09:05 | sean-k-mooney | adrianc: am if you want to adress them i can focous on the os-vif brctl removal which is the other thing im context switch with | |
| 14:09:17 | mriedem | we advertized the next minimums in rocky | |
| 14:09:25 | mriedem | so really this would be the first required minimum bump since pike | |
| 14:09:34 | kashyap | mriedem: Yes, I did the bump last April-May (https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bump_min_libvirt_and_qemu+(status:open+OR+status:abandoned+OR+status:merged) | |
| 14:09:36 | mriedem | giving at least a year to prepare | |
| 14:09:47 | kashyap | mriedem: Indeed | |
| 14:09:53 | mriedem | (knowing people skip several years of openstack releases now) | |
| 14:10:07 | sean-k-mooney | adrianc: i dont think there is anything controvertiol in any of the coments on the seirs so if you have time to make the requested change go for it | |
| 14:10:38 | mriedem | looks like we don't have zkvm 3rd party CI anymore... | |
| 14:10:45 | kashyap | Release-wise, we're just about to reach M3 (Mar 04-08), and the GA is aroud 12-Apr — I feel we're still okay | |
| 14:11:05 | adrianc | sean-k-mooney: Ack, ill start from the base patch then :) | |
| 14:11:11 | kashyap | mriedem: Yeah, was wondering this morning about it | |
| 14:11:17 | mriedem | https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems/IBM_zKVM_CI | |
| 14:11:33 | kashyap | Today I spent 4 hours digging into s390x and their fun serial console stuff | |
| 14:11:49 | openstackgerrit | Alexandra Settle proposed openstack/nova master: Adding cross refs for config options in scheduler filter guide https://review.openstack.org/636635 | |
| 14:11:52 | mriedem | kashyap: so how about you send a reminder to the mailing list and also copy zkvm-ci@linux.vnet.ibm.com and bjzhjing@linux.vnet.ibm.com | |
| 14:11:56 | kashyap | MarkusZ left a note in the code with a pointer to a bug ... and it turned out it's a bug _I_ filed 4 years ago :P | |
| 14:12:17 | mriedem | markus_z is long gone from openstack | |
| 14:12:21 | kashyap | mriedem: I guess you mean now, right? | |
| 14:12:35 | mriedem | kashyap: yeah, i'd say do that now and if we don't hear any strong objections by end of week we go ahead | |
| 14:12:40 | kashyap | mriedem: I know, I just found it sadly funny that when I decided to learn more from the bug ... apparently I filed it. | |
| 14:12:45 | kashyap | mriedem: Alright, let me draft it right away. | |
| 14:13:04 | kashyap | mriedem: I spent a painful 8 days on-and-off arriving at the root cause. But hey, fun :-) | |
| 14:13:37 | kashyap | Thanks for your time. Appreciate it | |
| 14:13:38 | mriedem | you've grown as a person i'm sure | |
| 14:14:18 | kashyap | I did; I grew in "(positive) complexity" :D | |
| 14:15:42 | kashyap | What tags would I use? [ops][nova] suffices I guess? | |
| 14:15:48 | kashyap | s/suffices/suffice/ | |
| 14:16:34 | mriedem | yeah | |
| 14:17:10 | kashyap | mriedem++ | |
| 14:17:25 | kashyap | Hm, we should get a 'karma bot' in | |
| 14:32:04 | efried | Shilpa: It looks to me like you're not specifying an engine for your task flow. I thought the default was a linear one, but it's possible it's not. Do you get the same results if you specify a linear engine explicitly? | |
| 14:32:45 | Shilpa | efried: tried with engine='serial' but no sucess | |
| 14:33:22 | Shilpa | i will check setting engine='linear' and get back to you | |
| 14:33:51 | efried | Shilpa: I don't remember exactly what the engine names are, would have to consult the docs. | |
| 14:34:02 | Shilpa | ok | |
| 14:35:31 | efried | Shilpa: Beyond that, I'm probably not a whole lot of use to you. Josh Harlow (harlowja) is the guy who could help, but I don't see him in the usual haunts; possible he's moved on to greener pastures. | |
| 14:35:47 | efried | You may want to try posting your bug to the taskflow github repo | |
| 14:35:54 | Shilpa | efried: its serial but no sucess | |
| 14:36:03 | efried | Shilpa: Okay. | |
| 14:36:57 | Shilpa | efried: at taskflow github repo, in REDME posted Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/taskflow/ | |
| 14:38:49 | bauzas | holy shit, I'm deploying devstack and placement gives me a 503 when being started | |
| 14:38:52 | bauzas | wtf | |
| 14:39:10 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: its likely the same issue i had | |
| 14:39:21 | sean-k-mooney | you have old apache config files | |
| 14:39:22 | bauzas | efried: cdent: any thoughts on that ? | |
| 14:39:28 | bauzas | hah | |
| 14:39:32 | bauzas | i asked to reclone | |
| 14:39:41 | sean-k-mooney | it wont fix it | |
| 14:39:44 | bauzas | yeah | |
| 14:39:54 | bauzas | but then we're missing something in lib/placemenbt | |
| 14:40:04 | bauzas | because a clean.sh didn't fix it too | |
| 14:40:24 | openstackgerrit | Alexandra Settle proposed openstack/nova master: Adding cross refs for config options in scheduler filter guide https://review.openstack.org/636635 | |
| 14:40:24 | sean-k-mooney | nuke your /etc/http/site-available and sites-enabled | |
| 14:40:38 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: ya i was ment to wite a change to devstack to fix it | |
| 14:40:45 | sean-k-mooney | its on my todo list | |
| 14:40:50 | efried | cool | |
| 14:40:51 | bauzas | ok | |
| 14:40:54 | bauzas | gtk | |
| 14:40:55 | sean-k-mooney | hopefully ill get to it by next week | |
| 14:40:57 | cdent | it's a generic problem with how apache stuff is config'd not just placement | |
| 14:41:18 | cdent | there are additional issues when you switch back and forth between using uwsgi and not | |
| 14:41:19 | sean-k-mooney | ya i hit the same issue with cinder i think | |
| 14:41:23 | openstackgerrit | Alexandra Settle proposed openstack/nova master: Adding cross refs for config options in scheduler filter guide https://review.openstack.org/636635 | |
| 14:41:34 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: wait, I'm running devstack with uwsgi | |
| 14:41:40 | sean-k-mooney | yes | |
| 14:41:48 | bauzas | I don't have httpd site | |
| 14:41:50 | efried | cdent: is it the kind of thing it would be appropriate to put a hack into devstack to clean up / make sure it dtrt? | |
| 14:41:50 | sean-k-mooney | apache is still being used as a reverse proxy | |
| 14:42:06 | cdent | efried: sean-k-mooney plans to figure it out | |
| 14:42:12 | efried | woot | |
| 14:42:25 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: wait, I don't know what to bitch | |
| 14:42:30 | sean-k-mooney | if your using ubnuntu its under /etc/apache2/... | |
| 14:42:37 | bauzas | my httpd directory is sane | |
| 14:42:56 | bauzas | it's RHEL, so /etc/httpd but whatever | |
| 14:43:02 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: for me it was poining at an old socket name nova-placement.socket | |
| 14:43:39 | bauzas | ah, interesting | |
| 14:43:42 | sean-k-mooney | you could see the error in the apache errror log in /var/httpd/error.log | |
| 14:43:43 | bauzas | in conf.d, I have two files | |
| 14:44:03 | bauzas | nova-placement-api.conf and placement-api.conf | |
| 14:44:27 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: the simple solution is to run clean unistall httpd and delete /etc/httpd then stack | |