| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-11-29 | |||
| 19:34:22 | dansmith | agent list is legacy and not related | |
| 19:34:36 | frippe75_ | dansmith: exaclty. But I cannot get it into comput_nodes | |
| 19:34:41 | dansmith | unless you're running icehouse and xenserver from five years ago? :) | |
| 19:34:55 | frippe75_ | haha ok. that was a check suggested by #openstack com.. | |
| 19:35:20 | dansmith | frippe75_: this sounds like a setup/usage sort of issue then, and that's not what this channel is for (see topic) | |
| 19:35:21 | frippe75_ | No CentOS 7.5.1804 / Rocky stable release | |
| 19:36:20 | frippe75_ | dansmith: Sorry I really know! But I have been banging my head for 30hours+ and then you go off-topic. Ok. understand. | |
| 19:41:58 | mriedem | the services table record exists for the host but not the compute_nodes table record? which release? | |
| 19:42:00 | mriedem | which virt driver? | |
| 19:42:09 | dansmith | mriedem: we switched to #openstack | |
| 19:56:12 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: thanks for the reivew. | |
| 19:56:26 | sean-k-mooney | ill make some chages and submit again tomorow | |
| 21:09:35 | mriedem | PciDevice objects are used to model a tree, right? where you can have a PciDevice.dev_type = 'type-PF' with children PciDevices that are type-VF, yeah? | |
| 21:10:11 | mriedem | and the allocation of each device is in the 'status' field, so allocated/claimed/available etc | |
| 21:11:25 | mriedem | jaypipes: right? ^ | |
| 21:12:43 | dansmith | mriedem: correct as I understand it | |
| 21:12:52 | dansmith | there should be a parent_id relating vf to pf | |
| 21:14:09 | mriedem | yup ok | |
| 21:39:26 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Use a static resource tracker in compute manager https://review.openstack.org/620711 | |
| 21:40:37 | efried | jaypipes: I think this is ready now ^ Lots of test changes. However, I think there's going to be a manual rebase needed when I restack the series. | |
| 21:41:32 | efried | heh, yup | |
| 21:45:55 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: SIGHUP n-cpu to clear provider tree cache https://review.openstack.org/615646 | |
| 21:45:55 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Reduce calls to placement from _ensure https://review.openstack.org/615677 | |
| 21:45:56 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Consolidate inventory refresh https://review.openstack.org/615695 | |
| 21:45:56 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Commonize _update code path https://review.openstack.org/615705 | |
| 21:45:57 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Rip the report client out of SchedulerClient https://review.openstack.org/617042 | |
| 21:45:57 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Rip out the SchedulerClient https://review.openstack.org/617049 | |
| 21:45:58 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Use a static resource tracker in compute manager https://review.openstack.org/620711 | |
| 21:46:00 | efried | rebase only ^ | |
| 22:28:00 | mriedem | tis your white whale matey | |
| 22:29:53 | mriedem | tonight, during TNF?! | |
| 22:30:05 | mriedem | there will be brees slips all over it | |
| 22:32:32 | mriedem | heh wrong channel | |
| 22:56:05 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Reduce calls to placement from _ensure https://review.openstack.org/615677 | |
| 22:56:05 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Consolidate inventory refresh https://review.openstack.org/615695 | |
| 22:56:06 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Commonize _update code path https://review.openstack.org/615705 | |
| 22:56:06 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Rip the report client out of SchedulerClient https://review.openstack.org/617042 | |
| 22:56:07 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Rip out the SchedulerClient https://review.openstack.org/617049 | |
| 22:56:07 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Use a static resource tracker in compute manager https://review.openstack.org/620711 | |
| 22:57:41 | efried | jaypipes: Ran out of time tonight, still need to fix up the tests for the now-WIP above. That will cause failures up the chain, and I'm guessing there will be manual rebases needed there once I do fix the tests. But other than that, everything in the series should be ready. | |
| 23:12:48 | pacharya_ | Hi need some help with nova instance info cache table. Due to some network connectivity issues nova received empty list during the heal instance info cache periodic task and instance cache table got updated with same. | |
| 23:13:09 | pacharya_ | now the list and get API for that instance does not have any IPs listed | |
| 23:13:17 | pacharya_ | Does anyone know how to fix this? | |
| 23:43:55 | jaypipes | efried: cool, will get to it again tomorrow morning. | |
| #openstack-nova - 2018-11-30 | |||
| 00:38:10 | openstackgerrit | Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: API microversion bump for handling-down-cell https://review.openstack.org/591657 | |
| 02:38:52 | openstackgerrit | Alex Xu proposed openstack/nova master: Parse the numa topology from the new flavor when resize instance https://review.openstack.org/620874 | |
| 02:57:41 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Drop pre-cinder 3.44 version compatibility https://review.openstack.org/621061 | |
| 03:15:44 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Support for changing deleted_on_termination after boot https://review.openstack.org/580336 | |
| 03:25:20 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Add I/O Semaphore to limit concurrent disk ops https://review.openstack.org/609180 | |
| 03:25:31 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova stable/pike: Fix NoneType error in _notify_volume_usage_detach https://review.openstack.org/614872 | |
| 03:25:46 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova stable/queens: Default embedded instance.flavor.is_public attribute https://review.openstack.org/619351 | |
| 03:39:51 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Support for changing deleted_on_termination after boot https://review.openstack.org/580336 | |
| 05:30:07 | openstackgerrit | Alex Xu proposed openstack/nova master: Parse the numa topology from the new flavor when resize instance https://review.openstack.org/620874 | |
| 06:53:10 | openstackgerrit | Alex Xu proposed openstack/nova master: Parse the numa topology from the new flavor when resize instance https://review.openstack.org/620874 | |
| 06:53:10 | openstackgerrit | Alex Xu proposed openstack/nova master: Parse the new PCI request from flavor extra specs when resize https://review.openstack.org/621077 | |
| 07:11:19 | openstackgerrit | Filippo Inzaghi proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Add Python 3.6 classifier to setup.cfg https://review.openstack.org/621093 | |
| 07:25:09 | ohorecny2 | Everyone: Do you know some closer information about this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1795920 , please? I mean, if anybody is working on it or if you have some proposals how to fix it. | |
| 07:25:09 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1795920 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "SR-IOV shared PCI numa not working " [Undecided,Confirmed] | |
| 07:53:59 | belmoreira | mriedem: thanks for ping me. See: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1805984 https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1805989 | |
| 07:53:59 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1805984 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Placement is not aware of disable compute nodes" [Undecided,New] | |
| 07:54:00 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1805989 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Weight policy to stack/spread instances and "max_placement_results"" [Undecided,New] | |
| 08:21:50 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/nova master: Use new ``initial_xxx_allocation_ratio`` CONF https://review.openstack.org/602804 | |
| 09:23:37 | kashyap | alex_xu: If you're still about: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/620327/ | |
| 10:09:15 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/nova master: Use new ``initial_xxx_allocation_ratio`` CONF https://review.openstack.org/602804 | |
| 10:09:15 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/nova master: Add ratio online data migration when load compute node https://review.openstack.org/613499 | |
| 10:09:15 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/nova master: Add compute_node ratio online data migration script https://review.openstack.org/609995 | |
| 10:09:43 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Re-propose numa-aware-live-migration spec https://review.openstack.org/599587 | |
| 10:24:57 | gibi | jackding: hi! the last open patch for the io semaphor work has merged https://review.openstack.org/#/c/609180/ Does it mean that the bp io-semaphore-for-concurrent-disk-ops is done? | |
| 12:37:25 | openstackgerrit | Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova master: Transform scheduler.select_destinations notification https://review.openstack.org/508506 | |
| 12:40:56 | artom | bauzas, thanks for the +W on the NUMA migration spec :) What wasn't clear about the table? Matt had come up with some improved wording, so I can reword in a amendment patch | |
| 12:41:38 | sean-k-mooney | artom you could have just said the new code would only work if both the source and dest node supported it | |
| 12:42:41 | sean-k-mooney | for the other 3 cases the old workflow will be used so you dont really need the table but i could follow it in its redered from much easier then in the raw rst doc | |
| 12:43:18 | sean-k-mooney | i only read the raw rst doc normally so its a little annoying to have to read the rendered version | |
| 12:45:41 | sean-k-mooney | leakypipes: im going to send an email to the list regrading the serialisation of os-vif objects | |
| 12:46:29 | sean-k-mooney | leakypipes: so that kuryr-kubernetes are aware that this will break in the future https://github.com/openstack/kuryr-kubernetes/commit/7cc187806b42fee5ea660f86d33ad2f59b009754 | |
| 12:47:31 | sean-k-mooney | leakypipes: and that everything they are doing in this file is using os-vif out of contract https://github.com/openstack/kuryr-kubernetes/blob/master/kuryr_kubernetes/objects/vif.py | |
| 12:48:24 | sean-k-mooney | i have told them we do not allow external plugins to define there own vif object 3 releases ago but we definetly do support serialising and prestingign between potically differed versions of os-vif | |
| 12:49:07 | artom | sean-k-mooney, yeah, the rst doc is unreadable for the table | |
| 12:50:48 | sean-k-mooney | artom: anyway the spec is merged and it was more of a nit i think then anything else so i would not worry about it | |
| 12:51:23 | leakypipes | sean-k-mooney: ack, thanks for getting that conversation started. if you need a spellcheck before sending out, lemme know :P | |
| 12:51:47 | sean-k-mooney | people keep telling me that specs are appreently not documentation so as long as we understand what you ment its all good | |
| 12:52:39 | leakypipes | sean-k-mooney: I actually don't understand why kuryr-kubernetes is defining os-vif objects at all (versus just defining the things in os-vif itself) | |
| 12:53:17 | sean-k-mooney | leakypipes: they did not know that they were not ment too so they did it really early on | |
| 12:53:47 | leakypipes | sean-k-mooney: ok | |
| 12:53:55 | leakypipes | sean-k-mooney: can we undo that? :) | |
| 12:53:59 | sean-k-mooney | more recently the have added it to os-vif when i pointed out that it would break going forward if tehy didnt | |
| 12:54:11 | sean-k-mooney | get rid of there objects yes | |
| 12:54:39 | sean-k-mooney | i ment to do it in rocky but move from intel to redhat and didnt get around to it | |
| 12:55:26 | jangutter | sean-k-mooney, leakypipes: Re: ( https://review.openstack.org/#/c/607610/ ), I left the option open to do the "duelling options" right till the runway engages... mainly to keep progress unblocked, with the idea to update the spec with the decision made. | |
| 12:56:23 | sean-k-mooney | jangutter: i personally hate updateing spec retroactivly. so im happy to conceed just to avoid that | |
| 12:56:41 | sean-k-mooney | well almost | |
| 12:57:47 | jangutter | sean-k-mooney, leakypipes: I have been selling tickets, but I'm pretty sure I can track down the people and refund them with only a limited loss of kneecaps. | |
| 12:58:30 | sean-k-mooney | jangutter: if you want to continue the discussion over code review then we can | |
| 12:59:41 | sean-k-mooney | i would like to see if we can merge the spec soon however and move on to th code as we only have until midle of febuary to release os-vif and i would prefer to have this mered earlier then later. | |
| 12:59:46 | sean-k-mooney | e.g. the code | |
| 12:59:58 | jangutter | sean-k-mooney, leakypipes: on that note, do you think the spec is in a good enough shape for a wider review? | |
| 13:00:21 | jangutter | sean-k-mooney: agreed on that, want to fixup the code early next week to match the spec in any case. | |
| 13:01:58 | sean-k-mooney | jangutter: i would like to see if we can get an os-vif release in the next 2 weeks and alost another one at the end of january to give some time to test it with nova, so sound good. | |
| 13:02:20 | sean-k-mooney | jangutter: i think the spec i fine for wider review | |
| 13:05:22 | leakypipes | jangutter: I do, which is what I said in the review last night :) | |