Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-11-14
11:32:17 sean-k-mooney cold migrate and resize would both triger this. live migrate who knows
11:32:22 mdbooth logan-: At this point if you were a RH customer I'd ask you for sosreports.
11:32:54 mdbooth Basically I'd want to see full logs from the initial error which caused the root disk to be deleted.
11:33:32 mdbooth The subsequent error after the root disk has been deleted isn't all that interesting.
11:34:03 sean-k-mooney mdbooth: in theory this would alow apply to any missmatch in image backend right e.g. any combinantion lvm or image or rbd where the backend changes.
11:34:32 mdbooth sean-k-mooney: Yes. The code explicitly assumes that the layouts are identical on source and dest.
11:35:30 sean-k-mooney so this seams like something we should add to the host state object and then check in the scheuler in the future
11:35:44 logan- Ok I can pull more logs this afternoon. What would help? nova-compute in debug on both source & dest I’m guessing?
11:36:23 mdbooth logan-: Yep, specifically for the resize operation itself, not just the subsequent failure to boot
11:36:31 logan- Got it
11:36:35 logan- Will do. Thanks
11:40:41 mdbooth logan-: If you look in the instance directory on the destination you should find the root disk there
11:40:51 mdbooth logan-: Also, you should be able to revert resize
11:41:40 mdbooth I don't think we've actually deleted the root disk here, it's just that the dest is looking for it in the wrong place.
11:42:43 sean-k-mooney we might have deleted it on the source node
11:43:51 sean-k-mooney or do we not do that until we confirm and your guessing on revert it tries to find it using the location form the dest
11:45:09 mdbooth Not until confirm
11:45:20 mdbooth Revert will use the copy which remains on the source
11:46:29 mdbooth So actually I think this is just a case of extremely bad user experience. The operation isn't supported, but we could warn earlier rather than going down in flames. I don't believe any data has been lost.
11:47:03 mdbooth logan-: If ^^^ is correct, no need for those logs, btw.
11:56:42 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/rocky: Set defult value of num_nvme_discover_tries=5 https://review.openstack.org/608683
12:00:03 openstackgerrit Martin Midolesov proposed openstack/nova master: Allow driver to specify switch&port for faster lookup https://review.openstack.org/617695
12:52:40 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Use conductor groups to partition nova-compute services for Ironic https://review.openstack.org/609709
13:08:40 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Use external placement in functional tests https://review.openstack.org/617941
13:19:20 logan- updated the bug with additional details mdbooth
13:19:51 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Use external placement in functional tests https://review.openstack.org/617941
13:23:27 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Calculate port_id rp_uuid mapping for binding https://review.openstack.org/616239
13:23:27 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Pass allocations and traits to neturonv2 api https://review.openstack.org/616240
13:23:28 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Send RP uuid in the port binding https://review.openstack.org/569459
13:23:28 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Test boot with more ports with bandwidth request https://review.openstack.org/573317
13:26:09 mdbooth logan-: Can you retry the revert after setting instance state to 'resize_confirm' ?
13:32:18 ivaat hi i am seeking help for this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1801326
13:32:18 openstack Launchpad bug 1801326 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "CRITICAL keystonemiddleware.auth_token" [Undecided,New]
13:42:59 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Use external placement in functional tests https://review.openstack.org/617941
13:47:25 logan- mdbooth: I guess that will require database shenanigans? "openstack server set: error: argument --state: invalid choice: u'resize_confirm' (choose from 'active', 'error')"
13:50:51 mriedem logan-: heh, reset state won't allow you to set it back to VERIFY_RESIZE
13:50:58 mriedem so yes, db surgery
13:51:12 logan- ok i'll give it a shot
13:51:39 mriedem because you need to get to this https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/compute/api.py#L3506
13:53:56 ivaat hi! i am seeking help for this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1801326
13:53:56 openstack Launchpad bug 1801326 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "CRITICAL keystonemiddleware.auth_token" [Undecided,New]
13:54:04 ivaat i am sure it is bug
13:58:36 mriedem ivaat: see my comment in the bug, it's not a bug, unless you can investigate and prove otherwise
13:58:41 mriedem it looks like a misconfiguration
13:59:15 ivaat mriedem, well i attached nova.conf as well. tried user with logging in with same user. works
14:00:04 ivaat if it looks like misconfiguration then could you point out what part in config? i have gone trough config several times. followed official doc
14:00:38 mriedem see my comment on the bug
14:00:51 ivaat bug seems to be deleted
14:01:57 ivaat sry going directly with bug link i can see it now
14:02:49 ivaat mriedem, wtf. i just confirmed i have done this several times.. just take your time when helping. conf was attached to see what is wrong
14:03:36 logan- i tried hacking instances.vm_state='resized' and now it says "Instance has not been resized." so I guess there is some other state fields that need to be updated to hack it back to a revertable state
14:05:22 mriedem ivaat: i looked at the paste in the bug, i didn't see [keystone_authtoken] in there
14:07:31 mriedem logan-: so what did you do? vm was in error and you fixed the disk and tried to confirm again but that failed b/c it was in error rather than resized status?
14:07:37 ivaat at moment when i installed was no guide to add keystone_authtoken
14:07:55 mriedem ivaat: i don't know what install guide you were looking at
14:08:02 mriedem maybe something very old
14:09:12 ivaat alright, i will test it out
14:09:16 ivaat thx for now
14:10:15 aspiers[m] mriedem: does it make sense to aim for a quick hallway discussion about SEV while we're here? sean-k-mooney too if you're around
14:10:35 ivaat even nova conf is missing such keyword.. since it is section it should have been there
14:10:48 ivaat i think i got previous version conf
14:10:59 logan- mriedem: ya, resize -> error -> unable to revert resize due to error state
14:11:20 sean-k-mooney aspiers[m]: im not in berlin unfortunetly but im on irc
14:12:05 aspiers[m] sean-k-mooney: OK thanks. We can continue on the review of course, but feel free to ping me here too if you prefer
14:12:35 logan- So looking at how to revert the resize and return it back to the source node where the disk is still present in /var/lib/nova/instances/<uuid>_resize/*
14:12:36 sean-k-mooney if im needed i could dial in to a googel hangout but im sure there are enough people to sync up with to figure things out there without me
14:12:53 aspiers[m] I'm currently liasing with our SEV engineers and AMD's to get more clarity around the questions you guys raised
14:15:08 aspiers[m] guessing a hangout won't be needed but will certainly let you know if I'm wrong
14:15:36 sean-k-mooney aspiers[m]: ok just read your responces. if we can just document what will work and what wont then im more or less happy.
14:16:11 sean-k-mooney aspiers[m]: im also fine with an fix constatin + vm ram + video ram
14:16:19 aspiers[m] sean-k-mooney: absolutely - next patch set should give much more clarity over what is expected to work vs. not
14:16:25 sean-k-mooney but if we go that way i would make the constant a config value
14:16:56 aspiers[m] OK that sounds like a good idea as a short-term workaround until qemu exposes that calculation
14:17:42 aspiers[m] so you mean a fixed configurable value for the overhead per VM, right? so <hard_limit> would be calculated as flavor ram plus that value
14:17:54 sean-k-mooney the issue is qemu cant really know this up front as it depends on several things that can cahgne at runtime and from version to version
14:18:18 aspiers[m] possibly with an adjustment if guest video ram is specified via extra specs or image props
14:18:43 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Use external placement in functional tests https://review.openstack.org/617941
14:18:52 sean-k-mooney aspiers[m]: ya it could be a config value for the over head or a flavor extraspec
14:19:29 sean-k-mooney just some way to reduce or increase the 512 without code change if we mesuer it is too big or two small later
14:19:56 sean-k-mooney so it would be ram + video ram + a configurable constat overhead
14:20:40 sean-k-mooney that said i think we do this somewhere already
14:23:44 sean-k-mooney aspiers[m]: we support setting the hardlimit in https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/88951ca98e1b286b58aa1ad94f9af40b8260c01f/nova/virt/libvirt/config.py#L2102-L2133 and i belive we use it for realtime instances
14:25:00 aspiers[m] sean-k-mooney: ah yeah, I guess probably for the same reason (memory pinning)
14:25:57 sean-k-mooney aspiers[m]: yes we use it so we can memlock the memory for realtime instaces. also all hugepage backed instace will also have the hugepages memlocked which we use for ovs-dpdk so it can do dma into the guest memory
14:29:32 sean-k-mooney im trying not to be angry about the fact that apparently we only use this in unit tests.... http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=hard_limit&i=nope&files=&repos=nova
14:30:05 aspiers[m] haha :)
14:31:13 sean-k-mooney aspiers[m]: well the code is there for you to use...
14:34:37 aspiers[m] indeed. I don't think the actual coding is gonna be too hard
15:21:53 mriedem dansmith: so belmiro gave me another issue to worry about, for which he's going to open a bug. they drop the allocation candidates limit down to 10 to make scheduling faster, but they also at times disable a large number of computes in a cell for $reasons (mnaser also does that for load balancing the cloud); the problem then is b/c of the low alloc candidates limit, placement gives back 10 disabled computes and gets novalidhost
15:22:08 mriedem to workaround it he set reserved = total for inventory in placement on the disabled nodes,
15:22:12 mriedem but that sucks for hundreds of vms
15:22:20 dansmith ouch
15:22:24 mriedem i suggested a pre-request placement filter to somehow filter out disabled nodes
15:22:40 mriedem maybe forbidden trait/aggregate, idk
15:22:48 dansmith hmm
15:22:59 dansmith they disable compute or disable a cell?
15:23:04 dansmith *computes
15:23:08 sean-k-mooney mriedem: i was going to say yes tag with a trait and use forbindin traits but then we are using placmeent to sotre metadata
15:24:34 dansmith mriedem: I think the right thing to do is to make placement results better so they don't need such a tiny result set to mitigate performance issues
15:24:42 dansmith but, regardless of what that number is, the same problem could happen

Earlier   Later