Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-10-31
13:30:31 spatel__ hmm! i will take a look and see thanks sean-k-mooney
13:31:18 smcginnis sean-k-mooney: ack
13:31:28 smcginnis I'll wait a bit and see what melwitt has to say
13:32:03 sean-k-mooney melwitt: she is usually online about 2-3 hours form now
13:32:18 sean-k-mooney i dont think the us have change form daylight saving yet right
13:33:27 smcginnis Nope, this coming Sunday morning.
13:34:18 sean-k-mooney you know im looking forward to the eu scraping daylight saving if for no other reason then to get rid of this stupid 1 week difference with the us
13:35:40 sean-k-mooney its worse for them i suppose if they have eu time zone meeting then it is for eu people but it always causes meeting issues
14:04:41 bauzas smcginnis: sean-k-mooney: hola, how can I help ?
14:06:07 sean-k-mooney bauzas: is there any reaosn to not release os-vif now?
14:06:21 sean-k-mooney bauzas: we were wondering if there was something you wanted to wait for.
14:06:28 bauzas sean-k-mooney: because of your concerns about some bugfixes not yet merged
14:06:53 bauzas but tbc, I'm fine with releasing os-vif now
14:07:25 bauzas sean-k-mooney: you said "i likely will have more patches related to these later in the cycle but those would be dependent on change to the neutron api that i dont expect to backport and are not actully required for the mitigation they just remove the need for the config option going forward.if we dont include them in this release its fine too but i would likely hope to do a 1.12.1 before the end of the year to pick them up if
14:07:25 bauzas dont include them in 1.12.0"
14:07:47 bauzas sean-k-mooney: that's why I said we could just release a bit later if you needed
14:07:49 sean-k-mooney ok. since i was not get much review on those patches we suggested going with 1.12
14:07:59 bauzas okay, then fine with me
14:08:09 bauzas smcginnis: ^
14:09:36 bauzas sean-k-mooney: smcginnis: I commended on the release change
14:09:52 smcginnis bauzas, sean-k-mooney: Ack, thanks for the clarifying. We can process this one for now and do another in the near future if we need to get that CVE out.
14:09:59 bauzas ++
14:24:05 ash_williams dansmith: want to push these backports over the line for that live migration mtu fix? https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bug/1800511+status:open
14:24:13 openstackgerrit Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova master: Modify get_by_cell_and_project() to get_not_deleted_by_cell_and_project() https://review.openstack.org/607663
14:24:13 openstackgerrit Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova master: Minimal construct plumbing for nova list when a cell is down https://review.openstack.org/567785
14:24:14 openstackgerrit Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova master: Refactor scatter-gather utility to return exception objects https://review.openstack.org/607934
14:24:14 openstackgerrit Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova master: Minimal construct plumbing for nova show when a cell is down https://review.openstack.org/591658
14:24:15 openstackgerrit Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova master: Minimal construct plumbing for nova service-list when a cell is down https://review.openstack.org/584829
14:24:51 dansmith ash_williams: is this your halloween costume?
14:24:57 ash_williams yes
14:25:00 ash_williams groovy
14:25:15 dansmith ash_williams: we had a sportsball question for you and thought you weren't arond
14:25:47 dansmith ash_williams: lyarwood and artom and I would like clarification if this is an incorrect statement: "otherwise we... fumble your field goal"
14:25:49 dansmith here's what I said:
14:25:57 dansmith [07:10:06] <dansmith>you fumble a pass, IIUC
14:25:58 dansmith [07:10:24] <dansmith>and a field goal is a kick, which involves no passing
14:26:00 dansmith amirite?
14:26:05 ash_williams you can fumble a run
14:26:10 dansmith WAT
14:26:13 ash_williams but yes you can't fumble a kick
14:26:15 ash_williams that's just dumb
14:26:27 ash_williams a fumble is when anyone carrying the ball drops it
14:26:36 cdent can't the ball holder fumble?
14:26:40 ash_williams yes
14:26:45 cdent (I mean when holding for the kick)
14:26:47 dansmith ash_williams: so lyarwood argued you could fumble the snap to the kicker during a FG
14:26:58 ash_williams you could botch the snap
14:27:07 dansmith is that a fumble though?
14:27:08 ash_williams which i guess technically could be a fumble
14:27:14 lyarwood \o/
14:27:18 artom These are just guttural noises to me
14:27:22 dansmith I thought fumble was like a terminal state for a play which determined what you could do next
14:27:25 artom Botch a snap? Fumble a run?
14:27:33 dansmith artom: yeah it's all BS :)
14:27:34 jangutter artom: you called?
14:27:52 artom jangutter, hah, no :D
14:28:18 artom jangutter, if you ever start a music career though, that's your name
14:28:21 artom Guttural Noises
14:28:30 jangutter artom: hehe, I collect pictures of plumbers ("Mr. Gutter", "Dr. Gutter")
14:29:01 jangutter artom: wide array of fall-back careers available to me :-p
14:29:48 artom You could also have "Initial Resting place of Edgar Allan Poe", but that doesn't scale
14:30:44 ash_williams https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fumble
14:31:06 ash_williams "A muff occurs where a player drops a ball that he does not have possession of, such as while attempting to catch a lateral pass or improperly fielding a kicking play such as a punt (you cannot "fumble" a loose ball)."
14:31:39 ash_williams so idk
14:31:48 ash_williams like most things in the nfl, the rules are confusing as hell
14:31:52 artom Oh great, more troglodyte gurglings
14:32:27 artom Muff the ball, punt the pass
14:33:16 cdent muff?
14:33:32 cdent where's gmann to bewilder us with cricket terms
14:34:44 jangutter yorker? googly?
14:37:31 ash_williams dansmith: and this one rounds out rocky i think so we can do a release https://review.openstack.org/#/c/614302/
14:37:35 artom Only one cricket term I know: zzzzz
14:38:58 gmann :) fumble can be used differently in every inning of cricket- batting or bowling or fielding.
14:48:49 ash_williams stable/rocky review needed here as well https://review.openstack.org/#/c/612293/
14:49:06 ash_williams lyarwood: i'm guessing you want these in stable yeah? https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bug/1784353+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
14:50:05 lyarwood ash_williams: yes please, I'll review later this afternoon
14:50:39 ash_williams johnthetubaguy: you should look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/609043/
14:50:41 ash_williams it's stable only
14:50:48 ash_williams related to ironic flavor migration for custom resource classes
14:51:04 ash_williams cern needs it and i'm assuming others will as well
14:53:32 ash_williams bauzas: can you get these backports? https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bug/1797580+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
14:54:00 bauzas ash_williams: sure I can take a look
14:56:58 openstackgerrit Maciej Jozefczyk proposed openstack/nova master: Force refresh instance info_cache during heal https://review.openstack.org/591607
14:56:59 openstackgerrit Maciej Jozefczyk proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Add fill_virtual_interface_list online_data_migration script https://review.openstack.org/614167
15:05:28 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/rocky: Explain cpu_model_extra_flags and nested guest support https://review.openstack.org/609789
15:08:07 tssurya mriedem: will my os_compute_api:servers:create:cell_down also need a microversion bump (of course if it needs I intend to put it in the same version as the API changes)? asking because I see you didn't bump for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/561284/ and you mention why you haven't in the commit, just that I don't understand it probably because I am not aware of the change history.
15:08:28 tssurya but just wanted to confirm if the down cell policy change needs a bump or not
15:10:24 ash_williams alex_xu: stephenfin: replied in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/613126/
15:11:04 ash_williams tssurya: the down cell stuff needs a new microversion yes
15:11:09 ash_williams https://review.openstack.org/#/c/561284/ is related to a cve bug fix
15:11:29 ash_williams a microversion isn't needed for that because a malicious user would just circumvent it by requesting v2.1
15:11:43 stephenfin ash_williams: It's not even Friday
15:11:50 ash_williams no but it's halloween
15:12:19 tssurya ash_williams: oh you are mriedem :) ?
15:12:26 ash_williams yes
15:12:35 tssurya ash_williams: heh but thanks for answering
15:20:33 ash_williams i need another core to +W a regression test for a bug https://review.openstack.org/#/c/608771/ - everything else stacked up on top is +W
15:29:59 bauzas ash_williams: on it
15:50:18 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: Add functional recreate test for bug 1799727 https://review.openstack.org/614563
15:50:18 openstack bug 1799727 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "CPU_Allocation_Ratio from nova.conf doesn't update exisiting providers" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1799727 - Assigned to Matt Riedemann (mriedem)

Earlier   Later