| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-10-18 | |||
| 17:16:32 | dansmith | or windows 98 | |
| 17:16:53 | sean-k-mooney | centos 5 hates virtio block devices for root disks... | |
| 17:17:17 | sean-k-mooney | i think anything pre windows 7 did not ship virtio driver by default | |
| 17:17:29 | sean-k-mooney | well vista might have | |
| 17:20:01 | dansmith | I didn't know any did | |
| 17:20:03 | dansmith | that's major progress | |
| 17:20:38 | imacdonn | yeah, I didn't think Windows came with any VirtIO drivers either | |
| 17:21:45 | imacdonn | I do know that the drivers have a vendor ID associated with them, and that matters for Windows Update .. because Oracle has our version, which has a different vendor ID than the Red Hat / Fedora ones | |
| 17:21:52 | sean-k-mooney | windows 10 does i belive 7 and 8 both require installation duuring install time either from an iso or a web share but i was under teh impression you could donwloading from windows update during install | |
| 17:23:15 | sean-k-mooney | imacdonn: the vendor id and prodoct id for virtio devices is an oasis standard now as far as i am aware | |
| 17:23:45 | sean-k-mooney | imacdonn: yep https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/ | |
| 17:29:02 | cfriesen | does anyone know how we handle UEFI NVRAM over shelve/unshelve? I'm guessing it's currently lost, the same way it's lost over cold migration and resize. | |
| 18:02:38 | openstackgerrit | Chris Friesen proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add support for emulated virtual TPM https://review.openstack.org/571111 | |
| 18:16:21 | imacdonn | mriedem: re backporting https://review.openstack.org/608091 ... I'd like to... I wonder if we need to do anything special, like a further release note that says that this changed after the initial release, or something.... | |
| 18:17:48 | mriedem | there is already an upgrade release note on it saying there is a new return code | |
| 18:18:33 | imacdonn | yeah. I'm just pondering that it wasn't part of the original release ... I may be overthinking it | |
| 18:19:32 | mriedem | original release...being whenever online_data_migrations was added? | |
| 18:19:53 | mriedem | i think you're overthinking it | |
| 18:20:12 | imacdonn | no, I mean, when Rocky was released, this change was not part of it .. but it's going to magically appear in an update release | |
| 18:20:55 | mriedem | idk, we could just signal that by bumping the minor version on the release rather than the patch version | |
| 18:23:02 | imacdonn | that seems like a reasonable idea ... probably won't make much difference in reality, but trying to do the right thing | |
| 18:24:59 | imacdonn | it looks like a clean CP for Rocky ... a couple of easy conflicts for Queens .. haven't tried to go further than that yet | |
| 18:32:02 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Document each libvirt.sysinfo_serial choice https://review.openstack.org/611426 | |
| 18:32:28 | openstackgerrit | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: Handle volume API failure in _post_live_migration https://review.openstack.org/611093 | |
| 18:38:06 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Make CellDatabases fixture reentrant https://review.openstack.org/611665 | |
| 18:38:06 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Modify get_by_cell_and_project() to get_not_deleted_by_cell_and_project() https://review.openstack.org/607663 | |
| 18:38:07 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Return a minimal construct for nova list when a cell is down https://review.openstack.org/567785 | |
| 18:38:07 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Refactor scatter-gather utility to return exception objects https://review.openstack.org/607934 | |
| 18:38:08 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Return a minimal construct for nova show when a cell is down https://review.openstack.org/591658 | |
| 18:38:08 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Return a minimal construct for nova service-list when a cell is down https://review.openstack.org/584829 | |
| 18:39:15 | dansmith | I don't think that fixes all the tests, but a bunch, and figure it'll be quicker to let zuul have a crack at it | |
| 18:40:44 | melwitt | what a slacker | |
| 18:57:59 | mriedem | dansmith: thinking out loud on how to break up my cross-cell-resize patch, i'm thinking: db model changes, versioned objects, compute (manager/rpc), compute API and then conductor at the end. API before conductor because conductor is what will set the Migration.cross_cell_move flag that makes the flow change. sound sane? everything else in the API is keyed off that migration.cross_cell_move flag. | |
| 19:18:25 | openstackgerrit | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add spec for sriov live migration https://review.openstack.org/605116 | |
| 19:18:40 | dansmith | mriedem: sure | |
| 19:20:28 | mriedem | artom: can you just fix the comment nit in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/587439/ and then i'm +2 | |
| 19:23:31 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Cross-cell resize https://review.openstack.org/603930 | |
| 19:26:35 | openstackgerrit | iain MacDonnell proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: Handle online_data_migrations exceptions https://review.openstack.org/611701 | |
| 19:26:54 | eandersson | Why is the api version part of the endpoint in keystone? Is this a requirement or just a best practice? | |
| 19:27:04 | eandersson | > "$nova_api_url/v2.1" | |
| 19:27:23 | artom | mriedem, yep, thank you :) Who can we pester for your patch below mine? (This is another downstream pressure type situation) | |
| 19:27:48 | mriedem | probably one of the many red hat cores | |
| 19:28:03 | melwitt | haha, yeah. I was gonna say, you can pester me | |
| 19:28:09 | mriedem | eandersson: good question for mordred | |
| 19:28:41 | mordred | I didn't do it | |
| 19:28:45 | eandersson | :D | |
| 19:29:05 | artom | melwitt, consider yourself pestered :D | |
| 19:29:14 | melwitt | :) | |
| 19:29:28 | mordred | eandersson: either $nova_api_url/v2.1 or $nova_api_url should totally work with keystoneauth/openstacksdk/shade | |
| 19:29:46 | mordred | eandersson: I think there are some older things out there that assume the thing in the catalog has the version appended | |
| 19:30:29 | mordred | but for nova I believe most of them do the right thing either way | |
| 19:30:41 | eandersson | So there might be an edge case that does not handle it properly | |
| 19:30:58 | mordred | I *personally* prefer unversioned endpoint in catalog because putting versioned endpoint in catalog is what got us into the wole volumev2 volumev3 service-type mess | |
| 19:31:41 | mordred | but I'm pretty sure nova isn't going to have a new major version in the new future, so putting a versioned nova endpoint in the catalog should be fine | |
| 19:31:56 | mordred | hopefully you're enjoying how I'm not giving you an answer at all | |
| 19:33:40 | eandersson | Yea I agree on unversioned | |
| 19:33:50 | eandersson | It's also causing minor issues for us with a api proxy | |
| 19:34:00 | eandersson | but might just be my lack of knowledge on nginx | |
| 19:34:46 | eandersson | hehe | |
| 19:49:54 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add nova-status upgrade check for consoles https://review.openstack.org/611214 | |
| 19:49:55 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add rolling upgrade info to enable_consoleauth workaround reno https://review.openstack.org/611218 | |
| 20:10:30 | openstackgerrit | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: Ensure attachment cleanup on failure in driver.pre_live_migration https://review.openstack.org/587439 | |
| 20:10:35 | artom | mriedem, ^^ | |
| 20:15:05 | artom | Cheerio :) | |
| 20:36:48 | mriedem | efried: gibi: hoowee i just went through https://review.openstack.org/#/c/606050/ | |
| 20:36:50 | mriedem | kind of a doozy | |
| 20:37:29 | mriedem | dansmith: i believe ^ will mean that if we ever go down the non-migration-based allocation cleanup route on a same-host resize, we'll wipe out all allocations for the instance, including for the old_flavor | |
| 20:37:44 | mriedem | but, i'm not sure how possible that is today unless you have <queens computes in a cell | |
| 20:37:49 | mriedem | which shouldn't happen if you're running stein | |
| 20:37:53 | tonyb | mriedem: Oh gosh that's a question ... I'll research it and see | |
| 20:38:04 | mriedem | tonyb: i forgot the question | |
| 20:38:37 | tonyb | mriedem: is emulatedTPM supported on kvm on power | |
| 20:38:44 | mriedem | oh | |
| 20:39:04 | tonyb | I have the spec open and I'll go read some code when I get off this meeting | |
| 20:40:28 | mriedem | i'm going to shift gears and do something fun like delete the caching scheduler | |
| 20:57:26 | efried | mriedem: Left responses to some of your queries. The main one I can't answer, though. | |
| 20:57:49 | mriedem | where do babies come from? | |
| 20:57:50 | mriedem | that one? | |
| 21:03:49 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Merge image_size extension response into image view builder https://review.openstack.org/606845 | |
| 21:12:30 | cdent | mriedem: do you recall if somebody already thought about postgresql with regard to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/611115/ ? Since it is a group by it might cause the "must appear in the GROUP BY" error. But I can't remember if that only happens if you use an agg function. | |
| 21:13:07 | cdent | So I started a check experimental on it, but then realized the tempest-pg-full won't run the functional tests that exercise the problem. Is there anything else that will? | |
| 21:13:26 | mriedem | nope | |
| 21:13:44 | mriedem | the only mysql/pg-specific stuff that runs in func/unit tests are the schema migration tests | |
| 21:14:18 | mriedem | the alternative is using DISTINCT in there as efried pointed out | |
| 21:15:07 | efried | I tried ^ locally and it worked, but no idea what that means. | |
| 21:15:18 | efried | I've been wanting to ask jay what the difference is. | |
| 21:15:39 | efried | He +2d the change, so he must've thought GROUP BY was fine, but... | |
| 21:16:13 | cdent | it's perfectly fine as is for mysql, but _might_ be a problem for pg | |
| 21:17:35 | cdent | I can poke at it (/me looks at queue ... ) Monday if nobody else wants/needs to. mriedem do you think this will tickle the problem? | |
| 21:18:02 | cdent | as in: do we need to care about this? | |
| 21:18:47 | mriedem | what will tickle the problem? | |
| 21:19:11 | mriedem | i don't know enough about group by rules for pg | |
| 21:19:41 | mriedem | you could probably recreate it with just placement and a pg db, | |
| 21:20:05 | mriedem | by having a consumer with >1 allocation against a resource provider and there not being any consumers table record for the allocations | |
| 21:20:09 | mriedem | so just hack it up manually | |
| 21:22:23 | cdent | What I meant was: is this the type of group by that postgresql will wail at? It will be easy enough to mess with manually. But for me, I won't have time before Monday | |
| 21:23:20 | mriedem | i don't know the answer to that | |
| 21:23:38 | mriedem | zzzeek_ might know off the top of his head | |
| 21:26:33 | cdent | i've left a note on the review, if nothing happens before next week, I'll dig | |
| 22:02:32 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove the CachingScheduler https://review.openstack.org/611723 | |