| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-09-28 | |||
| 12:30:57 | mriedem | lyarwood: can you hit these rocky backports? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/605260/ | |
| 12:31:03 | mriedem | need to keep that revert train moving | |
| 12:34:17 | kashyap | mriedem: He's on PTO this week, IIRC. Swimming in beer in Germany | |
| 12:34:45 | mriedem | what's bauzas' excuse? | |
| 12:34:46 | kashyap | https://www.oktoberfest.de/en/ | |
| 12:35:04 | kashyap | mriedem: It's France. They work in between holidays :D | |
| 12:35:44 | kashyap | Frankly, Belgium is no slouch either! I'll admit, for the last 3 years I didn't even use half my PTO. | |
| 12:36:00 | mriedem | johnthetubaguy: if you're around can you hit those rocky backports? starting at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/605260/ | |
| 12:37:13 | kashyap | mriedem: BTW, thanks for this detailed commit message and the fix! -- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/567630/ ("check image type before removing snapshots in _cleanup_resize") | |
| 12:37:22 | johnthetubaguy | mriedem: will take a look | |
| 12:37:50 | mriedem | kashyap: sure, that's from awhile back | |
| 12:37:57 | mriedem | oh | |
| 12:38:19 | kashyap | mriedem: Yeah, I know. I just appreciate the references, and "thinking out loud". | |
| 12:38:36 | kashyap | If you have an Amazon wishlist (not too expensive!) or some such, do post a link :D | |
| 12:40:09 | mriedem | i'll just take a root bier in DE | |
| 12:41:03 | kashyap | mriedem: Ah, you'll be in Berlin | |
| 12:41:17 | kashyap | Never heard of root bier. /me looks up | |
| 12:41:36 | mriedem | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root_beer | |
| 12:42:15 | kashyap | Ah, it's a soft drink. | |
| 12:42:59 | kashyap | (Actually the page clarifies it can be a 'hard' drink, too.) | |
| 12:43:48 | johnthetubaguy | mriedem: seems that commit got into queens and pike too, did we get the revert up for those yet? | |
| 12:44:40 | mriedem | johnthetubaguy: yup | |
| 12:44:41 | mriedem | hence the train | |
| 12:45:07 | johnthetubaguy | ah, right | |
| 12:47:21 | kashyap | Unrelated: If anyone here has any complaints / wishlist with libvirt & QEMU, feel free to type here (or https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-libvirt-qemu). FWIW, next month I'll be in Edinburgh (KVM Forum / Open Source Summit), at the gathering of KVM / QEMU / libvirt folks. | |
| 12:49:00 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova stable/ocata: unquiesce instance after quiesce failure https://review.openstack.org/605884 | |
| 12:52:35 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Add microversion 2.67 to support ``volume_type`` https://review.openstack.org/605573 | |
| 12:58:42 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Add compute version 36 to support ``volume_type`` https://review.openstack.org/579360 | |
| 13:05:03 | PapaOurs | mriedem: I'm here y' know | |
| 13:08:14 | PapaOurs | I mean, even if mriedem can't find my friday nick, who else ? | |
| 13:08:21 | PapaOurs | if even* | |
| 13:11:19 | mriedem | i can't keep track | |
| 13:13:26 | mriedem | johnthetubaguy: PapaOurs: while you're here, in case you haven't seen the thread, we're due to EM the ocata branch, | |
| 13:13:46 | mriedem | so i'm trying to flush through what ocata backports we have so we can do a final release before we tag the branch as EM, | |
| 13:13:52 | mriedem | which means we don't do releases of it after that point | |
| 13:13:57 | PapaOurs | gotcha | |
| 13:14:12 | mriedem | this will mean needing to flush the stuff in rocky/queens/pike first, since some of the ocata backports are also open on those other branches | |
| 13:14:26 | PapaOurs | I've seen a couple of changes in terms of relmgmt but I missed this one | |
| 13:14:27 | mriedem | i'll work on making an etherpad today and send something to the dev list, nova-specific, so we can burn that down next week | |
| 13:14:39 | PapaOurs | mriedem: good idea | |
| 13:14:40 | johnthetubaguy | mriedem: so that is end maintenance rather than extend maintenance? | |
| 13:15:00 | mriedem | johnthetubaguy: it just means we're allowed to let ocata rot at that point if we want | |
| 13:15:01 | PapaOurs | johnthetubaguy: it's basically the signal that we won't EOL but we won't also release | |
| 13:15:04 | mriedem | it's not in active maintenance | |
| 13:15:15 | johnthetubaguy | ah, got it | |
| 13:15:24 | mriedem | https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html#extended-maintenance | |
| 13:15:50 | PapaOurs | mriedem: do we have some deadline for Ocata being EM ? | |
| 13:15:57 | PapaOurs | mriedem: trying to find the email you mention | |
| 13:16:58 | mriedem | https://releases.openstack.org/ | |
| 13:17:05 | mriedem | Extended Maintenance estimated 2018-08-27 | |
| 13:17:20 | PapaOurs | oh fun | |
| 13:17:21 | mriedem | like most things for stable, it's a guideline for the timeline, but we're always slow to get around to eol | |
| 13:17:35 | PapaOurs | I see, so the sooner is the better | |
| 13:17:51 | mriedem | well, the sooner we EM, the sooner we can stop caring as much about ocata | |
| 13:17:58 | mriedem | not that most people probably care that much about it right now | |
| 13:18:10 | PapaOurs | some people care, but they're paid to care :) | |
| 13:18:29 | mriedem | like jroll? | |
| 13:18:37 | mriedem | jroll: does oath even pick up fixes from upstream stable? | |
| 13:18:39 | PapaOurs | like above my shoulders | |
| 13:19:17 | jroll | mriedem: yes, we build our packages from latest upstream branch + patches | |
| 13:20:22 | PapaOurs | jroll: I guess you have downstream branches too ? | |
| 13:20:49 | PapaOurs | so, EM isn't really a problem for you, right? | |
| 13:20:54 | jroll | PapaOurs: we keep a repo of patches in `git format-patch` format that we apply, yes | |
| 13:20:56 | jroll | I mean | |
| 13:21:11 | jroll | we can handle it ourselves if ocata disappears | |
| 13:21:18 | PapaOurs | that's my point | |
| 13:21:24 | jroll | but we'd prefer to push any bugfixes back to share with others | |
| 13:21:38 | PapaOurs | or you can continue to feed the branch, if you will, that's the intent of EM | |
| 13:21:52 | PapaOurs | it's just that it becomes out of the nova-stable team control | |
| 13:22:09 | jroll | right | |
| 13:22:27 | jroll | PapaOurs: I can't tell if you're trying to answer a question or what? | |
| 13:22:33 | jroll | :) | |
| 13:22:39 | mdbooth | mriedem: Just looking at your comment on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/604400/. Did that job even get as far as running the evacuate test? | |
| 13:22:47 | mdbooth | Looks like it had tempest failures, no? | |
| 13:23:00 | mriedem | mdbooth: it did for the local storage/lvm phase | |
| 13:23:08 | mdbooth | Ah... | |
| 13:23:09 | PapaOurs | jroll: no, no, my point is that I don't see a reason why we should continue to have Ocata maintained by us upstream | |
| 13:23:25 | mriedem | then ceph + live migration failed b/c i don't think we bring one of the computes back up after the evacuate run in the first phase and wait for it to be ready before switching to ceph | |
| 13:23:35 | PapaOurs | jroll: so, even if people care of Ocata for various reasons, EM will still be there | |
| 13:23:43 | mdbooth | mriedem: K. I'll go look harder. | |
| 13:24:53 | jroll | PapaOurs: yeah, I don't think anyone is disagreeing there | |
| 13:25:56 | mdbooth | echo '2. NFS testing is skipped due to setup failures with Ubuntu 16.04' | |
| 13:25:56 | mdbooth | #echo '2. test with NFS for root + ephemeral disks' | |
| 13:26:00 | mdbooth | There's my nfs testing :) | |
| 13:43:16 | _ix | Good morning, folks. I'm trying to validate my openstack installation with tempest, and although my machines are instantiating more-or-less correctly, metadata fails to be verified: `http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/public-ipv4 is empty` | |
| 13:43:51 | _ix | On existing, functional machines, trying to access that same endpoint is indeed empty. Is there something I'm missing here? | |
| 13:48:47 | openstackgerrit | Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add hide server address tests in test_serversV21.py https://review.openstack.org/605435 | |
| 13:53:29 | mdbooth | dansmith: lazy load of a field from a deleted object? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/604400/5 | |
| 13:54:11 | mriedem | mdbooth: that's been fixed | |
| 13:54:23 | mriedem | well, something related to that has been fixed | |
| 13:54:56 | mriedem | https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/objects/instance.py#L900 | |
| 13:55:13 | mriedem | https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/6ba8a35825a7ec839b2d0aab7559351d573130ab | |
| 13:55:19 | mriedem | but that's generic attributes, which flavor is not | |
| 13:55:41 | mriedem | https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/objects/instance.py#L958 | |
| 13:56:51 | mriedem | ah yup http://logs.openstack.org/00/604400/5/check/nova-live-migration/6aa7a4b/logs/subnode-2/screen-n-cpu.txt.gz#_Sep_26_23_53_06_475005 | |
| 13:57:32 | mriedem | mdbooth: good call | |
| 13:57:35 | mriedem | do we have a bug for that? | |
| 13:58:23 | mdbooth | mriedem: Haven't checked. I wrote that comment up in a panic as I'm about to be late for a meeting ;) | |
| 14:00:45 | mriedem | i'll look | |
| 14:00:54 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: Null out instance.availability_zone on shelve offload https://review.openstack.org/606086 | |