| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-09-16 | |||
| 19:12:56 | openstackgerrit | Vlad Gusev proposed openstack/nova stable/queens: Fix service list for disabled compute using MC driver https://review.openstack.org/592311 | |
| 19:56:24 | openstackgerrit | Alex Xu proposed openstack/nova master: add caching to _build_regex_range https://review.openstack.org/599071 | |
| 20:50:11 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Rename changes-since test sample file https://review.openstack.org/602522 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2018-09-17 | |||
| 00:02:29 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: add caching to _build_regex_range https://review.openstack.org/599071 | |
| 01:16:40 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add post-test hook for testing evacuate https://review.openstack.org/602174 | |
| 01:45:23 | openstackgerrit | Tao Li proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Remove the unused instance-name https://review.openstack.org/602520 | |
| 02:48:20 | openstackgerrit | Naichuan Sun proposed openstack/nova master: xenapi(N-R-P): support compute node resource provider update https://review.openstack.org/521041 | |
| 06:59:32 | openstackgerrit | huanhongda proposed openstack/nova master: Fix instance delete stuck in deleting task_state https://review.openstack.org/598084 | |
| 07:02:59 | gibi | good morning | |
| 07:04:20 | openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.openstack.org/601047 | |
| 07:28:33 | bauzas | good morning nova | |
| 07:40:20 | gibi | bauzas: good morning | |
| 07:40:44 | gibi | bauzas: I'm still working on the rebase of the nested allocation candidate patch series. I hope I can push it today | |
| 07:40:52 | bauzas | gibi: good morning, hope you're not too jetlaggued | |
| 07:41:03 | bauzas | gibi: no worries, I was doing the same | |
| 07:41:14 | gibi | bauzas: I'm pretty OK actually. Yesteday I slept 15 hours in a row | |
| 07:41:17 | bauzas | gibi: and I need to understand tetsuro's changes | |
| 07:41:20 | bauzas | wow | |
| 07:41:31 | bauzas | I'm happy for you | |
| 07:41:51 | bauzas | for me, I looked for 5 mins where my keys were in my car when going back from the school | |
| 07:42:30 | bauzas | but then I saw they were still on the door... | |
| 07:42:41 | gibi | :) jetlag is a nasty thing | |
| 07:42:57 | bauzas | :) | |
| 07:43:36 | gibi | I had my moment yesterday too. I forget like 3 times that I left half of the grocery in the car | |
| 07:44:02 | gibi | the first day is always about survival :) | |
| 07:44:05 | bauzas | lol | |
| 08:15:03 | openstackgerrit | huanhongda proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: Fix bug case by none token context https://review.openstack.org/603044 | |
| 08:34:21 | kashyap | Does this require a release note, because we're changing the default? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/602592/ ("libvirt: Use 'virt' as the default machine type for ARMv7") | |
| 08:43:33 | bauzas | kashyap: I'd tend to say yes, there is an upgrade impact AFAICS | |
| 08:44:02 | kashyap | bauzas: Yeah, let me add a note. But I have no clue how many (if at all) use ARMv7 | |
| 08:44:09 | kashyap | bauzas: Thanks for the view! | |
| 08:45:43 | bauzas | kashyap: existing guests wouldn't be changed tho, right? | |
| 08:46:02 | kashyap | bauzas: It will be *only* if: | |
| 08:46:25 | kashyap | (a) Upgrade Nova with this patch; (b) Start and stop the guest -- then, it will pick up this new machine type. | |
| 08:46:34 | bauzas | yeah of course | |
| 08:46:37 | bauzas | or rebuild | |
| 08:46:37 | kashyap | bauzas: So, it won't affect a running guest under its feet. | |
| 08:46:43 | kashyap | bauzas: Yep. | |
| 08:47:28 | bauzas | kashyap: I'm trying to put my feet into app developer shoes | |
| 08:47:53 | bauzas | kashyap: I imagine I would be surprised if my guest architecture would be different, hence the relnote | |
| 08:48:33 | kashyap | bauzas: Sure. So I'll add an upgrade note. Fine with you? | |
| 08:48:44 | bauzas | kashyap: yup | |
| 08:48:51 | kashyap | Thanks for looking. | |
| 08:58:09 | johnthetubaguy | +1 on the upgrade note, sounds like the correct call | |
| 09:00:27 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: interesting questions came up at the PTG around SEV (https://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#sev) | |
| 09:00:38 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: I was wondering if you had plans around that already? | |
| 09:00:40 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: Hi there, haven't seen you in a while | |
| 09:01:03 | johnthetubaguy | yeah, busy working with users these days, in a nice way | |
| 09:01:09 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: I am peripherally aware of SEV, as I've seen those patches fly by on QEMU and libvirt lists | |
| 09:01:17 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: Nice | |
| 09:01:31 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: But I don't have plans for that, I'm afraid. My plate is just too full for the next two months. | |
| 09:01:53 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Consumer gen support for delete instance allocations https://review.openstack.org/591597 | |
| 09:01:54 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Consumer gen support for put allocations https://review.openstack.org/591647 | |
| 09:01:54 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Consumer gen: remove_provider_from_instance_allocation https://review.openstack.org/591784 | |
| 09:01:55 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: consumer gen: move_allocations https://review.openstack.org/591810 | |
| 09:01:56 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: consumer gen: more tests for delete allocation cases https://review.openstack.org/591811 | |
| 09:01:56 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: consumer gen: support claim_resources https://review.openstack.org/583667 | |
| 09:02:48 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: Is there an Etherpad discusion about SEV at the PTG? | |
| 09:03:15 | gibi | bauzas: rebase for the consumer gen support is up ^^ | |
| 09:03:17 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: nothing much of interest, its in the main etherpad, I think it was clear non of us really know how to expose it yet | |
| 09:03:26 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: On this I presume? -- https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-ptg-stein | |
| 09:03:33 | gibi | bauzas: I continue with the nested a_c support rebase | |
| 09:03:35 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: yeah, thats the one | |
| 09:04:09 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: Damned if I can find the relevant line (`grep`ed for "SEV", "secure") | |
| 09:04:15 | kashyap | Ah, it's line-848 | |
| 09:04:25 | kashyap | "Exposing encrypted virtualization to operators" | |
| 09:04:31 | bauzas | gibi: oh cool | |
| 09:04:39 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: that sounds correct | |
| 09:04:42 | bauzas | gibi: don't worry with the a_c rebase | |
| 09:04:48 | bauzas | I'd like to upload it | |
| 09:04:57 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: Is that aimed at "Stein" release? | |
| 09:05:26 | gibi | bauzas: I need the a_c rebase to rebase the bandwidht series top of it :) | |
| 09:05:32 | johnthetubaguy | well, only in the same way everything new is sort of aimed at stein | |
| 09:05:48 | gibi | bauzas: but if you working on that that is fine then I will wait | |
| 09:06:14 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: is the intel SGX version going in soon, do you know? | |
| 09:06:57 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: Afraid, I don't know. | |
| 09:07:13 | gibi | bauzas: just to be on the safe side. are you rebasing a_c on top of consumer gen support? | |
| 09:07:15 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: I think what you're getting at is we need to take both Intel and AMD into consideration, obviously | |
| 09:07:31 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: no worries, based on a blog I am reading, it sounds like SGX isn't that usable yet https://lwn.net/Articles/686808/ | |
| 09:07:35 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: (Assuming Intel is going to come up w/ a similar thing 'soon') | |
| 09:08:11 | kashyap | Ah, the venerable LWN | |
| 09:08:27 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: FWIW, our customer's medical data processing probably needs this at some point, although per host allocation works in the meantime | |
| 09:08:33 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: Seems to be from 2 years ago; wonder what's the state today. But anyway, I don't see this merging anytime soon in Nova | |
| 09:08:44 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: yeah, totally | |
| 09:08:50 | bauzas | gibi: I was indeed | |
| 09:08:52 | kashyap | Given the complexity of it, and the "head-wrapping" required | |
| 09:08:59 | johnthetubaguy | +1 | |
| 09:09:28 | bauzas | gibi: now I need to rebase on top of your last update, but that should be fine | |
| 09:09:40 | gibi | bauzas: cool | |
| 09:10:12 | bauzas | gibi: well, sorry I wasn't clear | |
| 09:10:14 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: feels like it should work a bit like volume encryption, once its working correctly, but want to get my hands on it first, which is hard given my customer is an Intel only shop right now, this might change things I guess! | |
| 09:10:25 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: will let you know if I hear any more | |
| 09:10:26 | bauzas | I was working on rebasing tetsuro's branch on top of master | |
| 09:11:01 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: Sure. (And yeah, the use cases are definitely critical.) | |
| 09:11:24 | bauzas | gibi: most of the conflicts were due to the 1.30 microversion for reshapes | |
| 09:12:45 | gibi | bauzas: no problem. If nested a_c support ends up top of top of consumer_gen support then I'm OK. | |
| 09:13:07 | bauzas | gibi: yup, I just rebased the whole series | |
| 09:13:13 | gibi | bauzas: coolio | |
| 09:13:27 | bauzas | gibi: now, rebasing on top of your latest rev should be trivial hopefully | |
| 09:14:31 | bauzas | gibi: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/583667/ is the top patch of your series, right? | |