| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-08-30 | |||
| 21:47:50 | efried | how does a guy install a pycharm plugin? | |
| 21:51:05 | jaypipes | efried: sudo apt install vim? | |
| 21:51:40 | lbragstad | git clone https://github.com/$USER/dotfiles | |
| 21:53:33 | efried | found it. Thanks for nothing, snarks | |
| 21:54:16 | zigo | jaypipes: Real man use joe editor ... | |
| 21:59:39 | jaypipes | zigo: luckily, I'm not a real man. | |
| 22:00:07 | dansmith | mriedem: so should I just make up a fake test for that so we can merge and see if the problem goes away? presumably that's the only way we're really going to know? | |
| 22:04:59 | mriedem | dansmith: is it passing in the gate? | |
| 22:05:01 | mriedem | if so, yeah sure | |
| 22:05:05 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Avoid spurious ComputeNode.save during update_available_resource periodic https://review.openstack.org/598365 | |
| 22:05:19 | mriedem | efried: melwitt: ^ is a thing related to that xen bug | |
| 22:05:22 | mriedem | for allocation ratios | |
| 22:05:38 | mriedem | since i'm not sure how we're actually racing here, i'm not sure if it will actually fix it, | |
| 22:06:12 | melwitt | ack | |
| 22:06:33 | mriedem | but it's about the only thing i can think of that would get us this which f's up the inventory in placement during the periodic: | |
| 22:06:34 | mriedem | Aug 29 16:58:05.483508 dsvm-devstack-citrix-mia-nodepool-1379368 nova-compute[24436]: INFO nova.compute.resource_tracker [None req-a869fa19-aa9d-4335-9816-42ff29b64d48 None None] Using cpu_allocation_ratio 0.0 for node: 2f5a2e04-1b61-4437-ab6e-8dbbf797dc07 | |
| 22:06:39 | efried | mriedem: Doesn't seem to be doing what the commit title says... | |
| 22:06:44 | mriedem | that's logs from the normalize method in the RT | |
| 22:07:02 | dansmith | mriedem: it's passing the stuff that isn't dead on the floor for other reasons | |
| 22:07:15 | mriedem | efried: oh but you must read the full message my friend | |
| 22:07:20 | mriedem | it's a rich tapestry of suck | |
| 22:07:21 | efried | yeah yeah | |
| 22:07:43 | mriedem | and with that, i'm putting my lawn mowin' clothes on and hitting nature | |
| 22:07:47 | efried | I don't see it hurting anything to never write 0.0 to an allocation ratio. | |
| 22:08:06 | efried | unless, as you say, some other suckpoint is using that as a signal to refresh the real values from somewhere else. | |
| 22:08:07 | mriedem | right, i don't think this hurts, it might help | |
| 22:08:09 | efried | In which case that should be change. | |
| 22:08:10 | efried | d | |
| 22:08:26 | mriedem | except i have that todo in there - mostly a question for reviewers to check my brain | |
| 22:10:53 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Move conductor wait_until_ready() delay before manager init https://review.openstack.org/598353 | |
| 22:26:45 | jaypipes | mriedem_lawnboy, efried: prescient? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/598365/1/nova/tests/unit/compute/test_resource_tracker.py@1381 | |
| 22:27:30 | efried | Mm | |
| 22:27:36 | efried | I thought it was a bug in the test. | |
| 22:27:38 | efried | Clearly not. | |
| 22:37:25 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Fix nits: Compute: Handle reshaped provider trees https://review.openstack.org/598387 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2018-08-31 | |||
| 03:15:19 | openstackgerrit | Leopard Ma proposed openstack/nova master: Replace assertRaisesRegexp with assertRaisesRegex https://review.openstack.org/598415 | |
| 03:21:20 | openstackgerrit | huanhongda proposed openstack/nova master: Fix instance delete stuck in deleting task_state https://review.openstack.org/598084 | |
| 03:44:41 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Resource retrieving: add changes-before filter https://review.openstack.org/591976 | |
| 06:25:15 | openstackgerrit | Leopard Ma proposed openstack/nova master: Replace assertRaisesRegexp with assertRaisesRegex https://review.openstack.org/598415 | |
| 07:56:15 | openstackgerrit | Chen proposed openstack/nova master: Fix SOFT_DELETE vm_state string https://review.openstack.org/598482 | |
| 08:45:43 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Resource retrieving: add changes-before filter https://review.openstack.org/591976 | |
| 08:48:55 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Resource retrieving: add changes-before filter https://review.openstack.org/591976 | |
| 09:06:03 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Consumer gen support for delete instance allocations https://review.openstack.org/591597 | |
| 09:45:26 | openstackgerrit | Chen proposed openstack/nova master: Fix filter server list with SOFT_DELETED status https://review.openstack.org/597443 | |
| 10:13:58 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Delete instance_group_member records from API DB during archive https://review.openstack.org/588943 | |
| 10:31:32 | dr_gogeta86 | hi | |
| 10:31:57 | dr_gogeta86 | there is any known tecnique to migrate VMs with high memory pressure | |
| 10:32:13 | dr_gogeta86 | i can't evaquate a node for some machine who uses a lot of ram | |
| 10:52:50 | gibi | dr_gogeta86: I suggest to read the spec https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/newton/implemented/auto-live-migration-completion.html | |
| 10:54:05 | dr_gogeta86 | tnx | |
| 11:10:16 | giblet | dr_gogeta86: and here some final documentation for the features proposed in that spec https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/admin/configuring-migrations.html#advanced-configuration-for-kvm-and-qemu | |
| 11:38:01 | openstackgerrit | Radoslav Gerganov proposed openstack/nova master: Do not dump all instances in the scheduler https://review.openstack.org/598611 | |
| 12:13:45 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova master: hardware: fix memory check usage for small/large pages https://review.openstack.org/532168 | |
| 12:14:25 | sahid | finucannot: ^ | |
| 12:49:52 | finucannot | sahid: ack | |
| 13:26:46 | sahid | finucannot, leakypipes thanks | |
| 13:29:02 | leakypipes | sahid: de rien, mon ami | |
| 13:31:27 | sahid | :-) | |
| 13:36:32 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: Delete instance_group_member records from API DB during archive https://review.openstack.org/598953 | |
| 13:39:06 | poojajadhav | fried_rice: Hi | |
| 13:39:16 | fried_rice | poojajadhav: Greetings. | |
| 13:39:39 | poojajadhav | fried_rice: Can u help in simple tenant usage API | |
| 13:40:34 | fried_rice | poojajadhav: whoah. I'm certainly not the best resource for that, but I can see what I can do (read: who I can find who knows something about it). | |
| 13:41:18 | poojajadhav | fried_rice: Actually, I have started looking into the bug : https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1715570 | |
| 13:41:18 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1715570 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "simple tenant usage api calculating disk usages incorrectly" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Bhagyashri Shewale (bhagyashri-shewale) | |
| 13:43:19 | poojajadhav | fried_rice: To resolve the issue of the usages of the (disk, memory_mb, vcpu) I am trying to get usages from placement usage api and then will use that infor for simple tenantr usage api. But facing issue when getting palcement usages. | |
| 13:43:42 | poojajadhav | fried_rice: Getting errot like : [dict(resource_class_id=item[0], usage=item[1])for item in query.all()] *** ProgrammingError: (pymysql.err.ProgrammingError) (1146, u"Table 'nova_cell0.consumers' doesn't exist") [SQL: u'SELECT allocations.resource_class_id AS allocations_resource_class_id, coalesce(sum(allocations.used), %(coalesce_2)s) AS coalesce_1 \nFROM allocations INNER JOIN consumers ON allocations.consumer_id = cons | |
| 13:44:46 | fried_rice | leakypipes: ^ ? | |
| 13:45:16 | fried_rice | poojajadhav: Wait, how are you trying to retrieve the usages? | |
| 13:45:33 | fried_rice | via the placement API or by talking directly to "the database"? | |
| 13:45:49 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Consumer gen support for put allocations https://review.openstack.org/591647 | |
| 13:46:49 | poojajadhav | fried_rice: same like done in placement https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/api/openstack/placement/handlers/usage.py#L104-L109 | |
| 13:47:03 | leakypipes | fried_rice: simple tenant usage unfortunately is a pile of legacy and doesn't query placement at all. | |
| 13:47:16 | leakypipes | fried_rice: it's all looking at instances, compute_nodes table etc | |
| 13:47:21 | leakypipes | in the nova cell DBs. | |
| 13:47:30 | mdbooth | pip's giving me an ssl error (CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED) trying to download https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/2a/fd/2a8b894ee3451704cf8525a6a94b87d5ba24747b7bbd3d2f7059189ad79f/stestr-2.1.1.tar.gz on F28. Chrome thinks it's fine. Anybody seen anything similar? | |
| 13:48:15 | fried_rice | poojajadhav: You definitely shouldn't be attempting to access the placement database directly from anywhere other than within the placement API code itself. If you're trying to get placement information from nova, you would need to do it by talking to the placement API service through the REST interface, via the SchedulerReportClient. | |
| 13:49:44 | poojajadhav | fried_rice, leakypipes: If the instance is BFV then also its shwoing the flavor,root_gb as per https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/api/openstack/compute/simple_tenant_usage.py#L165-L168 | |
| 13:50:16 | fried_rice | poojajadhav: I thought we had some patches already proposed that were looking at fixing this... | |
| 13:50:52 | dansmith | leakypipes: despite the legacyness, placement doesn't provide the data it would need anyway | |
| 13:51:58 | mriedem | the is_bfv fix doesn't extend to the simple tenant usage API right?/ | |
| 13:52:02 | mriedem | since the API doesn't look at the request spec | |
| 13:52:47 | poojajadhav | fried_rice : But in the simple tenant usage api, we can get flavors details and falvor is exists in nova_api only. | |
| 13:53:32 | dansmith | mriedem: unrelated, but .. haven't we already had a discussion about allowing delete-on-termination to be provided in attach volume? | |
| 13:53:56 | dansmith | I found a very old blueprint and code from like 2013, but couldn't find anything more recent | |
| 13:54:08 | dansmith | and I thought we had (and you were opposed) | |
| 13:54:25 | mriedem | dansmith: someone was asking for adding delete_on_termination for ports during server create to match bdms, but not sure about adding that flag during attach | |
| 13:54:39 | mdbooth | dansmith: It does seem like a kinda weird thing to do, tbh. Also, how would that work with multi-attach? | |
| 13:54:53 | mriedem | i agree it would be weird | |
| 13:55:03 | dansmith | mdbooth: mriedem: yeah, I think it violates the "nova created it so nova deleted it" rule | |
| 13:55:05 | mriedem | delete_on_termination, to me, makes the most sense when nova creates the resoruce | |
| 13:55:10 | dansmith | and could be quite surprising | |
| 13:55:11 | poojajadhav | fried_rice : Can u please locate me to those patches | |
| 13:55:34 | fried_rice | poojajadhav: I'm probably thinking of something different. | |
| 13:55:45 | dansmith | mriedem: anyway i was sure you had already thrown down the hammer on this previously so I was just looking for a shortcut | |
| 13:55:55 | leakypipes | dansmith: ack | |
| 13:56:20 | mriedem | poojajadhav: https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/03c596a9f4324e572bc04d4bbad09a6d3d47366c#diff-cbbdc4d7c140314a7e0b2d97ebcd1f9c ? | |
| 13:56:40 | mriedem | dansmith: b/c today is friday red hat bug squash day and you have a customer that wants this ability? | |
| 13:56:50 | dansmith | mriedem: I told you never to call me here | |
| 13:56:53 | mriedem | and you can say "ol man riderman doesn't like it" | |