Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-08-20
14:48:19 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Merge security groups extension response into server view builder https://review.openstack.org/585475
14:48:20 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Merge extended_status extension response into server view builder https://review.openstack.org/592092
14:57:11 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Remove ChanceScheduler https://review.openstack.org/576384
15:13:03 tssurya dansmith, mriedem: yea it wouldn't affect us much
15:13:36 mriedem vdrok: is this also broken for rocky? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/593628/
15:13:41 mriedem in that we might need an rc3?
15:14:25 mriedem tssurya: it should in the --all-tenants case
15:14:40 mriedem but maybe you don't care about performance of that
15:14:58 tssurya mriedem: yea we usually use some other filters like project or name before that
15:15:50 dansmith tssurya: cool, I figured as much
15:16:41 vdrok mriedem: yup I think so :(
15:16:56 mriedem http://logstash.openstack.org/#dashboard/file/logstash.json?query=message%3A%5C%22Invalid%20inventory%20for%20'CUSTOM_BAREMETAL'%20on%20resource%20provider%5C%22%20AND%20message%3A%5C%22The%20reserved%20value%20is%20greater%20than%20or%20equal%20to%20total%5C%22&from=7d
15:17:05 mriedem melwitt: likely have another bug fix for rc2
15:19:22 dansmith mriedem: she was looking at that on friday, IIRC
15:19:42 mriedem ok rc2 hasn't merged yet, so i -1ed the release request
15:22:38 cdent yay! to ChanceScheduler going by by
15:24:13 stewie925 sorry guys, I am looking for an openstack channel to bring up an openstack-gerrit issue?
15:27:46 jroll stewie925: #openstack-infra would be best
15:29:32 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Use placement microversion 1.26 in update_from_provider_tree https://review.openstack.org/593628
15:33:11 mriedem dansmith: if you want i can report a perf bug for the batch size instance list stuff
15:33:20 dansmith mriedem: I want
15:33:34 mriedem you want it you got it!
15:33:43 mriedem the hottest band in the land, KISS!
15:40:00 mriedem dansmith: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1787977
15:40:00 openstack Launchpad bug 1787977 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Inefficient multi-cell instance list" [Medium,Triaged] - Assigned to Dan Smith (danms)
15:40:03 dansmith thanks
15:52:41 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: Use placement microversion 1.26 in update_from_provider_tree https://review.openstack.org/593678
15:52:43 mriedem dansmith: for rc2 ^
16:25:09 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Remove mox in libvirt/test_driver.py (5) https://review.openstack.org/570842
16:33:40 johnsom Hi nova folks. I'm getting failures with stable/rocky devstack that is blocking some gates. Would someone have a minute to take a look? http://logs.openstack.org/55/593455/1/check/neutron-lbaasv2-dsvm-api/33e93f3/logs/devstacklog.txt.gz#_2018-08-20_16_04_21_951
16:34:04 johnsom And http://logs.openstack.org/55/593455/1/check/neutron-lbaasv2-dsvm-api/33e93f3/logs/screen-n-cpu.txt.gz#_Aug_20_16_02_14_425974
16:35:52 johnsom The later is n-cpu exiting with a critical error
16:46:54 dansmith johnsom: it can't talk to conductor
16:47:52 melwitt .
16:48:05 johnsom I have been digging through logs for a while. It seems to be repeatable across gate hosts.
16:55:34 johnsom It looks like compute service list shows two nova-conductors in the up status. Any pointers where else I should look in the logs? There aren't any errors I see in the n-cond log file
16:59:59 openstackgerrit Konstantinos Samaras-Tsakiris proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Placement model for passthrough devices https://review.openstack.org/591037
17:06:24 kosamara efried sean-k-mooney: ^^
17:06:31 efried ack
17:07:08 sean-k-mooney kosamara: currently reivew an sriov bond spec but ill take a look at that next
17:42:16 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Make instance_list perform per-cell batching https://review.openstack.org/593131
17:42:17 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: List instances from all cells explicitly https://review.openstack.org/593717
18:50:58 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Fix soft deleting vm fails after "nova resize" vm https://review.openstack.org/546920
19:08:01 melwitt mriedem: ack on the new patch needed for rc2
19:09:33 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Merge extended availability zone response into server controller https://review.openstack.org/502859
19:09:42 melwitt problem was reported on friday, when I dug into the logs, I saw that version 1.26 wasn't being sent for the call to allow reserved == total, but didn't realize on the original patch the change missed another call site that needed 1.26
19:10:18 melwitt glad the fix was found
19:23:54 gryf hi. there is a code in review for some time now. can I get some attention from core reviewers? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/536351
19:27:08 efried gryf: I think johnthetubaguy ought to have another look at ^ and see if his concerns have been addressed. Other cores will be reluctant to approve the patch with another core's -1 on it.
19:27:50 melwitt dansmith: could you take a look at the proposed fix? ^ it seems to make sense but I'm not that familiar with the particulars of resource reporting considering overcommit
19:28:22 dansmith melwitt: oh yeah I looked at this last week but never said anything
19:28:35 dansmith melwitt: tbh, I'm not sure why we should change that at the moment
19:28:54 dansmith it's just reporting a different value for something we don't look at during scheduling anyway
19:30:34 melwitt they're saying it's being rejected at the check_can_live_migrate_source stage, not related to scheduling
19:31:02 melwitt the disk value is being rejected
19:32:12 dansmith yeah, but neither value is totally right I don't think
19:33:00 gryf current value is totally wrong
19:33:55 gryf instead of remaining space, entire disk size is provided :/
19:34:09 dansmith okay well, this isn't really related to resource reporting and I'm in the middle of something else at the moment,
19:34:22 gryf dansmith, no rush
19:34:22 dansmith but clearly I'm not familiar enough with that to review it without a deep dive, so.. :)
19:34:32 gryf oh :C
19:35:49 gryf either way, we already have that code applied, since we bump on this
19:36:15 gryf I thought that maybe it is worth to have it fixed on stable
19:37:57 mriedem anyone know if big john is going to be in denver?
19:44:06 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Use placement microversion 1.26 in update_from_provider_tree https://review.openstack.org/593628
19:51:35 mriedem melwitt: if you're ok with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/593678/ for stable/rocky, you could +1 and then we can find another stable maint team core to approve to move rc2 along
19:52:03 melwitt ok
20:20:50 sean-k-mooney mriedem: FYI my summary of the live migration testing i did last week and a half is here http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-August/133546.html
20:21:16 sean-k-mooney i didnt mean to add [all] but that does not matter now
20:22:00 sean-k-mooney i have opened 2 bugs in nova and 3 in neutron
20:22:16 mriedem sean-k-mooney: cool, thanks!
20:22:32 sean-k-mooney by the way i also noticed the irc bot nolonger comments on new bugs in irc since we went to regeistered mode
20:28:00 sean-k-mooney / away until noon IST
22:21:35 mriedem tonyb: if you're up, we've got another rc2 patch for you on stable/rocky https://review.openstack.org/#/c/593678/
22:23:24 tonyb mriedem: Done.
22:23:27 mriedem tonyb: <3
22:23:35 tonyb :D
23:53:15 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/rocky: Use placement microversion 1.26 in update_from_provider_tree https://review.openstack.org/593678
#openstack-nova - 2018-08-21
05:52:13 vishakha mriedem: Hi, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/580271/ is this change valid?? Kindly review. As I am little confused with comments. Thanks
06:31:53 openstackgerrit Chen proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: Update ssh configuration doc https://review.openstack.org/594041
06:37:06 openstackgerrit Chen proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: Revisons on notifications doc https://review.openstack.org/594042
07:13:35 openstackgerrit Jiri Suchomel proposed openstack/nova master: Ignore deleted instances when populating with availability zones https://review.openstack.org/594050
07:17:13 gmann alex_xu: i am on vacation for 2 weeks (till 31st Aug ) so will not be able to do API office hour.
07:17:55 gmann melwitt: ^^ i will be able to provide API updates from 31st Aug onward (on vacation for 2 weeks.)
09:43:51 mriedem o/
09:44:35 kashyap Isn't it terribly early for you there?
09:44:45 cdent jet lag?
09:44:52 sean-k-mooney mriedem: o/
09:45:23 mriedem jet lag and work on the brain
09:45:40 lbragstad mriedem: same, my sleep schedule is completely screwed
09:46:29 sean-k-mooney mriedem: well do what jay pipes used to do. if your up early get work done early and be done by 1/2 pm and enjoy the rest of your day
09:48:03 kashyap mriedem: ^ Might want to check it out, when you're not sleeping :P
09:49:25 kashyap (FWIW, the author is not a "journalist" writing junk 'pop science'; he's a serious researcher on that topic.)
09:57:59 mriedem sean-k-mooney: question in https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1788014
09:57:59 openstack Launchpad bug 1788014 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "when live migration fails due to a internal error rollback is not handeled correctly." [Undecided,New]
10:03:32 sean-k-mooney mriedem: hi i think that is the issue yes. i have not had time to pin down the exact cause but i supect it because we are not activating the source binding after deleting the dest
10:04:08 mriedem hmm, i guess i would have expected neutron to automatically activate the source host port bindings when the dest host bindings were deleted
10:04:24 mriedem because when we activate the dest host bindings, neutron automatically de-activates the source host bindings,
10:04:51 mriedem so my thinking was when we delete the dest bindings on rollback, neutron would say, oh i need to activate the only other bindings (source) left

Earlier   Later