| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-08-10 | |||
| 09:23:11 | lyaaaaaarwood | mvpnitesh: btw can you write this up in a bug please? | |
| 09:24:12 | mvpnitesh | lyaaaaaarwood: Sure. I'm getting this error http://paste.openstack.org/show/727798/ in nova-cell-region and http://paste.openstack.org/show/727799/ in nova-cell-child | |
| 09:25:43 | lyaaaaaarwood | mvpnitesh: that's with the workaround? | |
| 09:25:54 | lyaaaaaarwood | mvpnitesh: there's obviously more to this that I'm missing | |
| 09:28:05 | mvpnitesh | lyaaaaaarwood: No without work around. Now i've to test the work around code. | |
| 09:53:50 | openstackgerrit | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: Update .gitreview for stable/rocky https://review.openstack.org/590730 | |
| 09:53:54 | openstackgerrit | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: Update UPPER_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/rocky https://review.openstack.org/590731 | |
| 09:54:00 | openstackgerrit | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Update reno for stable/rocky https://review.openstack.org/590732 | |
| 09:59:18 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: WIP scheduler: check request_spec.instance_group before updating https://review.openstack.org/590733 | |
| 09:59:21 | lyaaaaaarwood | mvpnitesh: ^ | |
| 10:05:24 | mvpnitesh | lyaaaaaarwood: Thankyou :) | |
| 10:20:11 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: add zvm into support matrix https://review.openstack.org/532720 | |
| 10:20:12 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: Add zvm admin intro and hypervisor information https://review.openstack.org/533125 | |
| 10:20:13 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: Add zvm CI information https://review.openstack.org/533512 | |
| 10:30:14 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Use placement 1.28 in scheduler report client https://review.openstack.org/583667 | |
| 10:30:34 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova stable/pike: Add recreate test for RT.stats bug 1784705 https://review.openstack.org/588036 | |
| 10:30:34 | openstack | bug 1784705 in OpenStack Compute (nova) pike "ResourceTracker.stats can leak across multiple ironic nodes" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1784705 - Assigned to Matt Riedemann (mriedem) | |
| 10:47:29 | gryf | hi guys, is there a chance to merge this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/536351/3 ? | |
| 10:57:28 | openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: [placement] Retry allocation writes server side https://review.openstack.org/590745 | |
| 12:19:54 | mriedem_ | sup! | |
| 12:22:59 | mriedem_ | sean-k-mooney: how are you feeling about this after i re-worked it? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/587498/ | |
| 12:24:28 | mriedem_ | no sahid around today? | |
| 12:25:23 | lyaaaaaarwood | mriedem_: nope, he's out on PTO | |
| 12:27:22 | mriedem_ | blast | |
| 12:27:24 | mriedem_ | EU | |
| 12:28:39 | sean-k-mooney | looking | |
| 12:34:20 | sean-k-mooney | mriedem_: im not sure NotImplementedError() is the most descriptive you could have chosen but it works | |
| 12:37:34 | mriedem_ | dansmith: so i just had put a bunch of links to logs on the CI failure into your revert patch, but then must have accidentally closed the tab and it's gone now :( | |
| 12:41:59 | sean-k-mooney | mriedem_: are they still stored in gerrit on a different versions? or were they just never saved to the server | |
| 12:44:43 | mriedem_ | dansmith: re-added | |
| 12:45:26 | mriedem_ | sob, devstack overwrites my plugging timeout setting http://logs.openstack.org/08/553608/10/check/neutron-tempest-linuxbridge/2b303c2/logs/devstacklog.txt.gz#_2018-08-10_00_50_06_570 | |
| 12:49:16 | mriedem_ | but the timeout definitely happens | |
| 12:49:22 | mriedem_ | takes 30 seconds to transfer the guest | |
| 12:49:27 | mriedem_ | then tempest tears down and deletes the server | |
| 12:49:37 | mriedem_ | then we eventually see the plugging timeout after that | |
| 12:49:49 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: api-ref: fix GET /flavors?is_public description https://review.openstack.org/588092 | |
| 12:52:51 | lyaaaaaarwood | mriedem_: just looking at the volume reschedule lack of cleanup issue we spoke about yesterday, do you have a super simple way to cause a reschedule with two computes in devstack? | |
| 12:53:56 | lyaaaaaarwood | mriedem_: I've manually raised the Reschedule exception but instances are just ending up in an ERROR state and not being built on the other compute. | |
| 12:54:10 | lyaaaaaarwood | and that compute is fine, has resources etc | |
| 13:01:36 | mriedem_ | lyaaaaaarwood: so it's not rescheduling at all? | |
| 13:02:09 | lyaaaaaarwood | mriedem_: Nope, doesn't appear to be, that was with --min-count | |
| 13:03:10 | mriedem_ | --min-count shouldn't have anything to do with it | |
| 13:03:24 | mriedem_ | lyaaaaaarwood: anything in the compute or cell1 conductor logs? | |
| 13:03:37 | mriedem_ | are both computes reporting in? | |
| 13:03:48 | mriedem_ | i.e. openstack hypervisor list shows but computes as up? | |
| 13:03:55 | mriedem_ | and both are reporting into placement? | |
| 13:04:00 | mriedem_ | openstack resource provider list | |
| 13:06:23 | mriedem_ | gotta go, bbiab on the plane | |
| 13:13:08 | openstackgerrit | Matthew Booth proposed openstack/nova master: Move static _get_power_off_values to compute_utils https://review.openstack.org/578822 | |
| 13:17:07 | lyaaaaaarwood | huh so Alternates: [] is likely the cause | |
| 13:17:23 | lyaaaaaarwood | http://paste.openstack.org/show/727812/ is the example | |
| 13:22:09 | leakypipes | lyaaaaaarwood: aye aye matey, how be yur Friday? | |
| 13:27:34 | lyaaaaaarwood | leakypipes: morning morning, it would be grand if these instances would reschedule arghhhhh! | |
| 13:28:00 | lyaaaaaarwood | leakypipes: any news on your 2.0 blog post? | |
| 13:28:33 | leakypipes | lyaaaaaarwood: just wrapping it up now after a little feedback from mordred. I'll be publishing it in an hour or two. | |
| 13:28:57 | leakypipes | lyaaaaaarwood: everyone shall hate me, so I've been preparing for that inevitability. | |
| 13:30:43 | lyaaaaaarwood | leakypipes: dansmith isn't online yet | |
| 13:30:48 | dansmith | excuse me? | |
| 13:30:54 | lyaaaaaarwood | whops | |
| 13:31:03 | lyaaaaaarwood | morning | |
| 13:31:30 | dansmith | wassup? | |
| 13:32:02 | lyaaaaaarwood | SteelyDan: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/590439/ - would you mind? | |
| 13:32:24 | SteelyDan | oh I mind | |
| 13:32:26 | SteelyDan | I mind greatly | |
| 13:33:18 | leakypipes | hahhaha | |
| 13:38:31 | SteelyDan | lyaaaaaarwood: oh you should have told me that ^ was cleaning up a mess I made | |
| 13:38:37 | SteelyDan | I would have been less.. me.. about it | |
| 13:39:43 | lyaaaaaarwood | SteelyDan: haha no issues | |
| 13:59:25 | melwitt | . | |
| 14:21:17 | fried_rice | melwitt: Do we need bug tags to backport things to Rocky at this stage for RC2? | |
| 14:23:24 | melwitt | fried_rice: what do you mean by bug tags? | |
| 14:23:35 | melwitt | backport potential? | |
| 14:23:39 | fried_rice | melwitt: Closes-Bug: #XXXX which is required for backporting "normally". | |
| 14:23:45 | fried_rice | in the commit message | |
| 14:24:07 | fried_rice | (well, I guess the existence of the bug is the important thing) | |
| 14:24:57 | melwitt | oh, yeah ok, you're asking if we need a bug for something we want to backport. yes, usually. I can't remember if we ever do it without a bug | |
| 14:31:28 | fried_rice | lyaaaaaarwood: Do you happen to know this answer? ^ I.e. if there's a "grace period" for RCs where we don't use bugs to backport? | |
| 14:32:00 | SteelyDan | definitely needs bugs | |
| 14:32:27 | SteelyDan | unless it's something super procedural or something, but not sure what that would be | |
| 14:33:01 | SteelyDan | things going into rc2 should be very prescribed anyway | |
| 14:33:36 | melwitt | I think he means something not going into rc2, right fried_rice? | |
| 14:33:51 | fried_rice | yes, that's what I mean | |
| 14:33:55 | SteelyDan | he says "to backport" so.. | |
| 14:34:13 | fried_rice | I just didn't know if, because we haven't "released" it yet, it doesn't technically count as a "backport", even though it's a cherry-pick to a non-master branch. | |
| 14:34:33 | SteelyDan | that would be something going *into* rc2 | |
| 14:34:44 | fried_rice | right, that's what I'm asking. | |
| 14:34:52 | fried_rice | Mechanically, that still entails a cherry-pick to stable/rocky, right? | |
| 14:35:06 | lyaaaaaarwood | fried_rice: no idea sorry, the stable branches are core managed until GA | |
| 14:35:06 | SteelyDan | fried_rice: something going into rc2 right now requires a lot of scrutiny, a bug, and some agreement | |
| 14:35:30 | fried_rice | SteelyDan: Okay, that's what I was looking for, thanks. | |
| 14:37:20 | melwitt | lyaaaaaarwood: we had rc1 yesterday and we're going to have an rc2 to fix some things. | |
| 14:37:38 | fried_rice | melwitt: wherezat etherpad again? | |
| 14:37:59 | melwitt | the RC todos? https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-rocky-release-candidate-todo | |
| 14:38:16 | fried_rice | thx | |
| 14:39:05 | lyaaaaaarwood | melwitt: and rc2 is tagged from the stable/rocky branch right? | |
| 14:39:34 | melwitt | lyaaaaaarwood: it must be ... this is new to me so I'm not sure. smcginnis can you enlighten me? ^ | |
| 14:39:40 | SteelyDan | yeah has to be :) | |
| 14:40:09 | melwitt | ok. so stable stays frozen for some time until the final release deadline I'm guessing | |
| 14:40:17 | lyaaaaaarwood | melwitt: yeah, so my point before was just that as a stable core I don't get +2/+W on stable/rocky until after GA | |
| 14:40:20 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova stable/pike: Make ResourceTracker.stats node-specific https://review.openstack.org/588037 | |