| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-06-13 | |||
| 20:59:09 | mriedem | no, i mean, | |
| 20:59:15 | dansmith | artom: waiting and also looking fairly impatient | |
| 20:59:21 | dansmith | artom: like a bus is late | |
| 20:59:22 | mriedem | numa networks just won't work with live migration, because numa doesn't work with live migration | |
| 20:59:26 | mriedem | s/waiting/punting/ | |
| 20:59:35 | artom | mriedem, great, more pressure | |
| 20:59:50 | artom | No wonder no one wanted to touch this for years | |
| 20:59:53 | artom | ;) | |
| 21:00:03 | mriedem | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmHeP9Sve48 | |
| 21:00:10 | dansmith | I did hear him say that if only we had heartbeating of RPC calls, then other stuff would be a lot better and he could get back to work | |
| 21:00:16 | dansmith | dunno if that's true, but sounded really good | |
| 21:00:37 | mriedem | i did my part | |
| 21:00:55 | artom | ... is it worrying that I have no idea what "heartbeating of RPC calls" means? | |
| 21:01:11 | mriedem | EVERYONE has been talking about it | |
| 21:01:19 | mriedem | it's like the new containers | |
| 21:01:28 | dansmith | it slices | |
| 21:01:29 | dansmith | it dices | |
| 21:01:35 | mriedem | it...pings? | |
| 21:01:38 | dansmith | it does the kids' homework | |
| 21:01:41 | dansmith | heh | |
| 21:02:00 | artom | This is high school all over again :( | |
| 21:02:01 | mriedem | artom: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/566696/ | |
| 21:02:13 | dansmith | artom: mildly live-migration-related :P | |
| 21:02:21 | jmlowe | so, about that url http(s) problem, seems to be fixed with a trailing / | |
| 21:02:54 | artom | Ah, I see | |
| 21:07:17 | jmlowe | Is that worth filing a documentation bug? If you are using ssl then you need a trailing slash on your nova endpoint url | |
| 21:08:38 | mgagne | you do?! | |
| 21:14:54 | dansmith | mriedem: did that tempest test get reverted? | |
| 21:15:06 | dansmith | just noticing a lot of nova things in check have failing tests | |
| 21:15:12 | dansmith | which is probably not helping load | |
| 21:15:12 | mriedem | dansmith: the patch is up | |
| 21:15:21 | dansmith | right, but unmerged? | |
| 21:15:24 | mriedem | http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/#1776684 | |
| 21:15:26 | melwitt | fwiw, I found this old thread about trailing slash, not sure if it's the same thing http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-March/090143.html | |
| 21:15:27 | dansmith | it's now 2h15m to get running | |
| 21:15:30 | mriedem | correct https://review.openstack.org/#/c/575132 | |
| 21:15:53 | dansmith | wonder if we could poke someone to slam that in? | |
| 21:16:18 | mriedem | i pinged mtreinish and gmann when i posted it in -qa | |
| 21:16:23 | mriedem | but gmann won't be around for awhile | |
| 21:16:27 | mriedem | ken'ichi is qa core | |
| 21:16:33 | dansmith | okay | |
| 21:16:38 | mriedem | but is asking for a config option, which i don't really think should hold up the revert | |
| 21:16:47 | dansmith | maybe melwitt can take that torch, I'm gonna disappear soon | |
| 21:20:04 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Ignore UserWarning for scope checks during test runs https://review.openstack.org/575237 | |
| 21:20:05 | mriedem | this is for cdent ^ | |
| 21:20:56 | mriedem | dansmith: you could also comment on or +1 the revert | |
| 21:21:04 | dansmith | I thought I did | |
| 21:21:26 | mriedem | call sdague out of the bullpen | |
| 21:23:43 | melwitt | which torch? this tempest revert? | |
| 21:23:51 | dansmith | melwitt: yeah | |
| 21:23:56 | melwitt | ack | |
| 22:01:15 | tonyb | Should we wait on the | |
| 22:01:59 | tonyb | Revert "Add server name check for multiple creations" to merge or just balcklist the test in the short term to unblock the queens gate? | |
| 22:19:07 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: placement: Allocation.consumer field https://review.openstack.org/565405 | |
| 22:19:08 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: rework allocation handler _allocations_dict() https://review.openstack.org/565407 | |
| 22:19:09 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add a microversion for consumer generation support https://review.openstack.org/565604 | |
| 22:19:10 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Fix nits from change Id609789ef6b4a4c745550cde80dd49cabe03869a https://review.openstack.org/574324 | |
| 22:20:36 | tonyb | dansmith, mriedem I'll nag gmann in a bit when he's online | |
| 22:21:50 | mriedem | thanks | |
| 22:22:52 | melwitt | tonyb, mriedem: that's an idea ... we do have a special test rc file for the cells v1 job IIRC. and it's affecting master too right, not just queens? | |
| 22:23:30 | tonyb | melwitt: Yeah it's probably all branches you're right | |
| 22:23:52 | melwitt | https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/devstack/tempest-dsvm-cells-rc | |
| 22:24:12 | tonyb | melwitt: so that's less appealing as we'd need to merge and revert is on (potentailly) 4 branches :( | |
| 22:24:31 | melwitt | yeah | |
| 22:24:48 | tonyb | rats | |
| 22:24:51 | melwitt | good to point out though, I had forgotten about the cells rc file | |
| 22:25:07 | mriedem | i mentioned it this morning when we identified the bug | |
| 22:25:11 | mriedem | and from the tempest revert, | |
| 22:25:17 | mriedem | you'll see i abandoned it at one point to go with the rc, | |
| 22:25:19 | melwitt | okay, sorry, I didn't see that | |
| 22:25:20 | tonyb | in other news that was probably the closest I've come to writing real code in a month ;P | |
| 22:25:21 | mriedem | however, it's not just cells that this could break | |
| 22:25:47 | melwitt | mtreinish where are you, we need you! :P | |
| 22:25:51 | mriedem | it's config-driven api behavior that was available < rocky | |
| 22:26:48 | mriedem | * < queens | |
| 22:27:07 | mriedem | but since tempest is branchless, people could be running with this configured differently in ocata or pike and then tempest would fail for them | |
| 22:27:42 | mriedem | which is why i'm saying on the tempest change, you can't really assert this until pike goes into extended maintenance mode | |
| 22:28:34 | mriedem | oops, i'm wrong, it was rocky https://review.openstack.org/#/c/499612/ | |
| 22:28:35 | melwitt | yeah, I think I understand now | |
| 22:28:53 | melwitt | ah okay | |
| 22:29:36 | tonyb | Yeah the tempest revert is clearly the rigth thing to do, but I guess I'm just impatient ;P | |
| 22:31:15 | mriedem | fixed the commit message | |
| 22:31:28 | tonyb | mriedem: danke | |
| 22:39:35 | melwitt | thanks gmann | |
| 22:40:15 | gmann | melwitt: mriedem seems like new PS. | |
| 22:41:37 | gmann | melwitt: done | |
| 22:41:54 | melwitt | gmann: cool, thanks. not sure if that might've failed pep8 | |
| 22:42:48 | openstackgerrit | Zack Cornelius proposed openstack/nova master: Implement file backed memory for instances in libvirt https://review.openstack.org/567876 | |
| 22:42:59 | gmann | melwitt: yea it should not anyways i ll keep eyes on this till merge. | |
| 22:43:18 | melwitt | awesome thanks ++ | |
| 22:47:58 | gmann | melwitt: when cell v1 going away? i am thinking to run nova cell v1 job on tempest too to avoid such failure. | |
| 22:48:36 | gmann | thinking if that will be worth to do or not | |
| 22:49:39 | melwitt | gmann: it's currently already deprecated, the plan as discussed at the ptg is to remove nova-network first, then cells v1 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-ptg-rocky L301, | |
| 22:50:09 | melwitt | we're making some progress on nova-network removal this cycle but are keeping the core intact as a safety net for the CERN folks as they're in the middle of a nova-network => neutron migration, | |
| 22:50:24 | melwitt | but we have _not_ started any cells v1 removal. the earliest we will be able to remove is stein | |
| 22:55:08 | gmann | yea. | |
| 22:56:24 | gmann | thanks , ll check if we can add cell v1 in tempest also and remove together with nova. | |
| 22:56:56 | gmann | dansmith: melwitt sorry for that tempest patch and blocking nova. | |
| 22:59:00 | melwitt | gmann: no worries, thanks for the help with solving it | |
| #openstack-nova - 2018-06-14 | |||
| 00:17:24 | efried | melwitt: I think we're good on the blueprints I know about. | |