| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-05-09 | |||
| 13:11:08 | mdbooth | Well, the change is redundant, but due to bad naming that's not at all obvious. | |
| 13:11:11 | efried | mdbooth: It is my understanding that there is quite a lot of horribleness in the bdm code that could be improved upon. | |
| 13:11:18 | jaypipes | stephenfin: no worries, it's not a huge deal really. | |
| 13:11:41 | mdbooth | The issue is that you added is_volume, which is a property, to the inherited list | |
| 13:11:46 | efried | mdbooth: The change itself is (was intended to be) a no-op. It was only supposed to get rid of the need to ask that @property through a private member of the outer bdm. | |
| 13:12:01 | stephenfin | jaypipes: I don't think I'm conflating those things. The main difference is whether it's an L2 network (uses physnets) or L3 network (uses a tunnel endpoint). tbh, the whole section on tenant networks and provider networks could be dropped | |
| 13:12:09 | mdbooth | So it breaks when something attempts to write to it | |
| 13:12:25 | efried | mdbooth: Write to what, .is_volume ? | |
| 13:12:29 | mdbooth | Yeah | |
| 13:12:34 | stephenfin | I'll probably do that as a follow-up. At this point I just want to get the spec in so I can grab a runway :) | |
| 13:12:37 | efried | mdbooth: Who was doing that, and where? | |
| 13:12:44 | efried | and why? | |
| 13:13:07 | efried | and based on what source info, if not _bdm_obj.is_volume itself? | |
| 13:13:18 | efried | mdbooth: sounds like we need a fup to remove... whatever that was. | |
| 13:13:26 | efried | mriedem: see email | |
| 13:13:34 | mdbooth | efried: Let me reload that context, but it broke my patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/528362/ | |
| 13:13:57 | mdbooth | efried: I believe the issue is due to something iterating over properties to initialise the object | |
| 13:14:02 | mdbooth | Let me just remind myself... | |
| 13:14:10 | mriedem | nothing like an immediate pounce | |
| 13:14:23 | efried | mriedem: No hurry, just responding to your question about the granular bp | |
| 13:14:37 | efried | I suppose I didn't need to pounce for that. Sorry. | |
| 13:14:55 | ShilpaSD | stephenfin: Hi | |
| 13:14:59 | efried | mdbooth: Okay, so it kicked your patch out of the gate, didn't like melt CERNs supercollider, that's a relief anyway. | |
| 13:15:23 | mdbooth | efried: My patch is more important than somebody's magnet set. | |
| 13:15:29 | efried | clearly | |
| 13:17:59 | jaypipes | stephenfin: understood. | |
| 13:25:06 | mdbooth | efried: Ok, so I think I can unpick this from my end. | |
| 13:25:23 | mdbooth | efried: However, the point about is_volume being redundant in that context still stands | |
| 13:25:43 | efried | mdbooth: Okay. From what I've been able to tell so far, it's not clear that we should be setting things on _bdm_obj rather than on the outer object itself. | |
| 13:25:47 | mdbooth | Which, as I say, would be obvious if we called 'block_device_mappings' 'volumes' | |
| 13:26:18 | mriedem | lyarwood: can you poke this regression fix for queens? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/564461/ we're going to do a release soon for another regression fix | |
| 13:26:19 | efried | mdbooth: I'll be on the lookout for that review :) | |
| 13:26:32 | mriedem | this one https://review.openstack.org/#/q/If9e1581db9c1ae14340b787d03c815d243d5a50c | |
| 13:26:54 | mdbooth | efried: Meh, I can't be arsed renaming things I'm not actively hitting. It's painful and nobody cares. | |
| 13:27:09 | lyarwood | mriedem: yeah np, looking now | |
| 13:27:33 | efried | mdbooth: Just so. Also, that's a slippery slope, as I mentioned before. Once we start "fixing" the block device code, there'll be no stopping. | |
| 13:28:55 | jmccarthy | mriedem: Morning ! I checked this out and it worked out great https://review.openstack.org/#/c/566367 ! | |
| 13:32:42 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: add consumer.generation/create missing consumers https://review.openstack.org/557958 | |
| 13:32:43 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: add Project, User and Consumer objects https://review.openstack.org/565403 | |
| 13:32:44 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: Add create() methods to Project, User and Consumer https://review.openstack.org/565404 | |
| 13:32:45 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: move consumer ensure to API layer https://review.openstack.org/565405 | |
| 13:32:47 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: rework allocation handler _allocations_dict() https://review.openstack.org/565407 | |
| 13:32:47 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: Add a microversion for consumer generation support https://review.openstack.org/565604 | |
| 13:33:10 | mdbooth | efried: Added a comment to the PowerVM patch. Not really worth a -1, tbh, but I figure somebody's going to have to touch it anyway. | |
| 13:34:00 | lyarwood | mriedem: right, so this is a stable/queens cherry-pick of a revert of a bugfix that only ever landed on master, fun. | |
| 13:35:06 | lyarwood | mriedem: it's valid as bugfix on stable/queens AFAICT, do we have enough time to drop the `This reverts commit` line? | |
| 13:36:45 | mriedem | lyarwood: which one? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/564461/ ? | |
| 13:36:49 | mriedem | it's not really a revert, it's a redo | |
| 13:37:02 | mriedem | jmccarthy: great, thanks | |
| 13:37:12 | lyarwood | mriedem: yeah the revert line just confused me | |
| 13:37:19 | mriedem | jaypipes: i think you have some context on this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/566367 | |
| 13:37:27 | mriedem | would be good to get that fixed since we backported the regression to ocata | |
| 13:37:57 | mriedem | lyarwood: right, so we revert the one workaround hack to remove the instance dir after the by_name init thing | |
| 13:38:12 | mriedem | because if we don't do that hack, we don't need to remove the dir, and that was the original bug anyway | |
| 13:39:07 | mriedem | lyarwood: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/524208/ landed when queens was master | |
| 13:39:11 | lyarwood | mriedem: right, ignore me, the fscking gerrit UI didn't list it as in Queens | |
| 13:39:23 | mriedem | "included in" dropdown | |
| 13:39:26 | mriedem | is what i check | |
| 13:39:41 | mriedem | lyarwood: you and mdbooth might also be interested in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/566367 | |
| 13:39:42 | lyarwood | mriedem: yeah it didn't display correctly, checked it again and there it is | |
| 13:39:45 | mriedem | dealing with libvirt imagebackend fun | |
| 13:42:14 | efried | mdbooth: ack, and thanks. | |
| 13:46:25 | mdbooth | mriedem: Somebody should clean that thing up ;) | |
| 13:52:22 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Fix detach_volume calls when rolling back a failed attach https://review.openstack.org/563213 | |
| 13:52:23 | mriedem | efried: gibi: test fixed, ^ - nice catch gibi | |
| 13:52:31 | mriedem | that's one that also needs to go back to queens as a regression fix | |
| 13:53:29 | mriedem | dansmith: can you hit this queens backport? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/564461/ | |
| 13:54:04 | dansmith | mriedem: yeah | |
| 13:54:48 | mriedem | thanks | |
| 13:55:07 | kashyap | Matt, when you can: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/565242/ ("libvirt: Deprecate support for monitoring Intel CMT `perf` events") | |
| 13:55:20 | kashyap | The unit test is "fixed", but in the most robust way. | |
| 13:55:31 | kashyap | (But that's dead code anyway, and we will remove it in Stein.) | |
| 13:55:54 | kashyap | If there are any better ways I can rewrite the new unit test, welcome. | |
| 13:57:12 | mriedem | lyarwood: this would also be good for cern https://review.openstack.org/#/c/566288/ | |
| 14:00:46 | jaypipes | mriedem: sure thing. gimme a few, though. trying to rebase a nasty. | |
| 14:00:51 | gibi | mriedem: +2+A on https://review.openstack.org/563213 | |
| 14:06:07 | mriedem | gibi: thanks | |
| 14:08:12 | wolverineav | mriedem: i've updated the patch with changes as suggested (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/534371/) please take a look when you have a moment :) | |
| 14:08:48 | mriedem | dansmith: pretty sure this is going to be a no-no backport given the object version changes yeah? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/563797/ | |
| 14:10:16 | mriedem | wolverineav: ack, lgtm, just waiting on zuul | |
| 14:11:19 | mriedem | actually +2; stephenfin - mind hitting https://review.openstack.org/#/c/534371/ again? | |
| 14:11:26 | wolverineav | mriedem: thanks! i wanted to proactively get that looked at. its been in review quite some time. | |
| 14:11:52 | mriedem | wolverineav: yup, i know, thanks for your patience | |
| 14:11:56 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova stable/queens: Fix detach_volume calls when rolling back a failed attach https://review.openstack.org/567232 | |
| 14:12:13 | mriedem | lyarwood: dansmith: ^ we'll want to get that in the queens release we do this week | |
| 14:12:33 | dansmith | mriedem: yeah, if it had been done non-remotable it would have been okay, but.. | |
| 14:13:22 | dansmith | mriedem: okay doesn't look like the master one has landed yet | |
| 14:15:11 | mriedem | dansmith: re that pike list_hosts one, -2 since they still have the nova-manage host list command in pike | |
| 14:15:18 | mriedem | so they can just run that with --config-file pointed at the cell db | |
| 14:16:16 | dansmith | ack | |
| 14:19:18 | openstackgerrit | Matthew Booth proposed openstack/nova master: Expose driver_block_device fields consistently https://review.openstack.org/528362 | |
| 14:19:19 | openstackgerrit | Matthew Booth proposed openstack/nova master: Add DriverLocalImageBlockDevice https://review.openstack.org/526347 | |
| 14:21:11 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: Unmap compute nodes when deleting host mappings in delete cell operation https://review.openstack.org/553829 | |
| 14:22:50 | dansmith | mriedem: melwitt tssurya: Do we have content for a cells meeting today? I got feedback on my patches to work on, which was my only thing. tssurya said maybe belmiro would have some things to discuss this week I think? | |
| 14:23:13 | mriedem | lyarwood: are you still working on this pike backport? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/561015/ | |
| 14:24:15 | mriedem | dansmith: i don't really have anything; i created a todo for myself to write some kind of functional regression test for https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1746863 - separate from the one i think mel was going to write | |
| 14:24:15 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1746863 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "scheduler affinity doesn't work with multiple cells" [High,In progress] - Assigned to melanie witt (melwitt) | |
| 14:24:23 | mriedem | for a separate but related bug we talked about the other day | |
| 14:24:26 | dansmith | ack | |
| 14:24:43 | lyarwood | mriedem: nope that dropped off my list, I can take another look at it in the next hour or so | |