Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-04-12
01:45:16 arvindn05 will keep my eye out from now on
02:16:33 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Deduplicate notification samples Rocky - 1 https://review.openstack.org/560296
02:22:27 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Deduplicate notification samples Rocky - 1 https://review.openstack.org/560296
02:31:22 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Deduplicate notification samples Rocky - 2 https://review.openstack.org/560299
02:32:37 takashin
02:55:32 Spaz-Work Morning Nova
02:56:42 openstackgerrit Arvind Nadendla proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Handle rebuild of instance with new image https://review.openstack.org/560718
03:21:17 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Deduplicate notification samples Rocky - 3 https://review.openstack.org/560727
03:31:35 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Deduplicate notification samples Rocky - 4 https://review.openstack.org/560731
03:37:40 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Deduplicate notification samples Rocky - 4 https://review.openstack.org/560734
03:45:18 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Deduplicate notification samples Rocky - 6 https://review.openstack.org/560737
04:04:26 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Deduplicate notification samples Rocky - 7 https://review.openstack.org/560748
04:40:06 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Fix race fail in test_resize_with_reschedule_then_live_migrate https://review.openstack.org/560454
05:11:24 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: remove ec2 in service and cmd https://review.openstack.org/556778
05:11:25 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: remove ec2 object definitions https://review.openstack.org/557150
05:11:26 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: remove ec2 db functions https://review.openstack.org/557572
06:20:13 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: Avoid live migrate to same host https://review.openstack.org/542689
06:30:45 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Deduplicate notification samples Rocky - 1 https://review.openstack.org/560296
06:41:29 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Deduplicate notification samples Rocky - 2 https://review.openstack.org/560299
06:42:32 openstackgerrit Naichuan Sun proposed openstack/nova master: xenapi: Use XAPI pool instead of aggregate pool for shared SR migration https://review.openstack.org/554154
06:54:22 openstackgerrit Naichuan Sun proposed openstack/nova master: xenapi: Use XAPI pool instead of aggregate pool for shared SR migration https://review.openstack.org/554154
07:08:06 openstackgerrit Naichuan Sun proposed openstack/nova master: xenapi: Use XAPI pool instead of aggregate pool for shared SR migration https://review.openstack.org/554154
07:08:56 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: Move update_task_state out of try/except https://review.openstack.org/557152
07:14:34 openstackgerrit Naichuan Sun proposed openstack/nova master: xenapi(N-R-P): Add API to support compute node resource provider update and create https://review.openstack.org/521041
07:24:57 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Deduplicate notification samples Rocky - 3 https://review.openstack.org/560727
07:25:40 openstackgerrit Naichuan Sun proposed openstack/nova master: xenapi(N-R-P): Add API to support compute node resource provider update and create https://review.openstack.org/521041
07:38:23 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Deduplicate notification samples Rocky - 4 https://review.openstack.org/560731
07:55:20 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Deduplicate notification samples Rocky - 4 https://review.openstack.org/560731
07:59:30 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Deduplicate notification samples Rocky - 4 https://review.openstack.org/560731
08:09:29 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: libvirt: Block swap volume attempts with encrypted volumes prior to Queens https://review.openstack.org/543569
08:12:43 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Remove mox in test_serversV21.py (1) https://review.openstack.org/560821
08:14:19 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Remove mox in test_serversV21.py (1) https://review.openstack.org/560821
08:32:16 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Deduplicate notification samples Rocky - 4 https://review.openstack.org/560731
08:53:37 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Remove mox in test_serversV21.py (2) https://review.openstack.org/560829
08:58:48 openstackgerrit Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: complex policy https://review.openstack.org/553776
08:58:49 openstackgerrit Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova master: Add rules column to instance_group_policy table. https://review.openstack.org/560832
09:03:15 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: remove ec2 object definitions https://review.openstack.org/557150
09:03:16 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: remove ec2 db functions https://review.openstack.org/557572
09:33:47 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Deduplicate notification samples Rocky - 5 https://review.openstack.org/560734
09:33:51 phuongnh hi jaypipes, I would like to add one more line in file https://review.openstack.org/#/c/462759/3/os_traits/hw/cpu/x86.py for CPU_FPGA
09:34:10 phuongnh the link to this is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field-programmable_gate_array
09:34:13 phuongnh Do I need to propose a blueprint in launchpad?
09:50:54 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Deduplicate notification samples Rocky - 6 https://review.openstack.org/560737
11:04:09 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Remove mox in test_virt_drivers.py https://review.openstack.org/559878
11:12:09 Shilpa stephenfin: Hi
11:20:40 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Remove mox in unit/virt/xenapi/test_vm_utils.py (1) https://review.openstack.org/558704
11:26:58 stephenfin Shilpa: o/
11:28:22 Shilpa stephenfin: i have added patch set https://review.openstack.org/#/c/550172/2, and added comment there, can you please go through the same.
11:29:51 Shilpa stephenfin: its ok to proceed with noVNC v1.0.0 tag, i have seen issue reported here at https://github.com/novnc/noVNC/issues/1034
11:31:27 stephenfin Shilpa: It looks like the CI is failing though?
11:31:35 stephenfin with a valid failure, no less
11:32:37 Shilpa stephenfin: i have noted that, but they were failing on earlier patch set too, so just ignored, will check logs
11:46:31 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Amend allow abort live migrations in queued status spec https://review.openstack.org/560872
11:58:09 bhagyashris alex_xu: Hi, I just want to know about the spec https://docs.openstack.org/oslo.config/latest/reference/mutable.html which basically give the provision to make the conf parameter as mutable
11:59:51 Shilpa stephenfin: checked logs http://logs.openstack.org/72/550172/2/check/tempest-full/f6945b6/job-output.txt.gz, and observed that 1 test case is failed, and that is tempest.api.compute.servers.test_novnc.NoVNCConsoleTestJSON.test_novnc[id-c640fdff-8ab4-45a4-a5d8-7e6146cbd0dc]
11:59:52 alex_xu bhagyashris: maybe gcb is good person, but looks like he isn't in this channel
11:59:53 bhagyashris alex_xu: there is one patch submitted in nova https://review.openstack.org/#/c/319203/3 so what are the criteria to make the conf parameter as mutable in any project
12:00:48 alex_xu bhagyashris: ok
12:01:53 bhagyashris alex_xu: as per the operators point of view every parameter should be make it as mutable but why only these two parameters are made it as mutable
12:02:01 openstackgerrit Matthew Booth proposed openstack/nova master: Give volume DriverBlockDevice classes a common prefix https://review.openstack.org/526346
12:02:02 openstackgerrit Matthew Booth proposed openstack/nova master: Add DriverLocalImageBlockDevice https://review.openstack.org/526347
12:02:03 openstackgerrit Matthew Booth proposed openstack/nova master: Expose driver_block_device fields consistently https://review.openstack.org/528362
12:02:04 openstackgerrit Matthew Booth proposed openstack/nova master: Add local_root to block_device_info https://review.openstack.org/529029
12:02:05 openstackgerrit Matthew Booth proposed openstack/nova master: Pass DriverBlockDevice to driver.attach_volume https://review.openstack.org/528363
12:02:06 openstackgerrit Matthew Booth proposed openstack/nova master: Fix libvirt volume tests passing invalid disk_info https://review.openstack.org/529328
12:03:06 bhagyashris alex_xu: in this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/319203/3
12:05:28 alex_xu bhagyashris: I guess that BP only target to something people just need at that point
12:07:28 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Deduplicate notification samples Rocky - 7 https://review.openstack.org/560748
12:07:40 alex_xu bhagyashris: I'm not sure all the config option works, but I also didn't see any reject for other options other than that BP
12:10:59 bhagyashris alex_xu: Actually I have few queries in nova only those two parameters are marked as mutable = True in (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/319203/3) so is that means other all the conf parameters are non-mutable.
12:11:40 openstackgerrit pippo proposed openstack/nova master: Update eventlet https://review.openstack.org/560876
12:32:41 efried Good UGT morning bhagyashris
12:33:33 efried bhagyashris: Are you going to take over https://review.openstack.org/560444 and https://review.openstack.org/560459 ?
12:34:55 bhagyashris efried: Good morning :)
12:42:22 bhagyashris efried: ok i will take.
12:43:34 efried bhagyashris: Great. Can you put your name down on the etherpad https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/rocky-nova-priorities-tracking see L115
12:43:54 efried jaypipes: FYI ^
12:47:39 bauzas stephenfin: quick question, if I'm providing a extra spec saying --property hw:numa_nodes=N, does it mean that the instance will use 2 physical NUMA nodes, or just that the instance XML will have 2 nodes ?
12:48:13 bauzas if the latter, are we supporting to not have sharded the NUMA nodes ?
12:48:37 efried sean-k-mooney, cfriesen: ^
12:48:40 bauzas stephenfin: context is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/552924/7/specs/rocky/approved/numa-topology-with-rps.rst@185
12:52:02 bauzas efried: as you can see, I wonder if we would still need a specific sharding param
12:52:47 bauzas efried: because when we discussed yesterday, I was only thinking of vGPUs affinited to CPUs, not about vCPUs being anti-affinited by NUMA nodes
12:53:05 bauzas so the latter would need something missing now
12:53:21 bauzas and then, in that case, that would be in my spec :
12:57:33 efried bauzas: Yup; and I totally can't answer that question (whether we need explicit anti-affinity/sharding)
12:57:47 bauzas efried: when looking at the doc, see " FLAVOR-NODES: (integer) The number of host NUMA nodes to restrict execution of instance vCPU threads to. If not specified, the vCPU threads can run on any number of the host NUMA nodes available."
12:57:47 efried But your spec definitely must.
12:57:51 bauzas https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/user/flavors.html#extra-specs-numa-topology
12:58:17 efried bauzas: Oh, that's interesting. I read that as a *maximum*.
12:58:41 efried In which case, we're covered.
12:58:50 efried sort of
12:58:59 efried We need to split into N numbered request groups
12:59:24 efried The only issue is that we can't specify that in a flexible way - it would have to be specific numbers of procs in each group.
12:59:36 efried and the only reasonable way to do that is to divide them evenly.
13:00:03 efried That still means we get *at most* N separate NUMA nodes, but because granular doesn't guarantee separation, we could get anywhere from 1..N
13:00:13 bauzas that said, in https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/admin/cpu-topologies.html
13:00:38 bauzas it says " Inadequate per-node resources will result in scheduling failures. Resources that are specific to a node include not only CPUs and memory, but also PCI and SR-IOV resources. It is not possible to use multiple resources from different nodes without requesting a multi-node layout. As such, it may be necessary to ensure PCI or SR-IOV resources are associated with the same NUMA node or force a multi-node layout."
13:01:02 efried That's fair.
13:01:22 bauzas what I understand from the above is that if I'm asking for 2 nodes but then only have 1 node, then NoValidHost

Earlier   Later