| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-04-04 | |||
| 03:57:40 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: add power actions https://review.openstack.org/543340 | |
| 03:57:40 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: add get console output https://review.openstack.org/543344 | |
| 04:04:41 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: ironic: Get correct inventory for deployed node https://review.openstack.org/553367 | |
| 05:32:22 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: Avoid showing password in log https://review.openstack.org/558694 | |
| 06:03:31 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: Remove a outdated warning https://review.openstack.org/557898 | |
| 06:16:11 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Remove mox in unit/virt/xenapi/test_vm_utils.py (1) https://review.openstack.org/558704 | |
| 06:49:19 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova-specs master: update: isolate guests emulthreads on CONF.cpu_shared_set https://review.openstack.org/511188 | |
| 06:49:21 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: PowerVM Driver: Network interface attach/detach https://review.openstack.org/546813 | |
| 06:57:49 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova-specs master: update: isolate guests emulthreads on CONF.cpu_shared_set https://review.openstack.org/511188 | |
| 07:06:22 | openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.openstack.org/548772 | |
| 07:45:54 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: Initial change set of z/VM driver https://review.openstack.org/523387 | |
| 07:45:55 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: Spawn and destroy function of z/VM driver https://review.openstack.org/527658 | |
| 07:45:55 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: add snapshot function https://review.openstack.org/534240 | |
| 07:45:56 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: add power actions https://review.openstack.org/543340 | |
| 07:45:56 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: add get console output https://review.openstack.org/543344 | |
| 07:53:26 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: Avoid showing password in log https://review.openstack.org/558694 | |
| 07:53:29 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: Morning; this is ready, if it's merged, can get going with the backports: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/534384/ | |
| 08:01:03 | gmann | johnthetubaguy: alex_xu_ gibi_away looking for feedback on this - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/547850/ | |
| 09:46:41 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova-specs master: update: isolate guests emulthreads on CONF.cpu_shared_set https://review.openstack.org/511188 | |
| 09:50:18 | naichuans | Hi, dansmith, do you have the time to review below patches: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/554154/, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/489451/. It all about use xapi-pool instead of aggregate pool. We have finished internal review and the test. Thank you very much. | |
| 09:59:57 | openstackgerrit | Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Fix host validity check for live-migration https://review.openstack.org/401009 | |
| 10:00:13 | johnthetubaguy | gmann: policy wise, I would prefer we concentrated on adopting the new set of roles, which I think we can do at the same time? | |
| 10:00:27 | johnthetubaguy | gmann: that might be stupid, what do you think? | |
| 10:02:56 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: Sorry to nag, but I don't suppose you'd have time to have a gander again on the above? | |
| 10:03:07 | kashyap | Just trying to curb the "dragging on" of this | |
| 10:03:13 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: its in my next tab :) | |
| 10:13:53 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: you get my first +2 of the day, its a relief to actually +2 something! | |
| 10:14:04 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: Haha | |
| 10:14:21 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: Thank you! If your fingers are itching, here's another one: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/558171/ | |
| 10:14:27 | kashyap | But it requires more discussion on the list | |
| 10:14:41 | kashyap | Topic of it: [RFC] Pick next minimum libvirt / QEMU versions for "Stein" | |
| 10:15:10 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: ah right, I usually let distro people argue that one out, good to have the discussion though! | |
| 10:15:22 | kashyap | Yeah, I did an hour's sleuthing and wrote a new email | |
| 10:15:39 | kashyap | But `postfix` isn't letting me send it to openstack-{dev,operator} lists | |
| 10:20:57 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: your libvirt version looks too new for Debian, did I miss something there? | |
| 10:21:18 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: I know, this morning I even spent time on #debian-backports | |
| 10:21:44 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: The discussion was: | |
| 10:21:45 | kashyap | I also talked on #debian-backports IRC channel on OFTC network, where I | |
| 10:21:45 | kashyap | asked: | |
| 10:21:46 | kashyap | "What I'm essentially looking for is: "How can 'stretch' users get | |
| 10:21:46 | kashyap | libvirt 3.2.0 and QEMU 2.9.0, even if via a different repository. | |
| 10:21:48 | kashyap | As they are proposed to be least common denominator versions across | |
| 10:21:50 | kashyap | distributions." | |
| 10:21:53 | kashyap | And two people said: Then the versions from 'Buster' could be backported | |
| 10:21:55 | kashyap | to 'stretch-backports'. The process for that is to: "ask the maintainer | |
| 10:21:58 | kashyap | of those package and Cc to the backports mailing list." | |
| 10:22:15 | johnthetubaguy | why 3.2 not 3.0.0? | |
| 10:22:28 | johnthetubaguy | well, and 2.9 rather than 2.8? | |
| 10:23:28 | johnthetubaguy | totally not against better stretch-backports, sounds like a good plan either way | |
| 10:24:01 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: That is possible, actually -- to accomodate 'Stretch' | |
| 10:24:13 | kashyap | To use 3.0.0 and 2.8 | |
| 10:24:30 | johnthetubaguy | its not a ... stretch (giggles like a school boy) | |
| 10:24:57 | kashyap | But we should remember that 3.2.0 and 2.9 are already much older | |
| 10:25:02 | kashyap | Hehe | |
| 10:25:08 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: Did you also catch the email -- http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2018-March/015067.html | |
| 10:25:20 | kashyap | Where I actually called out the Debian thing, and asked people to chime in | |
| 10:26:26 | johnthetubaguy | cool, seems like a step too far to exclude Debian, but its good to ask | |
| 10:26:44 | kashyap | Yeah, exactly. I *don't* want to exclude it | |
| 10:26:58 | kashyap | That's why I even spent an hour or two talking to the upstream Debian folks on OFTC | |
| 10:27:12 | kashyap | Just to see what could be done; since we can get rid of backward-compatibility code | |
| 10:31:17 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: so can't we do the bump to 1.3.1 and 2.5.0 now ish? | |
| 10:31:48 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: Yes, we can; that's what I'm working on. | |
| 10:32:05 | kashyap | > As it stands, during the "Pike" release the advertized NEXT_MIN versions | |
| 10:32:08 | kashyap | > were set to: libvirt 1.3.1 and QEMU 2.5.0 -- but they weren't actually | |
| 10:32:11 | kashyap | > bumped for the "Queens" release. So they will now be applied for the | |
| 10:32:14 | kashyap | > "Rocky" release. | |
| 10:32:19 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: I think that's what you were referring to | |
| 10:32:29 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: yeah, totally, just I would +2 that one | |
| 10:33:01 | kashyap | Yeah, it requires going through the whole codebase removing conditional cruft, etc. And fix relevant unit tests | |
| 10:33:11 | kashyap | Will post here once I'm ready in a bit | |
| 10:33:25 | johnthetubaguy | true... well there are two changes, the bump then the removal, depending on how you look at it :) | |
| 10:33:55 | johnthetubaguy | anyways, glad you are pushing on that, sounds worthwhile to me | |
| 10:39:35 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: Yeah; there are multiple changes | |
| 10:39:45 | kashyap | Just bumping it won't magically pass everything, would it? :-) | |
| 10:40:06 | kashyap | Only one way to try | |
| 10:40:11 | kashyap | s/try/figure/ | |
| 10:46:53 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: ha, good question, it might do | |
| 10:47:15 | johnthetubaguy | not for good reasons, our testing of the min version is laughable, AFAIK | |
| 10:47:25 | kashyap | :D | |
| 10:51:34 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Fix endpoint URI /allocation_requests https://review.openstack.org/557580 | |
| 10:55:48 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Provide error codes for placement API https://review.openstack.org/418393 | |
| 11:02:58 | sean-k-mooney | johnthetubaguy: kashyap for the rocky realse are we then not going to bump byond those verions and just use what we had planned for queens | |
| 11:03:14 | kashyap | sean-k-mooney: That's a good question | |
| 11:03:35 | kashyap | sean-k-mooney: I don't know, since we didn't give a heads-up, then we should simply stick with the versions what we planned for 'Queens'? | |
| 11:03:41 | kashyap | I know it sucks | |
| 11:04:04 | kashyap | sean-k-mooney: But we _can_ bump it; if we all agree | |
| 11:04:20 | sean-k-mooney | its less then ideal but if we dont depend on somthing form a newer release then i guess we dont have to bump | |
| 11:04:21 | kashyap | That's why I added the note to my post to the list: | |
| 11:04:21 | kashyap | > (Hmm, but note that libvirt 1.3.1 was released more | |
| 11:04:24 | kashyap | > than 2 years ago[1].) | |
| 11:04:30 | sean-k-mooney | ya i know | |
| 11:04:35 | sean-k-mooney | thats why i asked :) | |
| 11:05:17 | sean-k-mooney | it finally means we dont have to check libvirt verions for vhost multi queue once we require 1.3.1+ | |
| 11:14:07 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Use update_provider_tree from resource tracker https://review.openstack.org/520246 | |
| 11:41:08 | openstackgerrit | Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Bump MIN_{LIBVIRT,QEMU} versions for "Rocky" https://review.openstack.org/558783 | |
| 11:50:21 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: ^ | |
| 11:50:48 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: cool, ping me when zuul says yes | |
| 11:50:56 | kashyap | Yeap | |
| 12:07:10 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: We did in the past: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/432700/2/releasenotes/notes/pike-libvirt-min-version-bb7f43020995ac10.yaml | |
| 12:07:55 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: ah, cool, upgrade sounds correct | |