Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-03-19
14:27:44 jaypipes efried: ^^ I'm getting that nested providers in allocation candidates series back inline...
14:27:53 efried jaypipes: Cool dude.
14:28:33 efried Did you see my potentially earth-shattering dissenting opinion on the "split one resource across multiple providers" thing?
14:28:45 jaypipes efried: no. link?
14:29:22 efried jaypipes: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/534339/ -- my last comment, on PS5 before rebases
14:38:01 mriedem dansmith: replied in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/543277/
14:38:16 mriedem still don't see the need for hostId in the action events API, but people at the PTG wanted it
14:38:48 dansmith mriedem: I'm commenting about the rst syntax, using `` instead of "
14:40:25 mriedem oh, heh
14:40:46 mriedem i can push a doc cleanup patch on that
14:41:34 kashyap mriedem: melwitt: Heya, I've read the full chat between you both, dansmith, et al (including the quip: "besides the fix, you can also configure nova for other goodies!").
14:41:49 kashyap Not to discuss this to death, but 3 quick points:
14:42:03 dansmith mriedem: that's all I was saying :)
14:42:16 kashyap (1) I want to do the Right Thing & not rush anything in.
14:42:16 kashyap (2) The two Nova config options thing just causes untold pain for all vendors with all their unique deployment tools; and just wastes precious time all around for little gain.
14:42:20 kashyap (3) On your point: "well, what I mean is if you use it and it breaks something in queens/pike/ocata then we're probably not going to fix things to accommodate the various flags they enable" — That's a good point. Yes, we have to loudly and clearly document that "NB: There's a huge combination of CPU flags possible, just by virtue of them being available in a given CPU. It's not reasonable to
14:42:26 kashyap test all combinations; so if an Operator wants to try certain flags, it's their responsibility to test if that works in their environment".
14:44:22 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: Move placement exceptions into the placement package https://review.openstack.org/549862
14:44:44 kashyap melwitt: mriedem: As a last point, as dansmith also said in different words on Friday here —
14:44:55 kashyap It is not sensible to create an intentionally incompatible syntax in the Nova config file when the actual Nova code to process the config options is largely identical in both cases.
14:45:34 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: Optional separate database for placement API https://review.openstack.org/362766
14:47:16 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: Isolate placement database config https://review.openstack.org/541435
14:47:29 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Ensure that os-traits sync is attempted only at start of process https://review.openstack.org/553857
14:51:12 openstackgerrit Lenny Verkhovsky proposed openstack/nova master: Adding NVMEoF for libvirt driver https://review.openstack.org/482640
15:01:41 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Address review comments from afdc828db3c9d0205b6ded268db24f5cdf857fa6 https://review.openstack.org/554251
15:04:32 openstackgerrit Silvan Kaiser proposed openstack/nova master: Exec systemd-run with privileges in Quobyte driver https://review.openstack.org/554195
15:06:19 kaisers1 efried: fyi https://review.openstack.org/#/c/554195/2
15:06:30 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Report client: Remove version discovery comment https://review.openstack.org/554253
15:06:41 efried jaypipes, mriedem, cdent ^
15:06:45 efried kaisers1: ack
15:06:55 efried edleafe: also --^
15:06:57 cfriesen is github.com enforcing ssh versions now? I just got a "Peer reports incompatible or unsupported protocol version."
15:07:48 efried Could that be what kashyap was running into earlier?
15:08:14 kashyap efried: Probably; it's gone now. I'm able to fetch 'https' from git.o.o.
15:08:42 kashyap cfriesen: I also had troubles this morning w/ GitHub as my 'origin' for Nova
15:08:57 cfriesen looks like they're "weak crypto" versions of https
15:09:07 cfriesen bah, they're *disabling*
15:09:26 kashyap Yeah, apparently
15:09:58 efried Cause it's crucial that the content of a public repo be strongly encrypted.
15:10:14 efried Is that, what, so we don't get MITMs injecting viruses into the codebase for us?
15:11:03 efried tox -e py27 -- trojan_horse ?
15:11:30 jaypipes edleafe, cdent: do we have a bug in placement that diga might be able to pick up? he's looking for some work in placement/scheduler.
15:12:14 cfriesen is it possible to use SSH URLs with github?
15:12:27 cfriesen I don't see any on the nova page
15:12:55 jroll cfriesen: yep, git@github.com:openstack/nova
15:13:03 jroll need to add your public key in settings
15:13:08 edleafe jaypipes: diga: there's always https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=placement as a starting point
15:13:20 cfriesen jroll: thanks
15:13:25 jroll np
15:13:48 diga edleafe: Sure, will go through it
15:14:49 diga jaypipes: Thank you for your help
15:16:43 jaypipes diga: if I come across something for you, I will let you know.
15:17:01 diga jaypipes: Sure
15:21:56 diga jaypipes: I also know NFV technologies like hugepages, numa, dpdk very well. If you have something on that, let me know
15:23:57 jaypipes diga: cool. can you review this spec please? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/552924/
15:24:17 diga jaypipes: sure
15:28:12 Spaz-Home Morning folks
15:29:39 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: Move placement exceptions into the placement package https://review.openstack.org/549862
15:29:39 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: Optional separate database for placement API https://review.openstack.org/362766
15:29:40 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: Isolate placement database config https://review.openstack.org/541435
15:29:40 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Ensure that os-traits sync is attempted only at start of process https://review.openstack.org/553857
15:32:13 Spaz-Home Actually taking a relax weekend.. no coding.. just boiling 55 Habaneros, 2 Ghost Peppers, and trying to make a hot sauce without killing myself. Enjoy your day Cloud Creators :p
15:38:03 cdent jaypipes: what's the status of your "standardized provider descriptor file" spec/idea? Where on the scale or need<->experimental fishing is that?
15:38:23 jaypipes cdent: it's dead.
15:38:29 jaypipes cdent: I'll abandon it.
15:38:32 cdent dead fish
15:38:40 jaypipes cdent: smelly dead fish.
15:39:05 jaypipes cdent: I did too :) but I understand why dansmith doesn't.
15:42:25 mriedem sahid: there are a couple of issues in the tests for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/497457/2
15:42:27 mriedem https://review.openstack.org/#/c/497457/
15:42:39 mriedem sahid: specifically self.assertEqual(0, guest.migrate_configure_max_speed.called)
15:42:44 mriedem .called is a boolean
15:43:05 mriedem it's probably better to use guest.migrate_configure_max_speed.assert_not_called()
15:44:04 mriedem if you're about done for the day i could clean those up and then just approve
15:44:49 sahid oh i was sure of that "called" returns a number
15:44:52 sahid no no, i will
15:44:59 mriedem call_count returns a number
15:45:03 sahid but thanks for asking :)
15:45:12 sahid ack
15:45:29 mriedem thanks for finding that issue in the multinode job config
15:46:31 sahid mriedem: yeah, it's that g-api service which looked very strange
15:47:06 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: validate provider summary structure https://review.openstack.org/536516
15:47:07 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: WIP - populate alloc cands for trees https://review.openstack.org/534968
15:47:39 kashyap sahid: One more nit there: s/TAPs devices/TAP devices/ :-)
15:47:46 kashyap (In driver.py)
15:48:49 cfriesen has anyone run into problems with setuptools recently? I got a report that 39.0.1 didn't work with our version of pike, wondering if it's a general problem.
15:49:05 sahid kashyap: :) sure i will address that too
15:49:41 kashyap Thx
15:50:42 dansmith cfriesen: I had an issue downstream last week where the parse_version was returning a tuple instead of a string
15:50:56 dansmith cfriesen: migi was looking at it, in case you or he know anything else
15:53:34 cfriesen dansmith: we ended up pinning it to 38.5.1 for now, which seems to work okay
16:00:41 mriedem jaypipes: on that vmware resource pools spec, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/549067/6/specs/rocky/approved/vmware-resource-pool-placement.rst@210
16:01:05 mriedem jaypipes: finally just realized that this is proposing that the admin changes things *in vcenter*, not placement directly, and that's all proxied through the virt driver
16:01:24 mriedem which kind of goes against something we've always said we woudn't do, which is support out of band changes on the hypervisor
16:02:27 cdent mriedem: I think those sorts of changes are pretty much why upt exists?
16:02:42 cdent the hardware underlaying the hypervisor changes in some fashion
16:02:43 jaypipes mriedem: vcenter virt driver is virtually identical (pun intended) to how ironic virt driver wants to do things. i.e. the virt driver (not the compute service worker ala the resource tracker) creates the compute node resource provider records.
16:02:45 cdent upt notices
16:03:10 cdent efried: powervm is much the same, yeah? ^
16:03:38 mriedem jaypipes: this isn't creating the compute node resource provider record,

Earlier   Later