| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-03-16 | |||
| 12:39:15 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: complex policy https://review.openstack.org/553776 | |
| 12:45:31 | figleaf | ugh - tempest failed again. Is it worth rechecking yet again? | |
| 12:51:29 | tssurya | figleaf: guess not :( | |
| 12:51:48 | Spazmotic | heh | |
| 13:02:15 | Roamer` | a couple of years ago I proposed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/137830/ and then Things Happened(tm) and we stopped working on the StorPool Nova image backend. Looks like we'll write it after all (even if we have to maintain it out-of-tree); if I un-abandon that spec and propose it for inclusion, will somebody be very much against it? | |
| 13:10:30 | fried_rice | artom_: Thank you very much sir. | |
| 13:10:46 | fried_rice | alex_xu_: Thanks! | |
| 13:11:29 | fried_rice | figleaf: I win! | |
| 13:12:17 | figleaf | fried_rice: You probably sabotaged tempest so that you could win :) | |
| 13:12:17 | fried_rice | figleaf: To save some heartache, consider rebasing on top of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/548934/ (which is already in the gate) instead of master. | |
| 13:12:37 | fried_rice | figleaf: Oh, I totally did. I didn't know it was gonna *work* though. | |
| 13:13:11 | figleaf | fried_rice: that patch has a tempest failure, too | |
| 13:13:20 | figleaf | you forgot to un-bork tempest | |
| 13:16:59 | fried_rice | those volumes... | |
| 13:22:08 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: New-style _set_inventory_for_provider https://review.openstack.org/537648 | |
| 13:22:25 | mriedem | https://review.openstack.org/553786 | |
| 13:25:32 | figleaf | mriedem: <fingers crossed> | |
| 13:32:42 | mnaser | how do we feel about having 'ComputeCapabilitiesFilter' but instead parses image properties rather than instance type | |
| 13:33:27 | mnaser | (reason is, i have X customer which needs Y feature, i dont want to start maintaining instance types for every single one, but rather give the ability for the customer to add propreties) | |
| 13:36:11 | leakypipes | mnaser: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/541507/ will make your day. | |
| 13:37:20 | mnaser | leakypipes: i love how the "example" is exactly what we're looking for .. trait:HW_CPU_X86_AVX2=required | |
| 13:38:03 | mnaser | (like, the exact instruction set too) | |
| 13:38:43 | leakypipes | mnaser: bingo. | |
| 13:39:01 | mnaser | i guess i'll have to live with custom flavors till this code gets shipped | |
| 13:39:17 | leakypipes | mnaser: should be done in <2 months | |
| 13:39:34 | leakypipes | right arvindn05? ;P | |
| 13:39:59 | mnaser | well isnt it nice we have 6 month release cycles so i can pick it up in a release in 6 months max | |
| 13:40:06 | mnaser | ok it's friday i'll be nice | |
| 13:42:37 | leakypipes | mnaser: :) | |
| 13:46:08 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova-specs master: virt: allow instances to be booted with trusted VFs https://review.openstack.org/485522 | |
| 13:51:11 | openstackgerrit | Ed Leafe proposed openstack/nova master: Add 'member_of' param to GET /allocation_candidates https://review.openstack.org/552098 | |
| 13:51:14 | figleaf | fried_rice: ^^ rebased | |
| 13:53:26 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Fix spec name for "report CPU features as traits" https://review.openstack.org/552159 | |
| 13:53:28 | mriedem | sahid: i see the problem in that linuxbridge multinode job | |
| 13:54:48 | mriedem | posted a new version | |
| 13:55:34 | leakypipes | figleaf: +2 | |
| 13:57:48 | sahid | mriedem: cool thanks, it's that change in "hosts", right? | |
| 13:58:59 | mriedem | yeah | |
| 13:59:13 | mriedem | subtle differences in the ansible playbook for a multinode job | |
| 14:00:14 | sahid | ok, i also working on backporting the change in one of our rhos version. so i hope we could do some internal tests | |
| 14:02:20 | stephenfin | lyarwood: Been looking at this oslo.config bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1755783 It seems nested_parse is getting confused with our output for that option http://paste.openstack.org/show/703014/ | |
| 14:02:22 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1755783 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "PCI configuration documentation renders with smart quotes" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Stephen Finucane (stephenfinucane) | |
| 14:02:40 | stephenfin | lyarwood: So it's probably going to need a significant rewrite of that extension to unconfuse it :( | |
| 14:03:02 | stephenfin | (all that stuff in the <paragraph> tag should have been parsed itself but wasn't) | |
| 14:03:42 | dansmith | sahid: I thought you said you already tested this locally back in an earlier version | |
| 14:03:58 | dansmith | sahid: does that mean you haven't actually tested this manually yet? | |
| 14:04:27 | dansmith | specifically "I'm making tests locally and everything seemed to work" | |
| 14:04:46 | mnaser | are live migration job failures common-ish in gate? aka safe to recheck? | |
| 14:06:00 | fried_rice | figleaf: I'm sorry I'm just getting to this, but I've got some comments on that guy. | |
| 14:06:27 | figleaf | fried_rice: go for it | |
| 14:07:21 | sahid | dansmith: that was for a previous version of that patch | |
| 14:08:00 | dansmith | sahid: right, the version that _couldn't_ work...so you haven't tested the latest approach locally? | |
| 14:08:56 | fried_rice | figleaf, leakypipes: The thing so far that we might potentially want to hold up for is that the syntax isn't consistent with member_of in GET /resource_providers. Looks like this discussed earlier in the life of this patch, but not addressed. | |
| 14:09:16 | sahid | dansmith: no sure what you mean by the version that _counldn't work | |
| 14:09:23 | dansmith | heh | |
| 14:17:09 | figleaf | fried_rice: what are the differences that you see? | |
| 14:18:12 | fried_rice | figleaf: GET /resource_providers?member_of=in:<list of UUIDs> -- yours has no 'in:'. Personally I think 'in:' is silly and would like to see it go away. But it's inconsistent. But I don't like it. But it's inconsistent. I'm torn. | |
| 14:19:33 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/553211 | |
| 14:20:18 | figleaf | fried_rice: what do you mean? Because 'in:' is optional with a single UUID? | |
| 14:20:28 | leakypipes | fried_rice: I used to think I was indecisive. Now I'm not so sure. | |
| 14:20:35 | fried_rice | cdent: Do we have a blueprint for placement split? | |
| 14:20:43 | stephenfin | Can someone send this on its merry way through the gate? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/553751/ Fixes an issue I introduced with 'tox -e docs' locally (which the gate no longer runs) | |
| 14:20:45 | fried_rice | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/553149/ should be tagged with it. | |
| 14:20:45 | leakypipes | fried_rice: no, it's more a collection of things. | |
| 14:21:04 | mriedem | mdbooth: dansmith: Kevin_Zheng: cfriesen: re: the abort queued live migration spec, i did some digging and i think the futures library/module is what we'd want https://review.openstack.org/#/c/536722/ | |
| 14:21:20 | mriedem | throw futures into a thread pool executor and you can cancel them if they haven't already started | |
| 14:21:23 | fried_rice | figleaf: I haven't gotten all the way through the patch yet (in a meeting atm) but it looks to me like your GET /a_c member_of doesn't use 'in:' at all. | |
| 14:21:35 | leakypipes | stephenfin: gerrit is telling me it needs a rebase | |
| 14:21:42 | dansmith | mriedem: that's one way to do it yeah | |
| 14:21:43 | mriedem | reminds me of when i used to use https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/package-summary.html | |
| 14:21:45 | fried_rice | figleaf: In GET /r_p if I'm not mistaken, you *can't* specify a list without 'in:' | |
| 14:22:13 | stephenfin | leakypipes: It is? I'm not seeing anything in the UI | |
| 14:23:00 | cdent | fried_rice: no, there's no spec or blueprint at this stage, mostly because of what leakypipes says: there's a suite of vaguely connected lots of things. Do you think we should have something? | |
| 14:23:04 | mriedem | mnaser: yes we hit live migration failures in the gate intermittently | |
| 14:23:07 | figleaf | fried_rice: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/552098/8/nova/api/openstack/placement/util.py@333 | |
| 14:23:15 | mriedem | mnaser: there are some known issues with libvirt in the versions we use | |
| 14:23:27 | mnaser | mriedem: ah bummer, i'll throw a recheck then | |
| 14:23:29 | leakypipes | finucannot: it says Cannot Merge for me. | |
| 14:23:37 | mriedem | mnaser: e.g. http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/#1706377 | |
| 14:24:16 | fried_rice | cdent: Seems like it would be nice. At least a common topic so we can see everything. I guess that would be sufficient. | |
| 14:24:48 | cdent | i'll make something | |
| 14:25:39 | fried_rice | figleaf: Okay; So far I had only read the explanation comment in microversion.py and it's not listed in there. I'll stay quiet til I finish the patch. | |
| 14:25:56 | mriedem | Kevin_Zheng: so i think we create a ThreadPoolExecutor, submit the live migration calls on that, which returns Future objects, and we map those to the migration id which we can later lookup to then call Future.cancel() | |
| 14:26:07 | fried_rice | I see it in the reno. | |
| 14:26:19 | finucannot | fried_rice: Oh, right. Weird that the UI didn't say that. | |
| 14:26:46 | superdan | mriedem: we need to make sure we don't .cancel() after it's started really running | |
| 14:26:54 | superdan | mriedem: does futures handle that or do we need to? | |
| 14:27:09 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: mirror nova host aggregate members to placement https://review.openstack.org/553597 | |
| 14:27:27 | figleaf | fried_rice: if the comments can be made clearer, that can always be done in a follow-up patch, no? | |
| 14:27:29 | leakypipes | lyaaaaaaaaaaaaar: ahoy, matey. | |
| 14:27:39 | fried_rice | figleaf: Yes, certainly. | |
| 14:28:05 | Kevin_Zheng | mriedem: Thanks for reviewing, I’m not familiar with this lib, have to do some reading first | |
| 14:28:21 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Follow the new PTI for document build https://review.openstack.org/553751 | |
| 14:28:22 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: conf: Correct documentation for '[pci] passthrough_whitelist' https://review.openstack.org/552874 | |
| 14:28:53 | finucannot | johnthetubaguy, leakypipes: and fixed. A global requirements messed with the sphinx version, causing a merge conflict ^ | |
| 14:30:22 | mriedem | superdan: cancel() returns False if the task has already starte | |
| 14:30:24 | mriedem | *started | |
| 14:30:28 | superdan | mriedem: ack, col | |
| 14:30:30 | superdan | *cool | |
| 14:30:31 | mriedem | you can also add a callback function to the future | |