Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-03-15
08:05:37 Amit82 Can LXC container orchestration be done using HEAT?
08:23:01 openstackgerrit Jianghua Wang proposed openstack/os-traits master: GPU: define traits for display heads https://review.openstack.org/553277
08:50:40 openstackgerrit Tetsuro Nakamura proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Support shared and dedicated VMs in one host https://review.openstack.org/543805
09:20:36 openstackgerrit Brooks Kaminski proposed openstack/nova master: XenAPI/Stops the migration of volume backed VHDS https://review.openstack.org/533168
09:22:49 lennyb Hi, is it possible to clean/updated nova database? I have Orphaned Exception ( master branch ) http://paste.openstack.org/show/701494/
09:24:40 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: WIP https://review.openstack.org/553288
09:27:20 openstackgerrit Jianghua Wang proposed openstack/nova master: XenAPI: deprecate the config for image handler class path https://review.openstack.org/497201
09:27:20 openstackgerrit Jianghua Wang proposed openstack/nova master: XenAPI: define a new image handler to use vdi streaming https://review.openstack.org/486475
09:27:30 Spaz-Work OoOo
09:32:05 claudiub|2 jichen: hi. around?
09:32:19 jichen claudiub: yes
09:32:29 jichen claudiub: what's up?
09:32:44 claudiub cool. regarding the live-resize. do you really want to support live-downsize as well?
09:32:58 claudiub there's quite a bit of opposition to that. :)
09:34:38 claudiub or maybe we can add support for upsizing first, and then look into downsizing afterwards
09:34:54 jichen no, actually, I am ok if we only support upsize at first cycle
09:34:59 claudiub the nova cores seems to be fine with upsizing.'
09:35:07 jichen exactly, I agree with you
09:35:16 jichen upsizing should be first priority
09:35:27 claudiub great, then I will amend the spec to mention this fact.
09:35:42 jichen ok, perfect, thank you~
10:20:42 openstackgerrit Claudiu Belu proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Adds spec for instance live resize https://review.openstack.org/141219
10:39:50 openstackgerrit Claudiu Belu proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Adds spec for instance live resize https://review.openstack.org/141219
10:57:41 openstackgerrit Andrey Volkov proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Get resource provider by uuid or name https://review.openstack.org/527791
11:00:38 stephenfin Does anyone else think reviewing specs in Gerrit is a PITA? How the heck did the docs team do it for so long?
11:02:23 Spaz-Work I wish I knew more about specs
11:02:35 kashyap stephenfin: What might be a better way?
11:03:05 stephenfin kashyap: Something that lets you comment on the rendered spec would be a huge help
11:03:09 stephenfin a la Google Docs
11:03:28 kashyap stephenfin: Not that I'm advocating "for Gerrit" (with which I have a "can't live with you, but have to live without you" relation)
11:03:46 kashyap stephenfin: What is it that is specifically bothering you?
11:04:18 stephenfin Take this spec, for example https://review.openstack.org/#/c/552722/
11:04:43 stephenfin artom has kindly gone through and linked to a load of places in the code in order to explain some of the things he's talking about
11:04:47 kashyap The pig is still loading
11:05:08 kashyap stephenfin: And
11:05:11 stephenfin However, I can't click those links because it's just text. All the rst->html magic hasn't been applied yet
11:05:33 kashyap (I saw that spec, meaning to review)
11:05:43 kashyap Ah-ha
11:05:47 stephenfin Similarly, for my NUMA aware vSwitch spec, I included a load of images but none of those render in the rST, naturally enough
11:06:19 kashyap Hmm, nod
11:06:27 stephenfin So you end up with this schizophrenic style review where you're having to review the HTML version then jump back to the rST version to leave comments
11:06:37 stephenfin It's just...silly :)
11:06:40 stephenfin Also, Realistically, no one should care about the formatting of the source for a doc. It's the output that matters
11:07:27 stephenfin But yeah, </rant> :)
11:07:36 stephenfin stupid Gerrit :mutter mutter:
11:07:43 kashyap stephenfin: Yeah, I hear the pain, I just try to focus on the core content, and the formatting not to be egregious
11:08:05 stephenfin kashyap: Do. It would be a good thing to finally resolve
11:08:05 kashyap stephenfin: BTW, slightly related: Some people seem to think 'patchwork' is "dead"
11:08:18 stephenfin Oh, really?
11:08:23 kashyap stephenfin: And QEMU folks have written their own: http://patchew.org/
11:08:32 kashyap There's a bit of overlap with 'patchwork'
11:08:56 kashyap stephenfin: See this snippet:
11:08:56 kashyap 17:59 < kashyap> bonzini: Isn't there some overlap between 'patchew' and 'patchwork'?
11:08:59 kashyap 17:59 < bonzini> kashyap: yeah, but patchwork seemed dead when patchew was started
11:09:02 kashyap From a week or so ago
11:09:09 kashyap (On OFTC, #qemu)
11:09:24 stephenfin Yup, that's been around for a while. At the time Patchwork _was_ dead
11:09:40 kashyap Ah-ha, I see
11:09:43 stephenfin Was only when I and another Intel dev started working on it (for freedesktop) that it started moving forward again
11:10:03 kashyap Most people used 'patchwork' as just a "tracker" of patches, though
11:10:03 stephenfin Guess the two could be folded in but meh, I've barely any time to work on Patchwork of late
11:11:30 Spaz-Work Nova meeting is 2100 today right?
11:17:32 kashyap Spaz-Work: Not sure the hour; there are two timings
11:18:00 Spaz-Work Yeah think this week is the 2100.. sitting here late in the day trying to convert that to CDT. Guess i'll read the logs :D
11:18:03 Spaz-Work Poor night shift hours.
11:32:31 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: WIP https://review.openstack.org/553288
11:33:11 mdbooth johnthetubaguy, any chance you might be able to squint at this bugfix for me: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/551302/
11:33:47 mdbooth Incidentally, who has anything to do with Hyper-V?
11:35:11 stephenfin mdbooth: claudiub is your man
11:35:26 mdbooth claudiub, Any chance you could look at ^^^ for me?
11:36:38 mdbooth lyarwood, it deletes a bunch of connection_info-related libvirt driver code in live migration if you'd care to look
11:37:20 mdbooth claudiub, I don't think it's an issue for Hyper-V, except that it might potentially fix bugs. It's a change, though, which is why I highlight it.
11:38:56 openstackgerrit Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova master: Add disabled column to cell_mappings table. https://review.openstack.org/552505
11:40:15 lyarwood mdbooth: ack, will look
11:58:00 openstackgerrit Hironori Shiina proposed openstack/nova master: ironic: Get correct inventory for deployed node https://review.openstack.org/553367
11:59:27 ameeda Hello, I am trying to upload image from server1 to openstack "server2" using rest api. when I did that I got error message "504 Gateway Time-out The server didn't respond in time."
12:02:15 lyarwood mdbooth: LGTM, however there's no volume backed LM tests at present http://logs.openstack.org/02/551302/6/check/legacy-grenade-dsvm-neutron-multinode-live-migration/3e0cf62/job-output.txt.gz#_2018-03-13_19_30_46_058750 - due to https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1524898
12:02:16 openstack Launchpad bug 1524898 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Volume based live migration aborted unexpectedly" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Lee Yarwood (lyarwood)
12:03:25 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: Enable test_volume_backed_live_migration in tempest https://review.openstack.org/528104
12:04:23 lyarwood mdbooth: ^ you can use this change from melwitt to test LM with volume backed instances
12:28:14 mdbooth lyarwood, Will do, thanks!
12:30:09 mdbooth lyarwood: Short of adding a depends on to my patch, what's the best way to run against that?
12:30:52 mdbooth lyarwood: Not that I'd mind adding a depends on if the test patch is likely to get some priority.
12:31:41 lyarwood mdbooth: another change on top of https://review.openstack.org/528104 that depends on your change?
12:31:59 mdbooth lyarwood: Good idea, thanks.
12:33:44 openstackgerrit Matthew Booth proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Run volume-backed live migration tests https://review.openstack.org/553377
12:55:46 openstackgerrit Andrey Volkov proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Get resource provider by uuid or name https://review.openstack.org/527791
13:02:10 lpetrut mdbooth: Hi, thanks for letting us know. I took a look over the patch and it looks good, it shouldn't affect the Hyper-V driver. High chance is that we'd only have issues with the Dell iSCSI driver that you're mentioning in the commit (which should be fixed by it).
13:02:53 mdbooth lpetrut: What changes is that I'm now passing the *old* bdms to post_live_migration instead of the new ones
13:03:10 mdbooth So connection_info will relate to the source host, which is where it's actually running, rather than the destination
13:03:12 lpetrut mdbooth: do you know by any chance if there are any other iSCSI drivers that would return different connection info among hosts (i.e. have a different conn info on the destination)?
13:03:37 mdbooth lpetrut: Potentially a lot, I think
13:03:47 mdbooth That particular issue has been around for ages
13:03:54 lpetrut for FC it would look different but that's fine as disconnect_volume is a noop for FC in our case
13:04:15 mdbooth The new issue is that there's one driver where initialize_connection doesn't return the same value if you call it a second time for the *same* host
13:04:37 lpetrut got it
13:05:50 mdbooth lpetrut: This was the original bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1475411
13:05:52 openstack Launchpad bug 1475411 in nova (Ubuntu Trusty) "During post_live_migration the nova libvirt driver assumes that the destination connection info is the same as the source, which is not always true" [Undecided,Fix released]
13:06:05 mdbooth That's obviously from 2015
13:06:54 mdbooth Affects 3par, apparently: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1288039

Earlier   Later