Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-03-14
19:13:57 mriedem which is a bigger change
19:14:00 melwitt unbinding the port and binding it again
19:14:30 mriedem sean-k-mooney: i think that would also require talking to the neutron team about whether or not that would do what we need
19:14:40 mriedem i can only talk to miguel once per day, he said
19:14:46 melwitt haha
19:14:56 cfriesen are there any races that come from not waiting for vifs to actually be plugged?
19:15:05 mriedem mnaser: is there a bug report for the ODL issue?
19:15:08 mriedem cfriesen: yes
19:15:08 dansmith yes
19:15:09 sean-k-mooney "in general" un binding and binding the port "should" be safe but it can fail
19:15:16 mriedem tempest races assuming it can ssh into the guest
19:15:18 melwitt cfriesen: instance can go to ACTIVE state without having networking yet
19:15:30 mnaser mriedem: in ODL world yes, but not in nova world, but i can make one
19:15:37 mriedem mnaser: yes please for tracking
19:15:43 mnaser ok
19:15:47 melwitt well, for ssh I know from using devstack that the instance says ACTIVE before ssh daemon is ready
19:15:52 sean-k-mooney cfriesen: odl has no mechanisium to notify nova today that they have been plugged
19:15:54 melwitt I thought
19:16:01 sean-k-mooney * notify neutron
19:16:19 mriedem melwitt: if that were true,
19:16:27 mriedem our CI would shit its pants daily
19:16:47 sean-k-mooney mriedem: we get around that by a retry loop
19:16:50 dansmith mriedem: we retry waiting for ssh
19:16:57 mriedem ah yes
19:17:01 dansmith but that's a totally different problem than not having networking and DHCP ready during boot
19:17:03 mriedem so we hide the poo
19:17:13 dansmith it's totally legit to not expect the instance is ready when the state goes to active,
19:17:21 dansmith it's not legit for the instance to boot up and expect networking but have none
19:17:31 sean-k-mooney tempest waits for active then wiats for ping to work then ssh's i think
19:17:41 dansmith and then tries ssh a few times with long timeouts
19:17:43 mriedem sean-k-mooney: yes i forgot about the latter
19:17:58 mnaser i mean, dhcp could be slow too, so it doesnt matter if internet is wired up..
19:18:02 mnaser start up of the OS could be slow
19:18:14 mnaser unless you setup something inside the OS that tells nova the vm is ready, we'll always have ACTIVE vms that arent accessible
19:18:22 melwitt yeah, +1 dansmith. could this screw boot up entirely? if DHCP not ready while it's coming up? or will it always recover
19:18:33 sean-k-mooney dansmith: active and ready in an ironic case is partcallarly different things. vms tend to be ready soon after they are active
19:18:38 dansmith melwitt: yes if networking isn't running
19:18:43 melwitt urgh
19:18:52 dansmith melwitt: some OSes may try DHCP briefly, and if it gets none, then it never retries
19:19:05 dansmith if you are a cloud image and don't know what kind of cloud you're on,
19:19:13 melwitt that would majorly suck to just have a junk instance if this is hit
19:19:26 dansmith you really have to just poke around until you figure it out because it could be a variety of things
19:19:31 mnaser ...but then again this is something that has been in nova for 3-4 releases, so a fix would be nice, but i dont think its a issue thats happening often enough?
19:19:36 sean-k-mooney melwitt: also oftend cloud images will wait for cloud init to finish before starting ssh so that can take a while too
19:19:45 mnaser considering the port is never really unplugged in ovs, most things are already wired up
19:19:48 melwitt I see
19:20:03 dansmith mnaser: yeah less of a concern on reboot for that reason
19:20:05 sean-k-mooney mnaser: on hard reboot it is unpluged
19:20:15 sean-k-mooney mnaser: on soft reboot it is not
19:20:26 mnaser sean-k-mooney: but the unplug in os_vif seems to be noop from what i see (or maybe im misunderstanding things)
19:20:36 mnaser sean-k-mooney: https://github.com/openstack/os-vif/blob/master/vif_plug_ovs/ovs.py#L266-L268 nothing happens here...
19:20:45 sean-k-mooney mnaser: that only because in that code path the plugin is done by libvirt
19:20:59 mnaser oh okay sorry i'm following you now
19:21:06 mnaser the actual unplug happens by libvirt which is then picked up by n-ovs-agent
19:21:34 sean-k-mooney yep when we do the domain destroy on hard reboot libvirt remove the interface form ovs and deletes teh tap
19:21:54 mnaser ok i understand now
19:21:56 mnaser thank youy
19:22:17 cfriesen my organization has a local patch to make plug_vifs() optionally wait until the vifs are actually plugged in order to ensure that things work reliably during a live migration...we added that a long time ago and I was wondering if it's still needed, but it sounds like it is.
19:22:44 sean-k-mooney cfriesen: when you say actully plugged what do you wait for
19:23:06 dansmith we can't know that the plumbing is done behind the neutron curtain without the event right?
19:23:39 sean-k-mooney cfriesen: if its external-ids:iface-status=active in the ovs db we hard code that here https://github.com/openstack/os-vif/blob/master/vif_plug_ovs/linux_net.py#L71
19:24:35 sean-k-mooney dansmith: technically for ovs and ovs agents only we shoudl be able to use external-ids:iface-status=active but i dont know for odl
19:24:54 dansmith but that's a very specific case
19:24:55 sean-k-mooney dansmith: for lb or vpp or whatever else we have no way to tell
19:24:57 dansmith for that one type
19:24:59 dansmith yeah
19:25:36 mnaser mriedem: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1755890 i tried to write a basic description and referenced this conversation but yeah feel free to update it with any lacking details
19:25:37 openstack Launchpad bug 1755890 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Instances fail to hard reboot when using OpenDaylight" [Undecided,New]
19:25:38 cfriesen sean-k-mooney: actually, never mind. the only one with a useful query is for our custom networking thing, the others are assumed to always be up. My bad.
19:25:47 melwitt I have to run for now but I'm cool with reverting those patches if that's the best option we have. bbl
19:25:59 arvindn05 mriedem: jaypipes: updated the spec based on comments Patch set 9 should address the issues https://review.openstack.org/#/c/541507/9
19:27:09 sean-k-mooney cfriesen: the dpdk based titainium server vswitch i assuem
19:27:17 cfriesen yep
19:28:07 cfriesen it'll query the vswitch API
19:29:03 sean-k-mooney cfriesen: ya the issue is that bar seeting external-ids:iface-status=active which is an ovs agent specif thing there is no way to tell for ovs in general.
19:31:51 sean-k-mooney when odl first intregrated support into the ml2 framework this gap was discussed back in icehouse but they had no way syncronis state in odl with neutron without a intoducing an sdn constrolller specific api, b having odl emit notifcation on the rabbitmq bus or be haveing the neutron server poll odl for state change
19:32:27 sean-k-mooney the chose to do non of the above an just report vif_plugged on port binding instead and its been that way ever since
19:32:59 mnaser sean-k-mooney: maybe this is a networking-odl bug? i know that right now it creates a websocket that listens for state updates
19:33:01 mnaser https://github.com/openstack/networking-odl/blob/master/networking_odl/ml2/port_status_update.py
19:33:28 mnaser https://bugs.launchpad.net/networking-odl/+bug/1686023
19:33:29 openstack Launchpad bug 1686023 in networking-odl "networking-odl dynamic port status update full support missing" [Low,In progress]
19:33:32 mriedem jaypipes: replied in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/539605/ - need bauzas to probably elaborate at this point since i don't remember this being talked about at the ptg
19:33:42 mnaser i guess they support DOWN => ACTIVE but not ACTIVE=>DOWN
19:34:44 mnaser i wonder if there's an easy way to let neutron know that the port has gone down in there
19:34:45 mnaser and avoid the revert
19:34:48 sean-k-mooney mnaser: well i think its a ml2 framework feature request. e.g. allow agentless backend notify neutron of state changes
19:35:15 mriedem if we can blame this all on an incomplete neutron backend then that works for me
19:35:19 sean-k-mooney mnaser: that bug seams to focus on admin state which is different
19:35:19 mnaser lolol
19:36:01 mriedem https://review.openstack.org/#/c/465463/
19:36:04 mnaser sean-k-mooney: https://github.com/openstack/networking-odl/blob/master/networking_odl/ml2/port_status_update.py#L91-L95 ever that little bit? the bug talks about admin state but it seems to get the actual port state
19:37:20 sean-k-mooney mnaser: yest that should adress this but it seams that odl is not detecting the removal of the port and readding it
19:38:22 sean-k-mooney mnaser: perhaps the networking-odl ml2 driver is just not sending the notification to nova when it recives the notification from odl
19:38:41 mriedem shouldn't the driver go through the normal notificatoin code in neutron?
19:39:05 mnaser sean-k-mooney: its certainly not sending it when its being unplugged, but it looks like the code to watch for state doesnt even update it to 'down' or 'unplugged' or whatever state it should be in neutron
19:39:17 sean-k-mooney mriedem: that notification code is triggered by port status updates on the rpc bus
19:39:28 sean-k-mooney mriedem: these update from odl are from the websocket
19:41:19 sean-k-mooney mriedem: since we are not storing the state changes from https://github.com/openstack/networking-odl/blob/master/networking_odl/ml2/port_status_update.py#L91-L95 in the db i dont think https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/neutron/db/db_base_plugin_v2.py#L155-L169 will be invoked
19:41:52 mnaser sean-k-mooney: is there an example of a plugin that is storing/updating state changes in db which might be good to reference
19:42:58 sean-k-mooney maybe look at the ovs agent code.

Earlier   Later