Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-02-22
13:48:54 kashyap melwitt: Wauw, isn't it like 05:45 AM for you there?
13:48:59 melwitt tis
13:49:12 kashyap Jee
13:50:40 melwitt oh, fyi everyone I'm traveling today and tomorrow to the PTG. so I won't be around later today and tomorrow
13:51:00 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/queens: Only pull associated *sharing* providers https://review.openstack.org/546740
13:51:14 jaypipes efried: you around?
13:51:20 efried jaypipes: Yup.
13:51:30 sean-k-mooney melwitt: nice :) going to do some siteseeing over the weekend?
13:51:47 jaypipes efried: you pinged me last night about something but it's gone from my scrollback... what was it?
13:52:09 efried jaypipes: I desperately needed some SQL help.
13:52:22 melwitt sean-k-mooney: on saturday yes. on sunday we have an internal meeting day
13:52:27 jaypipes efried: I don't know anything about SQL
13:52:29 efried jaypipes: But I slogged through it, with much cursing, and put up a patch for GET /resource_providers?required=<traits>
13:52:45 jaypipes efried: ah, cool.
13:53:11 efried jaypipes: We could conceivably get this blueprint closed before the PTG :)
13:53:24 jaypipes efried: nothing wrong with that, IMHO.
13:53:25 efried jaypipes: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/546837/
13:53:33 efried Yeah, I thought it would be a nice tickymark.
13:53:54 jaypipes efried: that multiattach failure related?
13:54:04 jaypipes don't see how it could be, but worth asking...
13:54:06 efried jaypipes: No, random timeout.
13:54:08 efried I rechecked.
13:54:10 jaypipes k
13:54:44 jaypipes melwitt, dansmith, mriedem, bauzas: one of the easier specs to +2/W here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/546009/2
13:55:36 bauzas mriedem: melwitt: gibi_off told me about that, I was planning to chair it
13:55:43 bauzas but fine by me
13:56:10 sean-k-mooney jaypipes: efried: if your makeing a list of blueprints that could be closed before the ptg the nic feature based scheduling blueprint has been code complete since pike and is fully rebased for rocky. spec needs to be reapproved and patches re reviwed though
13:56:36 melwitt bauzas: okay, cool. yeah, I realized I'd have to get up early to make sure you were able to run it anyway so I might as well do it. it was my bad. thanks though
13:56:38 jaypipes sean-k-mooney: link pls
13:57:28 sean-k-mooney jaypipes: code https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/enable-sriov-nic-features spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/545951/
13:57:46 sean-k-mooney on tox faild on the spec ill go fix that now
13:58:10 jaypipes sean-k-mooney: danke
13:58:35 sean-k-mooney did something change in the template between rocky and queens?
13:58:59 melwitt sean-k-mooney: there's one new section, Upgrade impact
13:59:03 bauzas melwitt: heh, no worries
13:59:28 sean-k-mooney melwitt: ah yes that is exactly the error http://logs.openstack.org/51/545951/1/check/openstack-tox-pep8/9898780/job-output.txt.gz#_2018-02-19_20_27_16_685503 ill add it and reupload
13:59:52 mriedem jaypipes: i'll look after said busification
14:00:01 mriedem and coffee injections
14:00:30 bauzas mriedem: alrready looking ;)
14:00:34 jaypipes mriedem: 10-4
14:05:52 openstackgerrit Carlos Goncalves proposed openstack/os-vif master: WIP: Add internal port https://review.openstack.org/546991
14:11:39 openstackgerrit Tetsuro Nakamura proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Support shared and dedicated VMs in one host https://review.openstack.org/543805
14:13:35 openstackgerrit Tetsuro Nakamura proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Support shared and dedicated VMs in one host https://review.openstack.org/543805
14:13:50 bauzas melwitt: mriedem: I'm about to set Invalid for https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1751036
14:13:50 openstack Launchpad bug 1751036 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "ConfigFileValueError when defining enabled_apis" [Undecided,New]
14:14:02 bauzas because of the interop APIs
14:14:09 mriedem bauzas: i'm in a meeting atm
14:14:10 bauzas but do you agree ?
14:14:19 bauzas that I now, let's discuss later
14:14:23 bauzas know*
14:27:34 openstackgerrit Tetsuro Nakamura proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Support shared and dedicated VMs in one host https://review.openstack.org/543805
14:38:10 tetsuro jaypipes, cfriesen: now this spec https://review.openstack.org/543805 is ready for review again.
14:41:58 jaypipes tetsuro: cool, thanks. (currently in nova meeting)
14:42:22 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Make _get_sharing_providers more efficient https://review.openstack.org/547008
14:42:36 tetsuro Oops
14:42:42 efried jaypipes, cdent: ^ the optimization that prompted the feature
14:44:28 jaypipes tetsuro: it's no prob :)
14:53:33 tetsuro jaypipes: I put your proposal into alternative section. The proposal sounds really attractive to me. But it is not kindful to operators, I guess.
14:54:47 jaypipes tetsuro: the proposal to just determine the shared pin set by subtracting the dedicate pin set from vcpu_pin_set?
14:55:44 tetsuro jaypipes: right.
14:56:07 jaypipes tetsuro: gotcha. ok, will re-review this morning :)
14:56:19 tetsuro thanks in advance!
14:58:05 jaypipes tetsuro: no problemo :)
15:01:19 bauzas melwitt: mriedem: maybe worth discussing Rambo's spec at the PTG during the cinder/nova cross-session on Thurs ?
15:02:13 bauzas or we could discuss the design before that, but if after, we loose the possibility to ask Cinder for a rebuild thingy
15:07:35 melwitt bauzas: that might be a good idea if we have time. since it's possible there's something they could do on their side to facilitate it
15:08:01 bauzas melwitt: for the moment I added L333 on https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-ptg-rocky
15:08:22 bauzas melwitt: because mriedem wanted to discuss about all the rebuild problems we have
15:14:13 mriedem there is nothing i would like to discuss more than rebuild problems
15:15:49 bauzas mriedem: melwitt: maybe we could start a discussion about rebuild on wed if time allows
15:17:22 bauzas I know there is a huuuuuge Placement discussion that would occur most on all the afternoon, but maybe I should be tired after 3 hours ;)
15:20:55 mriedem if we talk about this rebuild + bfv thing,
15:21:01 mriedem it should either be with the cinder people in the room,
15:21:03 mriedem or on misc friday
15:21:10 melwitt +1
15:21:11 mriedem b/c this is a misc thing
15:22:39 bauzas mriedem: melwitt: FWIW, I'll need to leave the room by Friday noon
15:22:47 bauzas for my flight :(
15:23:14 bauzas but yeah, we could discuss about rebuilding volume-backed stuff with Cinder folks
15:23:16 bauzas anyway
15:23:40 mriedem we'll be sure to schedule all cheese-related discussions for friday morning
15:26:12 dansmith jaypipes: I approved that spec
15:26:25 dansmith jaypipes: you can repay me by approving this compute rpc compat drop, which I know you want anyway: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/543580/
15:27:17 openstackgerrit Eric Berglund proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: PowerVM Driver: Network interface attach/detach https://review.openstack.org/546813
15:31:15 bauzas mriedem: on an interop concern, should we accept other APIs but the ones we have in-tree ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1751036
15:31:15 openstack Launchpad bug 1751036 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "ConfigFileValueError when defining enabled_apis" [Undecided,New]
15:31:19 bauzas I tend to say no
15:36:10 melwitt mriedem: please double check me on the rc3 tag https://review.openstack.org/#/c/547031/1/deliverables/queens/nova.yaml
15:37:58 mriedem efried: jaypipes: dansmith: left a comment in that spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/546009/ - fine to amend with some details
15:39:07 mriedem melwitt: done
15:39:32 mriedem melwitt: also that commit hash might end up being a merge commit
15:39:41 mriedem that's why we need the depends-on
15:39:59 melwitt mriedem: thanks. so if I keep the commit hash the same + depends-on, it will work fine?
15:40:37 mriedem not if we need to use a merge commit
15:40:47 mriedem i would just add the depends-on and then WIP
15:41:02 mriedem don't want to get caught by the old smcginnis trigger finger
15:41:15 melwitt oh okay. I thought I had seen you propose a commit hash ahead of merge before but maybe I made that up
15:41:29 smcginnis :)
15:41:31 mriedem i generally do, and the job fails until i fix it up
15:41:36 melwitt thanks

Earlier   Later