Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-02-16
02:34:53 mriedem imacdonn: nvm i see you already did, thanks
02:35:36 mriedem lyarwood: can you hit the +2ed stable/queens backports in your morning? https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:stable/queens - then we'll cut RC2
02:35:44 mriedem tonyb: or i guess you could do that ^
02:36:25 tonyb mriedem: Oh I can? I didn't think I could between rc1 and release
02:36:39 mriedem smcginnis was able to, so i assume you can
02:36:51 tonyb mriedem: Oh look at that ...
02:41:22 mnaser mriedem: i think so?
02:45:47 tonyb mriedem: done
02:50:42 mriedem tonyb: nice thanks
02:51:32 tonyb mriedem: If you create the tag request with a -W I can update it with the final SHA once they merge ... or we can wait 'til next week
02:54:58 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/osc-placement master: tox.ini settings for global constraints are out of date https://review.openstack.org/543348
02:55:30 mriedem i shall do so
02:56:47 tonyb mriedem: cool
02:59:18 tonyb mriedem, stephenfin, melwitt: I seem to recall that we said for backports of docs only changes we'd only require 1 stable-core to approve. Did I make that up?
03:02:07 mriedem idk
03:02:22 mriedem if it's a docs bug fix then i think that's probably ok
03:02:44 mriedem if it's another stable core that backported it then i'm also ok with fast approve on those
03:06:44 mriedem alright gotta go
04:52:08 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/queens: Bindep does not catch missing libpcre3-dev on Ubuntu https://review.openstack.org/544108
04:52:14 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/queens: doc: fix the link for the evacuate cli https://review.openstack.org/543507
04:52:21 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/queens: Add regression test for BFV+IsolatedHostsFilter failure https://review.openstack.org/543594
05:00:11 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/queens: Handle volume-backed instances in IsolatedHostsFilter https://review.openstack.org/543595
05:00:22 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/queens: Fix docs for IsolatedHostsFilter https://review.openstack.org/543596
05:15:49 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/queens: Make bdms querying in multi-cell use scatter-gather and ignore down cell https://review.openstack.org/543489
05:16:27 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/queens: VGPU: Modify the example of vgpu white_list set https://review.openstack.org/542882
06:13:21 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Clean up ports and volumes when deleting ERROR instance https://review.openstack.org/340614
06:13:22 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional recreate test of deleting a BFV server pre-scheduling https://review.openstack.org/545123
06:13:22 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Detach volumes when deleting a BFV server pre-scheduling https://review.openstack.org/545132
06:37:36 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add periodic task to clean expired console tokens https://review.openstack.org/325381
06:37:36 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Use ConsoleAuthToken object to generate authorizations https://review.openstack.org/325414
06:37:37 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Convert websocketproxy to use db for token validation https://review.openstack.org/333990
07:43:16 stelucz_ Hello, is there nova client command to delete resource_provider from database? After running nova service-delete <id>, record for compute node still exists in resource_providers table, thus reprovisioning of compute node ends up in message: Another thread already created a resource provider with the UUID 7b01cc27-c101-4c05-aaed-5958ef1270a1. Grabbing that record from the placement API.
07:57:08 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.openstack.org/541561
08:01:51 openstackgerrit Hiroaki Kobayashi proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Use jsonutils of oslo_serialization https://review.openstack.org/545231
08:47:20 openstackgerrit Tetsuro Nakamura proposed openstack/nova master: [libvirt] Add _get_numa_memnode() https://review.openstack.org/529906
08:47:21 openstackgerrit Tetsuro Nakamura proposed openstack/nova master: [libvirt] Add _get_XXXpin_cpuset() https://review.openstack.org/527631
08:47:21 openstackgerrit Tetsuro Nakamura proposed openstack/nova master: Add NumaTopology support for libvirt/qemu driver https://review.openstack.org/530451
08:47:22 openstackgerrit Tetsuro Nakamura proposed openstack/nova master: disable cpu pinning with libvirt/qemu driver https://review.openstack.org/531049
09:05:21 hrw how to mock nova.conf option in tests?
09:30:38 bauwser good Friday everyone
09:36:37 openstackgerrit Tetsuro Nakamura proposed openstack/nova master: trivial: omit condition evaluations https://review.openstack.org/545248
09:41:17 gmann_ hrw: you can by set_override - https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/bfae5f28a4c3b39f7978d5f3015c1b32be81215d/nova/tests/functional/api_sample_tests/test_hide_server_addresses.py#L30
09:41:37 hrw gmann_: thx
09:44:09 hrw oslo_config.cfg.NoSuchOptError: no such option num_of_pcie_slots in group [libvirt]
09:44:26 hrw now just have to find where tests fake whole nova.conf ;d
10:07:29 openstackgerrit Marcin Juszkiewicz proposed openstack/nova master: Allow to configure amount of PCIe ports in aarch64 instance https://review.openstack.org/545034
10:08:41 hrw this one adds test and new config option
10:11:01 stelucz_ Hello, is there nova client command to delete resource_provider from database? After running nova service-delete <id>, record for compute node still exists in resource_providers table, thus reprovisioning of compute node ends up in message: Another thread already created a resource provider with the UUID 7b01cc27-c101-4c05-aaed-5958ef1270a1. Grabbing that record from the placement API.
11:15:17 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: api-ref: provide more detail on what a provider aggregate is https://review.openstack.org/539033
11:45:08 openstackgerrit Marcin Juszkiewicz proposed openstack/nova master: Allow to configure amount of PCIe ports in aarch64 instance https://review.openstack.org/545034
11:48:41 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: trivial: Move __init__ function https://review.openstack.org/538223
11:48:41 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tox: Add mypy target https://review.openstack.org/538221
11:48:42 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tox: Store list of converted files https://review.openstack.org/538222
11:48:42 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: mypy: Add type annotations to 'nova.pci' https://review.openstack.org/538224
11:48:43 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: zuul: Add 'mypy' job https://review.openstack.org/539168
12:26:40 larsks Hey nova folk: there are some libvirt guests on our pike compute nodes that have an empty <nova:owner> attribute in the libvirt xml (which is causing ceilometer to blow up). Is an empty owner a known problem? Or is that expected behavior in some circumstances?
12:27:05 hrw larsks: maybe owner account got removed from system?
12:28:30 larsks hrw: the owner is the associated project, right? The project still exists.
12:28:54 larsks And would nova update the xml on a running guest like that in any case?
12:29:17 hrw <nova:owner><nova:user /><nova:project /></nova:owner>
12:29:51 hrw larsks: sorry, no idea. I jsut hack nova
12:30:08 hrw and use bigger and bigger knives each time
12:30:33 larsks Fair enough :).
12:49:34 cdent finucannot: has mypy found some juicy bugs in nova yet?
13:32:42 hrw anyone know how to get is guest instance i440fx or q35?
13:35:59 hrw found. guest.os_mach_type
13:37:28 finucannot cdent: Nothing exciting yet but it will as it expands. I started with 'nova.pci' simply because comprehending that stuff is currently a nightmare and types help
13:38:04 cdent Will be cool to see how things play out
14:01:08 openstackgerrit Marcin Juszkiewicz proposed openstack/nova master: Allow to configure amount of PCIe ports in aarch64 instance https://review.openstack.org/545034
14:01:21 hrw one step closer
14:01:29 hrw shit. have to fix commit message now
14:02:11 openstackgerrit Marcin Juszkiewicz proposed openstack/nova master: Allow to configure amount of PCIe ports https://review.openstack.org/545034
14:06:37 openstackgerrit Eric Young proposed openstack/nova master: Enable native mode for ScaleIO volumes https://review.openstack.org/545304
14:07:24 hrw one simple thing, few projects involved to find out what is going on. nova, libvirt, qemu, uefi :(
14:30:26 mnaser this simple clean up has been a lot messier than expected :(
14:31:20 mnaser melwitt: for some reason that example you have listed has multiple attachments so that’s probably why it still is marked as reserved? mriedem maybe can confirm this?
14:36:25 finucannot bauwser: Could you knock this one through? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/538223/
14:37:08 fried_rice stelucz: I believe osc has the command you're looking for. But it doesn't sound like you need to delete it in that scenario. The message you're seeing is not an error.
14:54:22 melwitt mnaser: multiple attachments? no
14:55:06 lyarwood sean-k-mooney: https://bugs.launchpad.net/os-vif/+bug/1749972 - finucannot pointed me in your direction regarding this odd `brctl setageing $bridge 0` behaviour I've just stumbled across with the latest 16.04 kernel, would you mind taking a look?
14:55:07 openstack Launchpad bug 1749972 in os-vif "`brctl setageing $bridge 0` fails on Ubuntu 16.04 4.4.0-21-generic" [Undecided,New]
14:55:17 mnaser melwitt: in your curl example, I saw multiple attachments returned
14:55:30 mnaser I count 4
14:55:47 mnaser (To 4 différence instances)
14:55:55 mnaser Different*
14:56:16 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: api-ref: Further clarify placement aggregates https://review.openstack.org/545356
14:56:23 fried_rice figleaf: ^^^
14:56:52 melwitt mnaser: oh, weird. I didn't notice that
14:56:55 fried_rice mriedem, superdan: bauwser also ^
14:57:44 mnaser melwitt: I can only guess that maybe you tried to run this before applying patch so a few got accumulated? Or maybe it’s a multiattach volume?
14:57:49 melwitt I had been reusing the same volume as I messed up a bunch of tests. I'll try again with a new one
14:58:01 bauwser fried_rice: +2
14:58:11 fried_rice thx
14:58:21 bauwser we can iterate long about docs :)
14:58:33 bauwser but I'm fine
15:00:39 fried_rice As long as each iteration is an improvement over the previous, agree that we need not make every patch perfect.
15:04:01 melwitt mnaser: indeed you're right, it works fine with a fresh volume with only one attachment. thanks for pointing that out
15:04:20 melwitt I'll respin it to remove that code comment I wrote that was wrong
15:04:43 mnaser melwitt: awesome!
15:16:06 melwitt correction, with a fresh volume it actually has no attachments, if I make it fail to build on compute. it ends up 'reserved' with no attachments, then the detach makes it 'available' then the delete deletes the volume

Earlier   Later