Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-02-08
16:11:57 mriedem johnthetubaguy might know
16:12:07 mriedem it was part of the feature classification work that osic was doing
16:12:24 hrw mriedem: functionality rather. there are other column without CI stuff
16:12:43 mriedem hrw: you can't create/delete a server with aarch64?
16:13:19 stephenfin mriedem: Looking at line 76, it would seem we should be using partial, not missing
16:13:33 hrw mriedem: docs part is weird.
16:13:34 stephenfin Assuming you _can_ create a server, heh
16:14:01 hrw mriedem: functionality list depends on tempest tests. and in tempest output I did not found ones referred there
16:14:23 hrw mriedem: support-matrix depends on commands == can be tested
16:14:41 mriedem doc/source/user/support-matrix.ini is much more straight forward, it doesn't concern itself with CI coverage
16:14:50 mriedem the doc/source/user/feature-matrix-gp.ini one is the one that annoys me
16:14:51 hrw mriedem: did not found or found errors in tempest
16:15:05 mriedem we have no CI coverage for libvirt+aarch64,
16:15:10 mriedem so that's an easy one,
16:15:20 mriedem but i don't know if the gp doc is just about CI coverage or not
16:15:24 mriedem it's half baked
16:15:29 mriedem and i'd kind of like to delete it
16:15:46 hrw mriedem: if feature-matrix-gp.ini tells me that feature X depends on test A-B-C-D and I see that A-B-C-D failed in tempest run then it looks like missing rather then complete
16:16:38 mriedem hrw: so for L73 you're saying you can't create or delete a server with libvirt+aarch64?
16:18:40 hrw mriedem: if I go straight through tests like this doc suggests then it looks like that
16:21:45 hrw feature-matrix-gp.ini/operation.create-delete-server lists two tests: 9a438d88-10c6-4bcd-8b5b-5b6e25e1346f (test_list_servers) and 585e934c-448e-43c4-acbf-d06a9b899997 (test_list_servers_with_detail) and I lack both in any tempest run logs
16:21:48 mriedem hrw: honestly i'd just remove the changes for the -gp doc and ignore it
16:22:11 mriedem let's just sort out the more complete feature support matrix, which isn't about CI
16:22:40 hrw mriedem: that's an option
16:24:49 openstackgerrit Claudiu Belu proposed openstack/nova master: hyperv: Cleans up live migration Planned VM https://review.openstack.org/478943
16:26:06 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: Add release note for Aggregate[Core|Ram|Disk]Filter change https://review.openstack.org/542290
16:28:27 cfriesen is there a debug option to include the body of requests in the nova-api log?
16:28:58 hrw mriedem: will check your comments on my setup
16:31:53 ameeda mriedem: I am back. I added this line "libpcre3-dev [platform:dpkg]" as you mentioned before to bindep.txt , do I have to add "pcre-devel" too ?
16:32:27 mriedem ameeda: i'm going to restore and approve https://review.openstack.org/#/c/542002/
16:32:38 mriedem it's so trivial it's not worth dropping it since yours would be the same
16:32:49 mriedem ameeda: yes you'd add pcre-devel for rpm
16:34:22 ameeda mriedem: but I take it before him :( , anyway feel free to do what you want
16:35:26 hrw how to use interface-detach? "nova interface-detach dd8 eth1" does nothing
16:35:57 ameeda mriedem: pcre-devel [platform:rpm test] is fine ?
16:37:02 johnthetubaguy hrw: good questions, the long term aim was for the tests to help auto generate the grid, only some tests passing sounds like partial to me
16:37:29 hrw johnthetubaguy: create-delete does not test either creating nor deleting
16:38:08 johnthetubaguy hrw: that sounds wrong, you got the links I can dig to see what was going on there
16:38:59 hrw johnthetubaguy: at least it goes like that when you look at 'tempest --list' output (sth like that - the one which gives names<>uuid mapping)
16:40:59 johnthetubaguy hrw: yep I see now, this looks broken: https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/5158ca7dcffd583dc8dd7c29b0a9a595d7de7dcf/doc/source/feature_matrix_gp.ini#L51
16:41:27 hrw johnthetubaguy: exactly
16:41:49 hrw anyone used 'interface-detach' without --port-id?
16:41:58 johnthetubaguy hrw: oh wait... that does a create in the setup
16:42:20 johnthetubaguy hrw: I think its taken from what was used for the logo certification stuff at the time
16:42:36 hrw johnthetubaguy: anyway I skip that part for aarch64
16:42:46 johnthetubaguy hrw: I think that's a nova-network thingy, the error handling is super dodgy
16:42:59 hrw johnthetubaguy: support-matrix.ini is easier to fill
16:42:59 johnthetubaguy hrw: why skip for aarch64? I missed that
16:43:14 johnthetubaguy ah, got you
16:43:33 hrw johnthetubaguy: like I told earlier: feature-matrix-gp.ini/operation.create-delete-server lists two tests: 9a438d88-10c6-4bcd-8b5b-5b6e25e1346f (test_list_servers) and 585e934c-448e-43c4-acbf-d06a9b899997 (test_list_servers_with_detail) and I lack both in any tempest run logs
16:44:01 hrw johnthetubaguy: so if I go right then create-delete functionality is missing, right??
16:46:03 johnthetubaguy hrw: correct, if its not tested in the gate, you would mark it as missing
16:46:58 johnthetubaguy by gate I mean 3rdparty I guess
16:47:33 hrw johnthetubaguy: http://logs.openstack.org/28/541728/8/check/build-openstack-sphinx-docs/b9ac718/html/user/feature-classification.html
16:48:49 hrw johnthetubaguy: table is bogus for aarch64: is marked as missing or unknown despite working. just because tests used in ini files test for other stuff than names say
16:49:04 hrw johnthetubaguy: or listed tests are not used anymore
16:49:32 johnthetubaguy hrw: yeah seems like its bit rotted
16:49:35 hrw hm. no volumes in my setup
16:49:37 hrw (openstack) volume create --image f91ae3a7-e067-466c-b1b3-e592ea58d266 --size 8 --availability-zone nova my-new-volume
16:49:40 hrw internal endpoint for volumev2 service in RegionOne region not found
16:50:03 johnthetubaguy probably worth deleting at some point...
16:50:17 hrw johnthetubaguy: so instead of filling table with 'sorry, but nothing works here' I prefer to fill support-matrix one with 'this works, this does not and that is not tested'
16:50:42 johnthetubaguy hrw: yes makes sense
16:52:09 johnthetubaguy separate thing to work out how this matches up with interop tests and the gate, sounds worrying
16:52:39 mriedem ameeda: i don't know what the "test" part is for in bindep, probably need to ask about that in #openstack-infra
16:53:25 mriedem hrw: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/tempest/tree/tempest/api/compute/servers/test_create_server.py#n87 does test create/delete
16:53:40 mriedem hrw: the test class setup creates some servers, and the teardown deletes those servers
16:53:46 mriedem http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/tempest/tree/tempest/api/compute/servers/test_create_server.py#n54
16:54:22 mriedem johnthetubaguy: hrw: interface attach/detach is specifically neutron only
16:54:48 mriedem https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/#create-interface
16:54:52 mriedem https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/#detach-interface
16:54:54 hrw mriedem: then why feature-matrix-gp lists list_servers instead of server_create etc?
16:55:10 mriedem hrw: likely because it's also a defcore interop test
16:55:26 mriedem any tempest compute api test that has a server in it creates a server
16:55:29 mriedem so they probably just picked one
16:55:43 hrw https://refstack.openstack.org/#/results/952ebce2-af82-4ed6-81ba-860e80d38af4 is one of our latest runs. 75% passed.
16:56:24 hrw anyway... let me check what other entries I am missing in support matrix
16:56:47 mriedem my guess is if tempest is blowing up on your CI run, things aren't getting cleaned up properly and you're seeing cascading failures
16:56:58 mriedem if you just run tempest.api.compute.servers.test_create_server.ServersTestJSON.test_list_servers it should be fine
16:57:00 hrw other than volumes which for some reason does not work on my setup
16:57:04 hrw mriedem: possible
16:58:25 hrw found. no cinder ;D
17:01:33 johnthetubaguy mriedem: yeah I think we picked interop ones over any other
17:02:14 johnthetubaguy hrw: the basic one doesn't use volumes I thought
17:02:30 mriedem it doesn't
17:02:40 mriedem he's just saying that's why he's "unknown" about anything wrt volumes
17:03:02 hrw anyway redeploying with cinder now
17:03:20 johnthetubaguy ah
17:03:42 mriedem yeah you kind of need cinder for volumes
17:03:53 mriedem unless you're still running essex somewhere
17:04:24 hrw essex for me is some part of uk or sth like that ;D
17:04:55 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Ensure resource classes correctly https://review.openstack.org/539738
17:04:55 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: New-style _set_inventory_for_provider https://review.openstack.org/537648
17:04:56 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: SchedulerReportClient.update_from_provider_tree https://review.openstack.org/533821
17:04:57 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Use update_provider_tree from resource tracker https://review.openstack.org/520246
17:04:57 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Fix nits in update_provider_tree series https://review.openstack.org/531260
17:04:57 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Move refresh time from report client to prov tree https://review.openstack.org/535517
17:04:58 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Make generation optional in ProviderTree https://review.openstack.org/539324
17:04:58 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Add nested resources to server moving tests https://review.openstack.org/527728
17:06:07 stvnoyes mriedem: fyi - I just updated that bug on multiattach + multi-create. The next issue is stickier than the first one. https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1747985

Earlier   Later