Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-01-31
20:38:25 mriedem dansmith: melwitt: we had talked at one point a few weeks ago about re-arranging the cells docs to move the cells v2 setup stuff to the top since that's mostly what people care about now when upgrading to ocata ^
20:38:47 mriedem tried to move that stuff around and still leave the historical manifesto and cells v1 stuff in there to still make sense
20:39:18 melwitt ack
20:44:37 efried mriedem: "the in-tree powervm driver doesn't support gpu passthrough right?" Not yeeeeeetttt....
20:49:00 hrw does someone uses hw_pointer_model option? with something else than 'usbtablet' there?
20:49:38 hrw and if you do then does it work for you?
21:05:35 ameeda mriedem: replied
21:05:52 mriedem hrw: i thought it was end of day for you?
21:07:05 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Re-arrange cells docs for modern deployments https://review.openstack.org/539674
21:17:18 mriedem dansmith: can you hit this backport so i can get the one below it? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/527560/
21:17:24 ameeda mriedem: please check the patch there is important comment there https://review.openstack.org/#/c/507486
21:18:14 dansmith mriedem: doneski
21:23:09 mriedem ameeda: i'm not sure what you want me to look at in that change
21:24:55 mriedem ugh i guess we can't backport this fix now https://review.openstack.org/#/c/524755/4/nova/objects/host_mapping.py@152
21:25:47 mriedem even though nothing uses it over rpc?
21:27:49 dansmith mriedem: well like I said I don't think that needed to be a bump anyway
21:28:03 dansmith mriedem: you could backport without the version bump and be fine I think.. seems scary, but should be alright
21:28:37 openstackgerrit Claudiu Belu proposed openstack/nova master: hyper-v: autospec classes before they are instantiated https://review.openstack.org/342211
21:32:05 mriedem efried: see what you think about my 'experimental' wording idea in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/539266/
21:32:43 mriedem dansmith: might not be necessary, i was just thinking about it b/c the cells faq page says you can use this to list hosts in a cell, but there are other options for doing that as well, so not super important
21:36:57 ameeda mriedem: Surya Seetharaman -> The same change of adding "--until-complete" is been done here I think ? : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/507486/29/doc/source/cli/nova-manage.rst
21:37:17 ameeda mriedem: I will upload new patch now
21:37:59 mriedem ameeda: your patch is much more targeted to just updating the man page
21:38:15 openstackgerrit Ameed Ashour proposed openstack/nova master: add "--until-complete" option for nova-manage db archive_deleted_rows. https://review.openstack.org/539654
21:38:57 ameeda mriedem: I uploaded new patch.
21:39:56 ameeda mriedem: it seems that I shouldn't write tab when I add description ?
21:41:16 efried mriedem: Responded. Thanks.
21:41:20 openstackgerrit Ameed Ashour proposed openstack/nova master: add "--until-complete" option for nova-manage db archive_deleted_rows. https://review.openstack.org/539654
21:41:34 mriedem ameeda: everything should be spaces, not tabs
21:42:35 ameeda mriedem: oh, ok I will upload new patch, sorry
21:46:07 openstackgerrit Ameed Ashour proposed openstack/nova master: add "--until-complete" option for nova-manage db archive_deleted_rows. https://review.openstack.org/539654
21:47:13 ameeda mriedem: uploaded (Y)
21:52:00 ameeda mriedem: Thank you!! now I need to get Ocata release and add the change for it ? I think that I has pike version right ?
21:53:20 mriedem ameeda: you're on the master branch, which is currently queens
21:53:31 mriedem ameeda: review process is generally 2 +2s to approve a patch
21:53:43 mriedem ameeda: so you might as well hold off until someone actually approves the change
21:55:05 efried mriedem: FYI, I seem to have a decent delay in receiving email from the mailing lists. (By way of explaining why I appeared to say the same thing you had "already" said.)
21:55:54 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Provide support matrix and doc for VGPU https://review.openstack.org/539266
21:56:51 mriedem efried: that is no excuse, you need to do better at your precognition of issues to come up in the ML in order to beat me to the punch
21:57:04 efried clearly
21:57:06 mriedem better call tom cruise
21:57:19 efried or that bald chick
21:59:26 ameeda mriedem: its okay, Thank you for your time and helps.
21:59:43 ameeda mriedem: please don't forget to review this for me https://review.openstack.org/#/c/528385/
22:01:29 mriedem ameeda: at this point i dream about the opportunity to review that patch :)
22:01:33 mriedem it is my destiny
22:05:12 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove old flavor_access_get_by_flavor_id db api method https://review.openstack.org/539700
22:05:52 ameeda mriedem: lol, I appreciate that from you,I know that its hard to you to find time to check all reviews
22:06:38 ameeda mriedem: lastly I see +2 on one of my patches ^_^, lol
22:07:44 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove old flavor_extra_specs_delete db api method https://review.openstack.org/539702
22:13:30 melwitt mriedem: on this backport, we're only concerned about holding it from ocata because of the possible related network-vif-plugged event timeout, but not for pike? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/531422
22:13:53 mriedem melwitt: i am concerned for pike, but we have more time for pike
22:13:56 mriedem so less concerned
22:14:01 melwitt okay
22:14:27 mriedem i thought about dropping my +2
22:14:32 mriedem but i didn't think about it very hard
22:14:46 melwitt fair enough
22:15:27 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove old flavor_extra_specs_delete db api method https://review.openstack.org/539702
22:15:28 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove old flavor_extra_specs_get db api method https://review.openstack.org/539706
22:17:45 Roamer` hm, has anybody reported problems with the "libvirt: QEMU native LUKS decryption for encrypted volumes" change recently?
22:18:36 melwitt not that I know of. have you experienced problems with it?
22:18:50 Roamer` the StorPool Cinder CI started failing each and every test run with the same problem: test_encrypted_cinder_volumes_luks fails and there is a nova-compute exception: Failed to detach volume 645fd643-89fc-4b3d-9ea5-59c764fc39a2 from /dev/vdb: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'format_dom'
22:19:08 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove old flavor_extra_specs_delete db api method https://review.openstack.org/539702
22:19:09 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove old flavor_extra_specs_get db api method https://review.openstack.org/539706
22:19:11 Roamer` just a minute, let me point you at a stack trace
22:19:57 Roamer` http://logs.ci-openstack.storpool.com/18/539318/1/check/dsvm-tempest-storpool/c3daf58/logs/screen-n-cpu.txt.gz#_Jan_31_18_07_27_971552 and a couple of lines further down
22:20:50 Roamer` melwitt: ^^ - it looks like the LibvirtConfigGuestDiskEncryption is missing a "secret" (not initialized; maybe not passed somewhere?)
22:20:56 Roamer` and this happens on every run
22:21:30 melwitt Roamer`: okay. could you please open a bug against nova with a link to the log and excerpt of the stack trace?
22:21:54 Roamer` melwitt, sure, I'll open it right now
22:21:56 melwitt we'll have lyarwood take a look at it
22:22:01 melwitt thank you
22:24:46 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove old flavor_access_remove db api method https://review.openstack.org/539709
22:34:09 Roamer` lyarwood, melwitt, https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1746609
22:34:10 openstack Launchpad bug 1746609 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "test_boot_server_from_encrypted_volume_luks cannot detach an encrypted StorPool-backed volume" [Undecided,New]
22:34:23 Roamer` it's a bit brief, but it has links to the logs...
22:34:35 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Avoid inventory DELETE API (no conflict detection) https://review.openstack.org/539712
22:34:48 efried jaypipes: How about them apples ^
22:35:12 efried Note approx -400LOC net.
22:35:13 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove old flavor_access_add db api methods https://review.openstack.org/539714
22:35:30 melwitt Roamer`: thanks. we'll use this to investigate what's going wrong
22:35:38 openstackgerrit Eric Berglund proposed openstack/nova master: Use dict.get() when accessing capabilities dict https://review.openstack.org/539715
22:41:23 mriedem Roamer`: is the storpool volume driver passing a secret in it's connection_info dict when using an encrypted volume type
22:42:01 mriedem i'm not actually sure if that's required
22:42:27 mriedem should probably check lee's patches to see if he had to change anything in devstack for this stuff to work, like with the key manager across both nova and cinder
22:43:00 mriedem https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/libvirt-qemu-native-luks+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
22:43:18 mriedem melwitt: you know,
22:43:22 mriedem now that i think about it,
22:43:39 mriedem the tempest test that tests encrypted volumes is marked 'slow' so i don't think it actually runs in a job in our check queue...
22:43:47 mriedem i think there is a job that runs it in the experimental queue
22:44:36 mriedem this one https://github.com/openstack-infra/project-config/blob/master/zuul.d/projects.yaml#L10841
22:46:07 mriedem passes here though http://logs.openstack.org/60/539260/2/experimental/legacy-tempest-dsvm-neutron-scenario-multinode-lvm-multibackend/77a82c8/job-output.txt.gz#_2018-01-31_20_59_15_161538
22:48:01 melwitt hm, okay
22:48:06 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove old flavor_access_get_by_flavor_id db api method https://review.openstack.org/539720
22:53:10 Roamer` mriedem, the StorPool driver does not generate any structures by itself, at your suggestion it inherits LibvirtVolumeDriver's get_config() method
22:53:52 Roamer` and from what I can see of the libvirt LUKS patch, the secret should be stored by LibvirtBaseVolumeDriver's get_config()
22:54:38 mriedem u'data': {u'device_path': u'/dev/storpool/os--volume-645fd643-89fc-4b3d-9ea5-59c764fc39a2', u'encrypted': True, u'volume': u'645fd643-89fc-4b3d-9ea5-59c764fc39a2', u'qos_specs': None, u'client_id': 12, u'access_mode': u'rw'}
22:54:50 mriedem https://review.openstack.org/#/c/523958/18/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py@1342
22:55:04 mriedem looks like the libvirt driver is expecting a connection_info['data']['volume_id'] entry
22:56:02 melwitt there must be one, else we'd see a KeyError, right? is it None?

Earlier   Later