| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-01-24 | |||
| 21:03:33 | jackie-truong | I realize that it technically makes sense to have the dependencies work: TrustedCerts object -> API -> cert_utils module | |
| 21:03:45 | jackie-truong | But technically, that isn't necessary | |
| 21:04:09 | jackie-truong | Since the API can be updated to pass around a useless object | |
| 21:04:10 | mriedem | no i was saying object > util (make things do something) > API (expose the things that do something) | |
| 21:05:01 | jackie-truong | Yeah, that timeline makes sense too. Basically, both util and API changes depend on the object change | |
| 21:05:20 | jackie-truong | but util and API don't have any dependency on each other | |
| 21:06:00 | jackie-truong | So we used the depends-on tag to indicate what dependencies needed to build | |
| 21:06:41 | mriedem | jackie-truong: i think you're asserting like code deps, and i'm asserting functionality deps | |
| 21:06:43 | melwitt | mriedem: replied | |
| 21:06:45 | jroll | mriedem: our jobs are no longer segfaulting n-cond as of this morning, so nfi what was causing it :/ | |
| 21:06:55 | mriedem | jroll: huh | |
| 21:06:57 | mriedem | success! | |
| 21:07:09 | jroll | ikr | |
| 21:07:20 | jroll | proves "have a beer and try again tomorrow" is always a good plan | |
| 21:07:41 | jackie-truong | mriedem: Correct. Should the depends-on tag be used for functionality deps, too? | |
| 21:09:28 | sean-k-mooney | jroll: hum well it works. kind of hoped you would get to the bottom of that one | |
| 21:10:00 | jroll | sean-k-mooney: yeah, me too, but is nice to have it off my back | |
| 21:10:49 | mriedem | jackie-truong: you don't need a depends-on when it's in the same repo, just stack the changes in a series | |
| 21:10:53 | mriedem | object > utils > API | |
| 21:11:05 | mriedem | the API changes should always be the last thing to go | |
| 21:11:47 | sean-k-mooney | mriedem: logic being dont expose the feature at the api until its fully done right | |
| 21:12:30 | mriedem | sean-k-mooney: yes that's generally how things should work | |
| 21:12:48 | mriedem | because we support CD, | |
| 21:12:53 | mriedem | so that API can be in the wild once it's merged | |
| 21:12:56 | mriedem | and we have to support it | |
| 21:14:11 | jackie-truong | mriedem: Got it. bpoulos will fix shortly | |
| 21:14:19 | bpoulos | mriedem: I'll update the API order. I think we chose the way we did because that was the order it was listed in in the spec (at http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/queens/approved/nova-validate-certificates.html ) | |
| 21:28:28 | openstackgerrit | Brianna Poulos proposed openstack/nova master: Add trusted_certs object https://review.openstack.org/489408 | |
| 21:28:28 | openstackgerrit | Brianna Poulos proposed openstack/nova master: Implement certificate_utils https://review.openstack.org/479949 | |
| 21:28:29 | openstackgerrit | Brianna Poulos proposed openstack/nova master: Add trusted_image_certificates to REST API https://review.openstack.org/486204 | |
| 21:49:04 | openstackgerrit | Brianna Poulos proposed openstack/nova master: Add trusted_certs object https://review.openstack.org/489408 | |
| 21:53:43 | openstackgerrit | Brianna Poulos proposed openstack/nova master: Implement certificate_utils https://review.openstack.org/479949 | |
| 21:54:43 | openstackgerrit | Brianna Poulos proposed openstack/nova master: Add trusted_image_certificates to REST API https://review.openstack.org/486204 | |
| 21:59:41 | openstackgerrit | Brianna Poulos proposed openstack/nova master: Add trusted_certs object https://review.openstack.org/489408 | |
| 22:00:30 | openstackgerrit | Brianna Poulos proposed openstack/nova master: Implement certificate_utils https://review.openstack.org/479949 | |
| 22:00:45 | openstackgerrit | Brianna Poulos proposed openstack/nova master: Add trusted_image_certificates to REST API https://review.openstack.org/486204 | |
| 22:01:16 | mriedem | tssurya_: dansmith: melwitt: L74 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-ptg-rocky | |
| 22:01:22 | mriedem | updated to summarize some of the meeting notes | |
| 22:01:32 | dansmith | awesome | |
| 22:01:38 | melwitt | thanks for doing that | |
| 22:04:06 | tssurya_ | mriedem : thanks for putting it all in one place, | |
| 22:07:04 | jackie-truong | mriedem: dependency orders are now fixed. sorry about that | |
| 22:19:38 | mriedem | lyarwood: is the native luks swap volume thing b/c of blockRebase? and if so, is that then also an issue for guest-assisted snapshot of encrypted volumes for volumes like NFS/gluster? | |
| 22:20:10 | mriedem | i don't know if we even have a tempest test for creating a snapshot of an instance with an encrypted volume attached, probably not | |
| 22:20:28 | mriedem | and if we did, it would only be run in the NFS CI | |
| 22:26:37 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Move remaining uses of parted to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/519483 | |
| 22:31:35 | mriedem | gmann: do you plan on doing anything with these WIP changes? https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/api-extensions-merge-queens+status:open | |
| 22:31:47 | mriedem | gmann: otherwise once the 2 patches from alex_xu are merged i'm going to complete the blueprint for queens | |
| 22:32:46 | mriedem | or i can just defer to rocky | |
| 22:33:56 | mriedem | efried: i assume we'll just defer this to rocky https://review.openstack.org/#/c/508345/ | |
| 22:34:29 | efried | mriedem Yeah. I deemed nrp more important and didn't spend the cycles to investigate why that one's... "special". | |
| 22:34:40 | mriedem | that's fine | |
| 22:36:15 | bpoulos | mriedem lyarwood: the latest encrypted volume tempest tests are at https://github.com/openstack/barbican-tempest-plugin/blob/master/barbican_tempest_plugin/tests/scenario/test_volume_encryption.py and don't involve any snapshots | |
| 22:39:20 | mriedem | #success osc-placement 1.0.0 released; you can now do things with resource providers/classes via OSC CLI now | |
| 22:39:22 | openstackstatus | mriedem: Added success to Success page | |
| 22:39:28 | mriedem | mnaser: ^ | |
| 22:39:38 | mriedem | you don't have to hack the db directly as much! | |
| 22:41:23 | melwitt | "as much" \o/ | |
| 22:42:18 | openstackgerrit | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Update reno for stable/queens https://review.openstack.org/537698 | |
| 23:40:51 | efried | jaypipes Hi, didn't see you come in. | |
| 23:46:43 | openstackgerrit | Mike Perez proposed openstack/nova master: Replace support matrix ext with common library https://review.openstack.org/481304 | |
| 23:52:42 | jaypipes | efried: sorry been out of network access for a while | |
| 23:53:47 | efried | jaypipes You missed a rather hearty debate on the extent to which the internals of generation management should be a part of the placement API spec. | |
| 23:54:26 | efried | jaypipes TL;DR: does the client get to know that the generation is a monotonically increasing integer starting at zero; or should the generation be completely opaque to the client? | |
| #openstack-nova - 2018-01-25 | |||
| 00:04:08 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: New-style _set_inventory_for_provider https://review.openstack.org/537648 | |
| 00:04:08 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: SchedulerReportClient.update_from_provider_tree https://review.openstack.org/533821 | |
| 00:04:09 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Use update_provider_tree from resource tracker https://review.openstack.org/520246 | |
| 00:04:09 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Fix nits in update_provider_tree series https://review.openstack.org/531260 | |
| 00:04:10 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Move refresh time from report client to prov tree https://review.openstack.org/535517 | |
| 00:11:17 | jaypipes | efried: the client should just know it's an *atomically* increasing integer that, if it changed from the client's previous view of the generation, should trigger a re-read of the expected state. | |
| 00:11:26 | jaypipes | (and now I have to leave, I'm sorry :( | |
| 00:11:40 | efried | jaypipes Have a good one. | |
| 00:11:43 | Spazmotic | see ya jay | |
| 00:11:55 | Spazmotic | Just waking up and drinking my coffee and getting ready for hte gym.. whew | |
| 00:32:15 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Transform instance.resize_prep notification https://review.openstack.org/465081 | |
| 00:54:41 | mnaser | mriedem: awesome stuff about osc-placement :D | |
| 01:46:33 | oomichi | takashin: hi, still isn't https://review.openstack.org/#/c/533134/ favorite? | |
| 01:47:38 | takashin | oomichi: Hi. There are redirects. So the modification is not necessary. | |
| 01:48:33 | oomichi | takashin: do you see my comment? | |
| 01:49:59 | takashin | oomichi: Yes. but my patch was not just replacing http with https. | |
| 01:50:11 | Yikun | gmann, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/534721/, hi, I saw your inline comments, so, should we add 2 config like project_network_cidr[1 & 2] to keep this? or some other idea? | |
| 01:50:43 | oomichi | takashin: then, why did you change it even if there was a redirecting? | |
| 01:54:14 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Fix bug case by none token context https://review.openstack.org/522112 | |
| 01:54:15 | mriedem | efried: can you tell me if the release note i threw in here sounds ok? ^ | |
| 01:54:39 | efried | ... | |
| 01:55:19 | takashin | oomichi: My patch was changing 'pike' to 'queens'. Replaceing http with https was done at the same time, but it is not worth doing it separately. | |
| 01:56:49 | efried | mriedem LGTM, +1 | |
| 01:58:02 | oomichi | takashin: I am not sure why it is not worth doing it *separately* | |
| 01:58:16 | efried | mriedem Course, you coulda addressed my nit, but meh. | |
| 01:58:53 | efried | takashin Glad to catch you online. I've been wanting to tell you how much I appreciate your super-thorough code reviews. | |
| 01:59:37 | efried | takashin ありがとうございました ;) | |
| 02:00:17 | jose-phi_ | hi any idea | |
| 02:00:28 | takashin | efied: You are welcome. | |
| 02:00:36 | jose-phi_ | of why when i set data-port=br-ext:eno1 this interface got dead "eno1" | |
| 02:00:49 | jose-phi_ | and this is my data network so i lost all connectivity to the compute node | |
| 02:01:13 | takashin | oomichi: it is not worth doing it alone. | |
| 02:02:08 | takashin | efried: You are welcome. | |
| 02:02:52 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: set_{aggregates|traits}_for_provider: tolerate set https://review.openstack.org/536625 | |
| 02:02:52 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: New-style _set_inventory_for_provider https://review.openstack.org/537648 | |
| 02:02:53 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: SchedulerReportClient.update_from_provider_tree https://review.openstack.org/533821 | |