| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-01-22 | |||
| 13:52:11 | bauzas | jianghuaw: have you also tested for example suspending your instances ? | |
| 13:52:48 | sean-k-mooney | efried: thanks :) it will make my pm happy to know that this is well in hand. it was on our potential gaps list for a while. | |
| 13:58:28 | edleafe | efried: yes, scheduler meeting in 2 minutes in #openstack-nova-alt | |
| 13:58:43 | efried | Or #openstack-meeting-alt | |
| 13:58:51 | efried | Mondays | |
| 13:59:06 | edleafe | and lack of caffeine :( | |
| 13:59:07 | bauzas | nova alternative ? | |
| 13:59:09 | bauzas | man | |
| 13:59:26 | edleafe | too early to have to think clearly | |
| 14:00:04 | bauzas | just rename nova-alt to ciao | |
| 14:00:13 | bauzas | shorter FTW | |
| 14:00:28 | jroll | hey nova friends, the ironic rolling upgrade testing is down. while we try to track down why nova-conductor segfaults after upgrading ironic (without restarting n-cond), this patch will help us work around it by allowing nova queens to work with ironic pike (which is a good thing for users anyway). reviews would be super helpful, thank you :) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/535786/ | |
| 14:01:25 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: :) but its in go so obvioulsy better even though it has no epa/numa or any other kind of plathform awerness | |
| 14:01:50 | bauzas | shhhhhhtttttttttt | |
| 14:02:15 | edleafe | Scheduler subteam meeting running now in #openstack-meeting-alt | |
| 14:03:30 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: by the way if its not clear i am not a ciao fan | |
| 14:03:50 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: that's fine | |
| 14:04:00 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: just say now you're a Kata fan :p | |
| 14:04:06 | bauzas | be corp, man | |
| 14:04:50 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: haha well kata is a merger of clear containers and hyper right. its more of a libvirt alternitve then nova as far as i understand | |
| 14:05:11 | bauzas | that's at least a big question I have in mind | |
| 14:05:21 | bauzas | and I saw noone talking about that | |
| 14:05:33 | bauzas | I should learn Go, if I'm not foolish | |
| 14:06:35 | sean-k-mooney | reading go is not that hard, reversing the type/name order of things when writing it will drive me nuts for at least 6 months if i ever try to write it | |
| 14:07:01 | edmondsw | gibi finucannot think you'll be able to get to the PowerVM SEA networking patch? should be easy after the OVS one | |
| 14:07:08 | edmondsw | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/523216/ | |
| 14:08:42 | finucannot | edmondsw: Sure will. Got four series on my backlog but I'm working through an emulator threads bug today. Will probably be tomorrow, I'd say | |
| 14:08:54 | edmondsw | finucannot thanks! | |
| 14:09:54 | openstackgerrit | Eric Berglund proposed openstack/nova master: PowerVM Driver: SEA https://review.openstack.org/523216 | |
| 14:11:29 | edmondsw | ^ is just a rebase | |
| 14:22:47 | lyarwood | stephenfin: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/523958/ - Do you have time to go over this today? :) | |
| 14:23:13 | openstackgerrit | Eric Berglund proposed openstack/nova master: PowerVM Driver: vSCSI volume driver https://review.openstack.org/526094 | |
| 14:23:47 | stephenfin | lyarwood: Depends on how big it is. See above :) (tl;dr: /me side-tracked by a bug today) | |
| 14:25:47 | lyarwood | stephenfin: kk, pretty big but tomorrow (morning?) would be fine if that's possible | |
| 14:26:07 | stephenfin | lyarwood: It's top of my list | |
| 14:26:15 | stephenfin | Sorry edmondsw :) You're next in line | |
| 14:26:59 | edmondsw | stephenfin sure :) | |
| 14:29:29 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: i was talking to rodoflo eairlier regarding https://review.openstack.org/#/c/449257/ he needs to move on to yardstick work which means he wont be able to work on this before the code freeze | |
| 14:29:38 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: im going to try an pick it up | |
| 14:30:25 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: you had some changes you wanted regarding the spec dict/object can i ping you later once i have it setup locally to confirm what needs to be done | |
| 14:30:59 | stephenfin | sean-k-mooney: Sure can. I _think_ they make sense but I'll leave that to you to decide :) | |
| 14:31:02 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: this barly missed pike then we made a lot of change in queens so dont want it to slip to rocky if it can be avoided | |
| 14:31:26 | stephenfin | Agreed. I'd like to get that in, if at all possible | |
| 14:32:34 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: cool am i need to get dan smit to look at that too as he previous gave feedback re using objects | |
| 14:33:43 | stephenfin | sean-k-mooney: Yup, about versioning. I think the tl;dr: of it was that you can't really remove a field, even if it's unused, and type changes have to have backwards compatibility wrappers provided | |
| 14:33:58 | ameeda | jaypipes: are you around ? | |
| 14:35:32 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: yes he suggested synatsizing the new field form the old using a lazy loader if it was not set. i think rodlofo has that done i just want to make sure he is ok with the filed change you asked for too as i think that field existed before the patch so we cant just convert it to an object. | |
| 14:36:02 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: i need to read the patch again since its been a few weeks since i did so i may be mis remembering | |
| 14:43:27 | gibi | alex_xu: thanks for the update. I'm +2 on the bottom patch. I will review further in that chain soon | |
| 14:43:37 | efried | ameeda I believe Jay is trying to find a spot to work from at the moment. | |
| 14:44:33 | gibi | edmondsw: the SEA patch is on my list | |
| 14:44:53 | edmondsw | gibi great, tx | |
| 14:44:59 | ameeda | efried: hehe, so can you help me ? | |
| 14:45:15 | efried | ameeda Gosh, that depends. What's going on? | |
| 14:45:19 | mriedem | stephenfin: were you working on a nit fixes patch for the websocket proxy security series? | |
| 14:45:42 | ameeda | efried: can you please check this "https://review.openstack.org/#/c/526900/" and notice the scenario from the bug side ? | |
| 14:46:09 | stephenfin | mriedem: Yup, it merged. Lemme know if there's stuff I missed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/534368/ | |
| 14:46:38 | mriedem | stephenfin: ah ok - was just wondering if you wanted to update that docs patch for my one comment or do it in a follow up? | |
| 14:47:37 | efried | ameeda Oh, this patch. Yeah, I looked it over a bit last week and accepted that it's not really in my wheelhouse, sorry. | |
| 14:47:44 | stephenfin | mriedem: If it's just that, I can edit on Gerrit | |
| 14:47:52 | stephenfin | mriedem: reply left, in any case | |
| 14:48:10 | mriedem | stephenfin: just edit inline and i'll +W | |
| 14:48:33 | bauzas | mriedem: welcome back | |
| 14:48:38 | mriedem | thanks | |
| 14:48:39 | bauzas | mriedem: for your pleasure, we have https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1744325 | |
| 14:48:41 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1744325 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "If a rebuild is refused by the scheduler, the instance's imageref is not rolled back" [Critical,In progress] - Assigned to int32bit (int32bit) | |
| 14:48:57 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Document TLS security setup for noVNC proxy https://review.openstack.org/500544 | |
| 14:49:19 | stephenfin | mriedem: Done (y) | |
| 14:49:44 | mriedem | bauzas: tagged for rc potential but not going to look at it for awhile | |
| 14:49:58 | bauzas | mriedem: I'm following the change | |
| 14:50:36 | bauzas | I'll see how it goes, and try to help next week if we haven't reached to a clear solution | |
| 14:51:28 | ameeda | efried: thank you ! | |
| 14:51:34 | mriedem | it's not fun but i wouldn't say it's the worst bug i've ever seen, | |
| 14:51:52 | mriedem | considering until queens, if you tried rebuilding a volume-backed server, we'd always fail to do so and still change the imageref on the instance | |
| 14:54:16 | bauzas | mriedem: hmmm, you're right | |
| 15:02:25 | cdent | edleafe, efried: would be good to get this stack merged before we start merging all the big stuff so that it is useful in the inevitable debugging we will need to do: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/526557/ | |
| 15:04:21 | edleafe | cdent: ack | |
| 15:05:24 | Roamer` | mriedem, welcome back! What are the chances of the StorPool volume attachment driver? I know it's close to the deadline, but you said if we got our ducks in a row... and the last duck, 533046, has been merged for a week | |
| 15:05:58 | Roamer` | and right now we're in a weird position where the main use case for our Cinder and os-brick drivers is not in OpenStack proper :) | |
| 15:06:01 | mriedem | bauzas: comments inline in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/536268/ | |
| 15:06:24 | bauzas | mriedem: k, will look | |
| 15:06:29 | mriedem | bauzas: it's breaking evacuate potentially, and it's also missing rolling back a bunch of other properties, so it's probably not worth trying to rollback any properties since we'd be totally half assing it | |
| 15:06:42 | mriedem | might as well just put the instance into ERROR state and make the user rebuild with a valid image to fix things | |
| 15:06:50 | Roamer` | mriedem, sorry, of course I'm talking about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/140733/ (certainly this is not the only thing on your plate...) | |
| 15:07:15 | mriedem | Roamer`: i'll take a look | |
| 15:07:21 | bauzas | mriedem: oh, excellent catch | |
| 15:07:22 | mriedem | still trying to get my bearings | |
| 15:07:28 | Roamer` | mriedem, of course, thanks a lot! | |
| 15:07:53 | mriedem | bauzas: can you re-approve https://review.openstack.org/#/c/528128/ ? | |
| 15:08:07 | mriedem | so we can get the series of novaclient microversion changes flushed for a final release | |
| 15:08:07 | bauzas | mriedem: I'm half-reviewing, half-testing my own series, so apologies for not fully getting all the context in mind | |
| 15:08:14 | mriedem | bauzas: np | |
| 15:08:56 | bauzas | mriedem: oh, the novaclient change is just a rebase ? +wd | |
| 15:09:01 | mriedem | yeah | |
| 15:09:02 | mriedem | thanks | |
| 15:09:25 | bauzas | mriedem: I tried to look at the multiattach thing while you were on vacations | |
| 15:09:35 | bauzas | mriedem: that's an excellent job you made honestly | |
| 15:10:00 | bauzas | we're still missing the API bits, but I understand now the logic | |
| 15:10:23 | bauzas | I like the fact to short-cut the multiattach if we don't support that by the compute | |
| 15:12:45 | mriedem | bauzas: i saw thanks for reviewing those, | |