| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-01-09 | |||
| 10:14:04 | bauzas | like I said, you need to use separate physical devices | |
| 10:14:17 | bauzas | that's a driver limitation | |
| 10:15:52 | jianghuaw_ | bauzas, Got it. thanks for letting me know of it. | |
| 10:16:42 | jianghuaw_ | bauzas, do you have a link on the *driver limitation*? | |
| 10:16:50 | bauzas | no, unfortunately | |
| 10:17:05 | bauzas | that's something someone told me | |
| 10:17:16 | bauzas | awesome, heh ? | |
| 10:17:37 | bauzas | code driven by trust | |
| 10:17:49 | bauzas | and word of mouth | |
| 10:18:09 | jianghuaw_ | :-) | |
| 10:20:17 | openstackgerrit | Peter Penchev proposed openstack/nova master: Add the Nova libvirt StorPool attachment driver. https://review.openstack.org/140733 | |
| 10:35:53 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: console: introduce the VeNCrypt RFB authentication scheme https://review.openstack.org/345398 | |
| 10:35:54 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Document TLS security setup for noVNC proxy https://review.openstack.org/500544 | |
| 10:35:54 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: console: Provide an RFB security proxy implementation https://review.openstack.org/345399 | |
| 10:35:55 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: console: Send bytes to sockets https://review.openstack.org/531834 | |
| 10:39:01 | openstackgerrit | Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Use neutron port_list when filtering instance by ip https://review.openstack.org/525505 | |
| 10:47:37 | harsha | Hi folks, quick question on some python unit tests; I need to run - 'tox -e pep8'; should i run this on the test machine in the directory/path where I have my changes ? | |
| 10:47:51 | tetsuro | stephenfin: thanks for reviewing https://review.openstack.org/#/c/531328/ :) I'm both okay with microversion or not. | |
| 10:48:50 | tetsuro | stephenfin: Just FYI, I happend to find this blog https://techglimpse.com/why-does-openstack-report-hypervisor-type-as-qemu-when-libvirt_type-is-kvm/ . I don't know who wrote this, though. | |
| 10:49:27 | stephenfin | tetsuro: Oh yeah, to be fair, I honestly don't know what way it should be hence no -1 | |
| 10:49:44 | stephenfin | cdent: Fancy weighing in on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/531328/ ? | |
| 10:50:09 | stephenfin | I know we fix some bugs without microversions, but maybe they're just for 5xx type errors | |
| 10:50:14 | sean-k-mooney | tetsuro: well technicall kvm is not a hypervisor | |
| 10:50:32 | sean-k-mooney | it is kernel acclartion module that is used to acclerate qemu | |
| 10:51:19 | tetsuro | sean-k-mooney: hi, happy new year! | |
| 10:51:49 | sean-k-mooney | tetsuro: same to you :) i trust you had a good vaction | |
| 10:52:59 | tetsuro | sean-k-mooney: yup, I had a lot of mochi(rice cake) in new year days. | |
| 10:53:27 | cdent | stephenfin: looking | |
| 10:54:39 | rabel_b1 | do you know, what happened to https://docs.openstack.org/user-guide/cli-nova-launch-instance-from-volume.html ? i cannot seem to find it anywhere in the nova docs | |
| 10:54:55 | tetsuro | It is true that KVM is a kind of acceralator for QEMU, but in OpenStack document, it is one of the hypervisors. https://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/config-reference/compute/hypervisors.html | |
| 10:55:26 | lyarwood | mdbooth: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/460243 btw, merged both, pretty large change to backport but meh. | |
| 10:57:30 | hrw | tetsuro: kvm is in-kernel hypervisor with qemu used as interface to it. sth like that iirc | |
| 10:58:06 | mdbooth | lyarwood: Doesn't look that bad | |
| 10:58:11 | mdbooth | Not in driver.py, anyway | |
| 11:06:59 | cdent | you're probalby right | |
| 11:08:15 | sean-k-mooney | cdent: well when it comes to micro version is not really someting i spend much time thinking about normally so im not sure about that but im leaning towords the bump in this instance | |
| 11:08:42 | cdent | you've provided the critical point: a client may make decision based on the value | |
| 11:30:37 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/531737 | |
| 11:34:36 | kashyap | tetsuro: KVM runs part of the guest instructions directly on the baremetal CPU (taking advantage of CPU Virtualization extensions - Intel-VMX / AMD-SVM). While QEMU provides rest of the PC-like components (n/w card, disk interface, etc) | |
| 11:36:55 | openstackgerrit | Jie Li proposed openstack/nova master: Support volume-backed server rescue https://review.openstack.org/531524 | |
| 11:37:11 | tetsuro | hrw, kashyap: good to know. thanks for the information. | |
| 11:38:09 | tetsuro | sean-k-mooney, cdent: thank you for reviewing, let me wait for matt to leave comments here. | |
| 11:39:03 | sandanar | hi.. does anyone know what is the reason behind CONF.libvirt.volume_use_path always returns the default value and not the one passed in [libvirt] section of /etc/nova/nova.conf - https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1723928 this is causing multipath failures on the cinder side | |
| 11:39:04 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1723928 in os-brick "In case of volume_use_multipath=True, Nova unable to fetch CONF.libvirt.volume_use_multipath value from nova.conf" [Undecided,New] | |
| 11:40:45 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Microversion 2.59 - Migrations list pagination https://review.openstack.org/516168 | |
| 11:41:17 | lyarwood | kashyap: http://paste.openstack.org/show/641098/ - just noticed this on stable/pike https://review.openstack.org/#/c/531407/ | |
| 11:41:38 | lyarwood | kashyap: load of migration failed: Operation not permitted | |
| 11:42:40 | kashyap | lyarwood: That rings a bell, I recall seeing a bug for the VQ size | |
| 11:48:00 | kwathore | @meriedm: This is very critical bug which we have observerd releated to multipath: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1723928 | |
| 11:48:01 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1723928 in os-brick "In case of volume_use_multipath=True, Nova unable to fetch CONF.libvirt.volume_use_multipath value from nova.conf" [Undecided,New] | |
| 11:50:30 | hrw | hm. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/530965/ got rebased 2h ago and zuul still did not started | |
| 11:55:02 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova stable/newton: Raise MarkerNotFound if BuildRequestList.get_by_filters doesn't find marker https://review.openstack.org/530982 | |
| 11:55:34 | openstackgerrit | Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/os-vif master: Add support for Windows network commands https://review.openstack.org/487405 | |
| 11:56:29 | kashyap | lyarwood: From the top off my head, I vaguely recall a couple of fixes from Virtio net devices from StefanH. The bug links are eluding me | |
| 11:56:48 | kashyap | I asked Stefan for the specific versions that fix these screwey virtio queue issues | |
| 11:57:01 | kashyap | Will let ya know once I hear back from him | |
| 11:57:04 | lyarwood | kashyap: cool thanks | |
| 11:59:39 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Add regression test for resize failing during retries https://review.openstack.org/531405 | |
| 12:00:53 | openstackgerrit | Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/os-vif master: Add memoize function using oslo.cache https://review.openstack.org/472773 | |
| 12:03:21 | hrw | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/530965/ finally got +1 from Zuul. now just have to get second run of Zuul for +2 and merge ;d | |
| 12:03:50 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova master: hardware: only take into account small pages https://review.openstack.org/532168 | |
| 12:16:48 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Microversion 2.59 - Migrations list pagination https://review.openstack.org/516168 | |
| 12:19:44 | openstackgerrit | Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/os-vif master: Add abstract OVSDB API https://review.openstack.org/476612 | |
| 12:27:13 | openstackgerrit | Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/os-vif master: Add native implementation OVSDB API https://review.openstack.org/482226 | |
| 12:28:56 | ildikov | johnthetubaguy: gibi: hi :) this tiny patch needs a second +2 if either of you have a few minutes: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/529695/ | |
| 12:29:10 | ildikov | johnthetubaguy: gibi: thanks in advance :) | |
| 12:38:59 | openstackgerrit | Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Deduplicate aggregate notification samples https://review.openstack.org/531162 | |
| 12:39:36 | gibi | ildikov: done :) | |
| 12:44:32 | openstackgerrit | Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Deduplicate service status notification samples https://review.openstack.org/531381 | |
| 12:44:48 | ildikov | gibi: thanks!! :) | |
| 13:06:33 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: just looking at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/531358 looks like when you change your email to stephenfin instead of sfinucan you didnt update your global git user name. not sure if thats intentional but just taught i would point it out | |
| 13:06:50 | sean-k-mooney | * global git email | |
| 13:08:12 | openstackgerrit | Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Deduplicate aggregate notification samples https://review.openstack.org/531162 | |
| 13:25:27 | openstackgerrit | Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Deduplicate service status notification samples https://review.openstack.org/531381 | |
| 13:26:57 | mdbooth | Can anybody remind me about our stable backport window re https://review.openstack.org/#/c/530744/ | |
| 13:27:07 | mdbooth | That's an Ocata backport. Is it going to land? | |
| 13:27:16 | mdbooth | s/going/eligible/ | |
| 13:27:28 | mdbooth | stephenfin: ^^^ is your backport of my patch, btw | |
| 13:28:23 | lyarwood | mdbooth: looking | |
| 13:28:36 | efried | claudiub Wow, congratulations! That's been a long time coming. | |
| 13:28:57 | sean-k-mooney | mdbooth: i think ocata is still supported for backports assuimg the patch would normally qualify. | |
| 13:29:28 | sean-k-mooney | mdbooth: the defult stable supprot is 12 months with the option to extend to 18 i think | |
| 13:29:42 | stephenfin | sean-k-mooney: I've got both registered but need to configure 'user.email' on most repos | |
| 13:29:45 | lyarwood | mdbooth / sean-k-mooney ; by the book it would need to be a >=high impact bug | |
| 13:29:58 | stephenfin | sean-k-mooney: stephenfin is only an alias anyway so either one works | |
| 13:29:59 | lyarwood | mdbooth: and I think this is valid still for ocata tbh | |
| 13:30:30 | mdbooth | lyarwood: Yeah, bug doesn't have that metadata, but I'd say it should qualify | |
| 13:30:42 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: ya i remember you telling me that just was not sure if you missed it or not | |
| 13:30:58 | lyarwood | mdbooth: yeah, had to read through the commit but yup IMHO it's fine, I'll review the pike version now | |
| 13:31:17 | mdbooth | lyarwood: Thanks | |
| 13:33:00 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: lyarwood: since we are talking about backport i would like to backport this to pike and ocata too its trival enough but its a latent bug that has been present since os-vif was first created | |
| 13:33:02 | claudiub | efried: yeay, gonna have to celebrate. :)) | |
| 13:33:25 | claudiub | the patches on nova still need reviews though. :D | |
| 13:33:41 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: lyarwood by the book would this qualify for backporting? | |
| 13:33:43 | stephenfin | sean-k-mooney: "this" being? | |
| 13:33:53 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/531465/ | |
| 13:39:05 | lyarwood | sean-k-mooney: yeah I'd say that would be valid for ocata, it's trivial but useful. I'm not sure if there are other considerations that need to be taken into account for libs however. | |
| 13:41:21 | sean-k-mooney | lyarwood: in normal execution i think the edgecase that causes the interface not to be present happens very infrequently however in the gate it was causing random failures hence why it has been latent for so long | |
| 13:45:34 | openstackgerrit | Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Use neutron port_list when filtering instance by ip https://review.openstack.org/525505 | |
| 13:53:49 | kashyap | lyarwood: So apparently there are different reasons for hitting that error you pointed out earlier. (The bug URL I was looking for was, which has a slightly different error): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378788 (Race condition during virtio-blk dataplane stop triggers "Virtqueue size exceeded") | |