| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-11-14 | |||
| 15:51:20 | tristanC | mriedem: could we get +2 on the patches as well as the related change on stable/newton? | |
| 15:51:41 | jianghuaw_ | mriedem, could you suggest what I should do to move forward these two patches? https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:vdiStream+(status:open+OR+status:merged)+project:+openstack/nova | |
| 15:52:01 | mriedem | tristanC: that's why i pinged dan and sylvain | |
| 15:52:06 | mriedem | they are stable core | |
| 15:52:16 | mriedem | and master branch core for that matter... | |
| 15:52:50 | tristanC | does the pre-OSSA update looks good to you? | |
| 15:53:05 | mriedem | tristanC: the etherpad? | |
| 15:53:21 | tristanC | yes, https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ofe4voc7sg | |
| 15:53:22 | mriedem | etherpad looks fine | |
| 15:53:30 | sean-k-mooney | hum... on the plus side my openstack --os-cloud devstack-admin --os-region RegionOne compute service list --host vhost-user --service nova-compute -c ID -f value issue also happens on ubuntu. on the negitive side it also happens on ubuntu ... | |
| 15:53:53 | mriedem | sean-k-mooney: what issue? | |
| 15:54:18 | tristanC | mriedem: thanks! | |
| 15:54:31 | mriedem | jianghuaw_: do you mean regarding the blueprint? | |
| 15:54:38 | sean-k-mooney | mriedem: devstack is failing for me with "Didn't find service registered by hostname after 60 seconds" checking for the nova compute service to be registered | |
| 15:55:02 | jianghuaw_ | mriedem, yes. | |
| 15:55:03 | jaypipes | sean-k-mooney: apologies, keep getting ripped away :( | |
| 15:55:10 | mriedem | sean-k-mooney: does the hostname match what's getting created via the discover_hosts CLI? | |
| 15:55:24 | mriedem | discover_hosts CLI is what creates the host mappings in the cell in the api db | |
| 15:55:46 | sean-k-mooney | mriedem: ill check the conductor console auth and scheduer are registered | |
| 15:55:48 | mriedem | jianghuaw_: i wish you would have asked several weeks ago, before the spec freeze | |
| 15:56:03 | jaypipes | crlb: yessir | |
| 15:56:22 | openstackgerrit | Eric M Gonzalez (tasker) proposed openstack/nova master: unquiesce instance on volume snapshot failure https://review.openstack.org/519464 | |
| 15:56:51 | jianghuaw_ | mriedem, that's a shame. I thought I asked here to get reviewing on the patches. | |
| 15:57:46 | jianghuaw_ | mriedem, I thought that's spec-less BP. | |
| 15:58:14 | mriedem | jianghuaw_: it is a specless bp, but i generally consider new bp approval freeze to be at the same time as the spec freeze, which was october 19 | |
| 15:58:16 | mriedem | nearly a month ago | |
| 15:58:30 | mriedem | it's my fault for not being clear about that, | |
| 15:58:43 | mriedem | but also, specless blueprints are supposed to be brought up in the weekly nova meeting to get discussion and approval | |
| 15:58:52 | jianghuaw_ | mriedem, sorry. That's my fault. | |
| 15:58:57 | tssurya | dansmith : thanks for the review I will address the comments soon, and yes you are right about the integrity issue with regards to us ending up with a different list of uuids than what we actually deleted, the same problem also exists between the list of records inserted into the shadow tables and the list archived - we had a bug reported ; https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1727266 | |
| 15:58:57 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1727266 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "archive_deleted_instances is not atomic for insert/delete" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Surya Seetharaman (tssurya) | |
| 15:59:13 | tssurya | dansmith : maybe we need to first query for the list of records whose deleted flag is set; use that list to insert into the shadow tables, archive from the actual tables and also return the same list for deleting the instance_mappings and request specs ? | |
| 15:59:48 | mriedem | jianghuaw_: https://docs.openstack.org/nova/pike/contributor/blueprints.html#specs "When a blueprint does not require a spec it still needs to be approved before the code which implements the blueprint is merged. Specless blueprints are discussed and potentially approved during the Open Discussion portion of the weekly nova IRC meeting. See trivial specifications for more details." | |
| 16:00:17 | dansmith | tssurya: just about to jump on a call so I can't really process that in my head at the moment, so can you put it in the review for me to read when I circle back? | |
| 16:00:23 | jianghuaw_ | mriedem, got it. Thanks. | |
| 16:00:33 | tssurya | dansmith : yes of course | |
| 16:00:42 | crlb | jaypipes I'm running tox locally and getting no errors. However, on the review, Zuul, Dell, and Xen, appear to give errors that I don't understand. Is there something else I should be doing? | |
| 16:00:50 | dansmith | tssurya: thanks | |
| 16:01:38 | mriedem | tristanC: +2s on https://review.openstack.org/#/q/I11746d1ea996a0f18b7c54b4c9c21df58cc4714b | |
| 16:01:40 | tristanC | dansmith: thanks, appreciated the fast review! | |
| 16:01:41 | dansmith | mriedem: tristanC I just hit the last one | |
| 16:01:46 | dansmith | heh, yep | |
| 16:01:48 | mriedem | dansmith: thanks | |
| 16:02:05 | mriedem | i will assume bauzas is on the same call | |
| 16:02:08 | jaypipes | crlb: how are you running tox locally? | |
| 16:02:15 | jaypipes | crlb: do this: tox -epy27,pep8 | |
| 16:02:23 | jaypipes | crlb: and you'll see the same errors. | |
| 16:02:31 | tristanC | i'm waiting for vmt +2 on the ossa (https://review.openstack.org/519686) to send the advisory | |
| 16:04:54 | mriedem | ack | |
| 16:05:35 | bauzas | mriedem: thanks for helping with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/519662/ | |
| 16:05:54 | sean-k-mooney | mriedem: so looking at the nova_api db the host_mappins is empty as is the compute_nodes table in the cell1 db however the devstack@n-cpu.service is running on the hsot according to systemctl | |
| 16:05:55 | bauzas | and thanks for the tests | |
| 16:06:17 | mriedem | tristanC: small typo in your patch | |
| 16:10:47 | sean-k-mooney | mriedem: huh i just realised there is a giant Guru Meditation report dump in the nova-compute journalctl log. is there a partcalar part that i should read in that to figure out what failed | |
| 16:11:25 | mriedem | i think that happens when you kill the service? | |
| 16:11:40 | mriedem | i'd check for errors in the n-cpu logs about why the compute node record wasn't created | |
| 16:12:06 | mriedem | are the conductor services running? | |
| 16:12:23 | jaypipes | sean-k-mooney: the guru part. | |
| 16:14:28 | bauzas | mriedem: dansmith: FWIW, I'm having a big problem with my IRC bouncer so for the moment, I'm not getting a notify if someone asks me | |
| 16:14:46 | bauzas | mriedem: but yeah, just saw your pings | |
| 16:17:24 | sean-k-mooney | mriedem: according to openstack compute service list yes. that said on ubuntu i actully have a tracback and a libvirt issue. on centos it prints no No Traceback! in one of the green tread imediatly after connecting to libvirt | |
| 16:18:41 | mriedem | efried: remember that ksa adapter bug i pointed out to you on saturday? did that amount to anything? | |
| 16:18:50 | mriedem | person was having failures connecting to glance | |
| 16:18:56 | openstackgerrit | Matthew Booth proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: libvirt: bandwidth param should be set in guest migrate https://review.openstack.org/519631 | |
| 16:18:56 | openstackgerrit | Matthew Booth proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: libvirt: Don't VIR_MIGRATE_NON_SHARED_INC without migrate_disks https://review.openstack.org/519632 | |
| 16:19:15 | efried | mriedem I don't believe it was a ksa adapter thing. I responded in the bug report. I think they had either their conf or their catalog misconfigured. | |
| 16:19:39 | mriedem | ok you must have invalidated the bug? | |
| 16:19:47 | efried | mriedem I marked it as Incomplete | |
| 16:19:52 | mriedem | oh ok | |
| 16:20:15 | efried | mriedem From what I could tell, they were running pike, so it would be before my ksa adapter code, FWIW. | |
| 16:20:57 | efried | I mean, still going through ksa adapters & sessions ultimately | |
| 16:23:04 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: doc: fix link to creating unit tests in contributor guide https://review.openstack.org/519482 | |
| 16:23:42 | mriedem | bauzas: don't forget the two changes below https://review.openstack.org/#/c/519684/ | |
| 16:24:20 | bauzas | done | |
| 16:25:06 | mriedem | thanks. dansmith ^ when you're off your call | |
| 16:25:52 | mriedem | tristanC: changes are all approved, just need to approve the dependencies on the newton change | |
| 16:25:58 | mriedem | i'll request releases on all stable branches once those are merged | |
| 16:26:01 | openstackgerrit | Jianghua Wang proposed openstack/nova master: XenAPI: create vGPU for instance https://review.openstack.org/516899 | |
| 16:26:17 | mriedem | and then we'll eol newton | |
| 16:32:37 | prometheanfire | mriedem: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/519672/ doesn't apply to 16.0.2 cleanly, are we expecting releases soon with the fix (for pike/ocata at least)? | |
| 16:33:47 | mriedem | prometheanfire: "(10:25:59 AM) mriedem: i'll request releases on all stable branches once those are merged" | |
| 16:34:05 | prometheanfire | thanks, just rejoined the channel at 10:33 | |
| 16:34:09 | mriedem | doh | |
| 16:34:12 | prometheanfire | :P | |
| 16:36:37 | dansmith | mriedem: got them sorry | |
| 16:36:53 | mriedem | thanks, np | |
| 16:37:14 | mriedem | welcome back to the land of the (koala) free | |
| 16:40:32 | dansmith | you mean "welcome back to the land of internet" | |
| 16:40:43 | dansmith | and yes, it's good to be back on the right side of the wet noodle | |
| 16:43:54 | mriedem | tonyb: would you be against changing this release note on stable/pike to be 'fixes' or 'other' rather than 'features'? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/513717/4/releasenotes/notes/bug-1721179-87bc7b64215944c0.yaml | |
| 16:44:01 | mriedem | i don't want to alarm people reading stable patch release notes | |
| 16:44:57 | sean-k-mooney | efried: just comming to the end of the video on Ironic-Nova traits discussion. given the audiunce and topic it makes sense that only the ironic case was discussed but everything discussed also need to work with just plain nova | |
| 16:45:09 | efried | sean-k-mooney Yup. | |
| 16:45:18 | efried | sean-k-mooney Somehow... | |
| 16:45:52 | sean-k-mooney | efried: so with nova i need to be able to request the vm to be placed on a hypervior with secure boot enabled on the host not the vm | |
| 16:46:44 | efried | sean-k-mooney Does enabling secure boot on the hypervisor entail bouncing the compute service? | |
| 16:47:10 | sean-k-mooney | efried: i expcitly do not want to enabled it. i want to find a hypervisor with it enabled | |
| 16:47:38 | sean-k-mooney | efried: the config map thing iss irrelevent in this case as i do dont want to change configuration | |
| 16:48:15 | sean-k-mooney | efried: but yes it would require a host reboot to chage secureboot and it would require the host os is signed and the signing key is sored in the firmware | |
| 16:48:51 | efried | sean-k-mooney Okay, great. What I'm getting at is: if you enable secure boot on a hypervisor, and you have to restart the host (or at least restart the compute service) then we can make the case that the virt driver should set the SECURE_BOOT_CAPABLE trait on that host's RP. | |