Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-10-20
18:49:45 mlavalle that's my understanding as well
18:50:07 mriedem cool - just working on project update slides
18:50:15 mlavalle :-)
18:50:19 mriedem want to make sure i correctly promise the world
18:50:28 mlavalle LOL
18:58:55 superdan mriedem: correct
19:13:52 openstackgerrit Ildiko Vancsa proposed openstack/nova master: Implement new attach Cinder flow https://review.openstack.org/330285
19:31:19 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Refactor test_resource_provider https://review.openstack.org/513834
19:38:13 mriedem superdan: this doesn't seem kosher https://review.openstack.org/#/c/509107/2/os_vif/objects/subnet.py
19:38:36 superdan mriedem: that's because it's not
20:15:58 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Include /resource_providers/uuid/allocations link https://review.openstack.org/499826
20:21:16 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: console: introduce basic framework for security proxying https://review.openstack.org/345396
20:27:43 mriedem anthonyper: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/465160/ - talks about only allowing numa in the libvirt driver if using kvm
20:27:48 mriedem questions in there about numa support for libvirt+xen
20:36:54 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Include /resource_providers/uuid/allocations link https://review.openstack.org/499826
20:40:34 BenderRodriguez fried_rice: help me fix my issues
20:40:38 BenderRodriguez installing openstack
20:40:52 fried_rice BenderRodriguez I think you want the #openstack channel for that.
20:41:56 fried_rice mriedem Say, do we want to update the channel topic to reference the Queens release schedule at this point?
20:42:19 mriedem fried_rice: first, "say" is how my 60-something day starts a sentence,
20:42:22 mriedem second, yes
20:42:25 mriedem superdan: ^
20:42:32 fried_rice Dude, what's with all the ageist talk lately?
20:42:33 mriedem s/day/dad/
20:43:32 fried_rice whee
20:44:32 BenderRodriguez Why in the world
20:44:36 BenderRodriguez is openstack still running on top of 2.7
20:44:41 BenderRodriguez what is wrong with you developers/
20:44:50 BenderRodriguez python 2.7 that is
20:44:53 superdan dang, dropped op a little too early
20:44:57 fried_rice was gonna say
20:45:05 mriedem BenderRodriguez: you can run it on 3.5
20:45:08 mriedem it's not really a nova thing,
20:45:11 mriedem it's a packaging thing
20:45:14 mriedem and we don't control the packages
20:45:21 BenderRodriguez hmmm
20:45:32 BenderRodriguez what version of python are unit tests run on
20:45:36 BenderRodriguez pre-deployment
20:45:39 mriedem 27 and 35
20:45:42 BenderRodriguez ok good
20:45:46 mriedem unit tests, functional tests and integration tests
20:46:37 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: propagate OSError to MigrationPreCheckError https://review.openstack.org/469779
20:52:59 openstackgerrit Ed Leafe proposed openstack/nova master: Add alternate hosts https://review.openstack.org/486215
20:53:00 openstackgerrit Ed Leafe proposed openstack/nova master: Add Selection objects https://review.openstack.org/499239
20:53:00 openstackgerrit Ed Leafe proposed openstack/nova master: Return Selection objects from the scheduler driver https://review.openstack.org/495854
20:53:01 openstackgerrit Ed Leafe proposed openstack/nova master: Change RPC for select_destinations() https://review.openstack.org/510159
20:53:01 openstackgerrit Ed Leafe proposed openstack/nova master: Move the claim_resources method to scheduler utils https://review.openstack.org/511357
20:53:02 openstackgerrit Ed Leafe proposed openstack/nova master: Make conductor pass and use host_lists https://review.openstack.org/511358
20:53:02 openstackgerrit Ed Leafe proposed openstack/nova master: Trivial: fix spelling of allocation_request https://review.openstack.org/513847
21:03:25 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Adds 'sata' as a valid disk bus for qemu and kvm hypervisors https://review.openstack.org/459794
21:20:41 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: add nested resource providers https://review.openstack.org/377138
21:20:42 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: allow filter providers in tree https://review.openstack.org/377215
21:20:42 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: adds REST API for nested providers https://review.openstack.org/384807
21:20:43 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: update client to set parent provider https://review.openstack.org/385693
21:34:44 fried_rice leakypipes Are we gonna forbid changing traits on an RP with allocations?
21:35:37 fried_rice iow, you have to be able to go back and validate traits constraints of an existing deployment after the fact?
21:38:44 leakypipes fried_rice: I think *removing* traits where the provider has allocations should be prevented, yes.
21:38:52 leakypipes fried_rice: adding new ones is cool though
21:39:26 fried_rice leakypipes So why is it important that trait constraints be satisfied after the deploy has already happened?
21:40:11 fried_rice leakypipes We already said you could reduce inventory totals / increase reserved amounts / change allocation ratios after the fact, even to the point of being overcommitted, and you would simply not get deployed again until you came out of the red.
21:40:19 fried_rice leakypipes This seems like an extension of the same principle.
21:40:36 leakypipes fried_rice: because if you asked for (and got) 10G of DISK_GB and STORAGE_DISK_SSD trait, and we remove that trait from that provider, you no longer satisfy the request that caused you to land on that node.
21:41:04 fried_rice leakypipes Yeah, so I don't see how that's a problem.
21:41:38 fried_rice I mean, I don't know that it's a problem to forbid it either; just seems like an unnecessary check.
21:42:25 leakypipes fried_rice: maybe. honestly, it's 5:45pm on a Friday and I'm burnt out today.
21:42:47 fried_rice leakypipes Ight, I'll drop the question in the review for later. Have a good weekend.
21:44:35 leakypipes you too fried_rice
21:45:01 openstackgerrit Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova master: Transform keypair.import notification https://review.openstack.org/467514
21:46:37 figleaf fried_rice: You could add that to Open Discussion on https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaScheduler
21:46:48 fried_rice figleaf Good idea, thanks.
21:47:07 fried_rice figleaf And split-RC/split-traits
21:47:21 figleaf fried_rice: and whatever else tickles your fancy
22:09:47 rm_work Can VMs be migrated to hosts in a different AZ? Does it matter?
22:10:19 rm_work https://docs.openstack.org/nova/pike/admin/configuring-migrations.html#section-configuring-compute-migrations says: "In a multi-cell cloud, instances can be live migrated to a different host in the same cell, but not across cells."
22:10:31 rm_work Can one cell belong to multiple AZs?
22:10:35 rm_work Or am I thinking about this wrong
22:25:09 artom rm_work, VMs can't be migrated different AZs
22:25:20 artom (Slight oversimplification, but still)
22:25:23 rm_work hmm
22:25:27 rm_work ok
22:25:39 rm_work would take the slightly less brief explanation if you have time :)
22:26:30 artom An operator/admin can force it by bypassing the scheduler, I believe
22:26:55 rm_work ^^ johnsom
22:39:43 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Remove doc todo related to bug/1506667 https://review.openstack.org/509315
#openstack-nova - 2017-10-21
00:21:52 openstackgerrit Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova master: Transform keypair.import notification https://review.openstack.org/467514
00:23:55 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: conf: Remove deprecated 'null_kernel' opt https://review.openstack.org/499611
00:40:30 mriedem1 edleafe: realize it's late, was just wondering why no tests failed due to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/486215/20/nova/scheduler/filter_scheduler.py@364
00:42:26 mriedem oh i know why, no testing of the legacy path with hosts in different cells
00:55:37 gmann bauzas: johnthetubaguy if you are around can you re check this. I updated main policy info there - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/508101/
00:55:46 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Adds 'sata' as a valid disk bus for qemu and kvm hypervisors https://review.openstack.org/459794
00:56:45 Aditya multipath not working even if i placed 'volume_use_multipath=True' in libvirt section of nova.conf
00:56:47 Aditya https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1723928
00:56:49 openstack Launchpad bug 1723928 in os-brick "In case of volume_use_multipath=True, Nova unable to fetch CONF.libvirt.volume_use_multipath value from nova.conf" [Undecided,New]
00:57:49 Aditya multipathd is installed and runing
00:59:37 mlavalle go home mriedem
01:00:03 mlavalle have a nice weekend
01:00:06 mriedem but i am home
01:13:17 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Implement query param schema for host index https://review.openstack.org/513699
01:13:23 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Implement query param schema for delete assisted vol https://review.openstack.org/513668
01:13:32 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Implement query param schema for simple_tenant_usage https://review.openstack.org/507480

Earlier   Later