Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-10-17
19:20:01 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: placement: allow filter providers in tree https://review.openstack.org/377215
19:20:02 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: placement: adds REST API for nested providers https://review.openstack.org/384807
19:20:02 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: placement: update client to set parent provider https://review.openstack.org/385693
19:20:03 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Reformat _get_all_with_shared https://review.openstack.org/512799
19:21:29 gregwork sean-k-mooney: on rhel7 with rhosp11
19:22:05 sean-k-mooney gregwork: ah ok. selinux might complain in a similar way but i think that issue only happens on ubuntu
19:22:25 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: placement: Reformat _get_all_with_shared https://review.openstack.org/512799
19:22:31 sean-k-mooney you can set selinux to permmissive if it dose as a workaround
19:22:50 gregwork sean-k-mooney: what hardware are you using
19:23:05 gregwork sean-k-mooney: we are testing connect x-5 100gbe dual qsfp cards
19:23:18 dansmith efried: thanks
19:23:26 efried yahyoubetcha.
19:23:36 efried Also addressed cdent -1 in the middle of that series
19:23:50 dansmith gregwork: sean-k-mooney: your discussion seems unrelated to nova dev (see topic), maybe you could take it to #openstack?
19:24:00 dansmith efried: cool
19:24:03 sean-k-mooney gregwork: i have tested i350,e1000,x520 and xl70(both 4*10 and 2*40G)
19:24:22 gregwork dansmith: sure
19:24:30 sean-k-mooney dansmith: sure :)
19:24:30 efried dansmith You should eat slower. Gonna give yourself indigestion.
19:24:37 gregwork actually ill just msg you directly if you dont mind
19:24:41 dansmith efried: I'm parallelizing
19:24:48 efried efficient
19:31:12 mlavalle johnthetubaguy, mriedem: any chance you could take a look again on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/375580/?
19:31:30 mriedem 0 chance miguel
19:31:43 mriedem i've had the tab open all morning :)
19:33:09 mriedem should be able to get to it before parent / teacher conferences this afternoon, which are not going to go well
19:33:13 mriedem dansmith: ^ you know why
19:33:23 dansmith lol
19:33:28 dansmith wish I could go
19:34:32 mlavalle mriedem: thanks. good luck with the parent / teacher conference :-) I remember those days
19:37:18 efried sean-k-mooney Took another swing at the bandwidth spec
19:43:26 melwitt mriedem: I wonder if the problem is with cryptsetup and not luks (in your recreate patch). in the bug report lisali mentioned dmcrypt which would imply cryptsetup IIUC
19:43:41 melwitt the hard reboot is only in the luks test
19:43:41 sean-k-mooney efried: cool thanks ill review it with rodolfo tomorow when im back in the office
19:44:41 melwitt mriedem: ah but I see in the bug summary he uses LUKS in the repro steps. nvm
19:44:43 mriedem melwitt: i'll check the logs when they are available to make sure it's not something like reboot failed but the instance wasn't put into ERROR state
19:47:45 mriedem mlavalle: before you scamper off,
19:47:48 mriedem i have a question for you
19:48:00 mriedem https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1718605
19:48:01 openstack Launchpad bug 1718605 in neutron "[RFE] Support regex matching when filtering port with IP address" [Wishlist,Triaged] - Assigned to Zhenyu Zheng (zhengzhenyu)
19:48:14 mriedem mlavalle: would ^ be exposed via a new networking API extension?
19:48:26 mriedem i want to assert that it would be
19:48:35 mriedem so nova can tell if neutron is new enough to filter ports by an ip regex
19:49:47 mlavalle mriedem: yes, that makes sense
19:49:56 mriedem ok cool
19:50:06 mlavalle otherwise you don't know who you are talking about
19:50:14 mlavalle talking to^^^^
19:50:36 mlavalle good thing you left a comment in the RFE
19:50:42 mriedem \o/
19:50:54 mlavalle I'll make sure we talk about it in the drivers meeting
19:51:02 mriedem ok
19:59:29 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Improve the performance of filtering instances by IP. https://review.openstack.org/509326
20:00:35 melwitt mriedem: looks like reboot succeeded, weird http://logs.openstack.org/60/512760/1/check/legacy-tempest-dsvm-neutron-scenario-multinode-lvm-multibackend/b6880f6/logs/screen-n-cpu.txt.gz#_Oct_17_19_08_20_972474
20:02:03 mriedem are you sure that's the right request?
20:02:45 melwitt not totally sure but it's the only hard reboot in nova-api
20:03:01 melwitt I'm missing how to tie these to specific tests
20:03:15 melwitt not seeing any test ids or names
20:05:29 mriedem i think cbdc84d2-2f34-4868-8058-4c5503f5d815 is the volume id
20:09:02 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/newton: Fix --max-count handling for nova-manage cell_v2 map_instances https://review.openstack.org/507557
20:09:13 mriedem Stderr: u'Device /dev/sda is not a valid LUKS device.\nCommand failed with code 22: Device /dev/sda is not a valid LUKS device.\n'
20:09:30 mriedem oh i guess that's maybe normal
20:09:32 mriedem "/dev/sda is not a valid LUKS device; formatting device for first use"
20:10:49 melwitt I saw those errors too but they're not part of the reboot request (assuming the reboot request I found was the one you added)
20:10:55 melwitt there was only one so I assumed it had to be it
20:11:00 mriedem they aren't, they are part of the attach volume operation
20:11:19 mriedem req-b88ac35a-19f9-4aaa-8186-75028e85d14f is the reboot request
20:11:40 melwitt yeah, that's the one I found
20:12:18 mriedem ew why do we process all of the cpu/numa topology stuff again on reboot?
20:12:21 mriedem is that necessary?
20:12:58 melwitt it might be part of mdbooth's "redo all the things in reboot". I dunno
20:13:25 mriedem it's part of building the guest config after we destroyed it i guess
20:20:37 openstackgerrit Marco Chiappero proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Add a communication channel for power management support https://review.openstack.org/512815
20:21:52 mriedem melwitt: yeah i came to the same conclusion http://logs.openstack.org/60/512760/1/check/legacy-tempest-dsvm-neutron-scenario-multinode-lvm-multibackend/b6880f6/logs/screen-n-cpu.txt.gz#_Oct_17_19_08_20_972474
20:24:54 mriedem +2 on Kevin_Zheng's spec to proxy IP filtering to neutron as a way forward https://review.openstack.org/#/c/509326/
20:25:01 mriedem for that perf thing
20:33:02 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/newton: neutron: handle binding:profile=None during migration https://review.openstack.org/506323
20:39:20 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/pike: neutron: handle binding:profile=None during migration https://review.openstack.org/506319
20:39:26 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/ocata: neutron: handle binding:profile=None during migration https://review.openstack.org/506320
20:39:32 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/ocata: Provide original fault message when BFV fails https://review.openstack.org/493141
20:40:29 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova stable/newton: DNM: Test hard reboot with encrypted volumes attached https://review.openstack.org/512852
20:42:39 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova stable/newton: DNM: Test hard reboot with encrypted volumes attached https://review.openstack.org/512852
20:54:53 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add pagination and timestamp filtering support for os-migrations API https://review.openstack.org/506030
20:55:11 mriedem dansmith: i think this migrations paging spec is ready to go ^
20:55:16 mriedem has the multi-cell stuff in it
21:01:47 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/newton: Provide original fault message when BFV fails https://review.openstack.org/493206
21:03:46 dansmith mriedem: why descending order?
21:04:02 dansmith I mean, I know we do that in instance list but I don't know why that's good
21:04:29 dansmith it just means that pages are in the reverse order of display in a text screen, which annoys me
21:04:31 mriedem was just being consistent with the instance list
21:04:32 mriedem defaults
21:05:25 mriedem in some earlier patch sets we were talking about what to do and just settled on following what instance list does by default,
21:05:38 dansmith ugh
21:05:45 mriedem and that's only with the new microversion. the spec doesn't call it out, but if the request is < new microversion, we don't enforce any sort key/direction
21:05:56 mriedem so leave it to the natural order that we get today
21:06:40 openstackgerrit Moshe Levi proposed openstack/nova master: Don't overwrite binding-profile https://review.openstack.org/505613
21:06:40 dansmith mriedem: which file in the api is this? not compute/migration.py right?
21:06:51 mriedem where the default order is?
21:07:11 mriedem https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/api/openstack/common.py#L142
21:07:12 dansmith er, hmm, maybe it is
21:07:14 mriedem is what i was basing it on

Earlier   Later