| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-10-04 | |||
| 14:05:53 | sahid | libvirt have a pci device manager, and it's a bad idea to just ignore it | |
| 14:05:53 | dansmith | yep, it's a first step to get us basic support, as stated above | |
| 14:07:00 | sahid | but it's a hack, no need ot RP or anything to provide that basic support | |
| 14:09:49 | openstackgerrit | Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/os-vif master: Add support for Windows network commands https://review.openstack.org/487405 | |
| 14:13:40 | openstackgerrit | Eric Berglund proposed openstack/nova master: WIP(5): PowerVM driver: ovs vif https://review.openstack.org/422512 | |
| 14:13:51 | openstackgerrit | Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/os-vif master: Add Port Profile info to VIF objects Linux Bridge plugin https://review.openstack.org/490829 | |
| 14:15:08 | openstackgerrit | Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/os-vif master: Add VersionedObjectPrintable mixin https://review.openstack.org/493082 | |
| 14:18:47 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Fix test_get_volume_config method https://review.openstack.org/489467 | |
| 14:20:39 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: factor out compute service start in ServerMovingTest https://review.openstack.org/503037 | |
| 14:20:39 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Test resource allocation during soft delete https://review.openstack.org/495159 | |
| 14:23:10 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove unused get_all_instance_*metadata methods https://review.openstack.org/508299 | |
| 14:23:11 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove old compat code from servers ViewBuilder._get_metadata https://review.openstack.org/508326 | |
| 14:23:11 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Stop joining on system_metadata when listing instances https://review.openstack.org/508335 | |
| 14:23:12 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove system_metadata loading in Instance._load_flavor https://review.openstack.org/508357 | |
| 14:24:57 | dansmith | jaypipes: bauzas: stephenfin: easy +W on this cleanup: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/508299/2 | |
| 14:25:40 | jaypipes | dansmith: finito | |
| 14:26:03 | dansmith | jaypipes: ${thanks_in_some_fancy_language} | |
| 14:26:14 | jaypipes | :) | |
| 14:35:21 | mriedem | whew, got my aussy visitor visa | |
| 14:36:27 | dansmith | um I believe it's "aussie" | |
| 14:56:11 | cdent | anybody able to sail this gabbi test addition, already has jay’s +2: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/485209/ | |
| 14:57:19 | gibi | cdent: looking... | |
| 14:57:28 | cdent | thanks | |
| 14:58:12 | gibi | dansmith was faster | |
| 14:58:36 | cdent | thanks danpawlik | |
| 14:58:45 | cdent | oh noes! thanks dansmith | |
| 14:58:54 | danpawlik | cdent: lol | |
| 14:58:56 | danpawlik | :D | |
| 14:59:04 | danpawlik | cdent: I was wondering why you thanks me :D | |
| 14:59:23 | cdent | danpawlik: I’m sure you’ve done something worth being thanked for? Thanks for existing. | |
| 14:59:24 | gibi | danpawlik: now you have to do someting for cdent :) | |
| 15:00:26 | danpawlik | gibi: In that case, Im going to work! | |
| 15:00:34 | danpawlik | cdent: :D | |
| 15:10:40 | melwitt | mriedem: I started looking at the ceph job last night and something weird is happening where keystone can't start. still researching how to fix it | |
| 15:11:31 | mriedem | ok, but it's still a smoldering pile despite that | |
| 15:19:56 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Modernize set_vm_state_and_notify https://review.openstack.org/499799 | |
| 15:19:56 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Pass migration from API to conductor for evacuate https://review.openstack.org/500176 | |
| 15:26:05 | melwitt | mriedem: I see now, the keystone thing must have been from getting zuul'd. the failures I see now are from a 404 from cinder api test, like you said last time | |
| 15:26:47 | smcginnis | melwitt: Anything you need us to look at? | |
| 15:27:06 | mriedem | there was a long-standing change in cinder for ceph, | |
| 15:27:16 | mriedem | that jbernard thought would help stabilize some things | |
| 15:27:55 | mriedem | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/281550/ | |
| 15:28:45 | mriedem | and there was an alternative proposed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/432326/ | |
| 15:29:50 | mriedem | as far as i can tell, something something locks | |
| 15:30:37 | mriedem | there are some newer volume snaphot tests in tempest that are failing at a pretty high rate, globally, so those are probably not helping the situation | |
| 15:30:37 | melwitt | smcginnis: not yet sure. there's a couple of cinder api tempest tests failing on only our ceph job (for a long time) and I'm starting to look at it | |
| 15:31:05 | mriedem | and by "the situation", yes, i mean this guy http://pmcdeadline2.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/mike-the-situation__140331172717.jpg | |
| 15:32:01 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: List/show all server migration types https://review.openstack.org/489029 | |
| 15:32:54 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: What is the meaning of....recreate? https://review.openstack.org/508190 | |
| 15:38:51 | mriedem | sdague: dansmith: grenade creates a vm and leaves it running through the upgrade so it can ping it on the other side right? | |
| 15:39:02 | dansmith | mriedem: yeah | |
| 15:39:10 | mriedem | ok, i guess nova supports accessible upgrades then! | |
| 15:39:12 | mriedem | yay more tags | |
| 15:39:52 | dansmith | is that what that tag means? | |
| 15:40:03 | dansmith | because there was "no-impact-upgrades" proposed at one point that covered that bit | |
| 15:40:16 | cdent | nobody is ever sure | |
| 15:40:36 | cdent | smcginnis tried to kill the accessible tag but then someone came along and said, but wait, nova and cinder match that one | |
| 15:40:57 | mriedem | there are like 5-6 upgrade tags | |
| 15:41:12 | mriedem | i didn't know what a "controlled resource" was in reading the description, | |
| 15:41:14 | mriedem | assumed it was a VM, | |
| 15:41:25 | mriedem | but without examples in the tag descriptions it's hard to know what the author intended | |
| 15:42:04 | mriedem | i know what it means to the ATF... | |
| 15:42:06 | cdent | in nova’s case it does mean that running vm survives and can be worked with (accessed) through an upgrade | |
| 15:42:21 | mriedem | so what is "no-impact-upgrades"? | |
| 15:42:22 | cdent | but yeah, it’s entirely unclear | |
| 15:42:27 | cdent | dunno! :) | |
| 15:42:31 | cdent | I don’t like tags | |
| 15:42:33 | mriedem | weeeeeeeee | |
| 15:42:44 | mriedem | i don't either really, but probably for slightly different reasons | |
| 15:43:08 | cdent | i cannot say, since I dont know why you don’t like | |
| 15:43:19 | mriedem | no one in the dev teams probably thinks about tags | |
| 15:43:25 | mriedem | e.g. there is no bi-annual audit | |
| 15:43:39 | mriedem | i do'nt know what stick or carrot exists for us to care about tags | |
| 15:44:09 | mriedem | and i do'nt know if people consuming openstack are really giving them much weight, but maybe they are depending on project, | |
| 15:44:22 | mriedem | e.g. if there are 3 monitoring type projects, you'd care about what tags are applied to those | |
| 15:44:25 | cdent | the stick or carror aspect is part of my concerns | |
| 15:46:53 | sdague | mriedem: a bunch of them were going to be purged | |
| 15:47:16 | sdague | mriedem: there is a distinction somewhere about 0 api downtime | |
| 15:47:23 | sdague | which is important for things like keystone | |
| 15:47:35 | sdague | because, if keystone is out, operations fail randomly | |
| 15:51:22 | mriedem | i think that's the zero-downtime-upgrade one | |
| 15:51:34 | mriedem | the zero-impact-upgrade one is about performance during upgrade, as my understanding | |
| 15:51:46 | mriedem | so there are subtle differences | |
| 15:51:47 | dansmith | yeah something | |
| 15:51:58 | mriedem | replied to the ML thread on this, | |
| 15:52:16 | mriedem | but i'd think zero-impact-upgrade re perf would be something like strain on the network doing live migrations while upgrading compute hosts | |
| 15:52:56 | mriedem | but i'm not sure how nova would really have anything to do with that, it seems like a deployment topology decision | |
| 15:53:45 | mriedem | let's put that tag on openstack public clouds :) | |
| 15:54:46 | mriedem | onto another topic, sounds like cern would like to be able to pass user_data to rebuild... | |
| 15:55:05 | mriedem | sounds like they rely on rebuild pretty heavily | |
| 16:01:26 | cfriesen | does anyone know why AggregateImagePropertiesIsolation and AggregateInstanceExtraSpecsFilter behave differently? It's confusing... | |
| 16:11:09 | bauzas | cfriesen: the reason is "historical" | |
| 16:11:22 | bauzas | in other words, two efforts made by two teams | |
| 16:15:43 | cfriesen | bauzas: why am I not surprised. :) | |
| 16:16:23 | bauzas | the problem is that changing a filter behaviour is something tricky | |
| 16:17:00 | bauzas | I'd prefer providing a new filter that would do both image and flavor checks with the same behaviour, and in the meantime deprecate the old two filters | |
| 16:17:22 | bauzas | so we would be super clear that the behaviour is changing | |
| 16:17:40 | bauzas | keep those filters for a couple of releases, and then remove them from the tree | |
| 16:17:49 | bauzas | if people want to keep them out-of-tree, I'm fine | |
| 16:18:02 | bauzas | cfriesen: fancy proposing that ? :) | |