Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-09-25
14:04:41 sahid jaypipes: yes and what is the ETA for sometging production-ready?
14:04:48 sahid ok cool that is my point
14:04:50 owalsh bauzas: hey
14:04:50 bauzas well, with the fact that CPU pinning isn't targeted to be pushed to Placement, right?
14:04:53 jianghuaw bauzas, that's why we make the pGPU group as the vGPU's resource provider.
14:05:16 bauzas jianghuaw: so, say I have two same cards, I'd only see one pGPU group right?
14:05:27 jianghuaw true.
14:05:28 sahid jaypipes: it will take at least 2 or 3 releases and during that time we can't make any development?
14:05:39 bauzas jianghuaw: okay, then that's a bit different from libvirt
14:06:01 sahid i just suggest we work in parallel
14:06:29 jianghuaw bauzas, could you give an example for 'that shows up different device IDs for two same cards.'
14:06:32 jaypipes sahid: depends on what you mean by "production-ready". (I personally don't think the existing pci manager is well-written or maintainable, but I guess there are different defninitions of "production-ready")
14:06:32 sahid since the /pci is kind of production-ready and provide eveyrything we need
14:06:50 jaypipes sahid: again, I'm not disagreeing with you...
14:06:56 sahid jaypipes: yes yes :)
14:07:00 jaypipes not sure why you're acting like I am :)
14:07:26 sahid oops sorry really
14:07:45 sahid it's just that you are the only who are paying attention at me :)
14:08:10 dansmith jaypipes: we can provide pretty simple vgpu support via resource classes today right? without building more into the pci infrastructure we have
14:08:31 jaypipes sahid: we're paying attention but also in scheduler IRC meeting :)
14:08:42 dansmith jaypipes: if we just let virt drivers see that a vgpu was requested (i.e. see the flavor) and just configure the guest with an available one
14:08:43 jianghuaw bauzas, will the "GRID M60-0B" have different type id <type id='nvidia-11'> for two same pGPUs?
14:09:20 bauzas jianghuaw: I haven't tested yet, but I bet it
14:09:27 jaypipes dansmith: very simple resources, yes. we could add a (custom) resource class for the VGPU resources and have a flavor consume some amount of those
14:09:43 dansmith jaypipes: right, that'd be my preference for the first go-round
14:10:02 jianghuaw bauzas, I think if the type id is different, it will be a good solution to use 'type-id' for libvirt.
14:10:20 bauzas dansmith: jaypipes: I was only seeing the virt drivers adding the new VGPU resource class to the existing RPs as a first round, that's it :)
14:10:26 dansmith jaypipes: let people segregate different types of gpus into aggregates, and just assume equal portions of vgpu per instance without any smarts, which I think would be a perfectly reasonable first stab, which we can iterate on when we have traits and things
14:10:32 dansmith bauzas: ++
14:11:06 jaypipes dansmith: agreed.
14:11:21 bauzas jianghuaw: yeah, so you agree with the fact that the listOpt can have different semantics based on the driver?
14:11:50 jianghuaw bauzas, yes. libvirt uses the type-id but XenServer continue to use the type name. As you suggested, virt driver should able to mapping them into real resources.
14:12:05 bauzas that would be strings for each of the drivers, but in the libvirt case, it would be device IDs while it would be pGPU resource type names for xen
14:12:08 jianghuaw but we need confirm if the type-id will be different.
14:12:19 bauzas jianghuaw: what I need is a testbed :p
14:13:02 jianghuaw bauzas, thanks.
14:13:28 bauzas jianghuaw: fancy updating the spec so I can do a pass once again ?
14:14:10 jianghuaw bauzas, sure. I will update it soon.
14:14:19 bauzas cool
14:14:28 sahid dansmith: basically you can't do more than that right now and it's exactly what i'm pointing where we could have better support
14:14:36 jianghuaw bauzas, so I think the option name as enabled_vgpu_types is fine. right?
14:14:58 jianghuaw just confirm if I can keep this option name:-)
14:15:25 celebrate Hi guys! Do you know where the "availability_zone" attribute of instance is stored?
14:15:28 dansmith sahid: building more on the current pci stuff isn't "better" in any way, IMHO :)
14:15:57 dansmith sahid: and I just think that providing a basic building block initially and moving on from there avoids us building more baggage that we have to migrate, adapt, and remove later
14:16:00 mriedem celebrate: instance.availability_zone, or as metadata on a host aggregate the instance is in
14:16:25 bauzas celebrate: the scheduler queries hosts based on request_spec.availability_zone
14:16:41 bauzas instance.az is only set at boot time
14:16:50 celebrate yeah, in database i see AZ=nova, but scheduler thinks its "None"
14:17:12 sahid dansmith: i'm not agree with you the /pci is good and do what we need
14:17:27 dansmith sahid: okay :)
14:17:35 sahid dansmith: in all cases we will have to migrate the /pci
14:17:44 celebrate Do you know how to make scheduler understand that AZ is "nova"?
14:17:58 mriedem sahid: we don't have to migrate vgpus if we don't implement it in /pci
14:17:59 sahid the support of mdev is not so heavy
14:18:12 sahid mriedem: mdev is just pci devices
14:18:14 bauzas celebrate: well, nova AZ is actually equal to None
14:18:29 sahid so when you will migrate sriov it will be the same work
14:18:50 bauzas celebrate: that's a convention, or rather a config option default value
14:19:08 mriedem celebrate: https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/user/aggregates.html
14:19:11 bauzas namely [DEFAULT]/default_availability_zone
14:19:37 celebrate I've already set [DEFAULT]/default_availability_zone to "nova"
14:19:56 celebrate however scheduler thinks its None and refuses to respect AZ from aggregates
14:20:15 bauzas celebrate: I will need to disappear in a couple of minutes, but here are a few things to know
14:20:41 bauzas celebrate: #1 if you didn't ask a specific AZ at boot time, that means the scheduler won't care about placing your instance to a specific AZ
14:21:19 bauzas celebrate: if you did specified a AZ at boot, AZFilter in the scheduler will check the AZ for each of the hosts
14:21:28 celebrate can I somehow make scheduler change its mind?
14:21:38 bauzas celebrate: not sure I get why :)
14:22:07 celebrate because I have different AZ and scheduler sends VM there during live-migration
14:22:33 celebrate where this information is stored in DB?
14:23:03 bauzas celebrate: could you please describe your problem ?
14:23:36 celebrate I have 3 different AZ and during live-migration VMs travel from one AZ to another
14:23:57 celebrate and I want VMs to stay inside their AZ
14:25:04 bauzas celebrate: if the instance wasn't boot by specifying an AZ with --availability_zone' then the answer is "no, it's not possible to modify that later"
14:25:23 bauzas and tweaking the DB is fairly discouraged
14:25:45 bauzas rather, you should consider making use of "default_schedule_zone" config opt which sets a default AZ to any instance
14:26:04 bauzas I really need to disappear for a couple of mins (kids school thingy)
14:28:00 celebrate please tell me where it is stored in DB
14:28:10 celebrate please )
14:28:55 liuyulong_ mriedem, sdague, hello, http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-September/122567.html, I sent the issue of rebuild-keypair-updating to the mail list openstack-dev. So what do you guys think about it?
14:29:33 mriedem sahid: jaypipes: replied to the ML thread on vgpus
14:29:41 liuyulong_ Are there any others related to this discussion? PTG members?
14:36:24 celebrate so anybody knows where in DB "availability_zone" attribute is located?
14:36:40 celebrate the one attribute that is respected by scheduler
14:39:30 openstackgerrit Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/os-vif master: Field network.multi_host is now deprecated. https://review.openstack.org/507151
14:41:39 openstackgerrit zhangyangyang proposed openstack/nova master: Update oslo version in requirements https://review.openstack.org/507153
14:43:19 jaypipes mriedem: danke\
14:48:47 openstackgerrit Moshe Levi proposed openstack/nova master: Don't overwrite binding-profile https://review.openstack.org/505613
14:58:17 mriedem bauzas: don't forget https://review.openstack.org/#/c/506414/
14:58:34 bauzas mriedem: I'm on it
14:58:43 bauzas just needs moar time
15:01:14 sahid mriedem: ok thanks it's fair :)
15:01:33 sahid just have replied
15:04:01 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Change livesnapshot to true by default https://review.openstack.org/454323
15:04:14 jianghuaw bauzas, sahid, do you have a link where I can get the list of vGPU type ids for mdev?
15:05:49 jianghuaw per this link: https://libvirt.org/drvnodedev.html
15:05:56 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Add live.migration.force.complete to the legacy notification whitelist https://review.openstack.org/506104
15:06:10 jianghuaw 'The element has one attribute id which holds an official vendor-supplied identifier for the type'
15:06:21 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Add functional migrate force_complete test https://review.openstack.org/496202
15:07:09 jianghuaw I guess the type id is exactly mapped into the type name.

Earlier   Later