| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-09-21 | |||
| 15:40:33 | mriedem | edleafe: do i need to review those alternative hosts specs in any order? there is the one about the object model and then the other one. | |
| 15:40:49 | mriedem | or should those be merged? | |
| 15:41:15 | edleafe | mriedem: alternate hosts was a concept we agreed to in Pike but never wrote up in a spec | |
| 15:41:31 | edleafe | mriedem: the Selection object is independent | |
| 15:44:02 | dansmith | edleafe: is the host.updated=True thing the flag we use to avoid choosing that same host for another instance of a multi-create? | |
| 15:44:12 | sdague | mriedem: will look | |
| 15:44:28 | sdague | mriedem: I'm trying to sort out a final set of unit tests fails on the QEMU_IMG version thing | |
| 15:45:27 | edleafe | dansmith: I think so. That host state stuff is still black magic to me | |
| 15:45:39 | dansmith | edleafe: oh actually it's host.updated=None.. how. strange. | |
| 15:45:55 | dansmith | edleafe: okay I will comment based on that assumption and hedge a bit | |
| 15:47:00 | drwahl | does placement-api (in newton) require keystone v3? | |
| 15:47:42 | bauzas | dansmith: that's because updated is the flag for saying "please refresh my state" | |
| 15:48:19 | dansmith | bauzas: okay I'm confused about why we need to do that in this context then | |
| 15:48:39 | bauzas | dansmith: what's the exact concern you have in mind ? | |
| 15:48:48 | dansmith | oohh, | |
| 15:48:51 | bauzas | I just jumped on your above question | |
| 15:49:02 | dansmith | maybe this is "I'm going to consume this host, so make sure to refresh it soon" ? | |
| 15:49:08 | dansmith | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/486215/7/nova/scheduler/filter_scheduler.py | |
| 15:49:09 | dansmith | L92 | |
| 15:50:05 | bauzas | dansmith: no | |
| 15:50:14 | bauzas | dansmith: that's because we consume_from_request() before | |
| 15:50:35 | bauzas | dansmith: so the in-memory HostState is modified | |
| 15:50:42 | mriedem | stvnoyes: the scsi volume live migration tempest test failed for the new style attach flows in a grenade job, meaning one of the computes in the live migration is pike and one is queens http://logs.openstack.org/90/481290/6/check/gate-grenade-dsvm-neutron-multinode-live-migration-nv/d8962cc/console.html#_2017-09-17_04_21_05_125937 | |
| 15:51:01 | bauzas | dansmith: in case the calculations were wrong, we need to unset those modifications and force a fresh new DB call | |
| 15:51:26 | bauzas | we generally keep in memory the HostStates once per request | |
| 15:51:26 | dansmith | bauzas: meaning if we fail to do the consume, we want to trigger a refresh? | |
| 15:51:44 | bauzas | but for a multi-schedule call, then we could iterate wrongly | |
| 15:51:46 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/os-vif master: Rehome OVO unit tests to tests.unit.test_object.py https://review.openstack.org/489922 | |
| 15:51:53 | bauzas | dansmith: yup that sort of | |
| 15:51:58 | dansmith | hrm | |
| 15:52:09 | dansmith | not sure I fully get it, but it's not the thing I thought, so that's fine | |
| 15:52:33 | mriedem | stvnoyes: looks like it fails here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/487884/7/tempest/api/compute/admin/test_live_migration.py@185 | |
| 15:52:38 | dansmith | edleafe: so, what follows is some rambling for improvements we can make later, but listen and nod (or not): | |
| 15:52:57 | bauzas | dansmith: see HostManager.consume_from_request() and you'll understand | |
| 15:53:21 | dansmith | edleafe: I think what you're doing here is going through the list of hosts like we do today, and picking the target and alternates for each one, | |
| 15:54:02 | dansmith | edleafe: which may mean your first alternate for instance 2 may be the the target for instance 3 and so on, such that all the alternates for early instances are almost definitely going to be burned by the later instances for any num_instances>max_retries | |
| 15:54:03 | dansmith | right? | |
| 15:54:29 | dansmith | so, hmm, yeah if that's right, that seems like a problem | |
| 15:54:31 | edleafe | dansmith: yes. Selecting an alternate doesn't consume anything | |
| 15:54:52 | dansmith | what we probably need to do is go through and pick primaries, and then pick alternates for each after that | |
| 15:55:03 | dansmith | the alternates can overlap, but they shouldn't overlap with any primaries | |
| 15:55:21 | edleafe | dansmith: ok, that could be done | |
| 15:55:48 | dansmith | edleafe: I'm just thinking that we're basically never going to be able to reschedule those early instances if we do it in the order you have, which is probably bad :) | |
| 15:56:04 | dansmith | edleafe: I shall add comments about this | |
| 15:56:06 | edleafe | I think in an earlier version of this we didn't think this would be a significant issue | |
| 15:56:54 | dansmith | yeah, I think we discussed it before, indeed | |
| 15:56:55 | dansmith | I think i was focusing on the overlapping of the alternates, | |
| 15:56:57 | edleafe | since a) alternates should rarely be used and b) hosts might still fit an additional instance | |
| 15:56:59 | dansmith | and not considering the overlapping of primaries | |
| 15:57:01 | dansmith | yeah | |
| 15:57:26 | stvnoyes | mriedem: ok, Ill take a look | |
| 15:58:41 | gibi | dansmith: I think I found why the target_cell context manager eats our MarkerNotFoundException, see my comment in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/504986/6/nova/compute/instance_list.py@85 | |
| 15:59:21 | dansmith | gibi: ahh, that makes more sense.. I forgot we were using the figure's target_cell here | |
| 15:59:40 | dansmith | gibi: I wrote that fixture, so I'll fix that up and make this change at the end of this series | |
| 16:00:00 | dansmith | gibi: now, please, go find bugs in someone else's code :) | |
| 16:00:34 | efried | sdague mordred Design point about bp/use-ksa-adapter-for-endpoints: When setting up for a service where we have the ability to get auth from context, what should we do about auth in conf? Options: a) Always use the context auth, don't even register auth options in the conf; b) Register auth conf options and allow them to override the context auth. | |
| 16:00:45 | efried | cdent ^ you may also have an opinion | |
| 16:01:03 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Spec: Use keystoneauth1 Adapter for endpoints https://review.openstack.org/500190 | |
| 16:01:36 | sdague | efried: it depends on what the subcall is doing | |
| 16:01:48 | sdague | if it is acting on behalf of the user, it should use the context auth | |
| 16:02:02 | gibi | dansmith: OK, I will review that follow up too. But instead of looking at others code I will just stop looking at any code for today | |
| 16:02:04 | sdague | optionally wrapped in a service token so that it doesn't expire | |
| 16:02:23 | dansmith | gibi: as long as it's not finding bugs in _my_ code I'm fine with whatever :P | |
| 16:03:15 | gibi | dansmith: :) | |
| 16:03:30 | efried | sdague I guess there's also c) Don't use the context auth; require the conf auth. | |
| 16:03:38 | sdague | efried: yeh | |
| 16:03:39 | efried | sdague I hear you saying it's gonna be case by case. | |
| 16:03:41 | dansmith | gibi: I'll add you to the review of the fixture cleanup when I have it | |
| 16:03:45 | sdague | it's going to be case by case | |
| 16:03:59 | efried | sdague I'll likely need some help identifying which is which. | |
| 16:04:12 | sdague | efried: so, I think the answer ends up being roughly | |
| 16:04:23 | sdague | glance, cinder, barbican, keystone always act as user | |
| 16:04:41 | sdague | ironic always from conf, because nova is the ironic multi tenancy solution | |
| 16:04:51 | sdague | and neutron, it depends on the operation | |
| 16:05:31 | efried | sdague Okay. For that first set: You already pushed for glance to be able to get the auth from context, so not c). Should we b) allow conf override or just a) always use context? | |
| 16:05:59 | sdague | efried: for glance, I don't think so | |
| 16:06:13 | sdague | I can't think of a case where we should "sudo" on image things | |
| 16:06:27 | sdague | or that image things have to happen outside of a user context | |
| 16:07:08 | sdague | we should, whenever possible, really operate in the user context of the user token we got, because it ensures we don't have an unintended priv escalation | |
| 16:07:26 | sdague | ironic is a special case, ironic doesn't have regular users | |
| 16:07:31 | dansmith | edleafe: sanity check my tome of words on that review? | |
| 16:07:38 | efried | (It's worth noting that part of the mission statement of this bp was consistency. Sigh.) | |
| 16:08:09 | mordred | efried, sdague: "optionally wrapped in a service token" doesn't need nova-specific creds does it? | |
| 16:08:21 | edleafe | dansmith: on a call and an IRC meeting, so it'll be later | |
| 16:08:29 | dansmith | edleafe: sure | |
| 16:08:54 | efried | mordred It's just service_auth.get_auth_plugin(context) | |
| 16:09:00 | sdague | mordred: i foreget exactly what it needs on disk | |
| 16:09:08 | sdague | mordred: it does need some creds | |
| 16:09:20 | efried | oh | |
| 16:10:03 | efried | mordred sdague https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/service_auth.py | |
| 16:10:28 | efried | So it loads up the auth from the [service_user] group. | |
| 16:10:51 | efried | and we get two auths in the thing. | |
| 16:10:53 | efried | yeesh. | |
| 16:11:35 | mordred | so - you need at least some of the ksa settings for each service no matter what | |
| 16:11:51 | efried | Only if CONF.service_user.send_service_user_token is set | |
| 16:11:56 | mordred | like you need the adapter options and probably the session options - so it's really just a question of whether the authoptions are included right? | |
| 16:13:22 | efried | mordred Yeah, that's what we're discussing - whether we should even register the auth options in groups where that service can be contacted using the user context auth. | |
| 16:16:02 | mordred | nod. well - consistency notwithstanding, I'd vote for not registering conf options if we're not ever going to use them - otherwise someone is going to configure them and then be confused why they're not used | |
| 16:17:16 | mordred | but I defer to smarter nova humans | |
| 16:17:46 | sdague | mordred: ++ lets keep things trimmed down | |