Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-09-01
17:05:56 mriedem i'm going to make lunch
17:58:37 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Update docs for _destroy_evacuated_instance https://review.openstack.org/500144
18:03:28 openstackgerrit Sean Dague proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: test cells v1/nova-net without screen https://review.openstack.org/500151
18:03:42 sdague mriedem: doesn't seem like cellsv1 job is even in experimental queue for devstack?
18:04:26 mriedem it should be
18:04:45 mriedem used to be anyway
18:05:26 mriedem but yeah i don't see it in there now
18:06:01 mriedem only in experimental for tempest and nova from what i see
18:09:16 mriedem sdague: are you going to add that or should i?
18:10:16 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: doc: link to placement api-ref and history docs from main index https://review.openstack.org/498977
18:10:16 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: doc: link to versioned notification samples from main index https://review.openstack.org/500081
18:26:12 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove dest node allocation if evacuate MoveClaim fails https://review.openstack.org/499878
18:26:12 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Modernize set_vm_state_and_notify https://review.openstack.org/499799
18:28:10 fried_rice Procedural question: can I repoint the spec link for a blueprint? Need to submit a q spec for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/use-service-catalog-for-endpoints
18:28:10 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Update docs for _destroy_evacuated_instances https://review.openstack.org/500144
18:29:11 mriedem fried_rice: i have edit rights
18:29:13 mriedem so i can
18:29:26 fried_rice mriedem Ah, cool. So I'll shoot ya the link once I have it. Thanks.
18:30:42 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/pike: Fix nova assisted volume snapshots https://review.openstack.org/498979
18:31:02 mriedem thanks for making me think of this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GP1KHL0j0GU
18:40:05 sdague mriedem: either way, I was just surprised. I feel like we had this issue before
18:40:56 mriedem sdague: it comes up every time a devstack change breaks the cells v1 job and blocks nova
18:41:13 mriedem then we fix whatever and forget about it
18:47:00 fried_rice mriedem So the other thing is, this is no longer going to be "use service catalog for endpoints" - it's going to be "use keystoneauth1 discovery for endpoints". Can the blueprint-identifying name be changed; or do I need to file a new blueprint; or do we not care that the identifier is out of sync?
18:47:03 sdague ok, I really thought we merged it the last time :)
18:49:06 mriedem fried_rice: changing the bp name in lp would break the link in the old spec
18:49:09 sdague mriedem: https://review.openstack.org/500169
18:49:14 mriedem we could file a new blueprint and supersede the old one
18:49:32 fried_rice mriedem Okay, I'll do that. Thanks.
18:49:43 fried_rice long as there's a backtrail.
18:49:48 fried_rice supersede works
18:50:37 mriedem sdague: +1
18:51:23 mriedem dansmith: superdan: sdague: btw, i'm huawei now but guess what i get to do
18:51:24 mriedem BCG
18:51:34 mriedem jealous!?
18:51:47 dansmith wooooo
19:03:38 mriedem but no videos...
19:03:39 mriedem :(
19:04:15 mriedem "what do you think? should wanda record the future sale to her friend's sister's government contractor for the 3rd quarter even though the sale isn't complete but they say they will sign?"
19:04:28 mriedem ....YES!
19:09:12 sdague mriedem: ok, well at least one cells incompat found and fixed, I'll see if that gets it to completion
19:28:54 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Pass migration from API to conductor for evacuate https://review.openstack.org/500176
20:45:44 cdent mriedem: I recall from earlier in the week there was stuff happening about placement-osc-plugin. Where did that end up? Still in progress? Stall? Abort? Done?
20:45:54 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Spec: Use keystoneauth1 Adapter for endpoints https://review.openstack.org/500190
20:46:34 fried_rice mriedem mordred sdague ^ kablam
21:46:04 prometheanfire looks like online_data_migrations are broken in pike for postgresql
21:47:06 prometheanfire mriedem: http://paste.openstack.org/show/h1ABPkHTtlL8i29IIF3i/
21:47:25 prometheanfire that's after a db sync (which was successful)
21:49:33 prometheanfire http://paste.openstack.org/show/Oen7ZwvnFNlHfjSXyx9S/ has a second/third run too
21:54:07 cdent prometheanfire: is this actually true: “column build_requests.tags does not exist”?
21:55:36 prometheanfire which table?
21:55:53 prometheanfire guess build_requests?
21:56:26 prometheanfire that table is absent
21:56:28 cdent that’s nova/db/sqlalchemy/api_migrations/migrate_repo/versions/042_build_requests_add_tags.py
21:57:06 cdent diid you sync both all your databases?
21:57:23 prometheanfire that may be it
21:57:24 prometheanfire ...
21:57:42 cdent you need an api_db sync too
21:57:55 prometheanfire ya, I forget that every time
21:58:01 cdent :( it ought to be simpler
21:58:37 prometheanfire yep, happier now, NOTABUG
21:58:48 prometheanfire :D
21:59:00 prometheanfire so far so good this time around with postgres
21:59:15 cdent I was actually kind of hoping that it was a bug so we could have the “is postgres supported _really_?” argument all over again
21:59:19 cdent because gosh isn’t that fun?
21:59:33 prometheanfire oh ya...
22:00:25 prometheanfire if I could migrate to galera or something I would at this point, simply because online migrations and all
22:01:13 prometheanfire this install is grizzly I think, maybe havana
22:52:04 cdent If you like micro-optimizations, here’s one that may be useful: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/486829/
#openstack-nova - 2017-09-02
00:06:35 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/500011
00:11:27 mnaser i'm trying to figure out something that went bonkers in the puppet ci
00:11:31 mnaser (i know its friday at 8pm but who knows maybe someone is here)
00:11:36 mnaser http://logs.openstack.org/95/500195/1/check/gate-puppet-openstack-integration-4-scenario001-tempest-ubuntu-xenial/ba25431/logs/nova/nova-compute.txt.gz
00:11:47 mnaser it seems to be attempting to report a max_unit and total of 0gb disk
00:12:07 mnaser *however* .. according to this commit https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/3c217acb9c55d647ca362320d697e80d7cfa5ceb
00:12:09 mnaser it should not report it.
00:14:17 mnaser unless this somehow is reporting things in decimal (aka 0.x) and so therefore that if statement is not valid https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py#L5330-L5351
12:08:23 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/500011
12:12:47 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/500028
12:26:15 wlfightup host
12:26:18 wlfightup hello
12:26:25 wlfightup who online ?
#openstack-nova - 2017-09-03
02:41:58 prometheanfire what's the nova-metadata service used for?
02:42:12 prometheanfire I don't see it doc'd in the install guide, is it something I need to set up?
03:36:24 clarkb prometheanfire: iirc its so you can point VMs at something other than your proper api server for the metadata data
03:36:41 clarkb otherwise the api servers are also the metadata servers
03:38:05 prometheanfire ah
03:38:21 prometheanfire well, don't use that so will not go that route I guess
04:56:24 openstackgerrit steven.DN proposed openstack/nova master: start self-study https://review.openstack.org/500345
05:51:59 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: check query param for used_limits function https://review.openstack.org/499091
05:56:48 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: Remove qpid description in doc https://review.openstack.org/499087
06:15:23 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: check query param for server groups function https://review.openstack.org/500347
06:27:08 mikal clarkb: I don't think that's correct. I can't see any evidence in the code that the api server ever starts a metadata service
06:27:33 mikal clarkb: the target user is quite different for the metadata service compared with the compute api
06:29:15 prometheanfire mikal: I did a little more reading, the old api server (eventlet) also ran the metadata service I think
06:29:52 prometheanfire what is the compute wsgi script used for? I don't know a service/port that maps to
07:37:29 mikal prometheanfire: that isn't the compute api?
07:44:44 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move lvm handling to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/495516
07:44:45 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move xend existence probes to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/495538
07:44:45 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move shred to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/495537

Earlier   Later