Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-08-11
04:31:15 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Avoid chowning console logs in libvirt https://review.openstack.org/472229
04:31:16 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: First attempt at adding a privsep user to nova itself. https://review.openstack.org/459166
04:31:16 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move execs of touch to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/489190
04:31:17 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move libvirts dmcrypt support to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/490737
04:31:17 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move execs of tee to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/489438
04:31:18 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Don't shell out to mkdir, use ensure_tree() https://review.openstack.org/492326
04:31:19 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move libvirt usages of chown to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/471972
04:31:20 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Move ploop commands to privsep. https://review.openstack.org/492325
04:31:21 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Read from console ptys using privsep. https://review.openstack.org/489486
04:31:22 openstackgerrit Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: Refactor libvirt.utils.execute() away. https://review.openstack.org/489816
07:06:49 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Resource tracker compatibility with Ocata and Pike https://review.openstack.org/491012
07:50:51 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: refactory some code on get_password https://review.openstack.org/449458
07:51:10 openstackgerrit Markus Zoeller (markus_z) proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Explain the flow of the "serial console" feature https://review.openstack.org/476188
08:24:49 openstackgerrit Ilya Popov proposed openstack/nova master: Tests: Add cleanup of 'instances' directory https://review.openstack.org/491589
09:27:21 openstackgerrit yfzhao proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Fix wrong links https://review.openstack.org/492921
09:34:41 gibi good morning
09:39:41 bauzas gibi: good lunch :p
09:41:47 gibi bauzas: the day started earlier a bit but I was occupied with internal meetings
09:42:03 gibi bauzas: but yes, a lunch is about to happen too
09:42:42 gibi bauzas: did Matt cut rc1 last night?
09:43:12 bauzas gibi: no
09:43:23 bauzas gibi: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/492788/2
09:43:39 bauzas he was waiting for the merge IIRC
09:43:53 bauzas gibi: now, the main problem is about the Ironic job
09:43:57 bauzas dtantsur: around ?
09:44:25 bauzas dtantsur: context is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/487954/14
09:44:37 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: replace chance with filter scheduler in func tests https://review.openstack.org/491529
09:44:52 bauzas dtantsur: that change is atm a RC1 blocker but I don't see the Ironic job providing the log saying that the flavor is modified
09:45:06 gibi bauzas: thanks for the info
09:45:33 bauzas dtantsur: if we cut RC1 without ^, that could possibly be an upgrade problem for Queens
09:45:55 bauzas so I would appreciate any ironic folks support now :)
09:46:06 bauzas TheJulia: around too ?
09:47:58 smcginnis bauzas: Do you need to hold that RC request?
09:49:34 smcginnis bauzas: Oh, nevermind. Now I see your comment there.
09:50:04 bauzas smcginnis: yeah, I'd like to discuss with matt about whether we cut RC1 without the change I provided in my comment
09:50:21 bauzas smcginnis: do you accept that ? is it possible to cut RC1 only on Friday?
09:50:30 bauzas I mean, it's also a branch
09:50:41 smcginnis bauzas: I think we're probably fine waiting until Monday if we have to.
09:50:49 smcginnis bauzas: You're just waiting on one patch, right?
09:51:05 bauzas smcginnis: yup, I just rebased the releases tag with the merge sha1
09:51:32 bauzas smcginnis: so if we just cut the tag without the above change, a +W would only be needed
09:51:51 bauzas the only blocker for us is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/487954/
09:52:18 bauzas other bugs would be treated in other RCs
09:52:34 bauzas HTH
09:52:36 smcginnis bauzas: Cool, I think we're fine waiting a little then.
09:55:27 dtantsur morning bauzas
09:55:52 dtantsur I'll start looking in it in a few minutes
10:00:23 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: test server evacuation with placement https://review.openstack.org/492548
10:03:15 bauzas dtantsur: FWIW, I'm forging a DNM patch for adding more voerbosity
10:04:29 dtantsur cool
10:16:55 openstackgerrit Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Make compute log less verbose with allocs autocorrection https://review.openstack.org/492571
10:18:56 dtantsur bauzas: I don't really understand the CI failure there.. it seems unrelated to me
10:19:19 bauzas dtantsur: hence me logging more
10:19:27 bauzas dtantsur: I'm even not sure we run the thread
10:19:43 bauzas given it's in a conditional
10:20:55 dtantsur we should not, it only runs for nodes with resource_class != None
10:21:25 dtantsur bauzas: I can make https://review.openstack.org/#/c/491777/ depends-on this patch, to see how it behaves with resource_classes. wdyt?
10:22:14 bauzas dtantsur: sure
10:22:43 bauzas dtantsur: if that doesn't trample you waiting for devstack patch being merged
10:23:00 bauzas dtantsur: I mean, if you can wait for that devstack patch to be merged, that's fine to me
10:23:01 dtantsur we need to make sure it won't blow up after merging the both changes :)
10:23:06 bauzas yeah
10:23:32 bauzas anyway, just doing an urgent internal bug thingy and then I'm back to the DNM patch
10:23:43 dtantsur ack
10:27:44 dtantsur ok, both patches updated, waiting for the CI
10:41:06 openstackgerrit Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/nova master: Deprecate bare metal filters https://review.openstack.org/492563
10:42:04 dtantsur bauzas: meanwhile, do you think we can also get ^^ in?
10:53:11 bauzas dtantsur: looks to me hard for RC1
10:53:21 bauzas dtantsur: even if we haven't yet merged it
10:53:26 bauzas tagged it, sorry
10:53:50 dtantsur ok, that's fine. I just have an ironic docs patch depending on it, I may need to split it
10:53:53 bauzas dtantsur: we're already past the deadline but I leave matt make the hard call :)
10:54:29 dtantsur vdrok: first of all, please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/487954/
10:54:52 vdrok dtantsur: looking
10:56:09 dtantsur vdrok: it fails the ironic CI for some reason. I see network connection problems between various services, so it is not necessary related to the patch itself
10:56:36 vdrok dtantsur: yup, there is some socket error in the vbmc log as well
10:56:51 dtantsur I've rechecked it, let's see
10:57:16 dtantsur vdrok: our next step would be to make https://review.openstack.org/491777 and https://review.openstack.org/476968 pass the CI - reviews welcome there too
10:57:26 bauzas dtantsur: I'm more concerned by the fact I don't see the logs mentioning the flavor update rather than the Ironic job giving us -1 :)
10:57:57 bauzas dtantsur: in other words, I feel brave enough to +2 some ironic change if I'm sure the job issues are unrelated
10:58:17 dtantsur bauzas: why should we see any updates, given that the nodes don't have resource classes yet?
10:58:38 bauzas oh f****
10:59:01 bauzas dtantsur: you killed me :p
10:59:22 dtantsur bear metal powerzzz!
10:59:25 bauzas dtantsur: those ironic nodes aren't having resource classes
10:59:26 bauzas ?
10:59:31 bauzas yet, I mean ?
11:00:04 dtantsur bauzas: yep. your logging line should show up in https://review.openstack.org/491777 instead - hence I made it depends-on the nova patch
11:01:20 bauzas dtantsur: oh snap https://review.openstack.org/#/c/491777/9/devstack/lib/ironic@1821 right?
11:01:48 bauzas until that devstack change, the gate nodes aren't yet correctly having resource classes
11:01:55 bauzas I thought it was already the case
11:02:08 bauzas dtantsur: IMHO, we should invert the depends-on
11:02:10 dtantsur hah, sorry for not figuring out the confusion earlier
11:02:48 bauzas dtantsur: why would you make the devstack change dependent on the nova change ?
11:02:52 dtantsur bauzas: yeah, good call probably. wanna me drop the depends-on from my patch?
11:03:10 bauzas if the nova change uses what's provided by the devstack one ?
11:03:10 dtantsur I wanted one of them to depend on the other, I don't care which exactly :)
11:03:29 bauzas dtantsur: yeah, please remove the depends-on on the devstack one
11:03:51 bauzas dtantsur: and then I'll update https://review.openstack.org/#/c/487954/ to include devstack
11:04:12 dtantsur bauzas: done

Earlier   Later