| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-08-08 | |||
| 19:44:07 | melwitt | okay, lemme look at force-down then | |
| 19:44:54 | dansmith | ah yeah it will work | |
| 19:45:01 | dansmith | service_is_up() checks it and that's what api is using | |
| 19:45:18 | dansmith | you should kill the service first though, | |
| 19:45:25 | melwitt | sweet | |
| 19:45:26 | dansmith | to make sure you're not running periodics I think | |
| 19:45:34 | melwitt | thanks yall | |
| 19:45:53 | mriedem | let me -1 quick | |
| 19:45:54 | mriedem | for points | |
| 19:46:08 | melwitt | and to mess up jaypipes stats | |
| 19:48:27 | mriedem | melwitt: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/470578/3/nova/tests/functional/regressions/test_bug_1679750.py@31 was confusing | |
| 19:48:36 | mriedem | i said force down and then linked to gibi's thing which was disable | |
| 19:48:41 | mriedem | i guess i meant the same PUT /os-services API | |
| 19:48:47 | mriedem | it was an exercise for the reader | |
| 19:49:18 | melwitt | yeah, I got too excited about it and didn't put two and two together | |
| 19:49:34 | mriedem | well this is exciting stuff | |
| 19:50:10 | melwitt | yeah it is | |
| 19:50:34 | mriedem | ok here comes the placement scheduler interaction thingy | |
| 19:50:38 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Mark max microversion for Pike in history doc https://review.openstack.org/491581 | |
| 19:50:39 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add release note for shared storage known issue https://review.openstack.org/491582 | |
| 19:50:39 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add a prelude section for Pike https://review.openstack.org/491424 | |
| 19:50:40 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: doc: provide more details on scheduling with placement https://review.openstack.org/491900 | |
| 20:00:24 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional test for local delete allocations https://review.openstack.org/470578 | |
| 20:00:50 | melwitt | gdi left a commented out line | |
| 20:01:55 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional test for local delete allocations https://review.openstack.org/470578 | |
| 20:05:38 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Get auth from context for glance endpoint https://review.openstack.org/490057 | |
| 20:06:43 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Mark max microversion for Pike in history doc https://review.openstack.org/491581 | |
| 20:06:43 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add release note for shared storage known issue https://review.openstack.org/491582 | |
| 20:06:44 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add a prelude section for Pike https://review.openstack.org/491424 | |
| 20:13:10 | openstackgerrit | Jackie Truong proposed openstack/nova master: Add trusted_certs to Instance object https://review.openstack.org/489408 | |
| 20:32:39 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Document service layout for consoles with cells https://review.openstack.org/491914 | |
| 20:34:59 | melwitt | mriedem: consoles doc ^ | |
| 20:35:54 | mriedem | cool | |
| 20:50:33 | openstackgerrit | Sean Dague proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Import configuration reference https://review.openstack.org/491853 | |
| 20:51:55 | sdague | mriedem / melwitt can we get some doc reviews on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/491834/ and stack, that gets our docs landing page in a pretty reasonable state | |
| 20:52:11 | sdague | all those extra config reference imports are going to be a bear to get sorted | |
| 20:52:45 | sdague | I'll keep plugging on 491853 but I expect that's at least all of my tomorrow if not more to get it sorted | |
| 20:58:09 | cdent | jaypipes: I reviewed your stack, got stuck a bit on the last one. And I went through mriedem’s release note stack. Is there other major stuff pending? | |
| 20:58:19 | jaypipes | cdent: already responded :) | |
| 20:58:26 | jaypipes | cdent: upi | |
| 20:58:30 | jaypipes | guh | |
| 20:58:43 | jaypipes | cdent: have you reviewed the func tests for local delete? | |
| 20:58:47 | jaypipes | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/470578/4//COMMIT_MSG | |
| 20:58:58 | jaypipes | from melwitt | |
| 20:58:58 | mriedem | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/470578/ | |
| 20:59:08 | mriedem | yes he did | |
| 20:59:11 | cdent | jaypipes: yes | |
| 20:59:13 | jaypipes | k | |
| 20:59:23 | mriedem | jaypipes: you should send that home | |
| 20:59:26 | cdent | jaypipes: my point on the continue is that you’ve removed a continue | |
| 20:59:35 | cdent | but that it doesn’t matter | |
| 20:59:40 | jaypipes | cdent: oh, gotcha... | |
| 20:59:46 | cdent | so neither continue should really be there | |
| 20:59:54 | cdent | or something… not sure what? | |
| 20:59:59 | jaypipes | cdent: yeah, it's just a placeholder, sorry... rebase merge conflict mistake really | |
| 21:00:18 | cdent | I understood the coment was pretty much a *throws hands up* | |
| 21:00:42 | jaypipes | cdent: indeed. | |
| 21:00:48 | cdent | fun fun | |
| 21:01:19 | cdent | i’ll pass through everything again in the morning, and do my morning recheck rituatls | |
| 21:01:27 | cdent | otherwise: good night all, good luck | |
| 21:01:41 | jaypipes | k, thx cdent | |
| 21:02:28 | mriedem | jaypipes: what's the -1 for specifically? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/491900/ | |
| 21:02:49 | jaypipes | melwitt: glad you liked my old-man-joke about the HamburgerHelperFixture yesterday. :) | |
| 21:03:11 | melwitt | heh | |
| 21:04:08 | jaypipes | mriedem: that cell comment... | |
| 21:04:17 | mriedem | jaypipes: i replied | |
| 21:04:23 | mriedem | i think you misunderstood | |
| 21:04:25 | jaypipes | mriedem: as a user doc, I don't think that's helpful. | |
| 21:04:40 | mriedem | it's for an operator | |
| 21:04:50 | mriedem | the compute nodes live in the cells | |
| 21:05:02 | mriedem | not sure how that's less appropriate than talking about host UUIDs | |
| 21:05:25 | sdague | jaypipes: pay no attention to the directory structures on the docs, a bunch landed in probably the wrong place | |
| 21:05:51 | sdague | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/491815/ tries to reorganize and clarify without generating any new 404s | |
| 21:05:53 | jaypipes | mriedem: k, will update shortly. sorry, on call with kevinbenton :( | |
| 21:06:06 | mriedem | gd kevinbenton | |
| 21:06:06 | jaypipes | kevinbenton: welcome to that bus. | |
| 21:22:47 | openstackgerrit | Jackie Truong proposed openstack/nova master: Implement certificate_utils https://review.openstack.org/479949 | |
| 21:38:46 | kevinbenton | mriedem: sorry about that. jaypipes just wanted to have a sync-up call to tell me how terrible Nova is being managed by the PTL | |
| 21:40:38 | dansmith | ouch | |
| 21:43:01 | clarkb | kevinbenton: did you tell him its not too late to run for ptl? | |
| 21:43:36 | kevinbenton | clarkb: :) | |
| 21:43:50 | mikal | All right you lot, stop talking and release pike so I can go and break libvirt in queens. | |
| 21:43:56 | mikal | Less talky, more shippy. | |
| 21:43:59 | kevinbenton | something about no point in changing the captain of the titanic now :) | |
| 21:44:07 | clarkb | mikal: red hat already broke libvirt do we have to break it again? | |
| 21:44:23 | mikal | clarkb: if we break it enought it might just loop around to working again | |
| 21:44:35 | clarkb | (if you haven't heard rhel 7.4 has libvirt 3.2 which is not compatible with our stable branch libvirt-python constraint) | |
| 21:45:01 | mikal | In other news, whoever wrote code that said "sudo rm -rf <<path>>" needs to be kicked in the shins | |
| 21:56:38 | cfriesen | mikal: only in the shins? | |
| 21:58:23 | melwitt | I think he's just giving everyone a chance to get kicked | |
| 22:06:57 | mikal | Heh | |
| 22:07:22 | mikal | We have so much crap code around rootwrap. Its embarrassing. | |
| 22:21:21 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional test for local delete allocations https://review.openstack.org/470578 | |
| 22:54:37 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Fix the log information argument mistake https://review.openstack.org/478792 | |
| 23:00:29 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Create For End Users index section https://review.openstack.org/491785 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2017-08-09 | |||
| 01:02:42 | mriedem | dansmith: fyi, looks like we're hitting some slow nodes or something where n-cpu is auto-disabled by the servicegroup heartbeat because the report comes in late | |
| 01:02:43 | mriedem | http://logs.openstack.org/39/491439/3/gate/gate-tempest-dsvm-multinode-live-migration-ubuntu-xenial/d5c3c02/logs/subnode-2/screen-n-cpu.txt.gz#_Aug_08_20_55_49_474796 | |
| 01:03:15 | dansmith | seriously? | |
| 01:03:19 | dansmith | that's some crazy delay | |
| 01:03:24 | mriedem | sometihng like that, only seeing it on live migration jobs | |