Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-08-08
13:19:29 stephenfin cdent, sdague: Remind me - what's changing wrt ports in OpenStack services? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/491796/
13:21:33 vdrok good morning everyone!
13:22:34 cdent stephenfin: the goals that has been expressed in devstack is that services will be on prefixes rather than ports, so that everything is either on port 80 or 443, depending the use of ssl, and you get service urls like http://exampe.com/compute http://example.com/image http://example.com/placeent
13:22:41 vdrok have a small question, is it ok to have <address type="pci" ...> for ceph volume in the instance xml, not <address type="drive"...>? in the <disk> section of course
13:22:47 cdent where example.com is likely a reverse proxy of some kind
13:23:14 cdent in my experience, packagers aren’t bought into this idea
13:23:19 stephenfin cdent: That sounds familiar alright. Do we need to include any references to that in that document?
13:23:52 stephenfin And, more importantly, I guess that document is still correct as it stands?
13:23:53 jaypipes mdbooth: perhaps you might know the answer to vdrok's question above?
13:24:21 cdent stephenfin: I don’t really feel like I’m in a position to answer that: every time I’ve tried to point out ports and such in the docs, it has ended up conflicting with what’s in debs and rpms and we’ve followed what’s in them
13:24:30 vdrok jaypipes: thx :)
13:24:42 jaypipes np
13:25:11 sdague asettle: I'm changing that index page a bit right now anyway based on the email I sent, so maybe hold a second
13:25:24 bhagyashris jaypipes: yeah I will do this. but I have one query about the patches, As bfv case is handled properly at placement side so Is there a need of these two patches ? By looking at the patches it looks like they are only updating compute_node table records which are not required.
13:25:26 stephenfin cdent: That's fair. Always worth asking
13:25:26 asettle sdague: I am holding :)
13:26:07 sdague once I get all these references building together
13:26:42 stephenfin asettle, sdague: Pushed up the latest version of the "add stuff we missed from the admin guide" patch to address mriedem's comments. That probably affects your work, sdague? https://review.openstack.org/490952
13:27:49 sdague stephenfin: yeh, I think it will
13:35:31 jaypipes bhagyashris: I'm not sure... I need to revisit those patches.
13:36:49 bhagyashris jaypipes: ok. Thank you :)
13:38:10 openstackgerrit Maciej Jozefczyk proposed openstack/nova master: Remove host filter for _cleanup_running_deleted_instances periodic task https://review.openstack.org/491808
13:39:20 openstackgerrit Maciej Jozefczyk proposed openstack/nova master: Remove host filter for _cleanup_running_deleted_instances periodic task https://review.openstack.org/491808
13:40:35 openstackgerrit Maciej Jozefczyk proposed openstack/nova master: Remove host filter for _cleanup_running_deleted_instances() periodic task https://review.openstack.org/491808
13:44:25 sdague stephenfin: while I'm chugging through toc references - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/491761 would be handy to get in to reduce 404s
13:48:49 stephenfin sdague: What happened to nova-cert?
13:48:56 stephenfin (just out of curiosity)
13:49:38 dansmith jaypipes: still crankin' on both patches yes?
13:52:59 sdague stephenfin: we deleted it
13:53:39 sdague https://review.openstack.org/#/c/461762/
13:55:20 jsheeren hi all, how are the filenames generated for the image_cache under /var/lib/nova/instances/_base ? is it a sha1 sum or md5sum of the glance image id or something?
13:55:54 openstackgerrit Sean Dague proposed openstack/nova master: Add For Operators section to front page https://review.openstack.org/491815
13:56:20 sdague stephenfin: ok, see what you think of that bit
13:56:59 stephenfin also, I'd no idea nova-cert was gone. Good to know
13:57:23 stephenfin asettle: https://review.openstack.org/491815
13:57:34 stephenfin another one for you too ;)
13:58:02 asettle Hooray
14:01:37 cdent jaypipes: if you’re in a cruising reviews kind of way, I’m pretty sure that we don’t want to do this so you might be able to quickly dismiss it: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/483506/
14:02:22 cdent jaypipes: but we might want to do this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/483460/ (they used to be the same patches by the contributor I suggested they split them)
14:02:36 jaypipes dansmith: yup.
14:03:12 jaypipes cdent: k, will look at them during next test run.
14:03:16 dansmith jaypipes: okay, is is the bottom patch that is giving you trouble or the top? If the top, then maybe you could push what you have for the bottom one so we can get it reviewed and maybe on the way?
14:04:15 jaypipes dansmith: bottom one, unfortunately. I added a patch before the confirm/resize patch that cleans up the _remove_deleted_instance_allocations() method of the RT and adds a bunch of debug logging.
14:04:27 dansmith okay
14:04:36 jaypipes dansmith: only two failures left. should be pushing shortly.
14:04:48 dansmith alright
14:08:28 jsheeren nevemrind i found it
14:09:01 jsheeren https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/stable/newton/nova/virt/libvirt/imagecache.py#L53
14:09:04 jsheeren quit
14:09:39 jaypipes lol
14:10:38 gibi jaypipes, bauzas, cdent: Why do we still have RamFilter and DiskFilter in the enabled_filters? https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/conf/scheduler.py#L251-L252
14:10:54 jaypipes gibi: I don't know.
14:11:26 gibi jaypipes: interestingly CoreFilter is not there
14:11:40 jaypipes gibi: I presume for caching scheduler.
14:11:50 jaypipes gibi: since it doesn't use placement
14:11:59 gibi does CoreFilter needed also for the caching?
14:12:19 bauzas jaypipes: gibi: because CachingScheduler indeed
14:12:44 gibi bauzas: then the missing CoreFilter is a bug I guess
14:12:48 jaypipes gibi: I would assume so, yes.
14:12:55 bauzas and also because when we used placement in Ocata, we agreed to not modify the nova.conf
14:13:03 bauzas now we're in Pike, we could just cut that
14:13:03 robcresswell Re: Horizons magic edit flavor action, its now disabled-by-default, and the documentation for the setting has a big fat warning sign all over it. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/491442/
14:13:36 bauzas gibi: I know, but devstack runs it
14:13:39 cdent robcresswell++
14:13:39 bauzas gibi: crazy, I know
14:13:56 robcresswell Hopefully that means less headaches from now on :)
14:13:57 stephenfin sdague: Done. Because this is mostly new docs, I've started pulling on grammar stuff. Figure it's worth doing now rather than kicking the can
14:14:00 sdague robcresswell: ++
14:14:06 sdague stephenfin: sure thing
14:14:13 gibi bauzas, jaypipes: anyhow I'm filing a bug that the default is not consistent. Either we need all three Core,Ram,DiskFilter or non of them
14:14:21 mriedem we should remove them
14:14:24 mriedem caching scheduler isn't the default
14:14:27 mriedem so that's not the reason
14:14:37 mriedem we just didn't remove ram/disk yet because nobody did it
14:14:56 sdague robcresswell: other question, when I was linking to horizon docs this morning, I was surprised that they didn't include screen shots
14:15:00 mriedem we also didn't do https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427200/ yet because the logic is complicated
14:15:09 sdague is that on your plan?
14:15:31 bauzas mriedem: agreed, we could cut that in Pike
14:15:39 dansmith mriedem: bauzas: agreed
14:15:43 bauzas mriedem: we didn't done that for Ocata because of the upgrade
14:15:53 bauzas want me to do so ?
14:16:05 bauzas with a devstack related patch
14:17:13 sdague mriedem: more 404 cleanups - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/491761
14:18:08 robcresswell sdague: It's not something we've done before, since it was mostly dev / contributor docs. It's a sensible idea for the admin / user / operator content though.
14:18:51 sdague robcresswell: hmm ok, this didn't seem like dev docs - https://docs.openstack.org/horizon/latest/user/launch-instances.html
14:19:12 gibi mriedem, bauzas, dansmith: here is the bug for the cut https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1709328
14:19:13 openstack Launchpad bug 1709328 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "the default of the scheduler.enabled_filters config is inconsistent" [Undecided,New]
14:19:47 robcresswell sdague: Yeah, that got ported over as part of the docs -> repos move in the past month.
14:19:55 sdague robcresswell: gotcha
14:20:34 sdague stephenfin: before I fix the gramar bits in the top patch, you want to go through - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/491785 as well?
14:20:40 sdague so I can get them in one go
14:21:06 openstackgerrit Vladyslav Drok proposed openstack/nova master: Add format_dom for PCI device addresses https://review.openstack.org/491822
14:21:16 bauzas mriedem: dansmith: like I said to other folks there, I won't be there tomorrow only
14:21:39 bauzas mriedem: dansmith: plus being on vacations for 2.5 weeks starting on Monday till Wed (incl.) two weeks after
14:22:05 stephenfin sdague: Yup, I'm on that atm
14:23:01 gibi mriedem: FYI, I'm planning to skip the notification meeting today
14:23:28 sdague stephenfin: thank you
14:24:02 dansmith bauzas: like I said, probably easier if you just tell us when you _will_ be here
14:24:23 dansmith thu/fri of this week sounds like?
14:24:28 bauzas yup

Earlier   Later