Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-08-03
15:07:31 mdbooth That might achieve what you want in practise.
15:11:14 mriedem where is the error array defined?
15:11:33 mdbooth mriedem: rtfs
15:11:47 cfriesen mriedem: mdbooth: is there a libvirt bug here? I mean the source is running _live_migration_monitor() and calling guest.get_job_info(). shouldn't libvirt detect a failure?
15:11:48 mriedem ha, we already register an error handler
15:11:49 mriedem def _libvirt_error_handler(context, err):
15:11:49 mriedem # Just ignore instead of default outputting to stderr.
15:11:49 mriedem pass
15:12:02 mdbooth mriedem: hehe
15:12:07 cfriesen and if it doesn't, are we going to get an error in the callback?
15:12:20 mdbooth cfriesen: No
15:12:30 mriedem "with error being a list of information about the error being raised. "
15:12:59 mriedem i suppose it's similar to a libvirtError
15:13:39 mdbooth cfriesen: I don't recall the detail now, but at the time kashyap and I went over the libvirt and libvirt python binding code very carefully
15:13:52 mdbooth cfriesen: We're extracting everything from it which can be extracted
15:14:06 mriedem ah yup it's just the libvirtError.err list
15:14:09 mdbooth Hence my big comment explaining what we're not getting
15:15:05 mdbooth It's not designed to be used this way
15:15:38 mdbooth The intention was that you'd consume events instead. That api has been stable for much longer.
15:17:14 sdague mriedem: you'd need another grok parser
15:19:51 cfriesen mdbooth: okay, I think I got it. On another note, currently with block live migration if the guest is dirtying disk quickly the current logs don't show information about the initial block transfer.
15:20:15 mriedem would be nice if the libvirtError python binding class just had a nice __repr__
15:20:22 mriedem maybe it does already...
15:21:48 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: remove provider allocs in confirm/revert resize https://review.openstack.org/488510
15:21:49 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Sum allocations in the scheduler when resizing to the same host https://review.openstack.org/490085
15:21:49 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Add resource utilities to scheduler utils https://review.openstack.org/490514
15:22:13 dansmith jaypipes: I gotta start getting ready for my call, so I'm pushing.. the last patch is the only one that needs attention, AFAIK, a few fails in unit tests at least
15:22:31 jaypipes dansmith: got it. will take the ball.
15:24:08 dansmith jaypipes: note the new patch in the middle that adds a couple of utils and generalizes something in mriedem's patch
15:24:38 jaypipes dansmith: noted
15:25:16 jaypipes dansmith: I presume that's not the patch with test failures, though, yes? the top is the one with failures?
15:25:28 dansmith jaypipes: just your last confirm/revert one yeah
15:25:34 jaypipes got it thx
15:31:09 mriedem comments in the utils patch
15:58:33 mriedem cdent: where would one find the current placement api-ref?
15:58:42 mriedem or is that still just in builds that touch it?
15:59:15 cdent mriedem: there’s no publishing job yet as we were waiting for the stack to merge so that we could then move it to the new location and _then_ publish it
16:01:39 ildikov mriedem: hey
16:01:52 ildikov mriedem: coming to the meeting?
16:03:28 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Start using oslo_config.sphinxext https://review.openstack.org/482961
16:03:29 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Rework README to reflect new doc URLs https://review.openstack.org/480074
16:03:29 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Start using oslo_policy.sphinxext https://review.openstack.org/479358
16:03:30 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: policies: Fix Sphinx issues https://review.openstack.org/480516
16:03:30 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Rework index page per new sections https://review.openstack.org/478485
16:03:31 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Remove dead files https://review.openstack.org/478470
16:04:12 mriedem cdent: ok i was going to see if we needed any changes to the api-ref for the allocations minItems:1 thing
16:05:15 cdent mriedem: i think this one is allocations: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/470933/
16:05:17 cdent so not merged yet
16:08:48 cdent mriedem: when you use the term “latent issue” what does that actually mean?
16:09:35 mriedem not introduced in pike
16:09:37 mriedem not a regression
16:10:02 cdent thanks
16:15:06 mriedem cdent: ok questions in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/470933/
16:16:18 cdent mriedem: cool, I’ll hope andrey can look at those soon. If not, I can, I’m in the api-wg meeting now and then after that am gone (officially) until monday
16:31:11 mriedem dtantsur: jlvillal: did ironic ever go ahead with raising minimum required microversions?
16:31:51 dtantsur mriedem: nope, we haven't got to it
16:32:04 dtantsur I think we have an api-wg guideline for that, resulting from our discussions
16:33:17 mriedem ok
16:33:24 mriedem edleafe: i think the unit test failures in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/487925/ are probably related
16:33:42 mriedem it's super rare to have a random unit test failure with the ironic stuff in nova, and it's suspect when you're touching that driver
16:35:00 mriedem need some cores to look at this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/489763/ - it's a regression in pike, pretty simple fix
16:35:56 edleafe mriedem: those failures do seem to be more or less random. They don't happen locally
16:37:56 mriedem edleafe: i've never seen either of those happen in our ci though
16:39:13 mriedem http://logstash.openstack.org/#dashboard/file/logstash.json?query=message%3A%5C%22AssertionError%3A%20Expected%20call%3A%20call('node.list'%2C%20associated%3DTrue%2C%20limit%3D0)%5C%22%20AND%20tags%3A%5C%22console%5C%22&from=7d
16:39:28 mriedem that only shows up in that change
16:40:22 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: reflow rpc doc to 80 columns https://review.openstack.org/490455
16:41:10 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: doc: Make use of definition lists, literals https://review.openstack.org/490481
16:44:22 mriedem bauzas: any idea why the ServerGroupAntiAffinityFilter would stop working if you aren't tracking instance changes between the compute and scheduler service? Like i know there is a race possibility, but is that filter completely dependent on those? shouldn't it fallback to check the db or something if it's not tracking instance updates?
16:44:46 mriedem because with superconductor we don't have the upcalls from the computes to the scheduler for tracking instance chnages
16:44:48 mriedem *changes
16:48:39 dansmith jaypipes: I have emerged from my hole
16:50:43 dansmith jaypipes: any progress?
16:51:12 jaypipes dansmith: finishing up test runs now
16:51:50 jaypipes dansmith: had to go into your sched utils patch and add support for boot-from-volume... :(
16:54:05 dansmith my patch didn't regress that, right?
16:54:25 dansmith I dunno what change is needed for that, but I'll check it out when you push
16:55:54 jaypipes dansmith: mriedem had pointed out that we were not handling bfv in the "cheating" section.
16:56:06 jaypipes dansmith: thus my needing to put it into the resources_from_flavor() method
16:56:22 dansmith I'm saying I don't know what needs doing is all
16:56:31 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: remove provider allocs in confirm/revert resize https://review.openstack.org/488510
16:56:32 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: Add resource utilities to scheduler utils https://review.openstack.org/490514
16:56:43 jaypipes dansmith: gotcha. it required passing the instance as well as flavor. pls see above.
16:56:57 jaypipes dansmith: I'm still working on the top patch (confirm resize one)
16:57:06 jaypipes dansmith: but figured I'd push to show you what I changed.
16:57:39 dansmith oh zeroing root, I see
16:57:54 jaypipes dansmith: ya
16:58:11 jaypipes dansmith: I added you as co-author on the confirm resize one.
16:58:21 jaypipes dansmith: tag, you're it. :)
16:58:24 dansmith co-blamee
16:58:34 jaypipes heh
16:58:36 dansmith jaypipes: does that mean you want me fixing the tests now?
16:59:11 jaypipes dansmith: nah, I might in a little bit, but I'm currently working on them. I need to head out at 12:15 your time, at which point I'll push what I've gotten done.
16:59:16 dansmith ah
16:59:19 dansmith er ack
17:04:09 dansmith once again, BFV is a blemish on otherwise organized stuff
17:07:26 mriedem didn't you see the ops thread? boeing wants all bfv all the time
17:07:43 dansmith lots of people do
17:07:53 mriedem by extension, the entire US military wants BFV
17:08:04 mriedem 25% budget baby!
17:08:05 dansmith and if we had the ephemeral driver, that would be totally fine

Earlier   Later