Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-08-02
19:45:02 dansmith duh
19:46:14 dansmith heyyyyy
19:46:15 dansmith woo
19:46:25 dansmith fix comin'
19:46:27 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: remove provider allocs in confirm/revert resize https://review.openstack.org/488510
19:46:33 dansmith that passes &
19:46:58 jaypipes k, lemme pull that
19:47:33 dansmith but, that means that placement will 500 if you pass it an empty set of allocations (/cc cdent)
19:47:44 cdent noted
19:47:52 jaypipes cdent: bug please if you would
19:48:02 jaypipes that should be an easy fix.
19:48:02 cdent yeah, just finishing something else first
19:52:19 jaypipes dansmith: am I kosher to work on fixing that ocata to pike func test failure or are you still working on that patch?
19:52:39 jaypipes dansmith: and yes, I confirm that latest patch is passing tox -efunctional ServerMovingTest
19:52:47 dansmith jaypipes: yeah I hadn't looked at that yet, so I'll pass the baton back to you
19:52:49 dansmith jaypipes: someone has to fix up the "cheating" part anyway
19:53:14 openstackgerrit Ed Leafe proposed openstack/nova master: Handle addition of new nodes/instances in ironic flavor migration https://review.openstack.org/487954
19:53:30 jaypipes dansmith: did I miss the cheating part? where is that?
19:53:38 jaypipes oh, I see it now.
19:53:39 jaypipes nm
19:53:59 dansmith jaypipes: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/488510/14/nova/scheduler/client/report.py@1102
19:54:09 jaypipes yup, see it now.
19:54:16 dansmith probably need to have RT pass in the allocationy thing to subtract in there
19:54:21 dansmith instead of the report client knowing about flavors
19:54:36 dansmith and I figure there's some shared code to take a flavor and turn it into allocations, but I didn't go looking
19:55:03 dansmith but anyway, cheating aside, that passes all the forwards and backwards single and multi host tests for pike-and-pike
19:55:04 jaypipes dansmith: that something you want to fix up in this patch or do you want to tackle that in a followup?
19:55:05 dansmith which is... good
19:55:16 dansmith jaypipes: don't you think it's way too ugly to merge as is?
19:55:29 jaypipes dansmith: ugly sure, but harmless :)
19:55:31 dansmith jaypipes: i.e. it doesn't account for ephemeral_gb
19:55:50 dansmith maybe that's an easy fix, adding ephemeral and swap in there
19:56:15 jaypipes dansmith: sure, just remember swap is in MB :)
19:56:19 dansmith but if we can make it work right, I'm okay leaving the ugly there
19:56:35 dansmith jaypipes: you can just fix that bit while you're fixing the other test right?
19:56:56 jaypipes dansmith: happy to. was just checking to make sure I wouldn't clobber anything you were working on.
19:57:08 dansmith it's all yours
19:57:11 jaypipes kk
19:58:16 jaypipes dansmith: you want to keep those LOG.info() lines in remove_provider_from_instance_allocation()?
19:58:30 mriedem this deals with the various disk things https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/scheduler/client/report.py#L154
19:58:37 mriedem so throw that into a utility method if we need
19:58:43 jaypipes mriedem: yup, on it.
19:59:28 mriedem dansmith: you added this back in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/490085/4/nova/tests/functional/test_servers.py@1300
20:00:23 mriedem can i work on cleaning up https://review.openstack.org/#/c/490085/ and squashing in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/490159/ ?
20:00:38 mriedem this is quite a turducken we've gotten ourselves into
20:01:39 dansmith mriedem: ah yeah I was swapping things around several times when I couldn't get his patch working on master, sorry about that
20:01:45 mriedem so i can fix?
20:01:59 dansmith mriedem: jay's working on top of it, but if he's willing to rebase
20:02:00 dansmith your call
20:02:12 dansmith his call
20:02:19 mriedem what i'm changing won't impact jay probably
20:02:25 dansmith aye, just the rebase
20:02:26 mriedem so i'm going for it
20:02:27 jaypipes I can rebase no worries.
20:02:42 dansmith that was not fun
20:02:46 dansmith I need to do something more fun now
20:02:47 jaypipes dansmith: I'm going to leave those LOG.info() lines in remove_provider_from_allocations() but just pep8 em up.
20:02:51 dansmith like smash my finger in a door or something
20:02:56 mriedem i have a fun story
20:02:59 mriedem unrelated to this
20:03:01 dansmith jaypipes: ack
20:03:13 mriedem you know how horizon lets you edit a flavor?
20:03:14 openstackgerrit Sean Dague proposed openstack/nova master: add top 404 redirect https://review.openstack.org/490181
20:03:15 openstackgerrit Sean Dague proposed openstack/nova master: sort redirectmatch lines https://review.openstack.org/490182
20:03:23 dansmith mriedem: "edit" yes
20:04:13 mriedem we've got a customer that hit a fun scenario where they'd change the flavor on an instance in horizon, and it would show the old flavor even though it was deleted b/c of read_deleted='yes' from the nova db
20:04:29 mriedem then they upgraded, or something, and same scenario, but this time flavor 404 b/c no soft delete in the api db,
20:04:31 mriedem which we know about,
20:04:33 mriedem but horizon....
20:04:37 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: Update RT aggregate map less frequently https://review.openstack.org/489633
20:05:02 mriedem fixed in 2.47,
20:05:09 mriedem but this is like mitaka -> pike
20:05:23 mriedem good times
20:05:27 sdague mriedem: right, that was the crux of the fight around whether the original flavor id was included in the embedded flavor structure
20:05:35 sdague because of that feature in horizon
20:05:49 mriedem we should have added a cell0 for flavors :)
20:05:54 mriedem nova_flavors db
20:06:04 sdague which lets people dig themself a hole to fall in after they shoot themselves in the foot
20:06:05 mriedem when you just can't get enough dbs
20:06:21 sdague I'm telling you, db per project
20:06:27 mriedem sounds like a fun game
20:10:10 openstackgerrit Rawan Herzallah proposed openstack/nova master: Adding NVMEoF for libvirt driver https://review.openstack.org/482640
20:12:10 mriedem so i think Kevin_Zheng is going to send something to the ML asking about changing that behavior in horizon
20:12:29 dansmith meaning removing flavor editing?
20:12:37 cdent dansmith, jaypipes, edleafe: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1708260 you want to provide an opinion on whether the response should be a 400 or a lukewarm success (you asked me to do nothing, I have successfully done nothing)
20:12:37 openstack Launchpad bug 1708260 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Sending empty allocations list on a PUT /allocations/{consumer_uuid} results in 500" [Medium,Confirmed] - Assigned to Chris Dent (cdent)
20:12:46 mriedem at least disabling the ability to do it on the instance record itself,
20:13:03 mriedem like, there is a panel showing the instance and it's flavor and the ability to edit it right there on the instance record
20:13:09 mriedem which we know doesn't actually resize the instance or anythign
20:13:22 dansmith cdent: 200 vs 400 seems like something I'd have an uninformed gut opinion on, which you would immediately whip out some document to refute
20:13:26 dansmith cdent: so... no, I don't care :)
20:13:30 dansmith cdent: 500 seems wrong
20:13:55 cdent dansmith: aw dan, I’m trying to be inclusive.
20:14:06 mriedem 409
20:14:09 mriedem always 409
20:14:35 dansmith cdent: I'm being tongue-in-cheeky
20:14:44 cdent me too
20:15:09 cdent I’m going to call is a schema violation for now
20:15:35 openstackgerrit Jackie Truong proposed openstack/nova master: Add trusted_certs to Instance object https://review.openstack.org/489408
20:15:43 edleafe If the allocations body is required, 409 seems like the correct response

Earlier   Later