| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-07-18 | |||
| 14:37:36 | jangutter | jaypipes: Telcos, I believe. | |
| 14:38:06 | sean-k-mooney | jaypipes: AT&T from the ecomp side and several asian telcos form the OpenO community. ONAP is a fusion of both comunitys under the linux foundation. intel is a member but we have not been invole in the achitecher of this part whic come mainly form ecomp i belive | |
| 14:38:14 | jaypipes | jangutter: well, yeah :) | |
| 14:38:53 | openstackgerrit | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Add a scheduler custom driver possibility https://review.openstack.org/484828 | |
| 14:38:54 | sean-k-mooney | jaypipes: there is little european representation in ONAP current with most European telcos look more to OSM instead | |
| 14:39:13 | jaypipes | sean-k-mooney: wow, that was impressive :) comunitys, invole, achitecher, whic and belive. all new words in one sentence! | |
| 14:39:19 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: mriedem: jaypipes: I need to disappear from a certain amount of time because I need to pick my daughter and do some stuff, but I'll respond to the ML thread | |
| 14:39:23 | jaypipes | sean-k-mooney: ok, I'm going to stop poking fun now :) | |
| 14:39:34 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: mriedem: jaypipes: reviews welcome on https://review.openstack.org/484828 | |
| 14:40:08 | jangutter | jaypipes: there was _lots_ of representation from Chinese telcos on ONAP at OPNFV. | |
| 14:40:09 | sean-k-mooney | jaypipes: :) | |
| 14:41:29 | jaypipes | jangutter: k. good to know. I'm more looking for specific people, though. any names or emails would be good to get so I can reach out and have a chat. | |
| 14:41:48 | jaypipes | I suppose I can hit up alanmeadows from AT&T for that info | |
| 14:42:51 | jangutter | jaypipes: I'll see if there's a nice mini-summit link for the presentations with contact details. | |
| 14:42:55 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Populate the 'configuration' section https://review.openstack.org/478473 | |
| 14:42:55 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Populate the 'user' section https://review.openstack.org/478475 | |
| 14:42:56 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Switch to openstackdocstheme https://review.openstack.org/477751 | |
| 14:42:56 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Populate the 'contributor' section https://review.openstack.org/478474 | |
| 14:42:57 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Start using oslo_config.sphinxext https://review.openstack.org/482961 | |
| 14:42:57 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Rework README to reflect new doc URLs https://review.openstack.org/480074 | |
| 14:42:58 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Start using oslo_policy.sphinxext https://review.openstack.org/479358 | |
| 14:42:58 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: policies: Fix Sphinx issues https://review.openstack.org/480516 | |
| 14:42:59 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Populate the 'reference' section https://review.openstack.org/478484 | |
| 14:42:59 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Rework index page per new sections https://review.openstack.org/478485 | |
| 14:43:00 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Remove dead files https://review.openstack.org/478470 | |
| 14:43:29 | jaypipes | just kiddin, stephenfin :) | |
| 14:43:45 | jangutter | jaypipes: http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/opnfv-summit/extend-the-experience/onap | |
| 14:44:16 | jangutter | jaypipes: just names though, you should be able to hit the presentations from the 2017 summary site. | |
| 14:44:20 | mriedem | i'm sure i can ask around within huawei and someone might know | |
| 14:44:25 | stephenfin | jaypipes: Sorry - merge conflicts, yet again 🙈 | |
| 14:47:02 | mriedem | stephenfin: reviewing https://review.openstack.org/#/c/463987/ would be good | |
| 14:47:20 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: maybe add a release note but i think that review looks fine otherwise | |
| 14:47:22 | mriedem | it's passed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/481290/ | |
| 14:47:37 | mriedem | sean-k-mooney: bauzas: i don't, but review comments incoming | |
| 14:49:01 | stephenfin | mriedem: eek. ildikov has been imploring me to look at that, but I don't feel I know that code enough to really sign-off on it | |
| 14:49:20 | stephenfin | I'll try, but don't blame me if everything explodes afterwards, heh | |
| 14:50:05 | mriedem | it's ok to ask questions and not +2 | |
| 14:50:15 | mriedem | i've been through it a couple of times | |
| 14:51:00 | sean-k-mooney | mriedem: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/463987 is basically using the same workflow as the neutron portbinding then? eg createing a new binding/attachemt in this case on the destination and only removing the old one on succesfull migration? | |
| 14:51:20 | mriedem | sean-k-mooney: similar yes | |
| 14:51:59 | sean-k-mooney | mriedem: ok cool i have no ideay how the cinder integration works so proably wont review but that workflow makes sense to me. good to know | |
| 14:52:43 | mriedem | dims: i'd like to get this in first https://review.openstack.org/#/c/484501/ so we can backport that to stable | |
| 14:52:49 | mriedem | because of the associated bug | |
| 14:54:41 | dims | mriedem : +1, though we should probably add an upgrade note to ask operators to make sure that option is set in everyone's nova.conf | |
| 14:57:24 | mriedem | dims: hmm, if we have to add an upgrade release note then i worry about backporting it | |
| 14:57:48 | mriedem | dims: honestly i'm not really sure why the set_default there is overriding what the operator puts in the config, | |
| 14:57:52 | mriedem | but that was reported yesterday | |
| 14:58:00 | mriedem | dims: if you could figure that out it would be helpful | |
| 14:59:31 | dims | mriedem : it should not be overriding what's in nova.conf, it just sets the default value if there's nothing in nova.conf | |
| 14:59:59 | dims | mriedem : http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.config/tree/oslo_config/cfg.py#n2736 | |
| 15:01:18 | gibi | jaypipes: with cdent fix I still get the same KeyError as before, logs are here http://paste.openstack.org/show/615743/ | |
| 15:01:23 | keerthi | scheduling always happen only 10 at a time in the nova ? | |
| 15:01:38 | keerthi | shall we change this value ? | |
| 15:03:15 | keerthi | mriedem ? | |
| 15:04:11 | jaypipes | gibi: k, thanks for that log output, that's helpful. I'm wondering if alex_xu's patch here might help: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/480379/ | |
| 15:04:25 | gibi | jaypipes: I can test that as well | |
| 15:04:25 | jaypipes | gibi: sorry to bother you on this, but do you think you can apply that patch too? | |
| 15:04:34 | jaypipes | gibi: ty sir, much appreciated! | |
| 15:04:51 | jaypipes | gibi: in the meantime, I am working on adding functional test scenarios for your specific case. | |
| 15:05:12 | gibi | jaypipes: put me in the review if any I will check that out | |
| 15:05:19 | jaypipes | gibi: cheers | |
| 15:05:21 | alex_xu | mriedem: replied https://review.openstack.org/#/c/469800/, if we really think it is time to merge this patch first, I can change to +w | |
| 15:05:48 | jaypipes | gibi: köszönöm! | |
| 15:06:02 | mriedem | dims: yeah that's what i thought, but he was saying he had a value set in nova.conf and it would still use the default from code, and removing that line fixed it | |
| 15:06:18 | gibi | jaypipes: szivesen | |
| 15:06:24 | mriedem | dims: i don't have a devstack handy to recreate | |
| 15:06:37 | mriedem | keerthi: scheduling what? server create? | |
| 15:06:44 | keerthi | yes... | |
| 15:07:23 | dims | mriedem : barbican has a DSVM where this scenario works just fine. nova.conf has the BarbicanKeyManager and it gets picked up ok | |
| 15:07:24 | keerthi | when ever i create boot request...scheduling happens only for 10 at a time | |
| 15:08:33 | keerthi | rest of the requests need to wait in the queue and it starts proceeding next..is there way we can change this behaviour in nova ? | |
| 15:08:36 | dims | mriedem : oops, castellan has a dsvm test - see http://logs.openstack.org/19/476819/1/check/gate-castellan-dsvm-functional/c6e0d8c/logs/etc/nova/nova.conf.txt.gz | |
| 15:08:45 | keerthi | mriedem ? | |
| 15:09:26 | dims | mriedem : api log - http://logs.openstack.org/19/476819/1/check/gate-castellan-dsvm-functional/c6e0d8c/logs/screen-n-api.txt.gz#_Jun_23_08_05_22_681652 | |
| 15:09:31 | mriedem | keerthi: nothing comes to mind | |
| 15:10:30 | keerthi | jaypipes can you help me in solving my issue ? | |
| 15:10:31 | mriedem | dims: hmm, yeah, some of the options stuff was also changed in i think pike, so i'm wondering if it was a latent bug in newton | |
| 15:11:20 | jaypipes | keerthi: please see /topic. this isn't a support channel. better to post a question to the openstack mailing list please. | |
| 15:12:12 | mriedem | keerthi: you probably have max_concurrent_builds defaulting to 10 | |
| 15:12:14 | dims | mriedem : nothing has changed in set_default (oslo.config) or in nova keymgr in a while.... will search though | |
| 15:12:16 | mriedem | which is used in the ompute | |
| 15:12:17 | mriedem | *compute | |
| 15:12:19 | mriedem | not the scheduler | |
| 15:12:21 | mriedem | jaypipes: ^ | |
| 15:12:52 | keerthi | Thanks mriedem. i will look in to this | |
| 15:19:23 | mriedem | jaypipes: not-tags-any is tested in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/469800/ | |
| 15:19:35 | mriedem | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/469800/35/nova/tests/functional/wsgi/test_servers.py@237 | |
| 15:19:49 | mriedem | the 4 filters are tested in the same functional test, there just need to be more wrinkles it sounds like | |
| 15:20:19 | mriedem | and we can't do any of this in sql | |
| 15:20:25 | mriedem | which sucks, but it is what it is | |
| 15:21:17 | jaypipes | mriedem: ok, fair enough. will remove my -1. | |
| 15:21:41 | gibi | jaypipes: with alex_xu's https://review.openstack.org/#/c/480379/ I still get the same stack trace. logs are here http://paste.openstack.org/show/615747/ | |
| 15:22:00 | gibi | jaypipes: I will try to combine cdent's and alex_xu's patch together | |
| 15:22:00 | mriedem | thanks | |
| 15:22:11 | jaypipes | gibi: k | |
| 15:29:45 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Test changes with multiple cells https://review.openstack.org/467383 | |
| 15:29:48 | jaypipes | gibi: hmm, ok I have an idea... | |
| 15:30:33 | jaypipes | gibi: can you do me a favor? | |
| 15:30:37 | jaypipes | gibi: these two lines: https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/objects/resource_provider.py#L2393-L2394 | |
| 15:30:47 | gibi | jaypipes: sure | |