Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-07-10
14:03:27 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Stop using mox stubs in test_console_auth_tokens.py https://review.openstack.org/477374
14:03:43 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Add 'updated_at' field to InstancePayload in notifications https://review.openstack.org/475276
14:03:56 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Use URIOpt https://review.openstack.org/479215
14:04:44 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Amend the "list-show-all-server-migration-types" spec https://review.openstack.org/460847
14:05:39 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Fix quota class set APIs https://review.openstack.org/467999
14:16:02 mriedem o/
14:21:16 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/os-vif master: set mtu on all code paths https://review.openstack.org/469951
14:31:48 dansmith jaypipes: can you legitimify my comment here? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/476631/19
14:32:37 mriedem dansmith: we're talking about it in the scheduler meeting
14:32:42 mriedem #openstack-meeting-alt
14:32:43 dansmith oh
14:54:03 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-novaclient master: Fix cropping the endpoint url https://review.openstack.org/479818
14:59:10 artom mriedem, could you remove the procedural -2 on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/467321/?
15:00:11 mriedem done, but i haven't really looked at everything else going on there
15:00:31 artom mriedem, cheers!
15:00:41 artom mriedem, bah, that can be done in its own time
15:00:49 artom Getting the -2 off is a good first step ;)
15:03:29 mriedem i was a -W but who's counting
15:03:53 mriedem artom: not sure if you saw before going on PTO, but i opened a docs bug for putting something in the feature support matrix for device tags,
15:03:57 mriedem is that something you can work on?
15:04:13 artom mriedem, I saw that, yeah
15:04:26 artom mriedem, didn't someone already submit a patch?
15:05:00 mriedem ah yes https://review.openstack.org/#/c/481478/
15:05:19 artom mriedem, err, twice, even
15:05:24 artom https://review.openstack.org/#/c/481479/ as well
15:05:34 artom Or are those different?
15:05:43 mriedem once is for the server create, the other is attach
15:06:02 artom Aha! I'll put those on my to-review list, in a call right this instant
15:08:34 openstackgerrit KaiLi proposed openstack/nova master: Add "default" rule when generate policy.yaml.sample https://review.openstack.org/481443
15:14:47 mkucia Hi, I have question for qeens as I believe this is beyond pike. Is there some work planned that is related to extracting ResourceProvider handling from nova's driver code? For example when libvirt xml is being assembled there are multiple interations over different kinds of resources. In the RPs perspective it seems for me that those resources can be generalized.
15:15:10 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/os-vif master: add host port profile info class https://review.openstack.org/441590
15:18:30 mriedem mkucia: there are no plans for that
15:18:55 mriedem mkucia: there are only plans to extract the placement service/api/data model into a separate project
15:19:27 mkucia Ok. Thanks!
15:27:05 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/os-vif master: set mtu on all code paths https://review.openstack.org/469951
15:27:06 bauzas dumb question, but can someone point me if/where we have privsep commands in our codebase?
15:29:28 mriedem we don't
15:29:41 bauzas nevermind, got the fully monty https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/privsep
15:29:41 mriedem os-brick and os-vif use privsep
15:29:50 bauzas full*
15:29:59 bauzas mriedem: that's what I discovered
15:30:03 mriedem you can also check out https://review.openstack.org/#/c/459166/
15:30:05 bauzas the whiteboard is pretty explicit
15:30:07 bauzas yeah
15:30:20 bauzas finding https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/privsep was helpful
15:45:16 mriedem sdague: are you back around this week?
15:46:02 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/os-vif master: set mtu on all code paths https://review.openstack.org/469951
15:49:48 mgagne mriedem: sorry about that (overriding your changes)
15:50:20 mriedem mgagne: no problem, got everything updated last night, should be ready for core review
15:51:18 mriedem oomichi: can you take a look at this new microversion change when you get a chance? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/454322/
15:51:29 mriedem i've gone through it and would +2 but i added the os-instance-actions changes
16:04:45 openstackgerrit dane-fichter proposed openstack/nova master: Mask password when logging connection_info during swap volume https://review.openstack.org/466533
16:09:34 openstackgerrit Alex Szarka proposed openstack/nova master: Raise a real Exception instead of direct Exception call https://review.openstack.org/482200
16:10:11 sean-k-mooney jaypipes: 30 second rereivew https://review.openstack.org/#/c/469951/ i move some comments that did not make sense after the refactor but otherwise identical to the version you just reviewed. sorry for the churn
16:10:57 openstackgerrit Alex Szarka proposed openstack/nova master: Raise a real Exception instead of direct Exception call https://review.openstack.org/482200
16:11:48 openstackgerrit Alex Szarka proposed openstack/nova master: Raise a real Exception instead of direct Exception call https://review.openstack.org/482200
16:13:15 jaypipes sean-k-mooney: cool +2
16:24:53 kashyap Any Ceph people, the RBD cache is enabled by default - isn't it?
16:25:24 kashyap Yep, it is - http://docs.ceph.com/docs/kraken/rbd/rbd-config-ref/
16:29:24 sdague mriedem: very ish... I'm traveling out to openwest tomorrow and there for the rest of the week
16:29:54 sdague mriedem: if you have a few priority things for me to look at I can, but won't have a ton of bw this week
16:30:52 mriedem sdague: ok, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/454322/ would be good
16:31:15 mriedem there is a cinder change dependent on it, and i've pushed devstack and tempest changes to test it all out - flushed a few bugs last week, test is green now
16:38:49 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: claim resources in scheduler https://review.openstack.org/476632
16:38:51 jaypipes mriedem, dansmith: ^^
16:44:08 mriedem yar matey
16:59:05 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Mark LXC as missing for swap volume support https://review.openstack.org/482216
17:14:08 dansmith jaypipes: remind me.. we create allocations but the computes won't delete them yet because they're not instance.host=$me, right?
17:14:31 dansmith jaypipes: you're not very defensive about your allocation delete, and I was wondering if we could race to delete those with anything making that risky
17:15:59 jaypipes dansmith: in answer to your first question, yes, we don't delete the allocations because of this code: https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/compute/resource_tracker.py#L1055-L1061
17:16:45 jaypipes dansmith: w.r.t. not being very defensive about allocation delete, I'm not following you. I'm deleting allocations that were successfully claimed in a multi-instance launch request where one of the claims failed but others succeeded.
17:17:13 dansmith jaypipes: right, but if one delete fails we won't continue to delete the rest (or try at least)
17:18:03 artom What's our policy on English mistakes in things like commit messages and comments?
17:18:07 jaypipes dansmith: if one delete fails, that's correct, we just ignore the failure and attempt deleting the others that were successfully allocated.
17:18:35 dansmith jaypipes: I was asserting that you wouldn't, but it looks like delete_allocation_for_instance() won't ever raise/fail
17:18:39 jaypipes artom: I always point out the mistakes
17:18:42 dansmith artom: +1 for correcting
17:18:44 dansmith me too
17:18:47 jaypipes dansmith: right.
17:19:00 artom dansmith, jaypipes, cheers!
17:19:12 jaypipes artom: I speak good.
17:19:26 artom jaypipes, only because you not fail english.
17:19:37 jaypipes heh :)
17:20:54 artom Aww, I was hoping someone would come in with the unpossible reference :(
17:22:47 kashyap artom: It's the way you phrase it, right?
17:22:55 kashyap artom: About correcting non-native English
17:23:02 kashyap If one talks like a moron, it'll come off bad
17:23:18 kashyap A good community example for this is - Eric Blake from QEMU
17:23:38 artom kashyap, you mean me correcting English mistakes and coming off as a pedantic twat?
17:23:39 kashyap He has this amazing knack to give feedback without sounding like a ****. And he's a stickler for English :-)
17:23:50 kashyap (So am I!)
17:23:52 kashyap aries: Yeah
17:23:59 kashyap Err, it was for artom
17:24:31 artom kashyap, thanks, I'll try to see if I can distill his technique into usable dos and donts
17:24:52 cdent dansmith: is this functional test still something you hope to make happen, or has it been superseded ? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/452006/
17:24:58 artom kashyap, it's still over text though - I can have the best intentions in the world, it's hard to know how your comments will be received
17:25:39 kashyap artom: Meanwhile, look at this feedback I got about how I over-use "comma", a developer (I know) labelled me: "You've gone comma-wild"!
17:26:01 dansmith cdent: yeah I guess
17:26:07 kashyap artom: `grep` for the terms: "conversation" and "wild" here :-) https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-07/msg01455.html
17:26:11 artom kashyap, I am disappoint

Earlier   Later