| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-06-01 | |||
| 20:22:47 | mriedem | terrible terrible api | |
| 20:23:06 | mriedem | i guess you can pre-create the port in neutron, provide that to nova with the tag you want if you're an advanced user | |
| 20:23:21 | mriedem | but people don't even like doing that with volume types and boot from volume | |
| 20:24:20 | cfriesen_ | mriedem: doesn't make sense to me...if you script it it's no big deal | |
| 20:25:10 | cfriesen_ | besides, if you only have one vif from "networks='auto'" why would you need to tag it? | |
| 20:25:22 | mriedem | idk | |
| 20:25:24 | mriedem | maybe you don't | |
| 20:25:34 | mriedem | maybe we consider tags an advanced use case | |
| 20:25:40 | mriedem | and that's how we can justify now feeling bad about it | |
| 20:25:44 | mriedem | *not | |
| 20:25:58 | mriedem | whatever i can do to get through this day | |
| 20:29:14 | cfriesen_ | I see in Newton's online_data_migrations we go back and create a RequestSpec object for old instances. Is there stuff that we're going to end up missing since the info isn't available any more? | |
| 20:31:13 | mriedem | cfriesen_: that's a bauzas question | |
| 20:31:53 | cfriesen_ | okay, will ask him. | |
| 20:33:12 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Update server create networks API reference description for tags https://review.openstack.org/470004 | |
| 20:33:13 | mriedem | artom: ^ | |
| 20:34:08 | mriedem | artom: maybe it's not so bad, could you even do networks={'tag': 'foo'} < 2.37? | |
| 20:34:22 | mriedem | i think it would puke if you specified networks w/o a network uuid or a port | |
| 20:35:40 | mriedem | yeah https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/api/openstack/compute/servers.py#L418 | |
| 20:35:47 | mriedem | if port isn't specified, uuid is quired | |
| 20:35:49 | mriedem | *required | |
| 20:35:58 | mriedem | so you couldn't just provide a tag w/o anything else before | |
| 20:35:59 | mriedem | whew | |
| 20:37:36 | artom | mriedem, yeah, I don't think you could ever have a nic with *only* a tag | |
| 20:46:22 | artom | Oh hey, I got 470000! | |
| 20:47:10 | mriedem | is that a special number? | |
| 20:47:17 | artom | It's round | |
| 20:47:22 | artom | That's beer, right? | |
| 20:47:31 | mriedem | molson? | |
| 20:47:33 | mriedem | or labat? | |
| 20:47:40 | artom | Nah, I drink the fancy microbrews | |
| 20:48:01 | mriedem | so, michelob light ultra? | |
| 20:48:28 | artom | Don't have those here, but if I'm ever in... wherever they're from, I'll try | |
| 20:49:33 | mriedem | they're in 'merica | |
| 20:49:35 | artom | Lately I've taken a fancy to Vrooden's bitter | |
| 20:50:03 | artom | They're so hipster they don't even have their own domain: https://vrooden.wixsite.com/vrooden | |
| 20:50:18 | artom | 'merica eh? I hear it's dangerous for strangers there ;) | |
| 20:50:29 | mriedem | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-MWN-XUtEQ is for when you're working hard all day being white and privileged, you need to relax with a bottle of water | |
| 20:51:09 | mriedem | they skipped the escalator | |
| 20:51:12 | mriedem | because they live in today | |
| 20:53:54 | artom | Dammit, http://www.checkmyprivilege.com/ is gone | |
| 21:02:02 | openstackgerrit | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Error out if nic auto or none are not alone https://review.openstack.org/470000 | |
| 21:32:04 | mriedem | cfriesen_: never fear, i'm going through your instance flavors api change | |
| 21:48:42 | mriedem | dansmith: cfriesen_: dhellmann fixed the missing renos issue https://review.openstack.org/#/c/470023/ | |
| 21:49:15 | mriedem | just in time for everyone and their dog to be moving off mitaka | |
| 21:49:23 | mriedem | except penick | |
| 21:57:30 | mriedem | cfriesen_: reviewed | |
| 21:57:32 | mriedem | in great detail | |
| 22:03:16 | cfriesen_ | mriedem: thanks, will go check it out | |
| 22:03:56 | cfriesen_ | geez, could you add more stuff? | |
| 22:06:50 | mriedem | i don't think so | |
| 22:12:42 | cfriesen_ | mriedem: for the one that will be max_version 2.46, do you want it named as flavor_id_2_46? | |
| 22:14:33 | mriedem | looking | |
| 22:15:00 | cfriesen_ | and for "flavor_links" which is unversioned, did you want me to add a _2_46 version for clarity? | |
| 22:15:35 | mriedem | so flavor_id_body_2 -> flavor_id_body_2_46? | |
| 22:15:38 | cfriesen_ | that way all the sub-fields of flavor would be versioned | |
| 22:15:42 | cfriesen_ | yes | |
| 22:15:44 | mriedem | i think that's probably fine | |
| 22:16:02 | mriedem | i think it makes more sense than incrementing | |
| 22:16:46 | cfriesen_ | what about totally new ones like "flavor_original_name" ? add 2_47 or leave unversioned? | |
| 22:17:00 | openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/470037 | |
| 22:17:00 | cfriesen_ | it'd be the only unversioned field | |
| 22:17:34 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Connecting Nova to DRBD storage nodes directly https://review.openstack.org/256292 | |
| 22:17:35 | mriedem | melwitt: fixed the link ^ | |
| 22:17:45 | mriedem | cfriesen_: i think you can leave it unversioned if it's not a duplicate | |
| 22:17:50 | mriedem | i'm good either way on those | |
| 22:17:52 | cfriesen_ | kay | |
| 22:21:12 | openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/469581 | |
| 23:22:45 | melwitt | mriedem: coolness | |
| 23:27:26 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Avoid forcing translation on logging calls https://review.openstack.org/413876 | |
| 23:28:00 | melwitt | mriedem: +2. also wanted to show you this, easy two patch series for the PCIWeigher in scheduler, if you wanted to close out another blueprint https://review.openstack.org/#/c/379524/ cfriesen, you might also be interested in reviewing | |
| 23:28:03 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Use PCIAddressField in oslo.versionedobjects https://review.openstack.org/466201 | |
| 23:41:17 | openstackgerrit | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Error out if nic auto or none are not alone https://review.openstack.org/470000 | |
| 23:43:18 | cfriesen_ | melwitt: it's on my review list, but stuff keeps coming up. | |
| 23:43:32 | melwitt | ack | |
| #openstack-nova - 2017-06-02 | |||
| 00:03:29 | openstackgerrit | John Griffith proposed openstack/nova master: WIP/POC Implement new attach Cinder flow https://review.openstack.org/330285 | |
| 00:17:09 | openstackgerrit | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Error out if nic auto or none are not alone https://review.openstack.org/470000 | |
| 00:25:26 | mriedem | melwitt: yeah i wanted cfriesen_ to review that first | |
| 00:27:32 | mriedem | i guess i can gander while i'm on a call tonight | |
| 00:27:36 | mriedem | a welcome distraction | |
| 00:29:59 | openstackgerrit | guang-yee proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Reconnect volumes and encryptors during a hard reboot https://review.openstack.org/400384 | |
| 00:33:26 | melwitt | heh | |
| 00:41:23 | openstackgerrit | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Better handle key=value pair not being key=value https://review.openstack.org/469988 | |
| 00:59:07 | mriedem | melwitt: reviewed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/379524/ but i clearly don't understand how this works, or weighers for that matter | |
| 01:00:25 | melwitt | mriedem: oh, sorry about that :( | |
| 01:02:11 | melwitt | you're right that the weigher wants to favor hosts with fewer free PCI devices, packing like you said. it intends to leave room for possible future requests that actually need several devices at the same time | |
| 01:02:42 | melwitt | *several devices on the same host | |
| 01:05:12 | cfriesen_ | mriedem: you had suggested a functional test with non-empty extra-specs. I think that means adding extra-specs to one of the flavors used in the functional tests, no? | |
| 01:11:24 | mriedem | cfriesen_: or just create a new flavor for the test | |
| 01:11:37 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/470037 | |
| 01:11:40 | cfriesen_ | mriedem: yeah, was just looking at that | |
| 01:17:04 | cfriesen_ | mriedem: is there a way to make a new flavor without needing to add new template files? | |
| 01:17:35 | mriedem | cfriesen_: yeah there is an api client used in the non-api sample functional tests | |
| 01:18:19 | mriedem | cfriesen_: something like this https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/tests/functional/integrated_helpers.py#L171 ? | |
| 01:18:44 | melwitt | you can checkout this badass functional test I wrote for an example https://review.openstack.org/#/c/355091/8/nova/tests/functional/test_boot_from_volume.py@54 | |
| 01:19:22 | mriedem | cfriesen_: the api sample tests use that mixin i think https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/tests/functional/api_samples_test_base.py#L69 | |
| 01:19:34 | mriedem | yeah, so you can re-use that method | |
| 01:19:38 | mriedem | to create a new flavor with what you need in it | |
| 01:19:49 | mriedem | even extra specs | |
| 01:20:22 | mriedem | although...the flavor ref is in the api sample request, | |