Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-04-28
13:51:42 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove compatibility code for flavors https://review.openstack.org/460377
13:52:58 mriedem bauwser: you wanted to do a newton release soon yeah?
13:53:03 mriedem we have two changes with +2s https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:stable/newton
13:53:10 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Remove useless API tests https://review.openstack.org/461011
13:53:10 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Remove 'FlavorRxtxController' extension https://review.openstack.org/461010
13:53:11 bauwser mriedem: k
13:53:15 bauwser mriedem: looking at those
13:55:05 bauwser figleaf: not sure you understood my comment on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/460177/1/nova/compute/resource_tracker.py@1004
13:55:34 cdent thanks sfinucan, TIL
13:55:53 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: implement get_inventory() for libvirt https://review.openstack.org/457782
13:55:54 leakypipes bauwser, mriedem, cdent, figleaf: ^
13:56:10 sfinucan cdent: Intel's favourite paradox, last I checked ;)
13:56:48 openstackgerrit Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Delete existing allocations for move operations or retries https://review.openstack.org/460433
13:56:48 openstackgerrit Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Don't delete allocation if instance being scheduled https://review.openstack.org/460177
13:56:49 openstackgerrit Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Allocate instance by the conductor https://review.openstack.org/460455
13:56:49 openstackgerrit Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Add reserved_host_cpus option https://review.openstack.org/460113
13:57:09 bauwser leakypipes: mriedem: https://review.openstack.org/460113 is now with a reno file
13:58:26 leakypipes bauwser: +2 from me. thx for adding the reno. :)
13:58:50 bauwser leakypipes: and ty for adding the TODO note for the reserved value <3
13:59:00 leakypipes :) np
13:59:28 mriedem leakypipes: you removed the ... :(
13:59:29 openstackgerrit Béla Vancsics proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Transform aggregate.update_metadata notification https://review.openstack.org/460625
13:59:36 mriedem leakypipes: like, ...murder?!
14:01:33 mriedem leakypipes: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/457782/3/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py
14:06:06 leakypipes mriedem: sorry, fixed.
14:06:06 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: implement get_inventory() for libvirt https://review.openstack.org/457782
14:06:09 leakypipes ^
14:08:25 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: trivial: Remove dead code https://review.openstack.org/460662
14:08:54 mriedem bauwser: comments inline https://review.openstack.org/#/c/460113/
14:09:07 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Replace reserved_host_disk_mb with reserved_host_disk_gb https://review.openstack.org/460661
14:09:08 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: conf: Reword 'reserved_host_memory_mb' help text https://review.openstack.org/461054
14:09:08 mriedem bauwser: if you want to defer talking about the overheads stuff until we actually replace claims with allocations, that's fine
14:09:30 bauwser mriedem: jinx my mind
14:09:41 bauwser mriedem: I didn't wrote that for that reason
14:09:54 bauwser mriedem: adding that conf opt is separate from the use we could have for it
14:10:34 bauwser but given we don't use it now, it's unrelated, and either way both the 3 reserved opts need some doc string modifcation once we merge claims
14:10:44 mriedem leakypipes: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/457782/4/nova/tests/unit/virt/libvirt/test_driver.py :)
14:10:52 mriedem bauwser: true
14:11:23 bauwser mriedem: that said, very good point because I didn't changed that for the claims change
14:11:40 bauwser so you should leave a note for the top change
14:11:45 mriedem bauwser: throw a DocImpact on your claims change too so we get a docs bug
14:11:57 bauwser mriedem: fair to say
14:12:32 sfinucan melwitt: Could you have a look at mriedem's comments on this change? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/453174/2/releasenotes/notes/add-nova-manage-quota-commands-3ad1eb3186f9e29d.yaml
14:12:44 mriedem bauwser: left a comment
14:13:02 bauwser <3
14:13:17 mriedem sfinucan: i've got a tattoo now that has a picture of melwitt telling me "s/quota/usage/"
14:13:20 mriedem literally scarred
14:13:27 melwitt lol
14:14:11 melwitt DID SOMEONE SAY QUOTAS >:|
14:14:20 mriedem ha
14:14:22 mriedem just like that
14:15:02 melwitt yeah, that has angry eyebrows on it
14:15:11 mriedem and a duck bill
14:16:52 sfinucan mriedem: can't argue with that. Thanks for reviewing those, btw
14:17:05 sfinucan mriedem: Seeing as you're at it, this one is the really interesting one -> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/453808/
14:17:09 sfinucan ;)
14:17:14 sfinucan *a
14:17:23 sfinucan (they're all really interesting, naturally)
14:17:32 mriedem sfinucan: i glanced over that one last night
14:22:21 sfinucan bauwser: How does 'reserved_host_cpus' differ from 'vcpu_pin_set' https://review.openstack.org/#/c/460113/
14:22:26 sfinucan outside of being less specific
14:22:42 bauwser sfinucan: well
14:23:15 melwitt sfinucan: I added a comment on the review
14:23:25 sfinucan melwitt: Cheers :)
14:24:20 sfinucan melwitt: I can't use underscore-separated command names (usage_refresh) with cliff :(
14:24:27 sfinucan see last comment on that patchset
14:24:30 melwitt sfinucan: even as the subcommand? oh
14:24:52 sfinucan nope. it's why I need to do this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/453809/
14:24:58 melwitt I was thinking only the first command had that limitation
14:25:34 sfinucan Afraid so. You can switch off that behavior but it's all or nothing
14:26:16 sfinucan ...which would prevent us nesting commands entirely, which we can't do
14:26:23 sfinucan cliff is broken by design but the community won't listen to me and switch to click :P
14:27:06 melwitt okay. I guess our choices are refresh or usagerefresh then. I'm not too concerned about it since my quotas patch set removes that nova-manage command anyway, so meh
14:27:33 mriedem why wouldn't we just have: nova-manage usage refresh?
14:27:38 mriedem don't call the subcommand QuotaCommands
14:27:43 mriedem call it UsageCommands
14:28:02 melwitt it might be mysterious what kind of usage is it talking about
14:28:08 melwitt "usage of what"
14:28:13 mriedem that's part of the excitement
14:28:15 mriedem but yeah
14:28:25 melwitt +1 to excitement
14:28:31 mriedem nova-manage quota usage_refresh then
14:28:37 mriedem or you can't _?
14:28:41 melwitt he said we can't have any underscores anywhere
14:28:52 mriedem we have nova-manage api_db
14:29:07 mriedem nova-manage quota_usage refresh?
14:29:08 melwitt he has a patch up to make that apidb https://review.openstack.org/#/c/453809/
14:29:21 mriedem gdi, the whole world is upside down
14:29:31 melwitt yeah
14:29:48 mriedem when EmilienM and every other deployment tooling person comes screaming, i'm pointing them all at sfinucan
14:29:55 melwitt hah yup
14:30:02 EmilienM hey hi
14:30:06 melwitt it's all your fault sfinucan :)
14:30:11 mriedem but EmilienM, sfinucan wanted to use click!
14:30:14 EmilienM you'll notice I didn't complain for a while
14:30:22 mriedem EmilienM: that's only because you don't care anymore
14:30:28 EmilienM no, it's because things work
14:30:34 mriedem we can fix that
14:30:55 EmilienM :)
14:36:42 sfinucan melwitt, mriedem: So, what's your poison? 'usage refresh' or 'quotas refresh'

Earlier   Later